logo
Redrawing Texas: the Republican plan to stack the decks for the midterms

Redrawing Texas: the Republican plan to stack the decks for the midterms

Yahoo6 days ago
Experts, politicians and concerned Texans say their state could be a blueprint for Republican efforts to stave off losses in next year's elections, with some calling the GOP division a 'festering wound' in Texas – all while Donald Trump stacks the deck against potential Democratic inroads.
Last month, nearly 150 people showed up at a Tarrant county commissioners court meeting in north Texas. The packed building wasn't used to such a high volume of visitors, but the day's key vote had been hotly contested for weeks.
In an unusual move, the commissioners court initiated a redistricting process that both liberal and conservative voters widely criticized. One map, as proposed, would essentially funnel more people of color away from precinct 2 and into precinct 1, thereby creating an opening for a GOP that has historically underperformed with people of color. The map's staunchest critics called the map 'racial gerrymandering', while the county judge, Tim O'Hare, claimed it was just about politics.
'It's purely partisan,' he told a local TV station in the days before the vote. 'At the end of the day, I'm doing it to put another Republican on the commissioners court, period, the end.'
At the 3 June meeting, dozens of speakers rose to voice their concerns, and several were kicked out of the meeting by O'Hare.
'Your constituents are telling you that they do not want these maps,' one woman said during the public comment section. She was then removed from the building.
The controversial map was approved by a 3-2 vote. Shortly afterward, the Trump administration said it wanted more maps to be redrawn in Texas before the 2026 midterms – and the governor, Greg Abbott, said on Wednesday that a special legislative session called for later this month would pick up that cause.
Amid a heated Senate primary race and Trump's slipping approval rating, Brandon Rottinghaus, a political scientist at the University of Houston who has extensively researched the Texas GOP, said 'partisan leaders are always looking for an edge'.
'Redistricting gives them the clearest opportunity to increase their strength and numbers. Tarrant county is the last big urban purple county and Republicans definitely want to plant their flag deeply there,' he continued.
Bob Stein, a gerrymandering expert at Rice University in Houston, echoed Rottinghaus's comments.
'Republicans are afraid they're going to lose upwards of three to four seats in Louisiana, California and New York and probably New Jersey,' he said. 'In fact, some of the privileged stuff I get to see says it could be a complete sweep. So what they want to do is get going now, and what you're seeing in Tarrant county is the effect of that.'
Multiple experts and politicians interviewed for this story pointed out how Texas isn't as conservative as one might think. Rather, Texans just don't vote enough.
A little over 60% of eligible Texas voters cast ballots in the 2024 election, which was six percentage points lower than the total in 2020. Most recently, fewer than 8% of Tarrant county voters cast ballots in May's local elections.
Beto O'Rourke, a Democrat, received more votes in Tarrant county in 2018 than the Republican senator Ted Cruz, and both Joe Biden and recent Cruz challenger Colin Allred also won Tarrant county in their respective races.
All of this spells trouble for the GOP as it prepares for 2026, especially in light of a GOP primary race that has already gotten personal.
Senator John Cornyn, who has been in office since 2002, is being challenged by the state attorney general, Ken Paxton, whose controversies include an attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election and an impeachment on charges of bribery, obstruction of justice, harassment and abuse of office.
Cornyn, who is typically seen as a more traditional Republican, has attacked Paxton's character, using terms such as 'conman' and 'fraud' to describe his opponent. Paxton, for his part, has cast Cornyn as an establishment figure out of touch with Texas.
'The split in the Republican party will definitely be on full display in this election,' Rottinghaus said. 'The establishment Republicans are very worried about losing the seat. You can see that in all the polling. You can see that in their attitudes and actions in how they're giving money and which staff are supporting which candidate. I mean, this is a wound that's been festering for a long time. It has not been sutured closed, and it may never be.'
The worry from the GOP, Rottinghaus added, is that a Paxton primary win could pave the way for a Democrat to mount a successful challenge in 2026.
Ken Shimamoto, a Fort Worth resident who opposed his county's recent redistricting, is following the Cornyn-Paxton primary race and displeased by what he sees. But he was not surprised.
'Everybody hates Ted Cruz, but Cornyn seemed the more reasonable senator until Paxton mounted his challenge,' he said. 'And ever since then, it seems like Cornyn has been bending over backwards to appease Donald Trump.'
Some of Cornyn's bending has been overt, such as posting a photo of himself reading Trump's book The Art of the Deal with a one-word caption: 'Recommended.'
Other efforts have been less obvious but far more insidious.
Three days after Paxton announced his challenge, Cornyn asked the Department of Justice to investigate the East Plano Islamic Center's plans to build a community around a mosque. Without evidence, the senator claimed such a project could constitute religious discrimination.
Despite widespread criticism (the Council on American-Islamic Relations called Cornyn's complaint 'factually baseless'), the justice department opened an investigation – only to close it roughly a month later.
To Texans like Shimamoto, as well as the political scientists interviewed for this story, there's a clear tie between gerrymandering and races like the Cornyn-Paxton fight. Only the most extreme candidates win in a primary, which means conservatives must run further right if they hope to triumph or keep the seat they already have.
'We've been gerrymandered to death,' said Allison Campolo, who lives in Fort Worth and is running to be chair of the Tarrant county Democratic party. 'That really drives down engagement. It prevents people from knowing what their elected representatives are doing and how it affects them.'
At the same time, politicians like Cornyn, Paxton and even Trump are unpopular in Texas. Recent polls show a majority of Texans disapprove of Trump, while only 29% of the state's residents currently approve of Paxton's performance. For Cornyn, that number is 24%.
Theoretically, this is good news for people upset about redistricting efforts or unhappy with their current leadership – but only if they vote.
'Texans have to continue to vote and make their voices heard,' said Democratic House representative Marc Veasey, whose district includes part of Fort Worth.
On redistricting, Veasey said that it was already being challenged in court on the basis that it violates both the constitution and the Voting Rights Act. To defend against the lawsuit, the commissioners court once again voted 3-2 to hire a law firm called the Public Interest Legal Foundation – the same firm that led the redistricting process.
As disheartening as this may be, Veasey urged Texans to 'not give up', saying: 'Texans can continue to tune in, not out. Continue to fight, vote, and make your voices heard.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Gets Silver Lining in New Poll As More Voters Approve of Economy
Trump Gets Silver Lining in New Poll As More Voters Approve of Economy

Newsweek

time2 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Gets Silver Lining in New Poll As More Voters Approve of Economy

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump can take heart from a new Fox News poll that shows rating for the economy improving and feelings on the economic direction inching up even though a majority of voters disapprove of the job he is doing, dislike his new budget law, and doubt his dealings with Iran are making the U.S. safer. The poll was conducted from July 18-21 and is based on interviews with a sample of 1,000 randomly selected voters. Why It Matters The poll is a wide-ranging survey of voter feelings six months after Trump began his second term and comes as his administration is engulfed in a political crisis over the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The poll found that only 13 percent of respondents think the government has been open and transparent about the case. President Donald Trump bangs a gavel after signing the "Big Beautiful Bill Act" at the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4, 2025. President Donald Trump bangs a gavel after signing the "Big Beautiful Bill Act" at the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4, 2025. Brendan SMIALOWSKI / POOL / AFP/Getty Images What To Know Thirty-two percent of voters rate economic conditions positively, the Fox poll shows. That is the highest number, by one percentage point, in about a year. On a personal level, 44 percent rate their financial situation positively, up from 39 percent in March and 38 percent in December. The poll found that 71 percent of respondents said inflation caused them financial hardship in the last six months but that is the lowest number since 2021, and down from a high of 78 percent in 2022, Fox said. The hardship is evenly distributed with large shares of Democrats (79 percent), independents (74 percent), and Republicans (62 percent) saying they felt it. "Overall, 56 percent are dissatisfied with the direction the country is taking. The silver lining is that's an improvement: 68 percent were dissatisfied at the end of last year, and it was 66 percent last summer," Fox said. On the president's key budget legislation, the "The One Big Beautiful Bill," or OBBB, Fox said "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." More respondents disapprove (58 percent) of the legislation than approve (39 percent) and more than twice as many think the law will hurt rather than help their family. Unsurprisingly, opposition to the budget comes from a large majority of Democrats, (89 percent) and independents (70 percent), but also one in five Republicans (21 percent). The poll found that significant shares of Trump's base oppose the bill, including 52 percent of rural voters, 46 percent of white men without a college degree, and 37 percent of white evangelical Christians, Fox said. The elements of the law that voters most dislike are increasing the debt ceiling (74 percent), reducing food stamp funding (65 percent), and making tax cuts permanent for those with higher incomes (64 percent). The most popular elements include removing taxes on tips (70 percent), making tax cuts permanent for those with yearly income of less than $250,000 (68 percent), and increasing military spending (61 percent), Fox said. "The survey reveals the greatest ideological agreement is on ending taxes on tips and making tax cuts to lower-income individuals permanent, as majorities of Democrats, Republicans, and independents approve—as well as on increasing the debt limit, as majorities of each disapprove," Fox said. Trump gets his best marks on border security with 56 percent approval compared with 44 percent disapproval. Voters are more disapproving of the job he is doing on other top issues such as immigration (48 percent approve and 51 percent disapprove), foreign policy (45 percent approve and 54 percent disapprove), the economy (44 percent approval, 55 percent disapproval), and inflation and tariffs (36 approve while 62 percent disapprove on both). "Currently, 46 percent of voters approve of Trump's performance, while 54 percent disapprove. That's exactly where things stood last month, and better than at this point eight years ago when 41 percent approved," Fox said. Attitudes on the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were mixed, with 47 percent approving and 50 percent disapproving. On whether the strikes were mostly successful or mostly a failure, 31 percent thought the former and 27 percent the latter with the highest share, 42 percent, saying it was too soon to say. On the Epstein case, only 13 percent think the government has been open and transparent about it, with more than five times as many, 67 percent disagreeing with that, including 60 percent of Republicans and 56 percent of MAGA supporters. One voter in five says they haven't been following the case, Fox said. What People Are Saying Fox News said: "Six months into Donald Trump's second presidency, the political tea leaves are muddled." On Iran, Fox said: "Bottom line, 43 percent think Trump's dealings with Iran have made the U.S. less safe, which is 15 points higher than the 28 percent who say the country is safer," Fox said. What Happens Next The poll indicates that the Epstein case could sap Trump's support but sustained perceptions of an improving economy should help him.

With no guarantee of an EU-U.S. trade deal, Europe keeps its options open
With no guarantee of an EU-U.S. trade deal, Europe keeps its options open

CNBC

time2 minutes ago

  • CNBC

With no guarantee of an EU-U.S. trade deal, Europe keeps its options open

A trade agreement between the European Union and U.S. could be imminent, however with no guarantees Brussels continues to prepare retaliatory measures. A 15% baseline tariff rate, which includes an around 4.8% duty currently in place, is currently the base-case scenario for EU imports to the U.S., an EU diplomat told CNBC on Wednesday. However, there could also be some exemptions that are still being worked out, they added. The EU may in turn reduce its own levies on the U.S., according to the diplomat. Negotiations between the U.S. and EU have been tough going with pressure mounting ahead of the Aug. 1 deadline which would see imports from the EU to the U.S. hit with a 30% tariff. While this is lower than the 50% rate Trump had previously threatened, it would likely still heavily impact businesses and economies in both the EU and the U.S. "Relative to the risk of much higher extra tariffs such as 30% or even 50% that Trump had occasionally muted before, that would be a positive outcome," Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg, commented in a note. But the deal is by no means done yet, with an EU diplomat telling CNBC the "final decision [is] in hands of President Trump." A second EU official also appeared hesitant, telling CNBC that media reports that the EU and the U.S. are closing in on a deal are "too optimistic." "Contacts between both sides continue, but until President Trump speaks his mind we don't have anything concrete. Everything still remains in the open," they said. Trump's administration appeared to strike a similar tone Wednesday. When asked about the potential for a 15% tariff rate, White House Deputy Press Secretary Kush Desai said discussions about any potential trade deals should be considered "speculation," according to a report from Reuters. Trump is notorious for last minute changes of heart and making quick decisions, the latest example of which took place earlier this week on the U.S.-Japan trade deal. During a meeting between Trump and the Japanese delegation, discrepancies and edits were seen on a card outlining the deal on Trump's desk, according to a photo posted on X by Dan Scavino, the White House deputy chief of staff. Despite European markets on Thursday being buoyed by the prospect of a deal, the uncertainty surrounding what a EU-U.S. agreement could look like remains. In the meantime the EU is still working on countermeasures it could impose if U.S. tariffs do come into effect next week. Primarily, these are set to include retaliatory tariffs which could come into force just days after the U.S.' duties. Under the EU's new plan, previously prepared lists of countermeasures targeting goods, will be combined in one list, totalling 93 billion euros ($109.4 billion). There has also been widespread talk about the EU deploying its so-called "Anti-Coercion Instrument," which has been described as the "nuclear option." If enforced, U.S. suppliers could face restricted access to the EU market. For example they would be unable to participate in public tenders in the bloc, there could be curbs on exports and imports, and foreign direct investment could be limited. While France has so far been the only country to call "for immediate establishment of coercion," if no agreement is struck, "there seems to be a broad qualified majority voting for establishing coercion," the EU diplomat told CNBC.

The Epstein files are roiling the House GOP, and there's no end in sight
The Epstein files are roiling the House GOP, and there's no end in sight

CNN

time2 minutes ago

  • CNN

The Epstein files are roiling the House GOP, and there's no end in sight

President Donald Trump has helped Speaker Mike Johnson survive every political storm of his speakership. Now, Johnson is stuck in a crisis of Trump's own making over Jeffrey Epstein — and there's no clear way forward without risking the ire of the speaker's most critical ally. Despite Johnson's efforts to quell the furor inside the GOP this week, he and Trump are now getting an outcome they'd sought to avoid after House Republicans joined Democrats on Wednesday for a high-stakes vote demanding the release of the Epstein files. The move took place in a House Oversight subcommittee and will soon require the GOP-led panel to sign off on a subpoena to Trump's Justice Department. Johnson knew in advance that tensions could escalate. Kentucky Rep. James Comer, who leads that Oversight panel, told CNN he cautioned Johnson last week that his panel would likely move forward with a subpoena related to Epstein if given the chance. 'People overwhelmingly want to do it,' Comer recalled of his conversation with Johnson. The Kentucky Republican also moved ahead with his own subpoena on Wednesday, demanding information from a high-profile Epstein associate. Republicans acknowledge their GOP speaker is trying to walk an impossible tight rope, yielding to Trump while also signaling support to members who wanted to see some action. But he ended the week under fire from hardliners and moderates alike over his handling of the supercharged issue that has dogged their party throughout July. Just weeks after his single biggest legislative victory, Johnson and his leadership team are now retreating into the five-week summer recess under a cloud of Epstein drama, with leadership even sending members home a day early rather than face a barrage of Democratic votes. 'There's a lot of frustration,' said one GOP lawmaker who has worked closely with leadership on the issue and was granted anonymity to discuss private conversations. 'We don't want to be adversarial with the President … but eventually you gotta call a play.' While his own members have clamored to vote to release the Epstein files, some complained that Johnson instead showed such deference to Trump that he didn't act at all. GOP leaders declined to bring any measure on Epstein to the floor, even if it meant shutting down all substantive work in the House in its final week of work until after Labor Day. 'To be accused of trying to cover up for a pedophile, it's detestable,' that GOP member said, explaining why GOP members were pushing leadership for a chance to vote on the issue. The nasty intra-GOP fight over Epstein paralyzed the House this week, with Johnson's own Rules Committee effectively shut down as Democrats flooded the panel with Epstein-related measures. Those members didn't want to go on the record against the measures without a clearer plan from Johnson. (Johnson himself had negotiated an agreement with the Rules panel on an Epstein transparency measure last week, but he didn't call it to the floor this week, to the surprise of some members.) Democrats continued to force the issue through committee work on Wednesday. In the House Committee on Education and Workforce, Democrats were planning to offer two amendments related to Epstein on an unrelated bill about human trafficking, but Republicans on the panel pulled the bill, a committee source told CNN. The committee then moved into recess. Behind the scenes, Johnson and his leadership team have told members they do not want to bring up an Epstein measure — even one that's nonbinding — because they don't want to split the party, and are hoping the courts will handle the issue in August, according to two people familiar with the matter. Johnson himself cited legal reasons not to release the files, such as victim information. And given how much Democrats have seized on the issue, Johnson has argued that continuing to take votes would just play into Democratic hands. Still, multiple other GOP sources told CNN that they believe Johnson is intentionally trying to avoid crossing the White House on this issue. Trump himself appears not to have gotten involved in the growing tension in the House conference. When some members arrived at the White House on Tuesday for an event, a group of Rules Committee members were brought into the Oval Office, according to the GOP member. Some were privately worried he might try to confront them about the Epstein resolution. Instead, he allowed them to watch him negotiate for Japan, thanking them for coming and giving them a White House Challenge Coin souvenir. Johnson defended his position on Wednesday, arguing that there was 'no daylight' between him and his conference, nor between House Republicans and the president. He pushed back on suggestions that the House had been brought to a standstill to avoid taking Epstein votes, insisting Republicans 'don't have any fear' and instead turned the blame on Democrats. 'No one in Congress is blocking Epstein documents. No one in Congress is doing that. What we're doing here, Republicans are preventing Democrats from making a mockery of the Rules Committee process because we refuse to engage in their political charade,' he said. He said that Congress 'will evaluate any necessary measures' to undertake if the Trump administration convinces courts to unseal the grand jury transcripts in the Epstein investigation. (The administration has already run into an early legal roadblock, with the judge blocking their request ). But Johnson also struck a careful balance when asked if he backed Comer's effort to subpoena convicted Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell. 'Every single one of us are for maximum transparency, and we'll use every power that we have to ensure that that's done. If they see fit to bring in Ghislaine Maxwell for testimony, that's fine,' he said when asked by CNN if he backed Comer's move, though he then raised questions about her credibility. 'Can we trust what she's gonna say?' With the House now gone for five weeks, Johnson and his team have a temporary reprieve from the outrage over Epstein. But it won't last long. Just days after lawmakers return in September, Johnson will have to deal with a rogue push by a gang of GOP hardliners to force a full vote for the release of the Epstein files on the floor of the House. That group of roughly a dozen Republicans, led by Rep. Thomas Massie, are using a maneuver known as a discharge petition to circumvent Johnson and force a bill to the floor with the help of Democrats. Massie has been vocal that if GOP leaders attempt to kill his maneuver, they'll lose their majority next November. 'The Epstein files are symbolic of what energized MAGA, which was this notion that you could give Republicans both majorities and put Donald Trump in the White House, and this group of people that were so powerful and so rich that they couldn't be touched by the law or by the judicial system, would finally get exposed,' Massie said. 'And if people believe that whole deal was off, that Trump and the Republicans aren't going to do that anymore, then they're going to be apathetic and disengaged in the midterms.' Johnson may have no choice but to bring the measure to the floor. Republicans on the House Rules panel have already warned Johnson they will not help him kill the resolution, as he's sought to do with similar rogue pushes from members, according to the GOP member involved in the talks. In the meantime, though, Johnson has privately urged his conference – including in a closed-door meeting on Tuesday – to give the Trump administration time to handle the investigation. He and his leadership believe the White House will take its own steps to address the matter over the August recess. Republicans feeling the heat back home from constituents, though, do not think more time away from Congress will sap momentum on the issue. And many have directly expressed their frustrations with House GOP leadership. GOP Rep. Eric Burlison of Missouri, who supports the release of the Epstein files, said that Epstein-related calls are the number one his office is receiving. 'It's the number one phone call that we get. By far. It's probably 500 to one,' he said. Burlison said he doesn't blame Johnson, but that each member needs to deal with it on their own. 'The American people have felt like this government keeps secrets from them for decades, right? Here we have one big national scandal slash conspiracy that we were this close to getting the details on so that's why the fact it isn't happening is just fanning flames of more conspiracy. People are assuming the worst and they are going to until the details get released,' Burlison said. And some Republicans are frustrated that Johnson's own messaging has been, at times, unclear. For instance, some were upset that Johnson called on Congress to 'put everything out there' on Epstein on a conservative podcast – just after he had instructed his own Rules Committee to take a vote rejecting Democrats' Epstein transparency push. They argued that the disconnect in the GOP message opened up their own members to vulnerabilities, such as Democratic attacks, and only fueled more scrutiny in Congress. Rep. Ralph Norman, who sits on the House Rules Committee and did vote for that Democratic transparency measure, warned that the pressure for the administration to release information related to Epstein will not die down during the time that the House is in its weeks-long August recess. 'It's not going to die down. I know. If you assume that, the public decides that anyway. I don't assume anything, particularly this. This transcends politics. This is about 13, 14, 15-year-old girls getting abused. Nah, this is above politics. This is beyond politics,' Norman told CNN. (Other members are irked that members like Norman have backed the Democratic amendments and have signed onto Massie's discharge petition, and yet continue to sit on Johnson's powerful Rules panel.) Even some Republicans who are demanding votes on Epstein transparency measures acknowledge the difficult position Johnson is in. 'I think the Speaker is doing the job he has to do' GOP Rep. Scott Perry told CNN. Perry was one of the House Republicans who defied their own leadership to vote to subpoena the Department of Justice files related to Jeffrey Epstein. 'I just think it's important that the American people know what's occurred,' Perry later told CNN. GOP Rep. Keith Self added, 'Speaker Johnson has a tough job. I think he's doing a great job managing all of the influences in our conference, so I'll leave it at that.' House GOP Conference Chair Lisa McClain argued that Republicans have to strike a balance but not let Democrats push them off message as they head back to their districts for five weeks. 'They need to do what they think is right for their district,' McClain told CNN when asked about the advice she'd give to members addressing the issue back home. 'But number two, focus on the 'One Big Beautiful bill' and all the wins that we're getting.' CNN's Nicky Robertson, Veronica Stracqualursi and Morgan Rimmer contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store