Americans need full answers on the Secret Service's Trump assassination-attempt failures
That is, no clear info on the would-be assassin's motives — and no satisfactory explanation of how the Secret Service let him come so very close to succeeding.
The New York Times managed to (seemingly) get access to Crooks' web-browsing history, and still couldn't say much of anything for sure.
His family won't talk to the press; that may be wise of them, but is frustrating to the many Americans who feel we should know more.
He looks like a smart, lonely kid who sank into mental illness at an age common for the onset of several deep disorders; maybe we just can't find out much more.
But we surely can learn more about the security failures that cleared the shooter's way onto that roof.
Indeed, it's pretty telling that only the determination of Corey Comperatore's widow seems to have forced several Secret Service heads to roll — and it was only Thursday, three days before the anniversary, that six agents who worked the Butler, Pa., rally got suspended.
Not fired, suspended, for 10 to 45 days.
The timeline of what went wrong that day is damning: Crooks, armed with a rifle, was somehow able to get onto the roof of the the AGR building just 400 feet from the stage from where Trump would speak — a building the Secret Service had already identified as a security concern, yet somehow failed to secure.
Nearly 30 minutes before the shooting, local cops raised alarms that a suspicious man with a rangefinder was spotted hanging around the building.
And two minutes before, the Secret Service Security Room was told that someone was on the roof.
Yet with all of that information, agents failed to act in time to stop Comperatore from being killed and Trump from very nearly being killed.
This was no run-of-the-mill ball-dropping by one or two agents, but deadly incompetence on every level.
The agency's Biden-era leadership may have slow-rolled any investigation or punishment once then-USSS Director Kimberly Cheatle quit soon after the epic failure, but shouldn't Trump's hires have caught up by now?
Getting to the facts is no impossible task; it starts with grilling each and every agent on duty that day, and the chain of command above them about each of their decisions: Give the public a complete accounting of who left the security team so undermanned; exactly how communications failed so badly; why information about a clear threat didn't bring the appropriate response.
That should be a top priority for FBI Director Kash Patel.
Trump has graciously dismissed the whole thing as 'a bad day' for the Secret Service, saying he has 'great confidence in these people.'
But that doesn't let his top people off the hook; this cannot happen again.
Imagine the national and global turmoil, had Trump turned his head just a second or two later.
At the very least, get Americans a full tick-tock timeline of exactly who decided what when, and so left such gaping holes in Trump's security.
Expose everyone at fault, and hold them all accountable.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate passes stablecoin framework in major crypto milestone
The Senate on Tuesday passed legislation creating a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins in a major milestone for the crypto industry. Lawmakers voted 68-30 to pass the GENIUS Act, which seeks to establish rules of the road for the dollar-backed cryptocurrencies. It marks the first time that major crypto legislation has cleared the upper chamber. The bill now heads to the House. 'With the GENIUS Act, we're bringing clarity to a sector that's been clouded by uncertainty and proving that bipartisan, principled leadership can still deliver real results for the American people,' Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott (R-S.C.) said in a statement. 'This did not happen by accident,' he continued. 'It happened because we led – across the aisle and with purpose.' Eighteen Democrats joined with most Republicans to pass the legislation, which has trudged forward through a series of procedural hurdles on the Senate floor over the past four weeks. Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), who was a lead negotiator for Democrats on the GENIUS Act, touted its passage as 'proof of what can be achieved through honest negations and a willingness to work across the aisle.' The stablecoin bill appeared to be sailing forward this spring after passing out of the Senate Banking Committee with the support of five Democrats. However, the legislation briefly hit a roadblock in early May, when Senate leadership moved to bring the bill to the floor. A contingent of crypto-friendly Democrats pulled their support, alleging Republicans had cut off negotiations prematurely and tanking an initial vote on the Senate floor. After two weeks of frantic negotiations, the two sides reached a deal on new bill text. 'With the GENIUS Act's passage, we are meaningfully closer to a stablecoin regulatory landscape in the U.S. that provides clear rules of the road, protects consumers, and holds bad actors accountable,' Gallego said in a statement. 'I look forward to seeing this bill pass the House with equally strong bipartisan support and get signed into law,' he added. House Financial Services Committee Chair French Hill (R-Ark.) applauded the bill's passage Tuesday, saying it brings lawmakers 'one step closer to creating a functional regulatory framework.' His committee advanced their own stablecoin legislation, the STABLE Act, in April, but the bill has yet to come up for a vote on the House floor. 'I look forward to working with my House colleagues to bring much-needed clarity and protections to the digital asset ecosystem,' Hill said in a statement. Several Democrats lamented the lack of provisions blocking President Trump from benefiting from stablecoins, which has become a key concern as the Trump family has increasingly expanded its crypto portfolio. 'Passing the GENIUS Act without strong anti-corruption measures stamps a Congressional seal of approval on President Trump selling access to the government for personal profit,' Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) said in a statement. 'Republicans rammed through this fatally flawed legislation without considering any amendments on the Senate floor—despite promises of an open amendment process and debate before the American people,' he added. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) initially sought to pass the bill via 'regular order,' allowing for amendments on the floor. However, as several controversial amendments, including Sen. Roger Marshall's (R-Kan.) Credit Card Competition Act, threatened to complicate the bill's path forward, Thune opted to scrap the open amendment process. The stablecoin bill's passage in the Senate marks a key win for the crypto industry, as well as the Trump administration and GOP leadership, who have made it a priority to get both stablecoin and market structure legislation across the finish line before August. Market structure legislation, which seeks to divvy up oversight of the rest of the digital asset market between two financial regulators, has moved slower than stablecoin legislation. However, the House's approach to market structure, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, advanced out of both the House Financial Services Committee and the House Agriculture Committee last week. Updated at 6:49 p.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump: ‘I haven't thought about' who ordered Ukraine weapons pause
President Trump told reporters Wednesday he hadn't thought about who inside his administration ordered the pause in shipments of munitions to Ukraine, as the Defense Department is expected to resume weapons shipments to Kyiv. At a Tuesday Cabinet meeting, the president was asked who had approved the weapons halt; he replied, 'I don't know. Why don't you tell me?' A reporter on Wednesday asked the president if he had been able to figure it out, and he said it wasn't top of mind. 'Well, I haven't thought about it. Because we're looking at Ukraine right now and munitions. But … no, I have not gone into it,' Trump said. He was then pressed on what that says about his administration that such a big decision can be made without his knowledge, and Trump insisted he signs off on big decisions. 'I would know. If a decision was made, I will know. I'll be the first to know. In fact, most likely, I'd give the order. But I haven't done that yet,' he said. The Defense Department last week halted the delivery of some air defense missiles and munitions to Ukraine, citing concerns about U.S. military stockpiles being depleted. The White House at the time confirmed the decision, saying it was made after a review of the U.S. military's backing of other nations around the world. Reversing course days later, the Pentagon said Tuesday it would send 'additional defensive weapons to Ukraine to ensure the Ukrainians can defend themselves while we work to secure a lasting peace and ensure the killing stops,' citing Trump's direction for the move. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Biden's White House doctor declines to answer questions in House deposition
Former President Biden's White House doctor, Kevin O'Connor, declined to answer questions during a deposition with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Wednesday, according to a statement from his legal counsel, citing physician-patient privilege and constitutional rights against self-incrimination. 'Earlier today, Dr. Kevin O'Connor asserted the physician-patient privilege, as well as his right under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, in declining to answer questions from the staff of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform regarding his service as Physician to the President during the Biden Administration,' the statement from O'Connor's legal counsel said. 'On the advice of his legal counsel, Dr. O'Connor refused to answer questions that invaded the well-established legal privilege that protects confidential matters between physicians and their patients. His assertion of his right under the Fifth Amendment to decline to answer questions, also on the advice of his lawyers, was made necessary by the unique circumstances of this deposition,' the statement said. Later in the day, the Oversight Committee released a video of the deposition, showing O'Conner identifying himself for the record, then going on to answer every question by invoking the Fifth Amendment or physician-patient privilege. He provided the same answer to both substantive questions and questions about whether he understood the proceedings. Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) subpoenaed the doctor last month to compel his interview as part of the panel's investigation into Biden's mental acuity while in office and whether the 46th president was aware of documents signed with his 'autopen' signature. Comer tore into O'Conner over his refusal to answer questions. 'It's clear there was a conspiracy to cover up President Biden's cognitive decline after Dr. Kevin O'Connor, Biden's physician and family business associate, refused to answer any questions and chose to hide behind the Fifth Amendment. The American people demand transparency, but Dr. O'Connor would rather conceal the truth,' Comer said in a statement. 'Dr. O'Connor took the Fifth when asked if he was told to lie about President Biden's health and whether he was fit to be President of the United States. Congress must assess legislative solutions to prevent such a coverup from happening again. We will continue to interview more Biden White House aides to get the answers Americans deserve.' According to a written draft of a statement delivered inside the deposition room, O'Connor's lawyer, David Schertler, said the committee indicated that 'it does not intend to honor one of the most well-known privileges in our law — the physician patient privilege …. Revealing confidential patient information would violate the most fundamental ethical duty of a physician, could result in revocation of Dr. O'Connor's medical license, and would subject Dr. O'Connor to potential civil liability.' Schertler also noted President Trump has directed the Department of Justice to conduct an investigation into Biden's mental acuity while in office, arguing the Oversight panel should pause its investigation until any criminal investigation concluded. And Schertler said O'Connor's decision to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege 'does not imply that Dr. O'Connor has committed any crime.' Asked about doctor-patient confidentiality before heading into the interview, Comer told reporters: 'I don't believe that he can hide behind doctor-patient confidentiality, because this is the president of the United States, and people expect the White House physician to be truthful and transparent about the president of the United States' health.' Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), the ranking member of the committee, slammed the GOP investigation in a statement. 'The only person's health that Republicans care about is Joe Biden's – even as 17 million Americans lose access to affordable health care thanks to their big budget betrayal,' Garcia said. 'Oversight Republicans could be working to lower costs for American families and conducting oversight of President Trump's corruption, but instead are obsessed with the past. Democrats will continue to look forward and build a more effective and efficient government for the American people.' The doctor's lawyers over the weekend had requested postponement of the interview, citing concern O'Connor would not be able to protect doctor-patient privilege during the testimony, and asserting the committee had declined to rule out any limitations to the scope of the deposition. The statement from O'Connor's legal counsel referenced President Trump relying on his Fifth Amendment rights when refusing to testify in a deposition before the New York state attorney general in 2022, saying: 'Anyone in my position not taking the Fifth Amendment would be a fool — an absolute fool.' NewsNation contributed. Updated at 6:36 p.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
