
Damage to Iranian nuclear sites so far appears limited, experts say
US President Donald Trump told Reuters on Friday it was unclear whether Iran still has a nuclear program following Israeli strikes, but experts say the damage to the country's nuclear facilities so far has appeared limited.
Israel's attacks succeeded in killing Iranian military leaders and nuclear scientists and striking military command and control facilities and air defenses, but satellite imagery did not yet show significant damage to nuclear infrastructure, several experts said.
"The first day was aimed at things that you would get through surprise - killing leadership, going after nuclear scientists, air defense systems, the ability to retaliate," said nuclear expert David Albright at the Institute for Science and International Security.
"We can't see any visible damage at Fordow or Isfahan. There was damage at Natanz," said Albright, referring to Iranian nuclear sites. But "there's no evidence that the underground site was destroyed."
UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi told the Security Council on Friday that the above-ground pilot enrichment plant at Iran's Natanz nuclear site had been destroyed and Iran had reported attacks on Fordow and Isfahan.
Grossi said electricity infrastructure at Natanz was also destroyed and the loss of power to a cascade hall may have damaged centrifuges there. But he said the level of radioactivity outside Natanz remained unchanged and normal.
The sprawling Natanz nuclear complex is Iran's main uranium enrichment facility. The site includes a vast underground uranium enrichment plant and a smaller, above-ground pilot enrichment plant.
In a telephone interview with Reuters, Trump said it was unclear whether Iran still has a nuclear program following the Israeli strikes. "Nobody knows," Trump said. "It was a very devastating hit."
Two regional sources said at least 20 Iranian military commanders were killed in the attack, a stunning decapitation reminiscent of Israeli attacks that swiftly wiped out the leadership of Lebanon's once-feared Hezbollah militia last year. Iran also said six of its top nuclear scientists were killed.
Albright said his analysis was based on the latest available images from about 11.20am Tehran time (0750 GMT). He added there may also have been drone strikes on tunnels to underground centrifuge plants and cyber attacks that did not leave visible traces.
"In terms of visible damage, we don't see much and we'll see what happens tonight," he said, adding that he believes Israel's strikes were still in an early stage.
Albright said the status of Iran's stocks of enriched uranium was not known and that it was possible Israel had avoided major attacks on nuclear sites due to concerns about harming international inspectors who were there.
Albright said there were thousands of centrifuges at the underground plant at Natanz and knocking out the electrical supply would bring into play a backup battery system.
He said it was likely that Iran was shutting down the centrifuges at the underground site in a controlled manner, which was a big operation.
"Batteries ... last a while, but eventually they will run out and if the centrifuges spin down in an uncontrollable manner, a lot will break," he said.
Israel warns of prolonged operation
Israel said it targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders at the start of what would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon.
Military and nuclear experts said that even with massive firepower, military action would probably only temporarily set back a program the West fears is already aimed at producing atom bombs one day, although Iran denies it.
Jeffrey Lewis, a non-proliferation expert at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, said damage at the Natanz facility appeared "moderate."
"Israel destroyed the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant, as well as some support buildings associated with power supply," he said. Lewis added Israel also hit a support building - possibly for power supply - near two underground nuclear enrichment facilities.
"The underground enrichment halls, as well as the large underground facility nearby in the mountains, do not appear damaged."
It was unclear what damage was sustained at the key Fordow nuclear facility, which could be used to develop nuclear weapons and is buried deep underground.
"It has always been the conventional wisdom that Israel may not have the ordnance to destroy Fordow without American military support," Mark Dubowitz, head of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank, told a podcast.
The United States is better equipped than Israel to destroy such targets with its most powerful bunker buster bombs, the 30,000-pound (14,000 kg) Massive Ordnance Penetrator.
If Iran decides not to negotiate a nuclear deal, the U.S. could use its B2 bombers and those bombs to destroy Fordow, Dubowitz said.
Decker Eveleth, a strategic analyst with the CAN Corp research group, said the overall aim of Israel's campaign was still unclear.
"They may be successful at dismantling Iranian command and control, destroying air forces (and) hitting a variety of targets related to the Iranian missile program," he said.
"(But) if their core objective is prevention of a nuclear breakout, can they destroy enough of Iran's nuclear infrastructure to actually prevent that from happening?"
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
an hour ago
- The National
Starmer sends fighter planes to Middle East after Iran threatens UK
Keir Starmer said on Saturday that the UK would deploy more RAF jets to the Middle East after Iran threatened to target British, French and US bases if the countries help stop strikes on Israel. The UK's Prime Minister said further military assets are being deployed to provide 'contingency support' across the region amid escalating hostilities between the two long-time foes. Additional refuelling aircraft have been sent to the region from UK bases and more fast jets will be sent over. The UK already has RAF jets in the Middle East as part of Operation Shader. Speaking to reporters travelling with him on a visit to Canada, Mr Starmer declined to rule out intervening in the conflict entirely but made clear he would continue pressing for de-escalation and said the 'intense' developments over the weekend would be discussed in detail at the G7 summit. 'These are obviously operational decisions and the situation is ongoing and developing and therefore I'm not going to get into the precise details, but we are moving assets, we've already been moving assets to the region, including jets, and that is for contingency support across the region. So that is happening,' he said. 'Our constant message is de-escalate, and therefore everything we're doing, all discussions we're having are to do with de-escalation.' Asked whether he would rule out UK involvement, he said: 'I'm not going to get in to that.' Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Both the UK and the US have insisted they were not involved in the Israeli strikes and that the country acted unilaterally. Mr Starmer would not be drawn on whether the UK was given notice of Israel's attack after reports that the country was not forewarned following the Government's decision to sanction two far-right Israeli ministers last week. 'In relation to Israel, I had a good and constructive discussion with Prime Minister Netanyahu yesterday, and that included discussions about the safety and security of Israel, as you would expect, between two allies,' he said. Asked if Britain had been told in advance of Israeli's military plans, the Prime Minister said: 'I'm not going to go into what information we had at the time or since. 'But we discuss these things intensely with our allies. But I'm not going to get into precisely what we knew, because it's a constant flow of information between our allies, and between us and the US.'


Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Israel-Iran clash: Pakistan PM expresses 'unwavering solidarity' with Tehran
[Editor's Note: Follow the KT live blog for live updates on the Israel-Iran conflict.] As the conflict between Israel and Iran rages on, Pakistan has expressed its "unwavering solidarity" with Iran in the face of Israel's "unprovoked aggression." Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who spoke to Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian over phone on Saturday, said: "Pakistan strongly condemns the violation of Iran's sovereignty and territorial integrity — an affront to international law & the UN Charter. Iran has every right to self-defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter. Pakistan


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
No US-Iran nuclear talks in Muscat on Sunday, says Oman
The new round of Iran–US talks, scheduled to be held in Muscat on Sunday, will no longer take place, Oman has announced. The cancellation follows Israel's strikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites, which killed several top generals. Tehran responded with a barrage of missiles. Despite the escalation, Washington was still hoping talks with Tehran over its nuclear programme could continue, although the Israeli attacks have cast serious doubt over the prospects for diplomacy. 'The Iran–US talks scheduled to be held in Muscat this Sunday will not now take place,' Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi posted on X on Saturday. 'But diplomacy and dialogue remain the only pathway to lasting peace,' he added. Iran, for its part, has called continued negotiations with the US 'unjustifiable' in light of the current escalation. On Saturday, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas that Israel's attacks were 'the direct result' of US support. The talks had aimed to prevent military escalation by pushing Iran to give up uranium enrichment and abandon any ambitions of developing a nuclear weapon. For weeks, US President Donald Trump remained publicly optimistic about striking a deal, while also warning of dire consequences if Iran failed to comply. But Israel's strike targeting Iranian military leaders and nuclear sites has now rendered the diplomatic process all but irrelevant. Still, Mr Trump insisted that Iran 'may have a second chance' to return to the table. Esmaeil Baghaei, the spokesperson of Iran's Foreign Ministry, accused Washington of enabling the Israeli attacks that killed senior Iranian commanders and dozens of civilians. 'It is inconceivable for Iran — and indeed for anyone in the world — that the Zionist regime could have carried out such a reckless and aggressive act of war without the co-operation, co-ordination, or at the very least the conscious green light of the US,' he said. 'We hold the US government responsible for the consequences of this unlawful and reckless act by the Zionist regime.' The IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors passed a resolution on June 12 declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations — the first such move in nearly 20 years. Tehran denounced the resolution as 'clearly designed to produce a crisis' and announced plans to open a new uranium enrichment site.