Education Department tags in DOJ to probe Minnesota after trans athlete helps girls' softball team win title
Transgender pitcher Marissa Rothenberger caused rivals to cry foul after she pitched five games in a row — including all three in the Class 4A tournament — and only gave up one run in 35 innings.
In the title game against Bloomington Jefferson, Rothenberger pitched a complete game shutout, striking out six and surrendering just three hits and no walks.
Three female softball players from Maple Grove High School and Farmington High School have filed a lawsuit against Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, arguing that Champlin Park gained an unfair advantage with Rothenberger able to shoulder the pitching load in a way that a biological female could not.
Advertisement
The investigation of the MSHL and the Minnesota Education Department will be carried out by a newly established Title IX Special Investigations Team, comprised of both Education Departmetn and Justice Department personnel and meant to enforce President Trump's February executive order to 'keep men out of women's sports.'
If found to be noncompliant, both organizations risk losing all federal funding.
3 Linda McMahon, Secretary of The Department of Education, testifies in front of the House Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies in Washington, D.C., on May 21, 2025.
Jack Gruber-USA TODAY via Imagn Images
Advertisement
'Minnesota's continued indifference to females' civil rights is completely unacceptable,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a statement announcing the elevated investigation.
'We must ensure women and girls are not stripped of their hard-earned accolades or subjected to the danger and indignity of unfair competitions, and we will fight to restore antidiscrimination protections under Title IX to the fullest extent of the law.'
3 Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks during a meeting with President Donald Trump and the Fraternal Order of Police in the State Dinning Room of the White House, Thursday, June 5, 2025, in Washington.
AP
3 Champlin Park High School in Minnesota.
Google Maps
Advertisement
But supporters of including trans athletes in women's sports point to the MSHL allowing their inclusion since 2014.
Minnesota Democratic Gov. Tim Walz has stood behind transgender competition in girls' sports, telling the Independent last month 'it's a mistake' for the party to abandon the issue.
'Here's the thing,' he said, 'we need to tell people your cost of eggs, your health care being denied, your homeowner's insurance, your lack of getting warning on tornadoes coming has nothing to do with someone's gender.'
The MSHL and the Minnesota Education Department did not immediately respond to inquiries from The Post.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democratic governors face a school-choice reckoning: Kids or unions?
Republicans in Congress achieved a historic breakthrough last month — and Democratic governors should jump at the chance to take advantage of it. It's the first-ever nationwide school choice program, included as part of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The program aims to give every child in America a shot at a better future by funding private- and parochial-school scholarships through a dollar-for-dollar federal tax credit. Advertisement But each state's governor has to choose to join it — and nowhere is the need more urgent than in New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul has a golden opportunity to make good on her own words. In 2022, in her gubernatorial debate with GOP nominee Lee Zeldin, Hochul said she supported lifting New York's charter school cap. But in the years since, she's let the leftist state Legislature handcuff charter expansion, leaving too many poor kids stuck in a one-size-fits-all government school monopoly that's failing them spectacularly. Advertisement Empire State families are demanding more choices to escape from failing district schools. Tens of thousands of kids are on charter-school waitlists in New York City — and 78% of New York parents support Education Savings Accounts like the school choice initiative passed by Congress. New York spent about $37,000 per student in 2023 — 66% higher than the state's average private-school tuition — yet only 13% of NYC's black 8th graders are proficient in math. Statewide, inflation-adjusted per-student spending has skyrocketed 209% since 1970. Have outcomes gotten 209% better? Advertisement Of course not: Test scores have stagnated or declined, proving that throwing more money at the problem without competition is a fool's errand. But now Hochul can't blame the Democrat-controlled state Legislature as an excuse to keep poor kids from accessing better schools, whether charter, private or religious. The new federal school-choice program puts the decision squarely in her hands, and in the hands of her fellow governors. Advertisement Other states' Democratic leaders are showing signs of cracking under the pressure of common sense. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's team has said he's considering opting in to the federal program. Even more encouraging is North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein, who vetoed a bill passed by the state's GOP-controlled legislature demanding he sign on to the program — calling the bill 'unnecessary,' since he 'intend[s] to opt North Carolina in.' Stein's veto message explicitly stated that 'school choice is good for students and parents,' and pledged to allow North Carolina's public-school students access to the funding. Stein's stance could encourage other Democratic governors to jump on the bandwagon. Speaking of which, California's Gov. Gavin Newsom should opt in, too. He sent his own kids to private school, and attended one himself in his early years. It's hypocritical to oppose school choice for other families while enjoying it for your own. Advertisement What makes the new federal program so compelling — even for Democratic governors beholden to teachers' unions — is a built-in incentive that's impossible to ignore. If states don't opt in, their constituents — whether they know it or not — will be subsidizing scholarships for families in the red states that are already rushing to sign on. All American families and taxpaying individuals can donate to K-12 scholarship-granting organizations and receive a dollar-for-dollar federal tax credit in exchange, even if their state doesn't join up. Advertisement All the governors can decide is whether kids in their state can access those scholarships. Opting out means shooting your state in the foot: Your taxpayers' donations will flow to other states' kids, leaving your own students behind. The ongoing crisis in our schools amplifies the urgency. Last week a new FBI report revealed 1.3 million crimes committed at schools from 2020 to 2024, including about 540,000 physical assaults. Advertisement The statistics prove what parents already know: Too many kids are getting beaten, bullied and traumatized in environments that should be safe havens for learning. Democratic governors can no longer do the bidding of teachers' unions by locking children in failing schools infested with violence. The unions' iron grip has protected mediocrity and danger for too long. School choice breaks that stranglehold, giving parents the power to vote with their feet and demand better. Trump's bill puts children first and champions freedom, opportunity and accountability in education. Advertisement It's time for Hochul and her peers to free our kids from the public school monopoly by helping families find better education opportunities. If she doesn't, she risks cementing a legacy of statewide failure and decline. Corey DeAngelis is a senior fellow at the American Culture Project and a visiting fellow at the American Institute for Economic Research.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Washington state will hold line on sanctuary law, governor says
Washington state won't roll back its law limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities, despite the Trump administration's threats to criminally charge state and local officials who follow it, Gov. Bob Ferguson said Tuesday. The big picture: Ferguson's public statement came in response to a letter he received last week from U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, telling him to submit a plan by Tuesday to end Washington's so-called "sanctuary" policy. Catch up quick: The state law, called the Keep Washington Working Act, largely prevents state and local police from assisting federal authorities with civil immigration enforcement. Among other changes, the 2019 law banned local police from detaining people based on civil immigration warrants and barred police officers from asking about a person's immigration status in noncriminal cases. The law also cracked down on information sharing between state, local and federal agencies. The latest: "Washington State will not be bullied or intimidated by threats and legally baseless accusations," Ferguson wrote in a letter formally responding to Bondi on Tuesday. At a news conference Tuesday, the Democratic governor called Bondi's letter threatening criminal prosecution of public officials "breathtaking" and something that "cannot be normalized." Bondi "seeks to have Washington state bend the knee to a Trump administration that day by day drags us closer to authoritarianism," Ferguson said. "That's not going to happen." Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell joined Ferguson at Tuesday's press conference, after Ferguson said the city received a similar letter. The other side: In the letter from Bondi, which Ferguson shared on X last weekend, the attorney general wrote that policies like Washington's have "obstructed federal immigration enforcement" for too long, "giving aliens cover to perpetrate crimes in our communities."
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Veterans' voices shape a report on the Afghanistan War's lessons and impact
Advertisement 'What can we learn from the Afghanistan War?' asked an Aug. 12 discussion session with four of the commission's 16 members. What they got was two straight hours of dozens of veterans' personal stories — not one glowingly positive, and most saturated in frustration and disappointment. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'I think the best way to describe that experience was awful,' said Marine veteran Brittany Dymond, who served in Afghanistan in 2012. Navy veteran Florence Welch said the 2021 withdrawal made her ashamed she ever served there. 'It turned us into a Vietnam, a Vietnam that none of us worked for,' she said. Members of Congress, some driven by having served in the war, created the independent commission several months after the withdrawal, after an assessment by the Democratic administration of then-president Joe Biden faulted the actions of President Donald Trump's first administration for constraining US options. A Republican review, in turn, blamed Biden. Views of the events remain divided, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered yet another review this spring. Advertisement The commission wants to understand the bigger picture of a conflict that spanned four presidential administrations and cost more than 2,400 American lives, said cochair Dr. Colin Jackson. 'So we're interested in looking hard at the end of US engagement in Afghanistan, but we're equally interested in understanding the beginning, the middle, and the end,' he said in an interview in Columbus. Cochair Shamila Chaudhary said the panel is also exploring more sweeping questions. 'So our work is not just about what the US did in Afghanistan but what the US should be doing in any country where it deems it has a national security interest,' she said. 'And not just should it be there, but how it should behave, what values does it guide itself by, and how does it engage with individuals who are very different from themselves.' Jackson said one of the commission's priorities is making sure the final report, due in August 2026, isn't 'unrecognizable to any veteran of the Afghanistan conflict.' 'The nature of the report should be representative of every soldier, sailor, airman, Marine experience,' he said. Dymond told commissioners a big problem was the mission. 'You cannot exert a democratic agenda, which is our foreign policy, you cannot do that on a culture of people who are not bought into your ideology,' she said. 'What else do we expect the outcome to be? And so we had two decades of service members lost and maimed because we're trying to change an ideology that they didn't ask for.' Advertisement The experience left eight-year Army veteran Steve Orf demoralized. He said he didn't go there 'to beat a bad guy.' 'Those of us who served generally wanted to believe that we were helping to improve the world, and we carried with us the hopes, values, and principles of the United States — values and principles that also seem to have been casualties of this war," he told commissioners. 'For many of us, faith with our leaders is broken and trust in our country is broken.' Tuesday's report identifies emerging themes of the review to include strategic drift, interagency incoherence, and whether the war inside Afghanistan and the counterterrorism war beyond were pursuing the same aims or at cross purposes. It also details difficulties the commission has encountered getting key documents. According to the report, the Biden administration initially denied the commission's requests for White House materials on the implementation of the February 2020 peace agreement Trump signed with the Taliban, called the Doha Agreement, and on the handling of the withdrawal, citing executive confidentiality concerns. The transition to Trump's second term brought further delays and complications, but since the commission has pressed the urgency of its mission with the new administration, critical intelligence and documents have now begun to flow, the report says.
