Ex-CJI DY Chandrachud's upcoming book talks about understanding relevance of the Constitution
The publisher said on 8 August that Justice Chandrachud's book, which will be published at the end of August 2025, explores the enduring relevance and transformative power of the Indian Constitution.
'Drawing on his vast legal experience and landmark judicial career, he presents a compelling case for why the Constitution is not just a legal document, but the very foundation of democracy, justice, and equality in India,' Penguin said, announcing the book which is basically a collection of speeches of the former CJI.
From the right to dissent to free speech; from privacy to gender equality, disability and environmental justice, Justice Chandrachud's (retd) judgments are milestones in the constitutional project of social transformation, it said. In Why the Constitution Matters Justice DY Chandrachud delves into the profound significance of the Constitution in shaping the nation's identity and governance
The book offers readers a nuanced understanding of the values enshrined in the Constitution, according to the publisher. 'With clarity and conviction, he makes complex legal concepts accessible to the audience of citizens, showing how constitutional principles impact our lives in practical, everyday ways,' it said.
'I'm delighted to debut as an author with Penguin Random House with 'Why the Constitution Matters'. The book attempts to weave together my experiences of law, justice and judging in a career of nearly twenty-five years on the bench. It is an invocation to every citizen to engage in realising the true potential of the Constitution.' Justice (Retd) Chandrachud is quoted as saying in the book announcement.
Justice Chandrachud (Retd) served as the 50th Chief Justice of India from 9 November 2022 to 10 November 2024. He was appointed a judge of the Supreme Court of India in May 2016.
The Constitution is not just a document; it is the very essence of our democracy, a beacon of hope, and a guiding light that ensures justice, equality, and liberty for all.
"The Constitution is not just a document; it is the very essence of our democracy, a beacon of hope, and a guiding light that ensures justice, equality, and liberty for all. I am delighted that Justice D Y Chandrachud in his forthcoming book addresses the core philosophy of our Constitution that is essential in preserving the fabric of our society. It is a must read for all citizens of the country." – Milee Ashwarya, Publisher and Senior VP, Adult Publishing Group, PRHI said.
Key Takeaways The book emphasizes the importance of understanding the Constitution for every citizen.
Justice Chandrachud draws on his extensive legal experience to make complex concepts accessible.
Key themes include dissent, free speech, gender equality, and environmental justice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Congress and allies gained in most of the Maharashtra seats where votes went up: BJP
The BJP on Friday (August 8, 2025) said the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, damaged his own credibility while alleging large-scale electoral manipulation in Maharashtra in 2024. At a press conference, Union Minister and BJP leader Bhupender Yadav said, 'Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi was talking about dropping an 'atom bomb'. Yesterday, a friend told me that he was actually cutting the tree on which he was sitting with an axe.' Responding to Mr. Gandhi's allegations, Mr. Yadav said that in the Maharashtra 2024 Assembly election, the Congress and allies had, in fact, won most of the seats where the votes had increased. 'Threatening language' He said the 'arrogance' in Mr. Gandhi's language, threatening the Election Commission of India (ECI) with consequences if the Congress comes to power, did not befit the Opposition leader. He accused the Congress leader and his party of attacking the Army and the constitutional institutions. 'The Congress leaders do not even miss an opportunity to speak against the comments made by the Supreme Court. In this country, the Army, the ECI, Parliament, and all the other constitutional institutions work autonomously and independently... it is the duty of a person who abides by the Constitution not to use arrogant and threatening language against these institutions,' he said. Referring to the Congress leader's press conference on Thursday (August 7, 2025), the BJP leader said Mr. Gandhi's main point was the increase of one crore votes in the Maharashtra Assembly election. 'The details are on the ECI website. In 2024, about 40 lakh votes increased between the Lok Sabha and Assembly elections, but Rahul Gandhi claimed that there was an increase of one crore votes, so there is an error margin of 60%,' he said. 'In Maharashtra, they [the Congress and allies] won most of the seats where the votes had increased. In Mumbra-Kalwa Assembly constituency number 149, where voters went up by 41,663, NCP-Shiv Sena's Jitendra Ahwad won the seat by 96,228 votes,' he said, citing several other instances wherein the Opposition candidates won by large margins. Stating that the addition or deletion of votes is an independent exercise of the ECI, Mr. Yadav said Mr. Gandhi should file an affidavit on oath before the ECI with respect to his accusations. 'However, he has not done so. His modus operandi has been to 'shoot and scoot, ' said Mr. Yadav, alleging that the Opposition disrupted parliamentary proceedings to evade discussion on the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar.
New Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
'New wine in old bottle': EC says Rahul Gandhi is 'recycling' old allegations on issue dismissed by apex court
NEW DELHI: The Election Commission on Friday accused Rahul Gandhi of re-cycling old allegations of poll irregularities which were settled by the Supreme Court, and asked the Congress leader to give a written declaration on his claims on wrongful entries in voters' list or tender an apology. Sources in the poll authority dubbed Gandhi's allegations on vote theft in at least three states as a "tired script" and likened it to "new wine in an old bottle." The sources said the issue, first raised by then Madhya Pradesh Congress president Kamal Nath in 2018, was settled by the apex court. The Election Commission also dismissed Gandhi's claims on non-functioning websites. "No issues with Election Commission of India's website. Functioning seamlessly since its launch," the poll authority said in a statement. The Commission said the primary site/link for E-Roll download for all states has been working without any issues since it was launched, and continues to be operational currently as well. The Congress leader hit back, asserting that he has already taken oath in Parliament to uphold the Constitution, indicating that there was no need for him to give a signed declaration to the poll authority on his claims. The sources said in 2018, Congress leaders tried to mislead the Supreme Court by producing documents from a private website to demonstrate that there were mistakes in electoral rolls, contending that the same face was shown for as many as 36 voters. The defects flagged by the Congress leaders were already rectified and the copy of the same was supplied to the party, the sources said, adding that this ground was made to seek the searchable PDF format for electoral rolls. The top court refused to accept the prayer of Kamal Nath. The sources said the Congress leaders were aware that the same trick cannot be repeated in the court, so they tried to mislead people by claiming irregularities in electoral rolls, contending that the same names were occurring at different places. The sources said the name of Aditya Srivastava, which was alleged to be in the electoral rolls of three different states, was rectified months ago. They said instead of availing the legal process, Gandhi tried to sensationalise the issue by making baseless claims before the media. As Gandhi continued with his attack on the EC alleging vote theft in at least three states, the poll panel said if he believes in his analysis and feels that his allegations against it are true, he should have "no problem" in signing a declaration under electoral rules and submit the names wrongfully added or removed from the voters' list. However, if Gandhi does not sign the declaration, it would mean that he does not believe in his analysis and resultant conclusions and "absurd allegations." In which case he should apologise to the nation, the sources said. The chief electoral officers of three states on Thursday asked Gandhi to share the names of electors he claimed were either included or excluded wrongfully from the voter lists along with a signed declaration for the poll authorities to initiate "necessary proceedings" in the matter. In a fact check post on X, the Election Commission said it has not removed voters' list from the websites of the state chief electoral officers and anybody can download the electoral rolls. It was responding to a user's post alleging that e-voter rolls for many states were removed after Thursday's press conference by Gandhi. Addressing a Vote Adhikar rally in Bengaluru on Friday, Gandhi said he has already taken oath in Parliament to uphold the Constitution. "The EC asks me to file an affidavit and give information under oath. I have taken an oath inside the Parliament holding the Constitution. Today when people are questioning the Election Commission based on the data I released, the EC has shut its website," he alleged. At a media briefing on Thursday, the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha claimed that there was "vote chori" of 1,00,250 votes in a Karnataka constituency, with 11,965 duplicate voters in the segment, 40,009 voters with fake and invalid addresses, 10,452 bulk voters or single address voters, 4,132 voters with invalid photos, and 33,692 voters misusing Form 6 of new voters.
Scroll.in
40 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Petition alleges Section 152 of BNS reintroduces sedition law, SC seeks Centre's reply
The Supreme Court on Friday directed the Union government to respond to a petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Live Law reported. Section 152 of the criminal law pertains to acts that endanger India's sovereignty, unity and integrity. It criminalises a wide spectrum of expressive conduct, including those who 'purposely or knowingly' use words to 'excite or attempt to excite' secession, rebellion or subversive activities. The petition claimed that the provision effectively reintroduces the colonial-era sedition law. A bench of Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria issued notice on the petition filed by SG Vombatkere, a retired major general in the Indian Army, and tagged it with another pending matter challenging the same provision. In his petition, Vombatkere said that the court had in May 2022 ordered proceedings and criminal prosecutions for sedition under Section 124A of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code to be kept in abeyance, The Hindu reported. However, Section 124A was slipped in again into the law in the guise of Section 152 when the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita replaced the Indian Penal Code in July 2024, the petitioner argued. 'The provision, in effect, reintroduces the colonial sedition law previously codified as Section 124A of the IPC, 1860, under a new nomenclature,' the newspaper quoted the petition as having said. 'Though the language is altered, its substantive content – criminalising vague and broad categories of speech and expression such as 'subversive activity', 'encouragement of separatist feelings', and acts 'endangering unity or integrity of India' – remains the same or is even more expansive,' it added. The petition also said that Section 152 was violative of fundamental rights under Article 14, Article 19(1)(a) and Article 21 of the Constitution. While Article 14 pertains to equality, Article 19(1)(a) talks about free speech and Article 21 about right to life and personal liberty. The 'sweeping' language used in Section 152, 'including phrases like encouraging feelings of separatist activities, failed the test of constitutional validity due to vagueness, overbreadth, chilling effect, disproportionate punishment, and absence of proximate nexus to public disorder', it added. New criminal laws Three new criminal laws – the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – came into effect on July 1, 2024. They replaced the British-era Indian Penal Code, 1860, the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. When introducing the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Union Home Minister Amit Shah had claimed that the new law ' completely repealed ' the sedition law under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code. 'Everyone has the right to speak,' the home minister had said at the time. 'We are completely repealing sedition.' However, critics have argued that Section 152 of the BNS is a 'new version' of a colonial-era sedition law, which had been misused to harass, intimidate and persecute human rights defenders, activists, journalists, among others, for exercising their right to freedom of expression.
