US alcohol consumption at record low as health concerns rise, survey finds
Gallup's latest Consumption Habits survey, conducted annually, showed that about 54% Americans reported drinking alcohol, compared with 58% in 2024 and 62% in 2023.
The figure falls below the previous record low of 55% in 1958 in the nearly nine decades of tracking by Gallup.
Alcohol sales have been falling since the pandemic drinking binge, as inflation and interest rates stretch consumer wallets. Spirit makers now also face growing warnings from public health authorities who say drinking even small amounts of alcohol is associated with at least seven types of cancer.
A majority of Americans — 53% — say moderate drinking is bad for health, Gallup found, up from 45% last year.
Fewer U.S. drinkers are consuming alcohol regularly, with a record-low 24% saying they had a drink in the previous day and 40% reporting more than a week since their last — the highest share since 2000, the survey found.
Average intake over the past seven days fell to 2.8 drinks, the lowest since 1996 and down from 3.8 a year ago, far below the 2003 peak of 5.1 drinks per week, the reports showed.
"The declines in alcohol consumption does not appear to be caused by people shifting to other mood-altering substances — in particular, recreational marijuana, which is now legal in about half of U.S. states," Lydia Saad, Gallup's director of social research, said.
Gallup has tracked Americans' drinking behavior since 1939 and their views of the health implications of moderate drinking since 2001.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
One in 10 pregnant women in Guernsey smoking at time of delivery
More than 10% of pregnant women in Guernsey said they were smoking at the time of delivery, new data says. Guernsey's Quitline and Public Health said last year, when 10.4% admitted smoking while pregnant, engagement with the smoking cessation service was "low, with women frequently declining appointments or not attending accepted appointments".The services added that further work was under way "to explore how we can improve the engagement of expectant women with services to help them quit smoking".Meanwhile, the UK reported a record low of 6.1% in the same year. The bailiwick levels were also up by 2.7% from the year bosses said pregnant women who were identified as smoking at the time of booking a maternity appointment or subsequent antenatal appointments were referred to the Quitline service on an opt-out appointments are then offered weekly for at least 12 weeks."The Quitline nurses understand that stopping smoking can feel daunting. However, it is absolutely achievable... with the friendly professional support and, where appropriate, free Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT)," the service is also the option to Health warned: "Smoking during pregnancy is harmful to both the mother and baby, and remains a significant risk factor for serious health complications."The risks of smoking in pregnancy include a greater risk of miscarriage, pre-term delivery, a low birthweight baby, stillbirth or sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)".
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump's efforts to defund Planned Parenthood threatens US healthcare system, study suggests
Planned Parenthood clinics treated people who rely on Medicaid at more than 1.5m visits in 2024, new research published on Wednesday shows. But the reproductive health giant's ability to treat those patients is now in jeopardy due to Republicans' efforts to 'defund' Planned Parenthood by kicking it out of Medicaid. Donald Trump's tax and spending package, passed in July, bans Planned Parenthood from receiving reimbursements from Medicaid, the US government's insurance program for low-income people. After Planned Parenthood sued over the ban, a judge temporarily stopped it from taking effect. If the ban moves forward, experts warn that it could cripple the entirety of the US healthcare social safety net. 'Planned Parenthood has filled a very important role in the reproductive healthcare safety net for people living on low incomes,' said Kari White, executive and scientific director at Resound Research for Reproductive Health. White was the lead author on the research paper released on Wednesday. 'Other providers have counted on them to do so. They just don't have the capacity to step in and fill the place that Planned Parenthood has had in the safety net.' In particular, White said, people will probably struggle to access contraception. After Texas started to ice Planned Parenthood out of its Medicaid program more than a decade ago, placements of contraceptive implants and IUDs – two of the most effective methods of birth control – fell by more than a third in counties that had a Planned Parenthood clinic. That indicated that those who had used Medicaid to obtain contraception at Planned Parenthood were no longer doing so. Provision of injectable contraceptives also fell; among people who used it, births covered by Medicaid rose by almost a third. Republicans have long sought to defund Planned Parenthood over the organization's commitment to providing abortions. But Planned Parenthood does not rely on Medicaid to fund its abortion provision as it is already illegal to use federal dollars, including Medicaid, to pay for the vast majority of abortions. The 1.5m visits documented in Wednesday's research paper, which was published in the medical journal Jama, only include visits for reasons other than abortion. More than 80 million people in the US use Medicaid, and 11% of female Medicaid beneficiaries who are between the ages of 15 and 49 and who receive family-planning services go to Planned Parenthood, according to an analysis by the non-profit KFF, which tracks healthcare policy. But defunding Planned Parenthood will probably hit blue states hardest, since they are home to larger numbers of Medicaid beneficiaries. About 50% of the people who visit Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties, which operates clinics in California, use Medicaid in some way, experts told the Guardian. If the defunding moves forward, the affiliate would lose roughly $50m, or half of its budget. It already went without Medicaid reimbursements for about five weeks earlier this year. 'It was a really stressful time for my staff. They have fees and bills to pay. And some of them probably were wondering if they would still have a job,' recalled Dr Janet Jacobson, the affiliate's medical director and vice-president of clinical services. 'It's hard not to take federal legislation that basically comes out and names you and threatens you and tries to defund you personally.' Jacobson is particularly worried about the future of a program at Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties that screens about 100,000 patients annually for sexually transmitted infections. Between July 2024 and June 2025, the affiliate uncovered more than 1,500 positive tests for syphilis, as well as almost 400 cases of trichomoniasis in pregnant women. Both STIs – which often do not have symptoms in their early stages – can have devastating consequences for pregnant women and their babies, such as preterm birth and birth defects. 'They haven't been able to ban abortion outright, so they're trying to take away the money for services like cancer screening, STI testing, birth control, and essentially trying to shut us down that way so that we can't provide abortion,' said Nichole Ramirez, senior vice-president of communication and donor relations at Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties. 'They're taking away this vital care from mostly underserved communities. They're willing to have an increase in STIs, have a potential increase in cancer rates so that they can try to get rid of abortion.'
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Severe' staff shortages at US veterans' hospitals, watchdog finds
The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is experiencing 'severe' staff shortages at all its hospitals, with the number of shortages increasing by 50% this fiscal year, according to a new report from the agency's independent watchdog. The report, released on Tuesday, came a day after the Guardian revealed the department had lost thousands of healthcare professionals deemed 'core' to the system under Donald Trump, without which, the agency said, 'mission-critical work cannot be completed'. The inspector general found 94% of VA facilities faced a 'severe' shortage of doctors, while 79% faced a severe shortage of nurses. Psychology was 'the most frequently reported clinical occupational staffing shortage'. A majority of VA facilities also reported severe shortages of police officers, who keep veteran patients and staff safe. The VA operates the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States, serving 9 million veterans annually. The report is required under two laws, one signed by Trump in 2017, which require the agency's inspector general annually to determine the extent of staffing shortages within each medical center. In a statement, Congressman Mark Takano of California, the ranking Democrat on the House committee on veterans' affairs, said the report 'confirms our fears' that shortages of medical staff were leading to 'decreased access and choice for veterans'. The VA press secretary, Peter Kasperowicz, told the Guardian the congressionally mandated watchdog report was 'not a reliable indicator of staffing shortages' and that it was 'completely subjective, not standardized and unreliable'. The report is based on a survey of VA medical centers in April. Since then, a Guardian review of agency staffing records found, the VA has continued to lose doctors, nurses, psychologists, social workers and other frontline medical professionals. Kasperowicz did not dispute the fact that the agency had lost thousands of 'mission-critical' healthcare workers under Trump – including after the watchdog's survey period concluded. The VA is in the midst of a department-wide reduction of 30,000 workers, which the secretary of veterans affairs, Doug Collins, said could be accomplished by September through a combination of attrition, a hiring freeze and deferred resignation program. The staff cuts, Collins said, would not affect patient care, but were 'centered on reducing bureaucracy and improving services to veterans'. In May, the Guardian reported that staff losses at the VA had led to unit closures, reduced hours of operations and exam backlogs across the hospital system.
