Dubai and Abu Dhabi's haven status tested by Mideast crisis
By Tuesday morning, just hours after Iran hit a US base in nearby Qatar and the UAE briefly closed its airspace, it was already business as usual in the financial centers of Dubai and Abu Dhabi.
ALSO READ: UAE sees surge in foreign-owned real estate firms An executive at one of Abu Dhabi's wealth funds said it was proceeding as planned with deals and investments, even encouraging foreign executives to visit for meetings. In Dubai, bankers were quick to relay optimism that the UAE would sidestep any major fallout. But while a ceasefire announced by US President Donald Trump appears to be holding, some executives acknowledge an undercurrent of nervousness because the geopolitical risks of the Middle East have come so sharply to the fore.
ALSO READ: Big changes ahead in passports for Indians in UAE in 2025 The stakes for the global financial community are particularly high in the UAE, which has attracted international billionaires looking to safeguard their wealth as well as Wall Street banks and hedge funds looking to expand. Abu Dhabi has been on a dealmaking spree with its $1.7 trillion sovereign wealth pile. Meanwhile, Dubai's property prices have surged 70% over four years propelled by buyers from around the world. 'I think the current situation is contained. But what happened is significant — it's a signal that no action is off-limits anymore,' said Hussein Nasser-Eddin, chief executive of Dubai-based security services provider Crownox, referring to the attack in Qatar, which like the UAE is a long-time ally of the US.
ALSO READ: UAE Golden Visa vs Trump's EB-5: Which one fits your residency goals? Nasser-Eddin said his firm — which provides travel security, protective and risk advisory services — has seen a rise in contingency planning requests in the Gulf in the last couple days. Companies have asked for details of Crownox's cross-border capabilities, essentially wanting to know if it could 'save the day' if things went wrong, he said.
Even such lingering concerns haven't been enough to deter those investing or living in the UAE. More than a dozen bankers, hedge fund and sovereign wealth fund executives interviewed by Bloomberg News said they haven't seen signs of capital flight or firms considering a pullback. They asked not be named because they weren't authorized to speak to the media. UAE stocks, which sank at the outbreak of the Israeli strikes on Iran, have not just recouped those losses but scaled new highs in tandem with US stocks. Dubai's equity benchmark is trading almost 3% higher than before the conflict, reaching the highest level since the 2008 global financial crisis. Abu Dhabi's index has added more than 1% and is at the highest since January. Both indexes are rising faster than the global benchmark MSCI ACWI. 'I believe that the safe-haven status will continue, the macro story remains robust and the reform program compelling. We continue to expect capital and population inflows in the medium-term,' Monica Malik, chief economist at Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC, said about the UAE. 'The fact that there were no economic disruptions and the ceasefire are positive.' Historically, Dubai has benefitted from periods of unrest not just regionally but elsewhere too. Most recently, after the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, some Russians bought Dubai real estate. Property prices have been shooting up since the pandemic. Still, the emirate's population is largely made of expatriates and any pullback from them would also dent the housing market, which makes up more than a third of the city's gross domestic product.'We had a period of 48 hours where buyers were reluctant to pull the trigger,' said Myles Bush, chairman of brokerage Phoenix Homes. 'However, now it's business as usual and buyer confidence has bounced back.'While market sentiment hasn't been affected so far, a resumption of hostilities may shake confidence, said Anna Kirichenko, a property broker who has worked in Dubai since 2007.There is also the potential for other economic fallout. Despite airspace closures ending and the ceasefire, several global airlines are still avoiding Dubai to ensure the safety of crew and passengers amid geopolitical tensions. Among them are Singapore Airlines, Air India Ltd. and United Airlines Holdings Inc. The aviation sector supported 27% of Dubai's GDP in 2023, according to a report by Emirates, contributing nearly $40 billion to the city's economy. Dubai and Abu Dhabi have in recent years attracted expatriates and financial firms partly because of the UAE's easy visa policies, low taxes and convenient time zone between East and West. The regulator for Dubai's financial center said it had contacted a number of firms, who reported normal business activity.A management consultant said it would take a far more devastating strike — such as one on a population center — to derail the UAE's haven status and its internationalization drive. IPO bankers in the UAE have said that their post-summer pipeline hasn't been affected by the geopolitical turmoil. Even in nearby Doha, the capital of Qatar, one banker said work had resumed as if the attack on the US base had never taken place. To be sure, plenty of risks remain. Even after the truce was announced, there appeared to be early breaches by both sides that caused Trump to issue angry warnings. US intelligence findings have also shown that American air strikes had only a limited impact on Iran's nuclear program, while Trump has maintained the sites were completely destroyed. Still, executives were reassured because Iran appeared to have provided warnings before the attack and the UAE — which also houses US military personnel — wasn't targeted. The chain of events suggests that officials in the Gulf had been able to manage the crisis from behind the scenes, one Dubai-based portfolio manager said.Ken Moelis, the veteran Wall Street dealmaker with close ties to the Middle East, characterized turbulence in the region as an opportunity for one of the most optimistic changes in the Gulf for a long time. He highlighted opportunities such as the potential impact of unlocking Iranian oil reserves and opening up the country's labor market, assuming sanctions are lifted.'All I hear about is what if the peace doesn't hold,' Moelis said in an interview on Bloomberg Television Wednesday. 'I haven't heard one person say, 'What if the 90 million population of highly educated motivated Iranians come into the market?''
(Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Profits plenty, prices attractive, still PSU stocks languish. Why?
Why Sebi must give up veto power over market infra institutions
Oil, war, and the Hormuz gambit: Why the 2025 standoff won't mirror the 2022 shock!
Second only to L&T, but controversies may weaken this infra powerhouse's growth story
Stock Radar: Titan Company bounces back after testing 200-DMA in June; breaks out from 1-month consolidation – what should investors do?
Long- or medium-term investing: Invest in ability & balance sheet; 6 large-caps from different sectors, with upside potential of up to 36%
Weekly Top Picks: These stocks scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus
These large- and mid-cap stocks can give more than 23% return in 1 year, according to analysts
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fibre2Fashion
6 minutes ago
- Fibre2Fashion
ICE cotton futures steady as crude gains, market awaits USDA data
ICE cotton futures remained stable amid rising crude oil prices and weakness in the grain market. Costlier crude oil supported US cotton, while weaker grains exerted pressure. Traders are awaiting the USDA weekly export sales report, due Thursday, which will provide a clearer outlook on global demand. India's removal of the import duty on cotton is also viewed as a short-term positive for global cotton trade. ICE's most active December 2025 contract settled at 67.60 cents per pound (0.453 kg), up 0.04 cent. Other contracts closed between 39 points higher and 20 points lower. Trading volume was 19,595 contracts, the second-lightest of 2025 (lowest was 18,619 on July 23), compared with 32,375 contracts cleared yesterday. ICE deliverable No. 2 cotton inventory fell to 16,006 packages on August 19, from 17,017 packages the prior day. ICE cotton futures held steady as rising crude oil prices supported fibre competitiveness while weak grains capped gains. India's suspension of its cotton import duty until September 30 offers short-term trade support. With low trading volumes and inventories falling, the market awaits USDA export data and Jerome Powell's Jackson Hole speech for clearer direction. Crude oil prices rose about 2 per cent on a larger-than-expected US crude draw, while Ukraine conflict talks and Russian crude sanctions remained in focus. Rising crude oil costs increased polyester fibre prices, indirectly supporting cotton's competitiveness. India suspended its 11 per cent cotton import tariff until September 30, signalling support for the apparel industry. Experts consider this a short-term positive for global cotton trade. The market continues to move in line with recent months, awaiting a catalyst for a directional shift. Attention is now on Thursday's USDA weekly export sales report, expected to shed light on US cotton demand, and Fed Chair Jerome Powell's Jackson Hole speech on Friday, which will guide the interest rate outlook. Currently, ICE cotton for December 2025 traded at 67.61 cents per pound (up 0.01 cent). Cash cotton stood at 65.39 cents (up 0.39 cent), the October 2025 contract at 66.64 cents (up 0.39 cent), the March 2026 contract at 69.25 cents (up 0.01 cent), the May 2026 contract at 70.50 cents (down 0.02 cent), and the July 2026 contract at 71.25 cents (up 0.01 cent). A few contracts remained unchanged, with no trading recorded today. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (KUL)
Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Starlink customers in India will be able to use Aadhaar for e-KYC verification
Billionaire Elon Musk-owned Starlink, which is gearing up to provide satellite internet services in India, has received clearance to carry out Aadhaar-based verification of potential customers in the country. The satellite-based internet service provider has been onboarded by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) as a Sub-Authentication User Agency (Sub-AUA) and sub-eKYC user agency, according to a press release issued by the Union Ministry of Electronics and IT (MeitY) on Wednesday, August 20. Sub AUAs are entities that rely on an existing primary AUA to connect to the UIDAI's central data repository for Aadhaar authentication. Similarly, sub-eKYC user agencies use eKYC user agencies to carry out online verification of customers via Aadhaar data. Notably, the ministry has stated that Aadhaar-based eKYC of Starlink customers will be on a voluntary basis as per existing norms. 'Starlink will use Aadhaar Authentication for customer verification, which will make the entire process smooth, secure and very easy,' it added. The UIDAI onboarding of Starlink comes more than a month after the SpaceX subsidiary received the last remaining regulatory clearance from the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorisation Centre (IN-SPACe) to start offering satcom services in India. Starlink has been looking to launch services in India for several years now. It has faced licensing hurdles and clashed with Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel, the country's telecom giants, over how frequency for such airwaves should be assigned to satcom operators. The Aadhaar-based verification of Starlink customers in India will be done in compliance with regulatory requirements while delivering high-speed internet to households, businesses, and institutions, the press release read. Earlier this month, Pemmasani Chandra Sekhar, the minister of state (MoS) for communications, said that Starlink had agreed to store the network data, traffic, and other data locally in India. Starlink is the third satcom operator to secure all clearances for offering satellite internet services in India. Other players include Bharti-backed Eutelsat OneWeb and Reliance Jio-SES. Tech giants Amazon Kuiper and Apple vendor Globalstar have also reportedly filed applications to acquire satcom licences in India. As for Starlink, it may still have some work to do, including setting up ground infrastructure and carrying out testing in line with security standards. Crucially, satcom operators have not been allocated spectrum as the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) is yet to outline the rules for the same. In May this year, the DoT issued guidelines for satcom companies operating in India. As per these guidelines, companies are required to set up local manufacturing, data localisation, use domestic navigation systems, implement a blocking mechanism, and cooperate with law enforcement agencies, among other norms.
Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Terms of Trade: From strategic ally to voodoo doll
When Donald Trump unfairly singled India for an additional 25% duty because of Russian oil imports – China imports more Russian crude than India – there were many theories of what led to the move. White House Counsellor for Trade and Manufacturing Peter Navarro's opinion piece in the Financial Times on Monday has finally made things clear. India is being punished not just for buying Russian oil but also its trade with Russia in things such as military hardware. India is being punished not just for buying Russian oil but also its trade with Russia in things such as military hardware. (REUTERS) 'The Biden administration largely looked the other way at this strategic and geopolitical madness. The Trump administration is confronting it…This two-pronged policy will hit India where it hurts — its access to US markets — even as it seeks to cut off the financial lifeline it has extended to Russia's war effort. If India wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one', Navarro writes. Subsequent statements from the White House and even Trump have supported Navarrro's arguments. To be sure, even before this blunt official declaration, there were voices, such as a Wall Street Journal Editorial, which had argued that Trump was using the additional tariffs on India to send a signal to Russia before the Putin-Trump talks that the US will do all it can (with China it cannot) to hurt the Russian oil revenues which are extremely critical to its overall economic fortunes. India, in other words, is now the proverbial voodoo doll which Trump is putting needles into to hurt a bigger adversary, namely, Putin. That the bilateral relationship has come to this from the MAGA+MIGA=MEGA wordplay Trump and Modi engaged in earlier this year, says a lot about how fast things have gone bad. Let us for a moment assume that India were to follow Navarro's advice and align itself completely with US's or rather Trump defined US interests. Will it necessarily entail a better future? Ukraine is the perfect counterfactual to disabuse anybody of this notion. The Financial Times has reported earlier this week that Trump has given some vague security assurances to Ukraine in the possible aftermath of a deal with the Russians on the condition that it buys $100 billion (it is almost half of Ukraine's nominal GDP) worth of US armaments. Apparently, the Europeans will finance the buying. 'Asked on Monday at the White House about further US military aid for Ukraine, Trump said: 'We're not giving anything. We're selling weapons,' the FT reported. Trump's conduct with Ukraine will be an important lesson for all countries who have been thinking of the US on the lines of 'a friend in need is a friend indeed'. As is obvious, this compromises the very core of the recently brewing strategic alliance between India and the US; the project of containing China. What do all these facts entail for India's positioning in the current world order? This is a question which ought to be asked beyond the optics of the diplomatic dance India is doing with Russia and China . Geopolitics is essentially the art of building self-serving relationships and promiscuity, ideological or vis-à-vis partners, is always par for the course. The Soviet Union was an important ally of communist China in its early phase, but China started treating it as its biggest enemy in Mao's lifetime itself. China bombed communist Vietnam to pretty much give the same Voodoo treatment to the Soviet Union which the US is trying to do to Russia by punishing India for its Russian oil imports. West Asia is a never-ending tale of so-called strategic alliances disappearing and reappearing with the only constant feature being disorder and misery. The country/regime which eventually wins this game is not the one which is seen as winning the short-time bargain or pulling off a momentary chutzpah but the one which manages to align, or even better, shape the glacial flow of geopolitics and economics to dovetail it to its own national interest. This is where the Chinese will always be grateful to Deng Xiaoping who saw a material benefit, and not just a schadenfreude (of hurting the Soviet Union) point in making a pivot to the US. 'As we look back, we find that all those countries that were with the United States have become rich, whereas all those against the United States have remained poor. We shall be with the United States', Deng is supposed to have said onboard his aircraft while going on his first visit to the US in 1979. This premise held for almost the entire period from the end of the second world war until 2016, had some sort of a dead cat bounce under Biden and is finally atrophying under the second Trump administration. As Navarro's FT piece suggests and Trump himself has declared multiple times, now countries that are with the US ought to make it rich rather than the other way round. The US today is an empire in decline which is making a last-ditch effort to cushion its productive capital by providing fiscal largesse at home and snatching some foreign markets abroad while making it politically palatable by selling populism as economic liberation to the underclass. This strategy boat has too many holes – fiscal deficit, debt, tariff induced inflation or even a jeopardising of the dollar's global dominance etc. – to sail securely for long. Ultimately, a time will come when something will give. This, however, is neither going to happen tomorrow, nor is it going to be a painless exercise. What India needs to work on in the interim is clearly flag what its larger national interest is —overtures to adversaries such as China or strategic alliances which land as voodoo dolls are not – and work towards achieving this goal in the medium to long term . If all the (geopolitics in the) world is a stage, no matter how good an actor one is, a thought-out script (a long-term strategy) is absolutely essential. It is tempting to blame the actor when things go wrong, but it is usually the script that can make or break a performance. (Roshan Kishore, HT's Data and Political Economy Editor, writes a weekly column on the state of the country's economy and its political fall out, and vice-versa.)
