EU-US trade deal: Ireland ‘no doubt' in challenging position over tariffs, says Minister
tariffs
but the recently announced
agreement
does bring 'some clarity', the Minister for Enterprise has said.
Peter Burke said the deal reached on Sunday, which will lock in tariffs of 15 per cent on most
EU
imports to the
US
, had avoided a 'direct trade war'.
Speaking on RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland on Monday, Mr Burke said the EU was four days away from 30 per cent tariffs, which would have been 'significant', while the Government is awaiting more details to emerge.
The final terms of the deal were worked out during a meeting between European Commission president
Ursula von der Leyen
and US president
Donald Trump
at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland on Sunday.
READ MORE
The accord effectively sees the EU accepting import taxes of 15 per cent on most of its huge volume of trade with the US.
The two sides agreed that no tariffs would be charged on imports of aircraft, certain chemicals and some agri-food goods, though the finer details of what agricultural products will benefit from these exemptions are still to be worked out.
[
EU-US trade deal analysis: Tariffs have a price for both sides. Trump was willing to pay it
Opens in new window
]
Mr Burke said there would be a number of 'carveouts' for particular sectors such as aviation, agri-foods and spirits. He said the Government was concerned about the 'stacking mechanism', which refers to the cumulative effect of multiple tariffs applied to the same imported product.
'All of those areas have been called out for separate carveouts, so we have to see what that will look like and what will that amount to on paper, and that's where the devil is going to be in the detail,' he said.
'But the critical thing is that at all costs we have to avoid escalation because it would be devastating in terms of the impact because the scale of the market is so huge.'
The Fine Gael TD said the Government had been 'very clear that tariffs are bad'.
'They constrain supply, they drive prices up. They're not good for the US economy, or indeed for the Irish economy,' he said.
'Ireland's position is very clear – we always favour an open, rules-based fair trade at every hand's turn. When you have the talk of tariffs and a deal like this, it is going to be challenging, and I think we have to be very honest about that.'
[
EU-US trade deal represents 'substantial burden' for Irish businesses
Opens in new window
]
The deal includes EU commitments to purchase set amounts of US oil, nuclear power and liquefied natural gas annually.
In terms of Ireland buying US oil or gas, Mr Burke said he was not aware of it at this point in time but could not 'give a definitive answer'.
Mr Burke added that a deal between China and the US had yet to happen, which would affect Irish exports and they would also have to see what separate carveouts will emerge.
'Until we get flesh on the bones in all those areas over the coming weeks, we'll be in a better position then to really put forward what the budgetary parameters will end up with.'
He also said he and the Government remained committed to cutting the hospitality VAT rate to 9 per cent and that it was in the programme for government, which had been agreed by all parties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
10 minutes ago
- Irish Times
St Stephen's Green shopping centre plan is shot down by planning appeals board
A €100 million plan to redevelop St Stephen's Green Shopping Centre in Dublin has been turned down by An Coimisiún Pleanála . The refusal overturns a grant of permission owners DTDL Ltd secured from Dublin City Council in December 2023. An Coimisiún Pleanála said the proposed scheme 'lacks a strong sense of original aesthetic and would not achieve a sufficiently high standard of placemaking, urban design and architecture at this key city centre location'. It concluded the scheme would be contrary to a number of policies in the area of high quality architecture, architectural design and brownfield, regeneration sites and large scale development of the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-28. An Coimisiún Pleanála noted these policies 'aim to encourage innovative, high quality urban design and architectural detail in all new development proposals, that positively contribute to the city's built and natural environment and incorporate exemplar standards of high-quality, sustainable and inclusive urban design and architecture befitting the city's environment and heritage'. The planning appeals board concluded that the proposed development would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area. The largest component of the new scheme was to be 35,043 sq metres of offices and ancillary spaces. The applicants also increased the level of retail and food and beverage space after the Council expressed concerns. An Coimisiún Pleanála upheld a recommendation by its own inspector in the case to refuse planning permission. However, it said it did not share the view expressed by the inspector that the existing shopping centre represents an exemplar twentieth century building. Opening the door for a future application, the board concluded that replacing the existing facade, including the existing external trellis detailing and dome, would not contravene the city's development plan, subject to an appropriately high quality 'design solution for this key city centre location'. Appeals by An Taisce, shopping centre trader Emmett Rogers and activist Frank had seen the plan come before the appeals board. The An Taisce appeal – jointly signed off by Dublin City Planning Officer, Kevin Duff and Heritage Officer, Ian Lumley – stated that what was predominantly a large office development 'lacks architectural sensitivity towards St Stephen's Green and results in the loss of an impressive naturally lit space'. Mr Rogers, who has been operating the Tribe outlet at the shopping centre since 1992, said if the redevelopment proceeded, 'I see Dublin losing another bit of its unique identity to developers'. Mr McDonald said the proposal was 'simply not good enough and does not qualify as a building of 'exceptional design and outstanding architectural quality' '. The redevelopment plan was first lodged in January 2023. In an architectural design statement, BKD architects said that, since opening in 1988, the centre had faced many difficulties attracting sustainable retailers for reasons including that most unit sizes were too small with units at the upper levels trading poorly and operating only on short-term leases. Planning consultants for the scheme, John Spain & Associates, told Dublin City Council that the existing building 'has become outdated'. It said the proposal sought to enhance a high quality shopping centre and office facility on a centrally located site.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Tariffs: as new regime kicks in, what does it mean for Europe and for Ireland?
US president Donald Trump 's August 1st tariff deadline has been hanging over the global trading system and Europe's transatlantic trade with the US for months. The deal struck by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump last weekend puts an end to a lot, but unfortunately not all, of the speculation. Much of the detail has yet to be ironed out and there is still confusion over how certain parts will work in practice. For example, a 'fact sheet' published by the White House seems to suggest the tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors will be paid by the EU when in fact they will be borne by US businesses and consumers. Is there something in this deal for both sides? READ MORE On paper and despite the positive spin coming from Brussels about 'trade certainty', it's a very a one-sided deal in favour of the US. It imposes, from Friday, a baseline 15 per cent tariff on most EU exports into the US, including approximately €70 billion worth goods exported from Ireland, while committing the bloc to major purchases of US energy and armaments. The EU, for its part, has reduced its tariffs on most US imports, in some cases to zero, giving US exporters much greater access to Europe's 450 million-strong consumer market. This is far cry from the zero-for-zero deal initially offered by Brussels. Based on last year's trade figures, the deal might be expected to net the US government roughly $90 billion in tariff revenue. What will it mean for the Irish economy? For a small, export-led economy that relies heavily on trade with the US, it's undoubtedly a negative. But Government ministers are playing up the fact that it avoids the 30 per cent tariff rate initially threatened by Mr Trump, keeps the trade doors open and avoids a mutually destructive trade war. Critics will say the EU gave in too easily and that it failed, as gatekeeper to the most lucrative consumer market in the world, to wield its economic might. According to one estimate, the tariff deal will knock 0.5 per cent off EU GDP (gross domestic product). What has been the reaction from Irish business? 'Irish exporters and importers will not have to operate under cumbersome and very expensive WTO [World Trade Organisation] rules. However, there will still be changes and increased costs to trade,' the chief executive of the Irish Exporters Association, Simon McKeever, says. Employers' group Ibec says a 15 per cent tariff represents 'a substantial burden for many industries' and has called on Government to consider providing supports to vulnerable businesses similar to those rolled out during Brexit. Does that mean an economic slowdown here? On the basis of a 10 per cent tariff on EU goods exports to the US with an exemption for pharmaceuticals, the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) had forecast the economy here would grow, in modified domestic demand terms, at a slower rate of 2.3 per cent this year, down from 3 per cent previously. Now that the actual deal involves pharma and a higher baseline tariff rate, the slowdown in headline growth is expected to be larger though not enough to trigger a recession. The Government's budgetary numbers, which are also based around a 10 per cent tariff rate, may also have to be scaled back. Does the different tariff rate in Northern Ireland present a problem? The divergence in tariff treatment between the EU and the UK (15 per cent versus 10 per cent) will also create cost differentials and other issues on the island of Ireland, between Northern Ireland and the Republic, particularly in areas like food and drink which will play out in way we perhaps can't see at this stage. Will the deal damage inward investment here? The nightmare scenario for Ireland would be for an Apple or an Intel to up sticks and leave in the face of Trump's protectionist agenda. There's no way of telling how these policies are influencing decision-making in the boardrooms of these companies. Like everyone else, they are probably adopting a wait-and-see approach. The Government will hope that the increased cost of trading with the US (from Ireland) doesn't outweigh the attraction of the Irish economy for US business. What else? Of course, the big question surrounding Trump's protectionist trade agenda is how will it impact the US economy. A major slide in performance there – with tariffs expected to lead to higher prices for US consumers – and the global economy (including Irish exports) could suffer. Trump is already hounding Federal Reserve boss Jay Powell to reduce interest rates to cushion any impact of tariffs but with inflation ticking up, that's unlikely. And, as always, there will be continued uncertainty over whether the US president will stick by this accord or decide that other action is needed.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump announces 25% tariff on India plus penalties for buying Russian energy
Donald Trump has said he will impose a 25% tariff on goods from India, plus an additional import tax because of the country's purchasing of Russian oil. The US president said on Wednesday that India 'is our friend' but its tariffs 'are far too high' on US goods. The Republican president added that India buys military equipment and oil from Russia, which he said has enabled the war in Ukraine. As a result, he intends to charge an additional 'penalty' starting on Friday as part of the launch of revised tariffs on multiple countries.
