How an ‘invisible' police unit has hounded criminals for generations
Unluckily, Cody chose the wrong copper to try to beat in a foot race, as Cairns was a local decathlon and long jump champion. Luckily, Cairns was a pacifist and didn't shoot him.
There is brave, and then there is crazy brave: Robbo Robertson firmly fits the latter category.
Called to a bank silent alarm, Robertson's partner Rod Porter (they were both unarmed) walked into the branch confident it would be a false call.
'I opened the door and saw an old lady on the ground,' Porter recalls. 'I thought the old dear had fallen over, and I leant over to help her up.'
His mood changed when a bandit yelled out to his partner: 'Shoot him, shoot him.' There was a gunman on the counter pointing a shotgun at the cop.
Porter ran (he was no Stawell Gift winner) with the two armed crooks in pursuit. Robertson fired up the Dogs' Valiant, tried to hit the gunmen, then put the car between Porter and the bandits.
When they took off in their stolen getaway car, Robertson 'rammed them up the arse. That made them really happy.'
Porter was hiding in a yard and when he emerged, Robertson said: 'Quick, get in. I know where they went.'
Porter remembers thinking: 'This is a bloody stupid idea. This man is an idiot – why are we doing this?'
Both offenders were arrested.
The Dogs follow on foot, cars, bikes and motorbikes, and once when an offender went bush, an enterprising officer borrowed a horse from a nearby paddock and rode in bareback, finding the crook's hideaway.
Then there was the non-ventilated 'super truck' in which a cop, often in 40-degree heat, would sit for up to 10 hours watching a suspect house. Stripped of most of their clothes, the officer would use a peephole to peek and an empty bottle to pee. 'It was a good way to lose weight,' one said.
In the early 1990s two crooks planned to break into a jeweller's house in Malvern East, where they would hold the wife and children hostage, forcing him to return to his shop, open the safe and provide a fortune in valuable stones.
The Dogs were following them because they were wanted for another job. As they did dry runs on the house, their bugged conversations revealed the hostage plan.
On the night of the planned abduction, the Dogs were watching from a flat overlooking the house. Police had moved the family and replaced them with mannequins, apparently sleeping in their beds.
The crooks were behind a brick wall across the road. What they didn't know was that on the other side of the wall was the special operations group, waiting for the right moment.
In crept the crooks, throwing back the blankets in the main bedroom, only to find two dummies. They bolted into the welcoming arms of the special operations group. Game over.
Another call for help started with police in Nepal, went to the Australian Federal Police, then to Victoria, and, finally, the Dogs.
A man had grabbed a woman in Melbourne after meeting her on a dating site, and then made a ransom demand to her Nepalese parents.
Somehow the Dogs found a likely address in Pakenham. One surveillance officer peered through a knothole in the fence from a vacant block to see a man digging a hole. It was not to plant tomatoes.
Retired senior sergeant Michael 'Mouse' O'Connor, a veteran Dog, takes up the story. With reports from the ground and support from the air, it was clear the man was digging a grave.
'He lay down in it to see it was the right size. I was sure she was dead. Then he marches her out – she was wrapped in Glad Wrap. The SOG were en route, but it would have been too late. I told the boys to go.'
One dropped on all fours, so others could use him to vault over the fence.
'She was scooped up, and all she could say was, 'Where did you come from?'' says O'Connor.
Some cases were sophisticated but not life and death. Australians are world-class shoplifters, and in the 1970s a family that would later become notorious gangsters were followed and grabbed with products worth $400,000.
In another case, a group of lithe young women entered a shop, then left, all apparently eight months pregnant.
One mob were more Benny Hill than The Untouchables – a shoplifting gang that used an attractive female member in a mini-skirt to bend over in a store, leaving the male shop assistant apparently hypnotised, allowing the rest of the crew to grab anything that wasn't nailed down.
Loading
After the 1976 Great Bookie Robbery, a relative of Ray Chuck, the mastermind of the job, was followed to Queensland, where he lived in a beachside caravan park.
As the target didn't have a car, there wasn't much action and the Dogs deputised the woman who ran the park to eavesdrop on the crook's calls that were made on the park's party line.
Over six weeks, the woman did all the work while the Dogs crew took up surfing.
Police sometimes say they have hit a brick wall, but in one case such a wall saved crooks from certain arrest.
The notorious Gym Gang, a stick-up crew that pulled jobs over 24 years that netted well over $4.5 million, had just grabbed their biggest haul.
In 1994, the gang pretended to be a road crew working on the Monash Freeway, stopping an armoured van carrying about $2.3 million that had just been picked up at the Reserve Bank.
As they had rehearsed, the gang drove the van to a dead-end lane in Richmond to load into another vehicle. What they didn't know was that behind the wall of a brick building at the end of the lane was the secret office of the surveillance branch.
The Dogs had security cameras facing the main street, but none into the laneway – meaning they missed their chance to nab the gang.
After the job, the Dogs would follow many of the suspects, finding they often met on suburban sports ovals to try to avoid listening devices. (One rode his bike everywhere in the hope he would be able to pick out the Dogs. Sometimes he did, but most times he didn't.)
While one of the necessary skills is to be able to move without being noticed, there is also an art in staying still and not being seen.
Ian 'Vag' Whitmore earned his nickname, according to O'Connor, because he could lie in a gutter for hours like a vagrant.
'He would hide in a garden or up a tree for eight or 10 hours to get photos and great results.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
12-08-2025
- ABC News
DV prevention advocates want animal abuse defined in SA's coercive control laws
In the throes of intimate partner violence, Amber's dogs were more than a comfort. They were her closest confidants and a source of protection. "Looking at my dogs every day ... it shows you that it's not just about you in that situation," she said. As the violence evolved, Amber's "gentle but boisterous" staffies were kept away from her. She said it was "agonising to be separate from them". Amber made the decision to leave, but no shelters could accommodate her pets. She would return to the house to feed and comfort them and was distressed to see the neglect they endured while she was gone. If you need help immediately call emergency services on 000. "[One] had a cut on the top of her head … they weren't being fed adequately, they weren't being walked or stimulated in any way that they were used to," she said. "They'd both lost a lot of weight and would flinch when you'd approach them at times, as if they were scared of being hurt. "And I was putting myself in an extremely unsafe environment." Domestic violence victim-survivors and the Law Society of South Australia want stronger legal provisions for domestic violence against pets. A bill to criminalise coercive control passed South Australia's lower house but has stalled in the upper house. While animal abuse is referenced in the legislation — in an example about being convicted of another offence like animal cruelty — it is not explicitly listed as a form of control. "(Animal abuse) needs to be included within the definition to avoid any possibility that it's not considered as a means of coercive control." When victim-survivor Jennifer Howard left a domestic violence situation she could not take her dogs. "My dogs eventually ended up at the pound and were likely euthanased," she said. To heal and help others in the same situation, Ms Howard founded Adelaide-based charity Safe Pets Safe Families which runs an animal foster program. Speaking at South Australia's Royal Commission into Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence in March — which will hand down its findings this month — Ms Howard explained how she had seen the human-animal bond get weaponised. "I've had some cases where a perpetrator has harmed the pet in front of the victim and said; 'you'll be next' to control them," she said. "That if they don't return home; 'this is what's going to happen' to their animal, so a lot of the time that's what draws people back to the house." A 2024 Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) literature review found it was common for victim-survivors to delay leaving, stay with or return to perpetrators because they could not take their animals. "They have really valid safety concerns for their animals if left behind," co-author and AIFS senior research officer Kylie Butler said. "You often have perpetrators that will try to isolate women and kids from traditional social support (like) family and friends, so the bonds between people and animals can be even more strong in these situations. The government study also found animal abuse was an early warning sign of intimate partner violence. Ms Butler said some victim-survivors believed the abuse would be dismissed by support workers or law enforcement, because it was a pet being harmed and "not a person". "The more people know about it, the more seriously it is taken," she said. The report recommended more animal-inclusive crisis accommodation, for animals to be included in safety planning, and strengthening collaborations between domestic and family violence services and pet foster services with the aim of reunification. It also found more training was needed for police, paramedics and vets in responding to domestic and family violence. "Being aware of this link … being aware of some of those early warning signs that it might be happening, but also knowing what to do then," Ms Butler said. Family Law and Domestic and Family Violence Committee Chair at Women's Legal Services Australia Meaghan Bradshaw said because domestic violence laws were formed by the states and territories, there was "some inconsistency in the way that animal abuse is recognised". "Domestic violence is complex … and it's important that all of the laws recognise the ways that it can occur, which can also include animal abuse," she said. In South Australia, a 2023 draft of the coercive control bill included harming animals in a list of coercive control examples, similarly to legislation in NSW. In New South Wales, "behaviour that causes death or injury to an animal, or otherwise makes use of an animal to threaten a person" comes under the legal definition of domestic abuse. But South Australian Attorney-General Kyam Maher said this was dropped following feedback from advocacy groups, revealing concerns that authorities may see a list of behaviours as exhaustive. "What we don't want to do is … have things excluded and not count as coercive control, because it's any sort of behaviour that seeks to restrict freedoms and any sort of harm that's threatened, including psychological harm that we want captured," he said. "We want to make sure it's as broad as possible." However, after questions to Mr Maher from the ABC he said the state government was considering making the inclusion. With the help of Jennifer Howard's charity, Amber's pets were cared for until she was able to home them again. "[They] are grey and old, which as an animal owner is what you would like," Amber said. Ms Howard and Amber want animal abuse as part of the "broad" definition of coercive control. "If we fail to recognise animals in domestic violence situations, we are failing to save human lives as well," Ms Howard said. "It's such a missing piece of the puzzle." They said more awareness of this risk factor could help end the national domestic violence crisis. "I think that if perpetrators knew the extent of what harming an animal could lead to, not all of them, but I think it would deter some of them," Amber said.

The Age
12-08-2025
- The Age
New Year's Eve no longer a time to Shrine
Russians in the High Court Brace yourselves. The Russians are coming for the High Court of Australia. Last week, the country's top court heard an appeal by the Russian Federation against laws created by the Albanese government to effectively cancel a lease for Russia's new Canberra embassy, down the road from Parliament House, on national security grounds. Russia claimed the lease cancellation was 'Russophobic hysteria', and quickly retained the services of Australia's foremost High Court winner, Bret Walker, SC, who led a challenge to the laws' constitutional validity. The day after that hearing, the court announced it would consider another high-profile case, this time brought by billionaire Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska. An industrialist with a stake in an alumina refinery in Gladstone and ties to Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, Deripaska was sanctioned by the Morrison government following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The designation stopped Deripaska from travelling to Australia or profiting from his company's share in the Gladstone refinery. Deripaska has been fighting those sanctions ever since, arguing that they are constitutionally invalid because they stop him travelling to Australia to challenge them. Last week, the High Court granted Deripaska special leave to appeal a March decision of Federal Court judges rejecting his argument. The sanctions against Deripaska, which aligns with similar decisions made by the United States, United Kingdom and European Union following the Ukraine invasion, were implemented by Marise Payne in her then role as foreign minister. And at the centre of the oligarch's legal challenge is one of Payne's old cabinet comrades, former attorney-general Christian Porter, who quit parliament before the 2022 election after using anonymous donors to fund an aborted defamation case against the ABC after the public broadcaster reported a historic rape allegation against him (which Porter has always denied). Porter, as CBD regulars would recall, has returned to the Perth bar with gusto, where he's acted in a series of high-profile cases. Which has now brought him into the orbit of a billionaire Russian oligarch, and paved the way for a dramatic return to Canberra. Steel yourself for a swim Spare a thought for the residents of Kew, who have to schlep off to the nearby eastern suburbs of Balwyn or Hawthorn for a swim after promises of a new recreation centre came crashing down. Kew Recreation Centre on High Street was knocked down to make way for a slick $73 million centre with pools, childcare, fitness rooms, indoor sports courts and a party room, all intended to be available from mid-2023. Unfortunately, like many knockdown-rebuild jobs, what came next was inferior to what it replaced. The centre's roof collapsed overnight in 2022, triggering Victorian Building Authority and WorkSafe investigations, and a blame game that continues to this day. The building authority has charged builder ADCO Group and its director, John Conroy, over the collapse, while WorkSafe's case against ADCO and facade contractor Colab Building are scheduled for a return to court next month. Boroondara Mayor Sophie Torney has been assuring residents the new centre 'is taking shape' and will be all-electric when it finally opens. So, when's the big day? Will the kids who should have learnt to swim there be adults by then? Council minutes show it was once expected the new pool would open in early 2025. But the council's website now says doors will open in late 2026. Boroondara Council told CBD it was working with the contractor 'to determine the opening date of the centre'. All going swimmingly then. Uncertainty maxes out for ADH TV Ever since broadcaster Alan Jones was arrested and charged with dozens of indecent assault offences last year (to which he has pleaded not guilty), the fate of the conservative media ecosystem that revolved around him has appeared increasingly uncertain. Jones was the face of online right-wing outrage merchants ADH TV, founded in 2021 by twenty-something chief executive Jack Bulfin and boosted by a very generous investment by billionaire nepo baby James Packer. Jones was a conspicuous absence from ADH TV ever since this masthead first reported allegations of groping a year before the criminal charges were laid. Now, the company is struggling to adjust to life after Alan. First, its plans to acquire regional TV licences from Southern Cross Austereo fell apart after Seven West Media stepped in. That's left us a little sceptical about the success of ADH's $42 million bid to buy the radio assets of this masthead's owners, Nine. But ADH's most newsworthy ploy is its deal to become an Australian launchpad for American conservative cable TV station Newsmax, a once niche Florida-based broadcaster which has had its influence turbo-charged by Dona ld Trump 's rise. ADH TV has since rebranded its online profile and social media accounts as Newsmax Australia, which the website said in January was 'coming soon'. But so far, nobody seems to know when that is, or what it will look like. Rumours that Newsmax had enlisted former NRL Footy Show host Erin Molan as a flagship presenter turned out to be just that. Molan has since landed a rather bizarre gig hosting an Elon Musk -backed show called 69X Minutes on the platform formerly known as Twitter. Molan is also set to unveil an eponymous show on the Salem Network, a Christian family-themed American broadcaster financially backed by the president's failson, Donald Trump Jr. Which probably takes her out of the running. Presenters at ADH TV who remained hopeful of broadcasting with Newsmax have no sense of when they'll be back on air, if at all. We've heard whispers of an October launch, but little more. Bulfin didn't return our calls. A complicated, and as yet, unsettled situation, it seems, that left CBD wondering whether Newsmax Australia would ever see the light of day. Which to us, is a sad day for Australian media. ADH TV provided a welcome home for so many of the right's has-beens: former Australian Christian Lobby boss Lyle Shelton, arch-monarchist David Flint, twice-rehabilitated News Corp broadcaster Chris Smith and, for some reason, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price 's husband.


The Advertiser
16-07-2025
- The Advertiser
Ex-cotton grower sentenced for $8.7 million irrigation fraud
A former southern Queensland cotton grower has been told how long he will remain behind bars after he was sentenced for multiple fraud offences in a Brisbane court on July 16. John Douglas Norman appeared before the court after he was remanded in custody at his last appearance in June 2025. Norman, who entered a plea of guilty on April 28 to six counts of fraud adding up to a value of around $8.7 million, was given a head sentence of 9.5 years by Judge Bernard Porter KC, and will have to spend at least three of those years in custody before he will be eligible for parole. Judge Porter said he had "no doubt Mr Norman will not commit another offence like this". "I have no doubt that he regrets what he did," he said. During the June 25 sentencing hearing, Norman's defence barrister Jeffrey Hunter KC spoke to the nature of Norman's offending and stated it was not "a particularly elaborate scheme". "The record keeping, such if there was any, was utterly shambolic," Mr Hunter said. "Even after the event, it was not possible for the defendant to identify which invoices related to the Healthy Headwaters work." When delivering the sentence, Judge Porter did not accept Mr Norman's ADHD diagnosis was an excuse for his fraudulent offending. He also noted that the case was "nothing like a Ponzi scheme or an insurance fraud case". Judge Porter sentenced Norman to 9.5 years on each count of fraud, to be served concurrently, with 21 days of pre-sentence custody to be observed. He will be eligible for parole on June 24, 2028. Norman, who has a wife and four children aged between 15 and 21, was supported in court by a contingent of family and friends. Norman was initially charged in 2018 with six fraud charges, as well as six other charges related to the falsification of records, which have since been discontinued. He had been accused of committing fraud to a value of $12 million, but in April 2025, the amount was reduced to $8.7 million and Norman entered his guilty plea, about three weeks before he was due to face trial. Norman's chief financial officer, Stephen Evans, was also charged with four similar fraud counts for allegedly helping to lodge the claims after he started working for Mr Norman's business in 2013. Evans received a head sentence of four years and six months, suspended after serving nine months. It was alleged that Norman submitted fraudulent claims to six projects managed by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy between 2010 and 2017. The claims related to the Healthy Headwaters Water Use Efficiency project, which helped Queensland's Murray-Darling Basin irrigation communities deal with climate change and reduced water availability. Under the program, irrigators were granted funds to undertake on-farm infrastructure projects to increase water use efficiency, such as improving water storage. A former southern Queensland cotton grower has been told how long he will remain behind bars after he was sentenced for multiple fraud offences in a Brisbane court on July 16. John Douglas Norman appeared before the court after he was remanded in custody at his last appearance in June 2025. Norman, who entered a plea of guilty on April 28 to six counts of fraud adding up to a value of around $8.7 million, was given a head sentence of 9.5 years by Judge Bernard Porter KC, and will have to spend at least three of those years in custody before he will be eligible for parole. Judge Porter said he had "no doubt Mr Norman will not commit another offence like this". "I have no doubt that he regrets what he did," he said. During the June 25 sentencing hearing, Norman's defence barrister Jeffrey Hunter KC spoke to the nature of Norman's offending and stated it was not "a particularly elaborate scheme". "The record keeping, such if there was any, was utterly shambolic," Mr Hunter said. "Even after the event, it was not possible for the defendant to identify which invoices related to the Healthy Headwaters work." When delivering the sentence, Judge Porter did not accept Mr Norman's ADHD diagnosis was an excuse for his fraudulent offending. He also noted that the case was "nothing like a Ponzi scheme or an insurance fraud case". Judge Porter sentenced Norman to 9.5 years on each count of fraud, to be served concurrently, with 21 days of pre-sentence custody to be observed. He will be eligible for parole on June 24, 2028. Norman, who has a wife and four children aged between 15 and 21, was supported in court by a contingent of family and friends. Norman was initially charged in 2018 with six fraud charges, as well as six other charges related to the falsification of records, which have since been discontinued. He had been accused of committing fraud to a value of $12 million, but in April 2025, the amount was reduced to $8.7 million and Norman entered his guilty plea, about three weeks before he was due to face trial. Norman's chief financial officer, Stephen Evans, was also charged with four similar fraud counts for allegedly helping to lodge the claims after he started working for Mr Norman's business in 2013. Evans received a head sentence of four years and six months, suspended after serving nine months. It was alleged that Norman submitted fraudulent claims to six projects managed by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy between 2010 and 2017. The claims related to the Healthy Headwaters Water Use Efficiency project, which helped Queensland's Murray-Darling Basin irrigation communities deal with climate change and reduced water availability. Under the program, irrigators were granted funds to undertake on-farm infrastructure projects to increase water use efficiency, such as improving water storage. A former southern Queensland cotton grower has been told how long he will remain behind bars after he was sentenced for multiple fraud offences in a Brisbane court on July 16. John Douglas Norman appeared before the court after he was remanded in custody at his last appearance in June 2025. Norman, who entered a plea of guilty on April 28 to six counts of fraud adding up to a value of around $8.7 million, was given a head sentence of 9.5 years by Judge Bernard Porter KC, and will have to spend at least three of those years in custody before he will be eligible for parole. Judge Porter said he had "no doubt Mr Norman will not commit another offence like this". "I have no doubt that he regrets what he did," he said. During the June 25 sentencing hearing, Norman's defence barrister Jeffrey Hunter KC spoke to the nature of Norman's offending and stated it was not "a particularly elaborate scheme". "The record keeping, such if there was any, was utterly shambolic," Mr Hunter said. "Even after the event, it was not possible for the defendant to identify which invoices related to the Healthy Headwaters work." When delivering the sentence, Judge Porter did not accept Mr Norman's ADHD diagnosis was an excuse for his fraudulent offending. He also noted that the case was "nothing like a Ponzi scheme or an insurance fraud case". Judge Porter sentenced Norman to 9.5 years on each count of fraud, to be served concurrently, with 21 days of pre-sentence custody to be observed. He will be eligible for parole on June 24, 2028. Norman, who has a wife and four children aged between 15 and 21, was supported in court by a contingent of family and friends. Norman was initially charged in 2018 with six fraud charges, as well as six other charges related to the falsification of records, which have since been discontinued. He had been accused of committing fraud to a value of $12 million, but in April 2025, the amount was reduced to $8.7 million and Norman entered his guilty plea, about three weeks before he was due to face trial. Norman's chief financial officer, Stephen Evans, was also charged with four similar fraud counts for allegedly helping to lodge the claims after he started working for Mr Norman's business in 2013. Evans received a head sentence of four years and six months, suspended after serving nine months. It was alleged that Norman submitted fraudulent claims to six projects managed by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy between 2010 and 2017. The claims related to the Healthy Headwaters Water Use Efficiency project, which helped Queensland's Murray-Darling Basin irrigation communities deal with climate change and reduced water availability. Under the program, irrigators were granted funds to undertake on-farm infrastructure projects to increase water use efficiency, such as improving water storage. A former southern Queensland cotton grower has been told how long he will remain behind bars after he was sentenced for multiple fraud offences in a Brisbane court on July 16. John Douglas Norman appeared before the court after he was remanded in custody at his last appearance in June 2025. Norman, who entered a plea of guilty on April 28 to six counts of fraud adding up to a value of around $8.7 million, was given a head sentence of 9.5 years by Judge Bernard Porter KC, and will have to spend at least three of those years in custody before he will be eligible for parole. Judge Porter said he had "no doubt Mr Norman will not commit another offence like this". "I have no doubt that he regrets what he did," he said. During the June 25 sentencing hearing, Norman's defence barrister Jeffrey Hunter KC spoke to the nature of Norman's offending and stated it was not "a particularly elaborate scheme". "The record keeping, such if there was any, was utterly shambolic," Mr Hunter said. "Even after the event, it was not possible for the defendant to identify which invoices related to the Healthy Headwaters work." When delivering the sentence, Judge Porter did not accept Mr Norman's ADHD diagnosis was an excuse for his fraudulent offending. He also noted that the case was "nothing like a Ponzi scheme or an insurance fraud case". Judge Porter sentenced Norman to 9.5 years on each count of fraud, to be served concurrently, with 21 days of pre-sentence custody to be observed. He will be eligible for parole on June 24, 2028. Norman, who has a wife and four children aged between 15 and 21, was supported in court by a contingent of family and friends. Norman was initially charged in 2018 with six fraud charges, as well as six other charges related to the falsification of records, which have since been discontinued. He had been accused of committing fraud to a value of $12 million, but in April 2025, the amount was reduced to $8.7 million and Norman entered his guilty plea, about three weeks before he was due to face trial. Norman's chief financial officer, Stephen Evans, was also charged with four similar fraud counts for allegedly helping to lodge the claims after he started working for Mr Norman's business in 2013. Evans received a head sentence of four years and six months, suspended after serving nine months. It was alleged that Norman submitted fraudulent claims to six projects managed by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy between 2010 and 2017. The claims related to the Healthy Headwaters Water Use Efficiency project, which helped Queensland's Murray-Darling Basin irrigation communities deal with climate change and reduced water availability. Under the program, irrigators were granted funds to undertake on-farm infrastructure projects to increase water use efficiency, such as improving water storage.