Trump Burger owner in Texas faces deportation after Ice arrest
Roland Mehrez Beainy, 28, entered the US as 'a non-immigrant visitor' from Lebanon in 2019 and was supposed to have left the country by 12 February 2024, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) spokesperson told the Guardian.
Citing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Texas's Fayette County Record newspaper reported that Beainy applied for legal status after purportedly wedding a woman – but the agency maintained there is no proof he ever lived with her during the alleged marriage.
Ice said its officers arrested Beainy on 16 May – five years after he launched the first of multiple Trump Burger locations – and placed him into immigration proceedings, an agency statement said.
'Under the current administration, Ice is committed to restore integrity to our nation's immigration system by holding all individuals accountable who illegally enter the country or overstay the terms of their admission,' the agency's statement also said.
'This is true regardless of what restaurant you own or political beliefs you might have.'
In remarks to the Houston Chronicle, Beainy denied Ice's charges against him, saying: 'Ninety percent of the shit they're saying is not true.' He is tentatively scheduled for a hearing in immigration court on 18 November.
Trump Burger gained national attention after Beainy opened the original location in Bellville, Texas, in 2020, the same year Trump lost his bid for a second presidential term to Joe Biden. Replete with memorabilia paying reverence to Trump as well as politically satirical menu items targeting his enemies, Beainy's chain expanded to other locations, including Houston.
Trump won a second presidency in January, and his administration summarily began delivering on promises to pursue mass deportations of immigrants. Political supporters of Trump in the US without papers, at least in many cases, have not been spared.
One case which generated considerable news headlines was that of a Canadian national who supported Trump's plans for mass deportation of immigrants – only for federal authorities to detain her in California while she interviewed for permanent US residency and publicly describe her in a statement as 'an illegal alien from Canada'.
In another instance, Ice reportedly detained a Christian Armenian Iranian woman who lost her legal permanent US residency, or green card, after a 2008 burglary conviction and incarcerated her at a federal detention facility in California despite her vocal support of Trump. Her husband, with whom she is raising four US citizen children, subsequently blamed the couple's plight on Biden's 'doing for open borders', as Newsweek noted.
Beainy's detention by Ice is not his only legal plight, according to the Houston Chronicle. He sued the landlord of a Trump Burger location in Kemah, Texas, whom Beainy claimed forcibly removed staff and took over the restaurant.
The landlord responded with his own lawsuit accusing Beainy of unpaid debts and renamed the Kemah restaurant Maga Burger.
In 2022, Beainy told the Houston Chronicle he endured threats to have Trump Burger burned down when the first one opened its doors. But the brand had since gained a loyal following and a portion of its profits were set aside to aid Trump's fundraising, Beainy said to the outlet.
'I would love to have [Trump's] blessing and have him come by,' Beainy said at the time. 'We're hoping that he … sees the place.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Dad of three was killed in Pennsylvania steel plant explosion and his sister is demanding answers on lack of information
One of the two victims killed in an explosion at a Pennsylvania steel plant has been identified as a father of three. Timothy Quinn was killed in an explosion at the U.S. Clairton Coke Works plant near Pittsburgh Monday morning, his sister, Trisha Quinn, told Channel 11. His partner at the steel mill told his sister he had been loaded into an ambulance after the explosion, and that he looked like he may have been deceased, but she lacked answers for far too long, she told the outlet. 'The steel mill is not giving families any information, and there's no crisis line to go to,' Trisha said before she received confirmation of her brother's death. 'I've been on the phone since 12 o'clock. We drove up from Jefferson, my brother's not here. Families need answers. This is a crisis situation, and we have nobody to call to see where our loved ones are,' she said. She said she drove 45 minutes to the hospital to find her brother and provide an update for his three children. Officials have confirmed that two people died in the explosion and 10 others were hurt. Of those 10, five were in critical condition at Allegheny Health Network hospitals and the rest were released. Authorities have not shared the identities of the victims, but Trisha Quinn says one was her brother. 'My dad worked at the steel mill for 42 years and he would be disgusted at what the situation is right now. Accidents happen but... they need communication with the family,' Trisha said. 'We need answers, we need them now, even if it's not what we want to hear, we need to know something.'
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Post-Brexit chaos as EU citizens living in Britain wrongly barred from UK
EU citizens waiting for the government to decide their pre- Brexit residency status have been wrongly refused entry to the UK, forcing them to give up their lives here. The Independent Monitoring Authority for Citizens' Rights Agreements (IMA) has expressed 'serious concerns' after some who left to go on holiday or visit family were barred from entering Britain on their return. Among those affected was a 34-year-old Spanish woman who was removed from the UK despite showing Home Office documents which proved her right to live and work in the UK. She had flown to Spain to see her sister and her new baby at Christmas, The Guardian reported. Another EU citizen, Greek Cypriot Costa Koushiappis, was forcibly removed after taking a short trip to Amsterdam in November, the paper said. The IMA has now written to the Home Office, warning that those waiting for a decision on their residency should not be removed if they make short trips overseas, including for business or leisure. It advised that those who hold a valid 'certificate of application' (CoA) from the Home Office can use it with Border Force officials at airports or ports to show they are allowed to travel. Miranda Biddle, chief executive of the IMA, said: 'Our position is that a citizen with a valid certificate of application has a right to exit and enter the UK while waiting for a decision on their EU settlement scheme application, subject to providing additional documentation required at the border.' She said she was 'keen to continue to work with the government' to 'ensure citizens are not discouraged from exercising their rights'. The group has called on the Home Office to clarify the CoA rules before a new system requiring visitors to the UK to have an 'electronic travel authorisations' is enforced. Campaign group the3million said it was 'very disappointed' that the IMA had agreed with the Border Force approach of asking EU citizens to carry documents to prove their residence before Brexit took effect on 31 December 2020. A CoA was sufficient proof of rights until such time as a final decision is taken, the group said. A Home Office spokesperson said: 'All individuals with a certificate of application are made aware that they may be asked for evidence to show that they qualify under the scheme before they are allowed entry to the UK. Equivalent guidance has been issued to Border Force officers and published online.'
New Statesman
28 minutes ago
- New Statesman
The British public aren't who you think they are
Illustration by Gary Waters / Ikon Images Last week, YouGov revealed that nearly half of Britons – 47 per cent – wrongly think there are more migrants staying in the UK illegally than legally. The numbers aren't even close: there are between 120,000 and 1.3 million illegal migrants living in the UK, out of a total of 10.7 million foreign-born people in total. Depending on which figure you use, that means people who come to the UK illegally make up between 1.1 per cent and 12 per cent of the total migrant population, suggesting half the British public are wildly wrong on this one. But the way in which they are wrong tells us something interesting about how misconceptions may be shaping the political debate and what politicians might want to do about it. It got me wondering: what else can we learn about the British public that might surprise us? August is a good time for taking a step back and examining how voters really feel about things, which may have been missed in the endless drama of the news cycle. So I asked five pollsters what they have discovered recently that might challenge the outlook of Westminster watchers, and what they thought this told us about our current political climate. Trump island Last week, we learned that Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves currently have lower favourability ratings than Donald Trump. But how do Brits really feel about the US president anyway? The answer, according to Ipsos, may surprise you. 'Let's be clear, Donald Trump isn't winning any popularity contests in the UK anytime soon, with 64 per cent of Britons overall unfavourable towards the US president,' says Keiran Pedley, director of UK politics at Ipsos. 'But what's fascinating in our polling is the generational divide that we uncovered.' Ipsos found that while just 9 per cent of those over 55 view Trump favourably, that figure jumps to 29 per cent for 18-34-year-olds (though 45 per cent in this age group are unfavourable). 'This isn't just a quirky stat,' Pedley adds. As the UK prepares for Trump's unprecedented second state visit, with the vice-president chilling out in a Cotswolds village, 'it suggests Trump's anti-establishment, social-media-driven brand of politics is having some cut through with a generation that gets its news from very different places than their parents. For many young people, who are perhaps more sceptical of 'business-as-usual' politics, his disruptive style seems to resonate. It's a crucial trend, and one that hints at a real shift in the political landscape.' What did your dad do again? During the election campaign, avid followers of UK politics got so sick of Starmer reminding us that his father was a toolmaker that when the Labour leader mentioned it in a live event with Sky News, the audience started to laugh. But according to Joe Twyman, co-founder and director of Deltapoll, only 18 per cent of British adults know this fact about the Prime Minister's background. 'You might know the correct answer, almost everyone you know might know the correct answer, but the average person in the street doesn't,' Twyman warns. With the question 'Who is Labour for?' increasingly coming up in focus groups and questions about class dynamics swirling once more around British politics, it's striking how little cut-through Starmer's personal story has had with the public. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe In more bad news for the Prime Minister, Deltapoll also found that 56 per cent of British adults think Starmer makes the world a worse place, compared to 24 per cent who think he makes it a better place. 'On the plus side,' Twyman adds, 'his score is better than that of Donald Trump (63 per cent vs 21 per cent), Benjamin Netanyahu (58 per cent vs 10 per cent) and Vladimir Putin (83 per cent vs 6 per cent). On the downside, his score is worse than that of domestic opponents including Kemi Badenoch (23 per cent vs 39 per cent), Nigel Farage (32 per cent vs 46 per cent), Boris Johnson (31 per cent vs 47 per cent), and Jeremy Corbyn (22 per cent vs 54 per cent).' Ouch. I have a cunning plan Speaking of Corbyn, Scarlett Maguire, founder and director of Merlin Strategy, has found an unlikely source of support: Reform voters. On a range of indicators – from 'authentic' and 'honest' to 'for working people' and 'understands people like me' – Corbyn beats Starmer decisively among those who say they would back Farage's party if an election were held tomorrow. The biggest wins for Corbyn over Starmer were 'represents change' (69 per cent vs 31 per cent) and 'makes radical decisions' (70 per cent vs 30 per cent). The only thing Reform voters thought Starmer was better at was representing Britain on the world stage. The fact that supporters of a radical right party preferred the (potential) leader of a radical left one to the Prime Minister of a centre-left government is striking, and suggests a real weakness in Labour's strategy of chasing Reform votes – although, Maguire points out, 'this does not show they like Corbyn, more the extent to which they dislike Starmer'. Merlin Strategy also found that, by a whisker, more people trust Farage on the economy than Starmer (33 per cent vs 31 per cent). The good news for Labour is that Badenoch is languishing behind at 21 per cent – but then, that was before she went to war with Liz Truss. In separate polling, when asked for a word or phrase that best describes Labour, the most popular answer was 'no plan' (22 per cent). But then, voters also picked 'no plan' for Reform (23 per cent), the Conservatives (25 per cent), the Lib Dems (27 per cent) and the Greens (33 per cent). Does anyone in Westminster have a plan? Answers on a postcard, please. Normal people So what are Reform voters actually like? As it's the holidays, Luke Tryl, UK director at More In Common, has been on the lookout for some more summery insights. In a survey on what summer activities people were looking forward to, he found that Reform voters 'are ahead among basically all the normal stuff' – like going abroad (to both EU and non-EU countries), sitting in a pub garden and having a barbecue. In contrast, 'the Tories only lead is with Tour de France fans, and Labour is posting its biggest scores on more niche things like Glastonbury or cold-water swimming', plus celebrating Pride. Reform have also won Wimbledon off the Tories. More In Common has looked at people's entertainment choices too, asking Brits to choose their favourite sitcoms. 'We found Reform led among fans of Fawlty Towers and Only Fools and Horses – which you might expect – but also among fans of The Office and Gavin and Stacey,' Tryl says. Labour are left leading on things like The IT Crowd and The Young Ones. (Unsurprisingly, the Tories lead among fans of Yes, Minister – a show which, by pure coincidence, contains the immortal political adage that 'the less you intend to do about something, the more you have to keep talking about it'.) According to Tryl, these two surveys 'tell a really good story using non-political proxies of how 'normal' the Reform vote is. It helps to explain their rise from fringe to leading in the polls'. They also show the sheer range in terms of class and cultural markers of those considering backing Farage. All that said, it's best to beware putting the UK public into neat little boxes – as two intriguing bits of polling from YouGov show. The first found that while just 35 per cent of Britons identify as a feminist, 83 per cent believe men and women should be equal in every way. They did the test by asking the question in three ways: 'Are you a feminist?'; then 'One definition of a feminist is someone who believes men and women should have equal rights and status in society, and be treated equally in every way. Are you a feminist?'; and finally 'Do you think men and women should have equal rights and status in society, and be treated equally in every way?' Support increased with each option. Tanya Abraham, director of political and social research at YouGov, notes the data 'suggests that there is a certain toxicity to the term 'feminist' that is putting some people off using it, even when it is paired with a description they would back'. But the poll is also a great demonstration of why it's so important not to make assumptions. You could look at answers to the first question and get what looks like a very clear indication of how British people feel about a pretty fundamental social question. And that indication would be wrong. YouGov also found last year that, whatever stereotypes we might have in our heads about England football fans, over two-thirds (67 per cent) don't mind whether the England manager is English or not. With the recent triumph of the Lionesses under their superstar Dutch manager Sarina Wiegman, that figure is probably even higher today than it was when YouGov asked the question in October 2024, after the German Thomas Tuchel was announced as Gareth Southgate's successor. Back then, Farage tweeted 'Why can't we have an English manager?' But YouGov found that just only 30 per cent of England fans had a preference for the manager to be English. Even more interestingly, YouGov's Dylan Difford wrote that while 'desire for an English candidate is highest among Reform UK voters, at 42 per cent… even then, 47 per cent disagree with Farage's view'. Maybe the real takeaway is that, in sport as in politics, the British people just want a winner. This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu are trapped] Related
