&w=3840&q=100)
History Today: When the US women's suffrage movement began 1848
Upstream view along the Seneca River in Seneca Falls, New York, c. 1850. Wesleyan Chapel, the site of the first women's rights convention in US history, is located just north of the river and is now part of the Women's Rights National Historical Park. Image/Smithsonian American Art Museum, Washington, DC
As part of Firstpost's History Today series, July 19 is a landmark in global history.
In 1848, the US women's suffrage movement was launched at the historic Seneca Falls Convention — a momentous step toward gender equality.
Nearly 150 years later, on July 19, 1993, the US Department of Defense announced its 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy affecting LGBT military service.
And in 1980, the Summer Olympics opened in Moscow, boycotted by around 60 countries in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The birth of the US women's suffrage movement
In the heat of mid‑July 1848, around 300 reform-minded Americans converged at the Wesleyan Chapel in Seneca Falls, New York.
Over two transformative days (July 19-20), they launched the country's first women's rights convention — a defining moment that set the stage for over seven decades of struggle until women won the vote with the 19th Amendment in 1920.
More from Explainers
History Today: When the #BlackLivesMatter sparked a movement to change the world
The catalyst for this gathering was a rejection that resonated with Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott: when Stanton, Mott, and other women were barred from speaking roles at the 1840 World Anti‑Slavery Convention in London simply due to their gender.
This exclusion led to a promise to fight for women's rights — resulting in a meeting arranged in Waterloo at Jane Hunt's home on July 9, which set Seneca Falls into motion.
Stanton, Mott, Martha Wright, Mary Ann M'Clintock, and Jane Hunt, influenced by Quaker ideals and abolitionist fervour, used Stanton's kitchen table as their planning ground.
A notice placed in the Seneca County Courier on July 14 announced 'a convention to discuss the social, civil and religious condition and rights of woman' — resulting in an overwhelmingly local but symbolically bold event in just days.
The first day was women-only, empowering them to speak freely about their frustrations under a patriarchal legal system.
On July 20, men — including the pivotal abolitionist Frederick Douglass — joined the discussion.
Stanton's keynote speech set the tone: 'We are assembled to protest against a form of government…without the consent of the governed,' confronting the systemic disenfranchisement of women's voices in public and legal spheres.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Drafted almost overnight, the Declaration of Sentiments was a rhetorical masterpiece — mirroring the Declaration of Independence, yet boldly asserting gender equality: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal.'
This document catalogued 16 legal, educational and civil grievances — from wage injustice to constrained marital rights — highlighting women's subordinate standing.
Among 12 resolutions, the ninth — calling for the elective franchise for women — stirred heated debate.
Initially narrow in acceptance, the suffrage resolution passed only after Douglass spoke in its favour — tilting the vote meter. Ultimately, 68 women and 32 men affixed their names — all 100 signatories daring to envision radical equality.
National newspapers covered the event. Some repelled it as 'insane,' while others praised the call for equality.
The St Louis Republic ridiculed the idea of men washing dishes; The North Star, by contrast, lauded it as a 'foundation of a grand movement.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Though suffrage advocates like Susan B Anthony were not present, they leveraged the event as a rallying point for impassioned advocacy.
Within two weeks, supporters held a second convention in Rochester. Regular conventions formed a sustained campaign strategy: Worcester in 1850, followed by gatherings nationwide and the creation of local suffrage societies.
Seneca Falls did not initiate public conversations about women's rights — it propelled them. Legal reforms enabling married women to own property, educated women, took legislative action, and pushed for marital autonomy over decades.
Icons such as Susan B. Anthony, Carrie Chapman Catt, Alice Paul and Sojourner Truth will later carry forth the torch, hosting parades, hunger strikes and civil disobedience .
Seneca Falls could not perhaps foresee its own fragmented legacy.
While Elizabeth Cady Stanton and others prioritised white women's suffrage, Black activists like Truth, Wells, and Mary Church Terrell continued the fight — often independently and into the Jim Crow era.
The Birth of the Movement at Seneca Falls was formal, symbolic, and foundational — but not comprehensive. The gender and race dynamics that started there retained tension through Jim Crow and beyond.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Charlotte Woodward Pierce, the only surviving signer to live to see the 19th Amendment ratified in 1920, was a living link between origin and outcome.
Seneca Falls inspired waves of activism globally — Britain, Canada, across Europe — showed that what began as a local answer to gender bias would echo across borders .
Modern scholarship complicates the Seneca Falls narrative. Historians like Lisa Tetrault argue that its prominence was constructed only decades later to establish origins for fractured factions of the suffrage movement.
Meanwhile, Black suffragist history predates 1848. These activists are finally being recognised through initiatives honouring Black women voters under Jim Crow and the long tail of disenfranchisement culminating in the VRA (1965) and ongoing battles on voter suppression.
Efforts following Seneca Falls included state suffrage victories — Wyoming in 1869, Colorado in 1893 — culminating in the 1913 Woman Suffrage Procession in Washington, DC.
These campaigns led to the ratification of the 19th Amendment on August 18, 1920 .
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Yet, hope proved partial. Native Americans and Black women continued struggling — barriers persisted well into and beyond the Civil Rights era .
The site is today part of the Women's Rights National Historical Park, anchored by landmarks like the Wesleyan Chapel and the Elizabeth Cady Stanton House.
Schools, museums, and essays mark the passing of Seneca Falls as both inauguration and testament.
Seneca Falls' legacy resonates today amid fights for transgender rights, reproductive justice, equal pay and civil rights.
Its shining principle — 'all women are created equal' — still demands constant loud reiteration amid modern pressures.
'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' announced
On July 19, 1993, US Secretary of Defense Les Aspin unveiled the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' (DADT) policy.
Sponsored by the Clinton administration, it allowed LGBTQ‑identified individuals to serve only if they remained discreet about their identity, and prohibited discrimination — but enforced dismissal if they disclosed it.
A compromise to balance demands for inclusion with military resistance, DADT sparked mixed reactions.
LGBTQ groups criticised its forced secrecy as psychologically damaging, while opponents insisted it threatened unit cohesion. Over its 17‑year lifecycle, 13,500 service members were discharged under DADT .
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
DADT was ultimately repealed on September 20, 2011, enabling open LGBTQ service, a landmark victory in civil‑military equality.
1980 Summer Olympics open in Moscow amid boycott
On July 19, 1980, the Summer Olympics began in Moscow — the first Games hosted by a communist nation.
However, nearly 60 countries, led by the USA, boycotted the event in protest of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979.
Still, 5,179 athletes from 80 countries competed, including Bulgaria and East Germany.
The Soviet Union topped medal tallies. Controversial performances — like US gymnast Cathy Rigby's absence and New Zealand's tainted gold — defined the competition.
The boycott marked a high-water point in Cold War sports diplomacy, raising questions about politicising athletic events.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
Pakistan racing against time for a trade deal, minister rushes to US for ‘final' talks
Pakistan's Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb has flown to Washington for the second time in two weeks to finalise a possible trade deal with the US. His visit comes days after Islamabad said the agreement was 'very close." read more Pakistan's Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb has departed for Washington on his second US visit in two weeks to finalise a potential trade agreement, his office confirmed late Monday. The visit follows Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar's recent remarks claiming that a deal was 'very close' and could be sealed within days. However, the US side, following Dar's meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, gave no specific timeline. 'A final discussion on the Pakistan-US trade dialogue will take place during the visit,' said Pakistan's Finance Ministry, adding that both sides stand to benefit from the agreement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD During his earlier trip on July 18, Aurangzeb held 'productive trade talks' with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer. The ongoing negotiations center on easing reciprocal tariffs and strengthening economic cooperation amid shifting geopolitical dynamics. Pakistan currently faces a 29 percent Trump-era tariff on its exports, part of the former president's trade policy aimed at surplus nations. Islamabad's trade surplus with the US was around $3 billion in 2024. To ease tensions and rebalance trade, Pakistan has offered to import more US goods, including crude oil, and to open up its mining sector to American firms. The finance ministry said Islamabad is also looking to diversify trade beyond traditional areas, with growth potential in sectors like IT, minerals, and agriculture. Ties between the two nations recently received a boost after President Donald Trump hosted Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, at the White House, an unusual high-level military meeting that underscored the influence of Pakistan's powerful military establishment, often seen as the country's de-facto decision-maker. Given Pakistan's worsening economic crisis, a trade deal with the US has become increasingly urgent. However, with Islamabad's limited bargaining power, sealing a strong agreement appears unlikely.


India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
Donald, McDonald's and Deepender Hooda's 2-foot potato
In the Indian Parliament, sometimes the most memorable debates aren't about numbers or policies. They're about McDonald's and potatoes, with a side of U-turn. This is true of Congress MP Deepender Singh Hooda and his two speeches in Parliament, separated by over a decade but connected by one unlikely common thread: McDonald's, the American fast food his recent speech during the debate on Operation Sindoor on Monday, Hooda called for shutting down McDonald's in India, not over food policy, but because the name reminded him of Donald Trump, whose repeated credit hogging of the India-Pakistan ceasefire had angered in a speech in 2012, Hooda pitched Haryana over Gujarat to McDonald's and said farmers of the state could grow 24-inch potatoes for the fast-food giant, urging it to source potatoes from Ambala for its fries. The U-turn is hard to miss. From offering supersized spuds to demanding a shutdown, all over a then, in 2012, BJP leader and the Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha, Sushma Swaraj, gently guided Hooda with humour. Today, her absence was felt. Perhaps only she could've reminded him that not every Donald is the same and a sitting duck for his a debate on FDI in retail in 2012, Congress MP Deepender Hooda stood up not just for farmers, but for the size of Haryana's potato produce. Responding to Sushma Swaraj's remark that McDonald's doesn't use Indian potatoes because they're too small for fries, Hooda proudly declared, "McDonald's company need not worry... if you want 24-inch potatoes for fries, come to Ambala". It was a light moment amid a heavy debate, and Sushma Swaraj met it with her signature wit: "Son, you're a farmer's son. First, learn the difference between a potato and a bottle gourd". It was a gentle correction, packed with humour and to the middle of a debate on Operation Sindoor and Donald Trump's repeated remarks on having brokered a India-Pakistan ceasefire, Hooda, this time from the Opposition bench, said, "Either silence Donald, shut Donald's mouth, or shut down McDonald's in India."Two speeches, 13 years apart, one unlikely thread — McDonald's. Once, a company to which Hooda was ready to supply with supersized potatoes became the target of his rhetoric, just because the name sounded like someone he disagrees with. It's a reminder that, in Indian politics, metaphors evolve and so do moods, knowingly sometimes otherwise. Perhaps it's less about fast food and more about changing equations and the penchant for could only wish Sushma Swaraj were still around. She had a knack for turning outbursts into thoughtful reflection with just a single line. Perhaps she would've reminded Hooda, once more, gently yet pointedly, that while names may sound alike, not everything deserves to be served with the extra fist of salt.- EndsTune InMust Watch


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘More negotiations needed…': Trump administration official shares update on India-US trade deal; no agreement before August 1 deadline?
India-US trade deal: Since India did not receive any tariff letter from Trump, it is yet unclear whether the 26% tariff rate announced for India on April 2 will kick in from August 1 or not. (AI image) India-US trade deal: In an indication that a trade deal between India and the US was less likely ahead of Donald Trump's August 1 tariff deadline, an American top official has said that more negotiations are required. According to a Bloomberg report, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has said that "more negotiations" are required between the two countries even as talks continue. Greer's statement comes days ahead of US President Donald Trump's August 1 tariff deadline, post which countries face higher tariffs. Since India did not receive any tariff letter from Trump, it is yet unclear whether the 26% tariff rate announced for India on April 2 will kick in from August 1 or not. Trump has additionally warned of implementing "secondary tariffs" on countries such as India and China for their Russian oil purchases. Also Read | India-US trade deal: India treads cautiously after Trump's trade agreements with Japan, others face challenges - here's what's happening Although India was one of the initial countries to initiate trade discussions with the White House this year, it has hardened its stance especially on agriculture and dairy sectors. In a CNBC interview on Monday, Greer spoke of the need for further discussions to seal a trade deal. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Learn More Undo Despite his earlier hints at an imminent agreement with New Delhi, he emphasised that India's traditional stance of market protection meant that any reduction in trade barriers would signify a significant policy shift. India-US Trade Deal: Talks Continue "We continue to speak with our Indian counterparts, we've always had very constructive discussions with them," Greer said. "They have expressed strong interest in opening portions of their market, we of course are willing to continue talking to them," Greer said. "But I think we need some more negotiations on that with our Indian friends to see how ambitious they want to be,' he said according to the Bloomberg report. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal recently expressed optimism about reaching an agreement to prevent the proposed 26% tariffs. Goyal maintained that the US-India relationship was free from contentious issues, noting that discussions had not included immigration policies, including H-1B visa regulations for skilled workers. Also Read | Donald Trump tariffs: Will the August 1 deadline by extended by US President? What Commerce Secretary Lutnick said Goyal has said that trade deal talks are progressing at a 'fast pace' even as he stressed that for any trade agreement India would keep its national interest in mind. He also said that trade deals cannot be worked out on the basis of deadlines. India has shown readiness to eliminate tariffs on specific products including auto parts and pharmaceutical items during trade discussions. However, the country maintains firm restrictions on agricultural and dairy sectors, which it considers non-negotiable in the final agreement. "The thing to understand with India is their trade policy for a very long time has been premised on strongly protecting their domestic market. That's just how they do business" Greer said. "And the president is in a mode of wanting deals that substantially open other markets, that they open everything or near everything." Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025