Dáil committee to scrutinise how Tusla has spent millions on ‘complex litigation'
Tusla
, is facing an investigation by the
Dáil
Public Accounts Committee
(PAC) over how millions of euro have been run up in legal costs over number of years arising from 'complex litigation' and a protected disclosure.
The costs include about €416,000 spent on a report on issues raised in a whistleblower disclosure made to the Minister for Children. The report was later quashed by the courts.
Tusla's accounts signal that the
State Claims Agency
will this year record significant additional costs arising from the same circumstances.
The chairman of the PAC,
John Brady
of
Sinn Féin
, said the amounts involved represented 'extraordinary levels of expenditure'.
READ MORE
Tusla told The Irish Times it cannot comment on legal cases.
However, some details were provided by the State's financial watchdog, the
Comptroller and Auditor General
Seamus McCarthy, and in a governance statement in Tusla's annual accounts for 2024, which have just been published.
Mr McCarthy told the PAC on Thursday that he wanted to draw attention to some matters including compensation and legal costs incurred by Tusla and the State Claims Agency in respect of four cases taken against Tusla.
He said the compensation payments to the four individuals totalled €799,000, while plaintiff legal costs of €949,000 were paid in two cases and Tusla's own legal costs incurred to date are €1.6 million.
Mr McCarthy said the legal costs of the State Claims Agency for these matters are not yet known.
The Tusla annual accounts show€848,000 was paid out in legal costs last year as well as €296,000 in legal compensation.
The accounts refer to legal settlements and costs relating to 'complex litigation cases' arising from circumstances before 2018.
In a governance statement and board members' report, it says a protected disclosure to the Government resulted in Tusla's board engaging an external investigator to look into the matter. The investigator's report was nullified by the courts following litigation.
'Tusla's own costs in relation to this action have amounted to just under €1.6 million to date,' the accounts note. This figure includes €416,000 for the third-party investigation and report.
The case was settled after mediation, with Tusla paying €200,000 damages and the State Claims Agency paying an additional €100,000 award to the individual. Legal costs have not yet been finalised, the accounts report notes.
A second case, involving 'complex' constitutional and administrative law issues, was settled via mediation with €49,500 damages paid. The other party's legal costs were €870,000, the report says.
Separately, the accounts say, two additional separate awards were made through the State Claims Agency to individuals 'arising from the same circumstances'. An award of €309,000 was made in 2025 (legal costs relating to this have not been finalised), while €140,000 was made in 2023, carrying with it a €79,000 legal costs bill.
Tusla said it 'does not comment on individual legal cases or specific settlements due to legal confidentiality, the integrity of the process and the rights of the individuals involved'.
The agency said a detailed note was provided in its annual report and financial statements.
Mr McCarthy said it was for Tusla to provide explanations to the committee regarding the issues involved.
The committee said it would seek for Tusla to appear before it in the autumn.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
8 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Government's spending overruns amount to ‘poor planning', Fiscal Council says
The Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC) has said the Government's ongoing spending overruns amount to 'poor planning and budgeting'. It follows the Summer Economic Statement (SES), published on Tuesday, showing that planned expenditure for this year is now expected to amount to €108.7 billion, €3.3 billion more than set out in Budget 2025. Some €90.5 billion was allocated in the budget to current expenditure, or the cost of delivering public services, and €14.9 billion to capital expenditure. Both lines have since increased. 'Based on spending data for the first six months of the year, this upward revision is likely to be insufficient,' IFAC said in one of a series of posts it made on X on Wednesday afternoon on the Summer Economic Statement. [ Tax and spending package of €9.4bn to form basis of Budget 2026 Opens in new window ] 'Analysis by the Council suggests current spending is likely to be around current spending is likely to be around €1 billion higher than the SES figures.' IFAC chairman Seamus Coffey confirmed the posts when contacted by The Irish Times. While gross voted spending is now officially forecast to rise by €7.9 billion next year, IFAC said that spending overruns in 2026 are 'almost inevitable'. Some €2 billion of the increase is being provided for capital expenditure under the Government's revised National Development Plan. The Government is allowing for scope for €1.5 billion of tax cuts in Budget 2026, which, IFAC notes, is the equivalent of linking the system to inflation. [ What did the summer economic statement really tell us about Budget 2026? Opens in new window ] 'Excluding windfall corporation tax receipts, the Government is forecasting a budget deficit of almost €11 billion next year,' the watchdog said, nothing that this equates to 3.2 per cent of gross national income-star (GNI*), a measure of the domestic economy. 'This is despite a strong economy.' IFAC also took aim at how the Government warned that if there is a deterioration in the international tariffs landscape, the 2026 budget package would be smaller. 'This is exactly the opposite of standard economic advice. Countercyclical policy means giving more support when the economy is weak and less when it is strong,' it said. The EU is currently in trade talks with the US in an effort to avert US president Donald Trump's threatened 30 per cent charge on most European imports kicking in from August 1st. The EU has threatened to impose nearly €100 billion worth of retaliatory tariffs on US imports ranging from bourbon whiskey to Boeing aircraft in one fell swoop if an accord isn't reached by the deadline. 'More generally, the Government's budgetary plans are focused on the short term,' IFAC said, noting that the Government has yet to live up to its own programme commitment to publish a medium-term fiscal structural plan.
Sunday World
an hour ago
- Sunday World
All-Ireland winning hurler found not guilty of assaulting boy (12) with stick
At Ennis Circuit Court today, the jury delivered a majority not guilty verdict A jury has found former All-Star and Clare All-Ireland winning hurler, Niall Gilligan not guilty of assaulting a then 12 year old boy with a stick. At Ennis Circuit Court today, the jury delivered a majority not guilty verdict that Mr Gilligan of Rossroe, Kilmurry, Sixmilebridge had assaulted causing harm of the boy at the Jamaica Inn Hostel, Sixmilebridge on October 5th 2023. Niall Gilligan at Ennis Circuit Court News in 90 Seconds - July 23rd Mr Gilligan sat impassive in the court as the court registrar read out the not guilty verdicts in the case concerning the assault causing harm charge and use of a stick. Earlier, judge in the assault case has asked the jury in the case to make 'a fresh start' in their deliberations this morning. Judge Francis Comerford sent the jury out at 10.40am to resume their deliberations. In the case, Mr Gilligan (48) of Rossroe, Kilmurry, Sixmilebridge denied the assault causing harm with a stick of a then 12-year old boy at the Jamaica Inn hostel, Sixmilebridge on October 5, 2023. On Tuesday, the jury deliberated for 2 hours and 47 minutes before they returned to the court just before 5pm and the jury foreman asked Judge Comerford: 'What is the next step if we are not unanimous?' In court this morning, Judge Comerford told the jury: 'I would ask you a fresh start and consider matters again and talk through the issues." Judge Comerford told the jury if they have a question or want to communicate any difficulties they can come back into court. Judge Comerford said that he would call the jury back in the course of the morning to confirm where they are and consider whether to move onto the next stage or not. On Tuesday, Judge Comerford told the jury: "It is always preferable that you try to reach a unanimous verdict - that is the ideal and it is better than any alternative." They jury commenced their deliberations at 12.33pm on Tuesday and before they commenced, Judge Comerford told them that they should make their decision in the case 'after a cold, direct, forensic determination of the facts'. In his closing speech to the jury on Monday counsel for Mr Gilligan, Patrick Whyms BL said in no way is Mr Gilligan trying to suggest that he was entitled to punish the boy as was suggested and said that the injuries sustained by the boy 'are clearly regrettable'. Mr Whyms said that on the evening at the Jamaica Inn hostel, Mr Gilligan 'didn't know that he was dealing with a child and did not create this situation'. Mr Whyms, instructed by solicitor, Daragh Hassett, said that Mr Gilligan "was at the end of his tether" by the vandalism being done to a vacant property he was trying to sell. Putting forward the defence of reasonable force against the charge, Mr Whyms said that Mr Gilligan was at the Jamaica Inn hostel on the night of October 5th 'in the dark and believed that he was under siege'. He said: 'Believing himself under threat and needing to protect himself and his property, Niall Gilligan needs to make an instant decision and so we are here." Mr Whyms said: 'And Mr Gilligan, a family man who has young children and no previous convictions gives a clear story which hans't changed and an entirely credible, fulsome account of what happened." Earlier in her closing speech on Monday, Ms Sarah Jane Comerford BL (instructed by State Solicitor for Clare, Aisling Casey) told the jury: 'This is a story of a man who lost his cool.' She said: 'Instead of picking up the boy after he slipped and bringing him out to his car and driving him home and telling his parents, he hit him and lost it and he was angry and frustrated.' Ms Comerford said that the alleged assault in broad daylight 'is the action of a man who took out his anger and frustration on a child. There is no evidence that his injuries were caused by anything other than his interactions with Niall Gilligan.' Ms Comerford said that Niall Gilligan 'lost control and punished the boy for the damage and inconvenience caused to his property on a morning when he had to clean up human faeces and urine from his property'.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Family of woman killed after being struck by motorcyclist successfully appeal decision not to prosecute
The family of a woman who was killed after being struck by a motorcyclist in Dublin city more than three years ago has been successful in its appeal of an original decision not to prosecute. Marie Pollard, a retired nurse from Castlegar, Co Galway , was struck by a motorcyclist while on foot at the junction of Eden Quay and Beresford Place in Dublin 1 on the morning of November 9th, 2022. The 62-year-old mother of three, originally from Co Meath , was seriously injured following the collision and was brought to the Mater Hospital, where she died two days later from a traumatic head injury. The driver of the motorcycle was uninjured and did not require medical treatment. READ MORE A decision was initially made by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) not to prosecute the motorcyclist which was ultimately appealed by Ms Pollard's family. A sitting of Dublin District Coroner's Court heard on Wednesday that, following a review, a decision has been made by the DPP to prosecute. Detective Inspector Ken Hoare told coroner Dr Clare Keane that criminal proceedings have now been instituted and a trial has been set for July 2026. Dr Keane adjourned Ms Pollard's inquest until criminal proceedings have been completed. Separately, an inquest into the death of Theresa Clarke, who died after being struck by a cyclist in south Dublin in June 2024, has been adjourned for a further six months. Theresa Clarke died five days after being struck by a cyclist in Ranelagh. Photograph: Colin Keegan The 73-year-old was involved in putting up posters for the local elections at the time of the collision on the night of June 4th on Ranelagh Road in Dublin 6. Ms Clarke, a mother of three from Knocklyon, died in Beaumont Hospital from a traumatic head injury five days after the collision. Dr Keane heard that an investigation file is still in progress and gardaí are awaiting the submission of the forensic collision report into the death.
