
Civil servants rack up £75,000 in expenses giving away Chagos Islands
Civil servants racked up almost £75,000 in expenses during the negotiations to give away the Chagos Islands, The Telegraph can reveal.
Foreign Office diplomats landed taxpayers with the large bill for travel to and from Mauritius, covering business class flights, hotel stays and taxis.
It comes on top of the estimated £9-£18 billion price that Britain will pay when handing over the strategically important Indian Ocean archipelago.
Critics said that Rachel Reeves's new Office for Value for Money (OVM) should investigate the spending, revealed by The Telegraph under freedom of information laws.
Figures released by the Foreign Office show that a team of just eight negotiators racked up the £75,000 bill.
The bulk of the spending was on 19 flights for officials on British Airways and Air Mauritius, of which 17 were business class.
The team clocked up £68,452 in air fares, with the most expensive being a return flight with BA in December which cost £6,338.
A further £3,458 was spent on hotel stays by the negotiators, at resorts in Mauritius where rooms cost up to £230 per night.
The remainder included £237 on meals, £104 for taxis and rail fares, and £1,444 worth of fees for flight changes and bookings.
The negotiations took place the end of August and in mid-December, when temperatures in the Indian Ocean islands average 27C.
At the same time Britain was battered by seasonal storms while the South of England endured its wettest Autumn in a century, according to the Met Office.
James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, said: 'Taxpayers will be horrified to hear that Labour are wasting so much money in order to negotiate wasting a whole lot more.
' Rachel Reeves's brand new OVM isn't looking at Chagos because, according to the Treasury, treaties are 'outside their remit'.
'That needs to change – wasting tens of thousands of pounds gadding about to waste billions of pounds renting islands we already own is far from value for money.'
The Foreign Office said that all the flights were in line with its 'strict rules' that business class can only be used for journeys longer than 10 hours.
It added that negotiators had only booked hotel rooms when there was not enough space to accommodate them at the High Commissioner's residence.
'In-person negotiations are essential to delivering such a complex agreement that is in the UK's national interests. In order to minimise cost, the negotiating rounds were split between the UK and Mauritius,' the department said in a statement.
The revelation comes after it emerged that Mauritius is demanding even more money from British taxpayers under the deal to hand over Chagos.
Under the controversial agreement thrashed out by Labour, the UK would already pay an estimated £9 billion to £18 billion.
No 10 would relinquish control to Mauritius, which is 1,500 miles from the archipelago and has never previously governed it.
Britain would then take out a 99-year lease on the biggest island, Diego Garcia, which is a key military base used by the US air force.
The deal has proved highly controversial in the UK and US but unexpectedly received the approval of Donald Trump at the start of this month.
Following the US president's sign off, Mauritian negotiators tabled demands for even larger lease payments and a new pot of development funding.
A Foreign Office spokesman said the negotiations in person 'were vital to delivering an agreement that secures the full operation of the base on Diego Garcia', adding: 'The UK Government has robust rules in place to ensure any expenditure is carefully checked and provides value-for-money for the taxpayer...
'As much as possible, the negotiators stayed at the High Commissioner's residence while in Mauritius for the negotiations.
'The agreement is rooted in a rational and hard-headed determination to protect UK security. Once signed it will protect the base on Diego Garcia and cement UK and US presence in the Indo-Pacific for generations to come.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
ANDREW NEIL: Starmer's claim to be 'investing in Britain's renewal' is delusional drivel in a class of its own - even for a Government that's a stranger to the truth
Our first job was to stabilise the economy and public finances,' Keir Starmer tweeted yesterday morning, a few hours before Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered Labour's spending plans for the rest of the decade. 'Now, we move into a new chapter . . . we're investing in Britain's renewal.'


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Chris Mason: Spending Review a gamble on patience in an era of impatience
The hours, days, weeks and even months after a Spending Review can feel like peeling away the layers of an there is the speech from the chancellor in the Commons: the political rhetoric and the numbers often designed to sound big but which are often there are accompanying documents - in this instance in particular a blue-covered, 128-page tome crammed with words, numbers and work of months, much of it conducted privately with intermittent blasts of authorised and unauthorised briefing, talking up and grumbling, then suddenly bursts out in public demanding digestion. But that takes time. And as the detail is pored over, elements that were not put up in lights by the chancellor become clearer.A good example is the expectation many, many people in England and Wales will be paying higher council tax to help fund the police - something not set out explicitly by Rachel Reeves at the dispatch details on what is planned are expected in the coming weeks - with the government's infrastructure plans due to be set out other elements could take much longer to play out: for example, an obscure budget in a particular department that was culled, only for an outcry in six months time. Or, conversely, a budget that hasn't been culled but is later determined to be a waste of money. Seven ways the Spending Review affects youWinners and losers: Who got what in the review?What has the chancellor has announced? The key pointsWatch: Where the money is being spent The government is seeking to badge this moment as a turning prime minister told the Cabinet and has now written in the Guardian that "this week we bettered a new stage in the mission for national renewal. Last autumn we fixed the foundations. Today we showed Britain we will rebuild."Let's curiosity here is the standard critique of political leaders is turned on its head with much of this Spending often the grumble is one of short-termism, the quick win, the lack of strategic long term yet the gamble the government has taken is a willingness for patience in an era of term, so called capital spending, can - the argument goes - transform the public realm and in so doing transform economic it doesn't happen quickly and day-to-day spending is limited, even cut in this at a time of volatile politics and a restlessness among an electorate, many of whom feel squeezed and have done for years and Chancellor Rachel Reeves acknowledged to me there was an impatience for change - the very thing Labour promised - and pointed to an expansion of entitlement to free school meals and breakfast clubs in England, for big bet though remains on economic growth - finding it and sustaining lack of it is the shackle on so much within government and beyond: the national mood, taxes, you name yes the prospect of more tax rises in the autumn will hang in the air all the big test of this Spending Review is the contribution it can make to delivering growth - and when.


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
UK issues unusual 'rising tensions' warning as US orders diplomatic evacuations
The Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO), a British maritime security agency, has taken measures following Donald Trump's move to issue evacuation orders for non-essential personnel The UK has issued an "unusual warning" to its commercial ships in the Middle East amid "rising tensions". The Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) fears "an escalation of military activity" is on the cards across the region, and believs security may be at risk. It says vessels must use the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman and Straits of Hormuz, all of which pass Iran, with caution for the forseeable future. Iran publicly threatened to attack US military bases in the Middle East if they were attacked first. Donald Trump added fuel to the fire yesterday, crassly stating the country will never have a nuclear weapon whether a deal is reached or not. 'UKMTO has been made aware of increased tensions within the region which could lead to an escalation of military activity having a direct impact on mariners. Vessels are advised to transit the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman and Straits of Hormuz with caution," the UKMTO said today. The Trump administration has issued evacuation orders for non-essential personnel at the US Embassy in Iraq, and its diplomatic facilities in Bahrain and Kuwait. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also told FOX News there would be voluntary departure for dependents of military personnel serving in the Central Command (CENTCOM) area of operations across the Middle East. This discourse led to the UKMTO advisory today as regional tensions surged. Iranian officials appeared to be responding to calls from hawks in the US to dismantle Iran's nuclear program by force if necessary. But Mr Trump was pessimistic when interviewed earlier this week. The US President said: "I don't know. I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago. Something happened to them, but I am much less confident of a deal being made." He spoke on the podcast Pod Force One on Monday, which explored in depth the tense situation across the Middle East. Meanwhile, suspected US airstrikes on Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen killed at least three people recently. Yemeni rebels said they shot down a £25m Reaper attack drone during April's onslaught, which indicated a possible US attack on Iran. It happened after the US moved six of its prized B-2 Strategic Stealth bombers to the secretive Indo-Pacific island base of Diego Garcia. Hours after the surprise announcement of the Washington-Tehran talks, Iran's foreign minister said the conversation in Oman would be "indirect" but could be "as much an opportunity as... a test." Mr Trump - who pulled the US out a 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers during his first term - said discussions would be at "very high level," as he delivered his warning to Tehran.