'They must not touch the Strait': Sicily bridge opponents vow to put up a fight
A general view shows the Strait of Messina, Italy, August 5, 2025. The area is part of the planned site for a suspension bridge connecting Sicily to mainland Italy, with construction expected to begin in the second half of 2025. REUTERS/Yara Nardi
MESSINA, Italy - Italy's decision to approve the construction between Sicily and the mainland of what would be the world's longest single-span bridge has set the stage for a legal battle that could further delay a project first conceived by the ancient Romans.
Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's right-wing government gave its final approval for the bridge over the Strait of Messina on Wednesday, earmarking 13.5 billion euros ($15.8 billion) for a project that has been under discussion for more than 50 years.
"They could offer me three times the value of my house, but that doesn't matter to me. What matters is the landscape. They must not touch the Strait of Messina," said Mariolina De Francesco, a 75-year-old living in the Sicilian city of Messina.
More than 440 properties will have to be expropriated on the Sicilian side and in the Calabria region on the mainland to make way for the 3.7-km (2.3-mile) bridge and connecting roads and railways.
"Our lawyers will take action, and we will stop them. That's guaranteed," said De Francesco, whose house lies near the site of one of the bridge's planned 399-metre-tall land towers.
Infrastructure Minister Matteo Salvini said preliminary works should start in September-October, and has promised generous compensation to those required to surrender their property. The bridge is due for completion in 2032.
The Messina Strait Company overseeing the project is bracing for a big legal fight. "(Legal appeals) certainly keep me busy because they waste a lot of our time," its CEO Pietro Ciucci told La Stampa newspaper.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Business Who loses the most from Trump's tariffs? Who wins?
Business SGX says over 30 companies in its IPO pipeline, eyes more acquisitions
World Israel security Cabinet approves plan to seize Gaza City
Singapore Four Certis officers charged after allegedly receiving over $9,700 in bribes from man
Opinion At 79, Liew Mun Leong has no time to be sentimental
Singapore Student found with vape taken to hospital after behaving aggressively in school; HSA investigating
Singapore CDC and SG60 vouchers listed on e-commerce platforms will be taken down: CDCs
World Trump urges 'conflicted' Intel CEO Tan Lip-Bu to resign immediately
Environmental groups this week filed a complaint with the European Union, flagging serious risks for the local ecosystem.
The Torre Faro district, on the northern edge of Messina, includes a nature reserve surrounding two ponds, and Calabria appears within arm's reach when strolling along the seafront.
SEISMIC RISK
Committees of 'No Bridge' residents say the area's environmental value and seismic risk make it unsuitable for the infrastructure. They also fear the works will drag on, making the neighbourhood unliveable because of the noise.
The Messina Strait Company says the bridge will be designed to withstand very strong earthquakes and will not be placed on active fault lines. It has also promised mitigation measures to safeguard habitats and protected species.
Contractual obligations will ensure that the timing and effects of construction activity, including noise, will be kept under strict control, the company added.
Supporters of the project - awarded to the Eurolink consortium led by Italy's Webuild - say it will bolster the economy of an underdeveloped region.
"The bridge could create jobs for young people, and maybe it could also change something in Sicily, where we always like to keep everything as it is," said 71-year-old Giuseppe Caruso, sitting on his bike near the beach.
Authorities have pledged strong safeguards against any mafia involvement. The two regions are home to the Cosa Nostra and 'Ndrangheta mafia organizations, which have a long history of infiltrating lucrative public works projects.
The government is also considering whether to categorise investment in the bridge as defence spending, which would help Italy meet new NATO targets to boost military budgets.
PUBLIC INTEREST
House expropriations are set to proceed gradually, in line with construction progress.
Activists and lawyers estimate some 1,000 people could lose their homes, and say the increased costs since the project was first awarded may breach European Union public procurement laws.
"We are a country governed by the rule of law within the EU, so even the government must respect the rules," said Antonio Saitta, a lawyer representing some Messina residents.
The Messina Strait Company said the rise in costs, from 8.5 billion euros in 2011 - before the project was blocked - to the current 13.5 billion euros, was due to the sharp increase in construction material prices.
Saitta said the main way of blocking the bridge was to file an appeal with an administrative court against the government's decision by the end of October.
Gianluca Maria Esposito, an administrative law professor at Sapienza University of Rome, said the public interest prevails over the private in such cases and that blocking the project would be a daunting challenge.
"The citizen is entitled to compensation but cannot claim further damages, nor can they oppose the realization of the project," he said. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
43 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Britain arrests 280 in crackdown on illegal delivery riders
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Britain's immigration enforcement officers stopped and questioned 1,780 individuals between July 20 and 27 and 280 people were arrested. LONDON – British authorities arrested almost one in five people they checked in a week-long crackdown on migrants working illegally as delivery riders in July, the government's interior ministry said on Aug 9. Immigration enforcement officers stopped and questioned 1,780 individuals between July 20 and 27 and 280 people were arrested, the interior ministry said, adding asylum support was being reviewed for 53 of those detained. The operation was part of a push by the government to tackle illegal migration which also includes new legal requirements for companies to verify workers' immigration status. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing pressure to show voters he can counter illegal immigration with support rising for Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage's Reform UK party. 'This government is making sure rules are respected and enforced,' border security minister Angela Eagle said. As well as the arrests, civil penalty notices were issued to 51 businesses, including car washes and restaurants, which could face fines for employing illegal workers, the ministry said. Police seized 71 vehicles, including 58 e-bikes, and confiscated £8,000 (S$13,833) in cash and £460,000 worth of illicit cigarettes. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump says he will meet Putin on Aug 15 in Alaska Opinion This US-India spat is going from bad to worse Asia Chinese villagers hit by worst floods in generations say they had no warning Singapore 'This is home', for retired shop owner putting up 11th flag display in Toa Payoh to mark SG60 Singapore Nation building is every Singaporean's responsibility, not the work of one party alone: Pritam Asia 'Very nerdy' hobby of doujinshi self-publishing is a growing billion-dollar market in Japan Business Are you set to retire comfortably in Singapore? Singapore Senior Gentlemen's Circus debuts to engage older men to stay active The interior ministry said immigration enforcement teams would receive a funding boost of £5 million for the work tackling illegal working. In July, the government struck a new deal with food delivery firms, including Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat, to share information aimed at preventing illegal working. In the 12 months to July, Britain returned 35,052 people with no right to remain, up 13 per cent on the previous 12 months. France this week agreed to accept some undocumented migrants who arrive in Britain by small boats with Britain accepting from France an equal number of legitimate asylum seekers with family ties in the country. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
University of California reviews US government's $1.2 billion UCLA settlement offer
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox UCLA, which is part of the University of California system, said this week the government froze US$584 million in federal funding. WASHINGTON –The University of California said on Aug 8 it was reviewing a US$1 billion (S$1.28 billion) settlement offer by US President Donald Trump's administration for UCLA after the government froze hundreds of millions of dollars in funding over pro-Palestinian protests. UCLA, which is part of the University of California system, said this week the government froze US$584 million in federal funding. Mr Trump has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian student protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza. The government alleges universities, including UCLA, allowed antisemitism during the protests, while some faculty groups have sued saying the cuts have chilled free speech. Large demonstrations took place at UCLA in 2024. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's military assault in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. 'The University of California just received a document from the Department of Justice and is reviewing it,' University of California President James Milliken said in a statement, adding the institution offered to have talks earlier this week with the government. Last week, UCLA agreed to pay over US$6 million to settle a lawsuit by some students and a professor who alleged antisemitism. It was also sued this year over a 2024 violent mob attack on pro-Palestinian protesters. In July, the government settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over US$220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay US$50 million. Both institutions accepted certain government demands. Talks to settle with Harvard University are ongoing. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump says he will meet Putin on Aug 15 in Alaska Opinion This US-India spat is going from bad to worse Asia Chinese villagers hit by worst floods in generations say they had no warning Singapore 'This is home', for retired shop owner putting up 11th flag display in Toa Payoh to mark SG60 Singapore Nation building is every Singaporean's responsibility, not the work of one party alone: Pritam Asia 'Very nerdy' hobby of doujinshi self-publishing is a growing billion-dollar market in Japan Business Are you set to retire comfortably in Singapore? Singapore Senior Gentlemen's Circus debuts to engage older men to stay active The US$1 billion settlement offer for UCLA marks an unusually high amount. The White House had no immediate comment. Experts have raised concerns about the government's federal funding threats to universities, saying they amount to an assault on free speech and academic freedom. The government has also attempted to deport some international students, over which civil rights groups have raised due process concerns. Rights advocates note a rise in antisemitism, anti-Arab bias and Islamophobia due to the conflict in the Middle East. The Trump administration has not announced equivalent probes into Islamophobia. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump administration asks to dismiss Harvard suit over foreign students
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A Harvard spokesperson said that the government's motion on Aug 8 has has no impact on the school's ability to enrol international students. WASHINGTON – The Trump administration asked a federal judge to throw out Harvard University's lawsuit over a proposed ban on international students, saying the president has broad authority to issue rules restricting the entry of non-citizens into the country. The Justice Department said in a court filing in Boston on Aug 8 that Harvard doesn't have the legal right to challenge the restrictions. The dispute involves Harvard's certification with the Student Exchange and Visitor Programme – a requirement for any university to enrol international students. In June, President Donald Trump signed an executive action that prevents foreign nationals from entering the US to study at Harvard, accusing the school of failing to implement discipline on campus and fostering a dramatic rise in crime. Mr Trump has made Harvard the main target of his effort to force universities to reshape higher education by cracking down on alleged antisemitism, removing perceived political bias among the faculty and eliminating diversity programs. Judge Allison Burroughs is expected to rule soon in another dispute over whether the government can terminate more than $2 billion in federal research funding for the school. Harvard sued the administration over the international students in May, arguing that the enrollment ban violates its due process rights and fails to follow federal regulations. Burroughs, who is overseeing multiple lawsuits between the school and the Trump administration, granted the university's request for a preliminary injunction blocking the policy, and then issued another order saying the government can't enforce Mr Trump's ban on its international students entering the US. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump says he will meet Putin on Aug 15 in Alaska Opinion This US-India spat is going from bad to worse Asia Chinese villagers hit by worst floods in generations say they had no warning Opinion Beyond the hype: Will AI eat Singapore's lunch or provide it in the future? Singapore 'This is home', for retired shop owner putting up 11th flag display in Toa Payoh to mark SG60 Singapore Nation building is every Singaporean's responsibility, not the work of one party alone: Pritam Business Are you set to retire comfortably in Singapore? Singapore Senior Gentlemen's Circus debuts to engage older men to stay active The Harvard lawsuit related to foreign students addresses both sections of the Trump policy. Compliance with the programme 'is an important requirement for hosting foreign student visa holders to ensure they are adequately monitored, disciplined, and reported on', the US said in the filing. 'Harvard was not complying with its obligations. This raised serious national security and public safety concerns, of which the President's determination is due the utmost deference.' A Harvard spokesperson said that the government's motion on Aug 8 has has no impact on the school's ability to enrol international students. 'The university will continue to defend its rights – and the rights of its students and scholars,' the spokesperson said. The Justice Department didn't immediately return a message seeking comment. The Trump administration has been trying for months to stop foreign students from enrolling at Harvard, one of several levers that could hurt the university's finances. In the last academic year, 27 per cent of Harvard students came from abroad. Ivy League settlements Harvard, the oldest and richest US college with an endowment of US$53 billion (S$68 billion), and the government have been negotiating toward a global settlement but have yet to come to a deal. Ivy League peers the University of Pennsylvania, Columbia and Brown have reached agreements in recent weeks. The White House views a payment of US$500 million by Harvard University as a floor in negotiations, and the cost of a deal could climb far higher if the school doesn't submit to government oversight provisions, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Justice Department lawyers said earlier this week that the US would no longer rely on a May 22 letter by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to justify the near-immediate ban on foreign students it sought, but plans to move forward through an administrative process to 'simplify this case and narrow the issues'. BLOOMBERG
