With a primitive canoe, scientists replicate prehistoric seafaring
By Will Dunham
(Reuters) -Our species arose in Africa roughly 300,000 years ago and later trekked worldwide, eventually reaching some of Earth's most remote places. In doing so, our ancestors surmounted geographic barriers including treacherous ocean expanses. But how did they do that with only rudimentary technology available to them?
Scientists now have undertaken an experimental voyage across a stretch of the East China Sea, paddling from Ushibi in eastern Taiwan to Japan's Yonaguni Island in a dugout canoe to demonstrate how such a trip may have been accomplished some 30,000 years ago as people spread to various Pacific Islands.
The researchers simulated methods Paleolithic people would have used and employed replicas of tools from that prehistoric time period such as an axe and a cutting implement called an adze in fashioning the 25-foot-long (7.5-meter) canoe, named Sugime, from a Japanese cedar tree chopped down at Japan's Noto Peninsula.
A crew of four men and one woman paddled the canoe on a voyage lasting more than 45 hours, traveling roughly 140 miles (225 km) across the open sea and battling one of the world's strongest ocean currents, the Kuroshio. The crew endured extreme fatigue and took a break for several hours while the canoe drifted at sea, but managed to complete a safe crossing to Yonaguni.
Just as prehistoric people would have, the voyagers navigated by the sun and stars, as well as the direction of the ocean swells, though for safety's sake they were accompanied by two escort craft. Yonaguni is part of the Ryukyu chain of islands stretching from Kyushu, the southernmost of Japan's four main islands, down to Taiwan.
The researchers previously failed with attempted crossings using reed rafts and then bamboo rafts, finding that they were too slow, insufficiently durable and unable to overcome the strong ocean current.
"Through the project with many failures, we have learned the difficulties of crossing the ocean, and this experience gave us a deep respect for our Paleolithic ancestors," said University of Tokyo anthropologist Yousuke Kaifu, lead author of the study published on Wednesday in the journal Science Advances.
"We found that the Paleolithic people could cross the sea with the strong ocean current if they had dugout canoes and were skillful, experienced paddlers and navigators. They had to face the risk of being drifted by the strong ocean current and the possibility that they would never be able to come back to their homeland," added Kaifu, who was aboard one of the escort boats.
Archeological evidence indicates that people approximately 30,000 years ago first crossed from Taiwan to some of the Ryukyu islands, which include Okinawa. But scientists had puzzled over how they could do this with the rudimentary technology of the time - no maps, no metal tools and only primitive vessels. And the Kuroshio current, comparable in strength to the Gulf Stream off Mexico, presented a particular challenge.
The research was in the vein of the famous 1947 Kon-Tiki expedition in which Norwegian explorer Thor Heyerdahl carried out a much longer journey by raft from South America across the Pacific to the Polynesian islands. Heyerdahl aimed to show how prehistoric people from the Americas could have colonized Polynesia.
"His theory is now countered by a series of pieces of evidence, but it was a great trial at the time. Compared to the time of the Kon-Tiki, we have more archeological and other evidence to build realistic models" of prehistoric voyages, Kaifu said.
The researchers in a companion study published in the same journal used simulations of sea conditions between Taiwan and Yonaguni 30,000 years ago to examine whether such a crossing was attainable at a time when the Kuroshio was even more powerful than today.
"As our paleo-ocean model simulation showed, crossing the Kuroshio was possible in ancient times, so I believe they achieved it," said physical oceanographer and study lead author Yu-Lin Chang of the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology.
"However, ocean conditions were highly variable. Thus, ancient people may have encountered unpredictable weather conditions during their journey, which could have led to failure," Chang added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who Can Build on the Moon? Understanding the Wild West of Lunar Architecture
Photo: Foster + Partners If all goes to plan, by 2040 people may be living on the moon in houses made—essentially—from mushrooms. At least, that's how astrobiologist Dr. Lynn J. Rothschild is picturing it. She imagines domed habitats that could comfortably host three bedrooms, with spectacular views of space beyond their large windows. Under an inflatable shell, they would be made of mycelium, a root-like fungal structure, something of an alternative building material heroine, lauded for its durability; versatility; and water-, mold-, and fire-resistant properties. Here on Earth, it's been used to make bricks for construction, furniture, and even shoes. 'Mycelium has low flammability and great acoustic properties. It can be made so that it is highly insulating,' says Rothschild, who works at NASA's Ames Research Center in Silicon Valley, California. Rothschild and her team are just one of several research groups exploring the possibilities of what a moon base might look like: China and Russia are aiming to create a lunar nuclear power plant, Foster + Partners is working with the European Space Agency to 3D-print a lunar habitat, and Japan hopes to establish its own surface colony, to name a few. With all of these projects in the works, it begs the question: Who is actually allowed to start building? In this article Who can build on the moon? How might lunar real estate be divided? What would homes actually look like on the moon? Where would moon homes be located? There's a reason that Star Trek dubbed outer space 'the final frontier.' Establishing settlements on extraterrestrial bodies is a bit like claiming land in the former Wild West—whoever can reach it first can plant their flag, with some limits. The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 and 2020's Artemis Accords state that no one country can own the moon and set guidelines for lunar conduct. However, individuals can explore, build structures, and mine the moon for its minerals. To this end, the United States, China, Japan, Russia, and India have all successfully landed lunar rovers, however, the US is the only country to have sent humans to the moon's surface. All are currently vying for a piece of its real estate: Japanese private space exploration company ispace is aiming to match the US's 2040 timeline for lunar habitats. However, it is currently stalled by multiple failed missions to land a probe on the moon. Meanwhile, China and Russia are partnering on a project called the International Lunar Research Station that claims construction will begin after 2028. The duo is considering powering it with a nuclear plant. Azerbaijan, Belarus, Egypt, Kazakhstan, Nicaragua, Serbia, Pakistan, Senegal, South Africa, Thailand, and Venezuela have also signed on to the project, though official designs for the station and plant have yet to be released. Should several countries be successful in building a moon base, research centers, habitats, or even a power plant on the moon's surface, each would be operated and occupied by its nation's astronauts and partners. They would be laid out similar to the way Antarctica's permanent research stations are plotted across its icy tundra, loosely clustered by global region but more on a first-come, first-flag-planted basis. To some, that's concerning. In January, World Monuments Fund (WMF) included the moon on its 2025 World Monuments Watch because of potential for new explorers and exploiters to damage it and its 'over 90 historic sites and countless artifacts, including the Apollo 11 lander, Neil Armstrong's first footprint, and the goodwill messages disc from 72 nations,' describes WMF CEO Bénédicte de Montclair. 'Existing frameworks like the Outer Space Treaty and Artemis Accords acknowledge space heritage but lack enforcement mechanisms,' she says. 'International cooperation—modeled after the Antarctic Treaty—could establish binding protections.' The United States isn't necessarily focused on founding habitats where historic moon sites or artifacts exist. NASA's Moon to Mars plan, which aims to establish homes on the surfaces of the moon and Mars (perhaps with the application of Rothschild's research), is focused on the South Pole. However, that isn't to say that other astronauts—or even private companies—with the ability to reach the moon wouldn't potentially damage these important sites. By 2040, NASA aims to have constructed long-term habitats on the lunar surface and will later do the same on Mars. To do so, however, isn't as simple as blasting traditional framing materials up to space during the next rocket launch. In addition to wanting to avoid steel or wood beams occupying valuable square footage inside spaceships, building on the moon requires specific architecture that can handle its thin, non-breathable atmosphere, which causes extreme temperature fluctuations and offers no protection from radiation nor meteoroid impacts. To that end, some NASA projects explore using the moon's own surface material to construct our future homes in combination with advanced building technologies currently being perfected here on Earth. 'Earth-based [building] innovations—focused on thermal regulation, resource efficiency, and structural resilience—serve as a foundation for designing lunar habitats that can withstand extreme temperatures, radiation, and micrometeorite impacts, ensuring long-term human survival beyond Earth,' explains Irene Gallou, a senior partner at architecture firm Foster + Partners, which has been working with NASA on designs for lunar and Martian habitats since 2015. Foster + Partners's lunar designs, which were on view recently at the Kennedy Center exhibition 'Earth to Space: Arts Breaking the Sky,' will 'rely on 3D printing, robotic assembly, and leveraging local materials derived from lunar regolith [the moon's topsoil] to create sustainable, cost-effective habitats,' Gallou says. Similar to 3D-printed homes on Earth, the building process would require that autonomous robotic printers, and perhaps inflatable scaffolding, be delivered to the site before construction can begin. A regolith material mix could take the place of typical concrete or mortar. Rothschild's fungal mycelia structures offer an even greener building method, which could eschew the need for large machine deliveries. 'On Earth, 'life' is a very common building material, from animal skins and bones in very early habitats to the wooden structures of today,' she explains. 'There are a lot of great reasons for biological materials—we have chosen one that should be ideal off-planet.' Adding to the list of benefits, a dark-colored fungi could mean stronger protections from UV rays and solar and galactic radiation. Plus it could be composted when no longer needed. 'It also has great biophilic psychological properties,' Rothschild adds, referencing the idea that incorporating nature into the built environment can reduce stress and improve cognitive function for residents, among other benefits. Lunar habitats would likely be located where the moon can offer the best resources. Rothschild's research, for example, explores the idea that fungus could grow lunar housing on site—just add water. There is evidence of ice in the deep, shadowed craters on the moon's South Pole—hence, where NASA and China are concentrating current missions—but harnessing it will be difficult. One solution Rothschild's team is exploring is pre-growing mycelia with wood chips inside an inflatable structure on Earth, then popping it up after transport to the moon to allow the structure to solidify. 'We would hope to use water that is already available on the moon to save mass required to carry water from Earth,' she adds. Aside from potential water sources, the lunar South Pole is a good location for habitats due to its 'near constant illumination, ideal for generating power via solar cells,' Gallou says. Foster + Partners and Branch Technology recently designed and prototyped a 164-foot-tall power-collecting solar tower for NASA, which could generate energy for self-sufficient live-work structures. Like on Earth, humans in lunar habitats will need the essentials—food, water, and shelter. If the Moon proves it can provide all three, it could become a place that we also call home. Originally Appeared on Architectural Digest More Great Stories From AD Not a subscriber? Join AD for print and digital access now. Pamela Anderson's Renaissance Started in Her Home Garden: 'That's Where I Found Myself Again' The Best Country to Live in: Our Top Picks for 2025 Inside Julio Torres's Williamsburg Mysterious Palace
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ancient canoe replica recreates a 30,000-year-old voyage
Instead of putting the pedal to the metal, a team of scientists from Japan and Taiwan are putting the paddle to the water–for science. The team used time-period-accurate tools to create canoes and used them to test the methods that ancient people would have used to travel across the sea in East Asia 30,000 years ago. Their results of these test paddles and findings are detailed in two new studies published June 25 in the journal Science Advances. Archaeological evidence suggests that about 30,000 years ago, humans first made a crossing from present-day Taiwan to islands in southern Japan. This journey could have ranged from 138 to about 450 miles and was accomplished without metal tools, maps, or modern boats. While the timeline of when East Asia's earliest modern human populations set sail and where they landed is fairly clear, how they did it has been more difficult to pin down. That's where these replica canoes come in. A team led by anthropologist Yousuke Kaifu from the University of Tokyo created various simulations, experiments, and replica canoes to recreate how this feat may have been achieved. 'We initiated this project with simple questions: 'How did Paleolithic people arrive at such remote islands as Okinawa?' 'How difficult was their journey?' 'And what tools and strategies did they use?'' Kaifu said in a statement. 'Archaeological evidence such as remains and artifacts can't paint a full picture as the nature of the sea is that it washes such things away. So, we turned to the idea of experimental archaeology, in a similar vein to the Kon-Tiki expedition of 1947 by Norwegian explorer Thor Heyerdahl.' One of the new studies details the construction and testing of a real boat, which the team successfully used to paddle between islands. The team constructed the 24-foot-long dugout canoe called Sugime in 2019. It was built from one Japanese cedar trunk, and with replicas of 30,000-year-old stone tools. 'A dugout canoe was our last candidate among the possible Paleolithic seagoing crafts for the region. We first hypothesized that Paleolithic people used rafts, but after a series of experiments, we learned that these rafts are too slow to cross the Kuroshio and are not durable enough,' said Kaifu. The team paddled Sugiume about 140 miles from eastern Taiwan to Yonaguni Island in southern Japan's Ryukyu group, which includes Okinawa. They navigated only by the sun, stars, swells, and their instincts. In total, the team paddled for more than 45 hours across open sea, without a lot of visibility of the island. In the six years since, the team is still unpacking some of the data they collected during the experiment, and are using it to inform or test new models about various aspects of Paleolithic sea crossings. [ Related: Southeast Asian sailors possibly mastered seafaring before Polynesians. ] 'We now know that these canoes are fast and durable enough to make the crossing, but that's only half the story,' said Kaifu. 'Those male and female pioneers must have all been experienced paddlers with effective strategies and a strong will to explore the unknown.' However, the team does not think that a return journey towards Taiwan was possible at the time. 'If you have a map and know the flow pattern of the Kuroshio, you can plan a return journey, but such things probably did not take place until much later in history,' explained Kaifu. The team also used advanced ocean models to simulate hundreds of virtual voyages, in an effort to understand if a journey like the one the modern scientists tried could have been made in different circumstances. These simulations tested several variables, including different starting points, seasons, and paddling strategies under both ancient and modern ocean conditions. Additionally, one of the new papers used numerical simulations to show how they may have crossed the Kuroshio Current–one of the strongest currents in the world. This simulation showed how boats made using tools of the time, and the right know-how, could have navigated the Kuroshio Current. 'The Kuroshio Current is generally considered dangerous to navigate,' Yu-Lin Chang, a study coauthor and oceanography student from the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, said in a statement. 'I thought if you entered it, you could only drift aimlessly. But the results of our simulations went far beyond what I had imagined. I'm pleased this work helped illuminate how ocean voyages may have occurred 30,000 years ago.' These various simulations helped fill in some gaps that a simple one-time experiment could not. They also revealed that launching a vessel from northern Taiwan offered seafarers a better chance of success than from points further south. Additionally, paddling slightly southeast instead of directly towards the destination was essential for compensating against the powerful ocean current. All in all, these findings suggest that the early modern humans in the area must have had a high level of strategic seafaring knowledge. 'Scientists try to reconstruct the processes of past human migrations, but it is often difficult to examine how challenging they really were. One important message from the whole project was that our Paleolithic ancestors were real challengers. Like us today, they had to undertake strategic challenges to advance,' said Kaifu. 'For example, the ancient Polynesian people had no maps, but they could travel almost the entire Pacific. There are a variety of signs on the ocean to know the right direction, such as visible land masses, heavenly bodies, swells and winds. We learned parts of such techniques ourselves along the way.'
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
With a primitive canoe, scientists replicate prehistoric seafaring
By Will Dunham (Reuters) -Our species arose in Africa roughly 300,000 years ago and later trekked worldwide, eventually reaching some of Earth's most remote places. In doing so, our ancestors surmounted geographic barriers including treacherous ocean expanses. But how did they do that with only rudimentary technology available to them? Scientists now have undertaken an experimental voyage across a stretch of the East China Sea, paddling from Ushibi in eastern Taiwan to Japan's Yonaguni Island in a dugout canoe to demonstrate how such a trip may have been accomplished some 30,000 years ago as people spread to various Pacific Islands. The researchers simulated methods Paleolithic people would have used and employed replicas of tools from that prehistoric time period such as an axe and a cutting implement called an adze in fashioning the 25-foot-long (7.5-meter) canoe, named Sugime, from a Japanese cedar tree chopped down at Japan's Noto Peninsula. A crew of four men and one woman paddled the canoe on a voyage lasting more than 45 hours, traveling roughly 140 miles (225 km) across the open sea and battling one of the world's strongest ocean currents, the Kuroshio. The crew endured extreme fatigue and took a break for several hours while the canoe drifted at sea, but managed to complete a safe crossing to Yonaguni. Just as prehistoric people would have, the voyagers navigated by the sun and stars, as well as the direction of the ocean swells, though for safety's sake they were accompanied by two escort craft. Yonaguni is part of the Ryukyu chain of islands stretching from Kyushu, the southernmost of Japan's four main islands, down to Taiwan. The researchers previously failed with attempted crossings using reed rafts and then bamboo rafts, finding that they were too slow, insufficiently durable and unable to overcome the strong ocean current. "Through the project with many failures, we have learned the difficulties of crossing the ocean, and this experience gave us a deep respect for our Paleolithic ancestors," said University of Tokyo anthropologist Yousuke Kaifu, lead author of the study published on Wednesday in the journal Science Advances. "We found that the Paleolithic people could cross the sea with the strong ocean current if they had dugout canoes and were skillful, experienced paddlers and navigators. They had to face the risk of being drifted by the strong ocean current and the possibility that they would never be able to come back to their homeland," added Kaifu, who was aboard one of the escort boats. Archeological evidence indicates that people approximately 30,000 years ago first crossed from Taiwan to some of the Ryukyu islands, which include Okinawa. But scientists had puzzled over how they could do this with the rudimentary technology of the time - no maps, no metal tools and only primitive vessels. And the Kuroshio current, comparable in strength to the Gulf Stream off Mexico, presented a particular challenge. The research was in the vein of the famous 1947 Kon-Tiki expedition in which Norwegian explorer Thor Heyerdahl carried out a much longer journey by raft from South America across the Pacific to the Polynesian islands. Heyerdahl aimed to show how prehistoric people from the Americas could have colonized Polynesia. "His theory is now countered by a series of pieces of evidence, but it was a great trial at the time. Compared to the time of the Kon-Tiki, we have more archeological and other evidence to build realistic models" of prehistoric voyages, Kaifu said. The researchers in a companion study published in the same journal used simulations of sea conditions between Taiwan and Yonaguni 30,000 years ago to examine whether such a crossing was attainable at a time when the Kuroshio was even more powerful than today. "As our paleo-ocean model simulation showed, crossing the Kuroshio was possible in ancient times, so I believe they achieved it," said physical oceanographer and study lead author Yu-Lin Chang of the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology. "However, ocean conditions were highly variable. Thus, ancient people may have encountered unpredictable weather conditions during their journey, which could have led to failure," Chang added.
