Te Ara Mokopuna – Treasury's 2025 Long-Term Insights Briefing Published
The briefing emphasises that monetary policy remains the primary tool for managing economic upturns and downturns.
The Treasury has published its final 2025 Long-term Insights Briefing (LTIB), titled Te Ara Mokopuna, which explores the circumstances under which fiscal policy can be used to buffer the economy from shocks and cycles, and how to do so in a sustainable and effective way.
The briefing emphasises that monetary policy remains the primary tool for managing economic upturns and downturns. However, there may be circumstances in which fiscal policy has a role to play in responding to shocks and cycles, such as:
– Ensuring critical services and infrastructure are maintained or rebuilt.
– Addressing the distributional impacts of shocks on communities.
– Providing economic stabilisation when monetary policy has less room to move or is constrained by extremes (e.g., near-zero interest rates).
The briefing also underscores that when fiscal interventions are required, they should be timely, temporary and targeted, with clear exit strategies in place. The briefing provides an overview of effective and less effective tools, with lump-sum payments, wage subsidies, and targeted adjustments to benefits or fees seen as more effective; and tax changes, new infrastructure investments, and permanent public consumption increases due to timing and reversibility challenges as less effective.
Reflecting feedback from the consultation period, the LTIB notes that the involvement of other stakeholders, including private businesses, communities and local government is critical. Fiscal policy should not undermine the incentives for others to prepare for shocks.
'Feedback highlighted there may be an increasing frequency and complexity of shocks, particularly due to climate change, and the important roles of insurance and local authorities in responding to natural disasters,' Iain Rennie said.
'The Treasury agrees that maintaining the resilience of the private sector is important, and that responses to shocks requires the involvement of other stakeholders, including local government and private businesses, and encourages others to prepare for these events.'
Treasury Secretary Iain Rennie noted that the ability to use fiscal policy to respond to shocks highlighted the need for governments to keep debt at prudent levels.
'New Zealand's economy is particularly vulnerable to ups and downs because of our small size, reliance on overseas markets, and high household debt.
'As a country, we need to have the capacity to respond to economic shocks when they occur. This will require successive governments to build a buffer – by setting sustainable medium-term fiscal intentions and running operating surpluses between shocks and downturns.
'Internationally we can see that governments tend to increase spending in a downturn or after a shock but fail to offset this with savings when times are good. This has also been the case in New Zealand, contributing to our rising level of public debt over time.
'The final 2025 Long-term Insights Briefing represents the Treasury's commitment to promoting fiscal sustainability and improving wellbeing for future generations of New Zealanders,' Iain Rennie said.
Te Ara Mokopuna reflects feedback received in a two-phase consultation process. The first phase (June-July 2024) sought input into the briefing's scope, and the second phase (April-May 2025) focused on the draft briefing. This involved public submissions and targeted engagement including with macroeconomic and fiscal experts.
'I would like to thank everyone who made submissions and those who contributed during consultation on the briefing.
'The feedback has been valuable in helping to shape the final briefing. Contributions will also help to inform our future policy advice and development of the Treasury's forthcoming stewardship reports,' Iain Rennie said.
Feedback reflected the critical role of our institutional arrangements in delivering sustainable and effective fiscal policy, and also focused on lessons learned from recent fiscal responses to shocks and cycles, the respective roles of monetary and fiscal policy in responding to the business cycle, and the role of the Crown's balance sheet, including public investments, in managing our exposure and preparedness to shocks.
A summary of the consultation feedback and changes made to the briefing as a result of this feedback can be found at Te Ara Mokopuna 2025 – Submissions.
short version of Te Ara Mokopuna 2025 is also available.
The Treasury has two further stewardship reports due for publication which will build on the themes raised in the LTIB. The 2025 Long-term Fiscal Statement will consider long-term pressures on New Zealand's fiscal position and the choices available to successive governments to return to a fiscally sustainable path. The Investment Statement will consider how governments' management of the Crown balance sheet, including debt levels and investments, can support New Zealand's living standards across generations. These are due to be published in the coming months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
Labour Leader Chris Hipkins Dismisses Criticism Of Covid-19 Overspending As 'Treasury Spin'
, Acting Political Editor Labour leader Chris Hipkins is dismissing what he calls "Treasury spin" after its analysts said the last government overspent during the Covid-19 pandemic against official advice. Treasury's 2025 Long Term Insights Briefing, released this week, calculated the total cost of the pandemic at about $66 billion, or roughly 20.4 percent of GDP. The report said Treasury advocated for more targeted support in late 2020 into 2021 and explicitly warned "against any further stimulus" by Budget 2022. But responding to questions from RNZ on Friday, Hipkins was unapologetic about his party's economic response to Covid-19. "We prioritised keeping people alive and keeping people in jobs," he said. "I'm never going to claim that we got everything perfect... but prioritising jobs and prioritising lives was the right thing to do." Hipkins claimed other countries also spent up large with the same objectives, but Treasury said New Zealand was near the top of the chart when considering spending as a percentage of GDP. "If you listen to the Treasury spin, then you're going to get one view," Hipkins told RNZ. "If you speak to other economists, you'll get a different view. "Our job was to support New Zealanders through the global pandemic, making sure that we saved lives and kept people's jobs, and we were very successful in doing that: one of the lowest death rates in the world, one of the lowest rates of unemployment in the world, and one of the fastest rates of economic growth in the world." About half of the total Covid-19 response cost was directly tied to the pandemic, such as the wage subsidy scheme, or health initiatives like vaccination, contact tracing and quarantine. The remainder went to a wide range of initiatives like: "tax changes, training schemes, housing construction, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, increases to welfare benefits, the Small Business Cashflow Scheme, Jobs for Nature, additional public housing places and school lunches". Treasury said that had "a lagged impact on the economy and proved difficult to unwind in later years". But Hipkins said Treasury had mischaracterised some of that spending, such as the provision of distance-learning for school students. "Making sure that kids could keep learning while they were at home during lockdown was an essential Covid-19 expense," Hipkins said. The report comes during a prolonged economic downturn, with both the government and opposition parties trading blame over its cause. Finance Minister Nicola Willis was quick on Thursday to wield Treasury's findings as evidence that Labour had been undisciplined in its spending, driving up inflation, and fuelling a cost-of-living crisis. "Treasury's language is spare and polite, but its conclusions are damning," she said. "New Zealanders are still paying the price of the previous government extending a big-spending approach initially intended for a pandemic response. "The lesson from Labour's mishandling of the Covid response is that while there are times when governments have to increase spending in response to major events the fiscal guardrails should be restored as soon as possible." To that, Hipkins scoffed: "By comparison to this government's track record, I'll take our one any day". Hipkins said Willis should stop blaming others and instead accept the consequences of her government's spending cuts. "The wreckage that she is leaving in her wake at the moment is obvious for all New Zealanders to see. Unemployment is going up," he said. "Economic growth has collapsed. Essential services that the public rely on a daily basis are falling into disarray, and this is all on Nicola Willis' watch."
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Wellington car dealer claims lease forged as $127k rent dispute escalates to High Court
The Herald has obtained documents filed for both sides in the High Court at Wellington. A hearing date is yet to be set. Photo / Mark Mitchell The plaintiffs are brothers Manish and Sailesh Patel, the trustees of the Patel Family Trust. Their statement of claim says Scott began leasing their site on High St in Lower Hutt in February 2012. That deal was formalised with a deed of lease signed in May that year. Rent was set at $2833 plus GST per month – just over $3250 including tax – and the agreement included a 10% default interest clause. According to the trust, Scott's rent payments were 'inconsistent' from the outset – some months were overpaid, others underpaid, and by 2013, Scott was regularly behind. They claim that by 2024, rent arrears had hit six figures, and in August, Scott was given four months to settle the bill or vacate by Christmas Day. No payment was made, and they changed the locks on December 16. Their lawyer then demanded $127,000 in unpaid rent and interest from Scott – warning the figure would continue to grow until the property was cleared and returned. In April this year, the trust filed proceedings in the High Court. The Patels have asked the court to: Confirm Scott's lease was lawfully cancelled. Grant them possession of the premises. Order Scott to pay $127,541.41 in arrears and award default interest at 10% per year. Grant damages for the lost opportunity to lease the site while Scott's vehicles and equipment remain stored there. Scott, who has been selling cars for more than 55 years, is fighting back – accusing the Patels of forging multiple lease documents and trying to 'extort' money and property from him under false pretences. The statement of defence he has filed in court outlines his position. He says that in 2012 he entered into a lease agreement with Jayanti Patel, the father of Manish and Sailesh. He presented Jayanti Patel with a 'draft' lease, which he had signed – but it was never formally actioned. 'There was no written lease. The arrangement was an unwritten short-term lease as is defined in sections 208, 209 and 210 of the Property Law Act 2007,' his statement said. 'There was no provision in the agreement for payment of interest … The document referred to [in the statement of claim] was not signed by any of the parties named [the brothers or Scott] ... Accordingly, [Scott] is not liable to the plaintiffs.' Scott alleges the lease documents being relied on in court by the Patel brothers are a manipulated version of the draft agreement he presented to the original trustees in 2012. In his court statement, he alleges his signature was 'electronically replicated' on to the document using cut-and-paste techniques, and says expert evidence filed alongside his application supports that. That evidence includes a handwriting analysis and forensic document examination. The handwriting expert believed the lease contains 'substantial and significant inconsistencies' and 'non-genuine' signatures across different versions. It concluded there was a 'strong probability' the documents had been deliberately altered or fabricated. Scott also alleges that since being locked out in December, he has been unable to retrieve business equipment and dozens of vehicles left on site – and that several of them have been damaged or stolen. He alleges unknown offenders have repeatedly entered the property, smashed windows, slashed paintwork, stolen wheels, and stripped valuable items from both vehicles and the on-site office. On one occasion, four left-hand-drive vehicles were damaged, and a fifth had a window smashed. On another, two cars were stripped of their wheels, rendering them immovable. David Scott says vehicles have been vandalised at his Park Lane premises on High St, Lower Hutt. Photo / Mark Mitchell He claims the trust failed to protect the vehicles while they controlled the site. Scott also says the trust's actions in blocking his access to the property breach the Property Law Act and have caused significant business losses. He is seeking to have the entire claim thrown out, declaring the lease invalid, and may pursue his own legal action for damage to his property. Stolen and damaged items, he claims, include five vehicle windows valued at $18,000, a mechanic's industrial toolbox worth $50,000, an air compressor, a floor jack, ladders, various power tools, batteries, and security cameras. Scott is also seeking $27,500 for panel and paint repairs to damaged vehicles and $9500 for replacement wheels and mags. Additional costs include battery chargers, car opening kits, and other workshop equipment. Beyond the material losses, the first defendant is also seeking $1.85 million in damages for emotional harm and stress. David Scott claims valuable items have been stripped from the office at his dealership. Photo / Mark Mitchell Scott told the Herald that the ongoing saga had deeply affected his health. 'I just want to sell cars … I like to help people." The Herald reached out to the Patel brothers through their lawyer, Matt Anderson. Anderson said the men would deny all 'baseless' allegations made by Scott. 'This is a simple rent recovery exercise on behalf of our clients,' he said. 'The tenant was significantly behind on rent for many years … Our clients had hoped that the tenant would vacate the property so they could relet the premises. Court proceedings were filed as the tenant refuses to vacate the premises, despite repeated requests, and our clients are left with a premises they cannot use and a tenant who was significantly in arrears and now will not give up the premises. 'Our clients deny all allegations of inappropriate behaviour referred to by the tenant in their counter-claim. 'Our clients are frustrated that the tenant is making baseless claims and using the court process as a means to delay leaving the premises.' Anna Leask is a senior journalist who covers national crime and justice. She joined the Herald in 2008 and has worked as a journalist for 19 years with a particular focus on family and gender-based violence, child abuse, sexual violence, homicides, mental health and youth crime. She writes, hosts and produces the award-winning podcast A Moment In Crime, released monthly on
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Hipkins Needs Ideas That Don't Make Kiwis Poorer
ACT Leader David Seymour is urging Chris Hipkins to bring serious ideas to today's Labour retreat – because so far, Labour's only policies would make New Zealanders worse off. 'Chris Hipkins, the recidivist country-destroyer, has retreated to his lair, presumably to stockpile fresh petrol for the economic fire he was stoking just 18 months ago,' says Seymour. 'He moans about the people leaving New Zealand, even while proposing to tax the ones who stay harder – and ban the industries that could bring Kiwis back – just as the economy is turning the corner. 'Yesterday, Treasury confirmed what ACT said at the time: Labour ignored clear advice not to 'stimulate' the post-COVID economy with reckless spending. Grant Robertson did it anyway, ramping up the spending machine, flooding the economy with cheap money that pushed up debt, then inflation, then interest rates, and now unemployment. 'It was economic vandalism on an historic scale. Now, as we hose down the smouldering ashes of Labour's inferno, Hipkins cries 'austerity' – like an arsonist returning to the scene of the crime, asking for the matches back. 'Labour is a party out of ideas – and the vacuum will be filled by the Greens and Te Pāti Māori. That circus would plunge us into third world conditions: higher debt, crippling taxes, more division, and fewer reasons to build a life in New Zealand.'
