Greenland awards major mining contract to Danish-French firm
The permit to extract anorthosite, awarded on Wednesday to Greenland Anorthosite Mining (GAM), comes in the wake of renewed global attention on the Arctic territory. US President Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed interest in purchasing the autonomous island, which remains part of the Kingdom of Denmark.
Anorthosite is a white rock primarily composed of aluminum, micro silica, and calcium. GAM intends to export crushed anorthosite for use in the fibreglass industry, positioning it as a more sustainable substitute for kaolin, the outlet said. The company is supported by the French investment firm Jean Boulle Group, along with state investment funds from both Greenland and Denmark.
Announcing the deal, Greenland's Minister for Mineral Resources, Naaja Nathanielsen, said that the project's objective is to scale up operations in order to offer a climate-friendly alternative to bauxite for producing aluminum—an essential material in the manufacturing of aircraft, vehicles, and defense equipment.
'My hope is that the mine will be operational in five years,' she told Reuters.
Despite the increased geopolitical attention, the minister noted that interest from the US had yet to materialize into actual investment in Greenland.
Trump has been talking about making Greenland part of the US and has offered to buy the resource-rich Arctic territory from Copenhagen, but also warned that he could go as far as using force to bring it under Washington's sovereignty.
Nathanielsen remarked that 'all the fuss' surrounding proposals to purchase the island had not led to a greater appetite for direct investment. While Greenland had received visits from various investors, she pointed out that there had been 'no concrete example of American funds being injected into Greenland's business community' so far. However cooperation with EU partners, she noted, is progressing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
12 hours ago
- Russia Today
The old world order cracked in Alaska
The meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump in Alaska may go down as one of Russia's most significant diplomatic wins. It was secured through years of military sacrifice, political perseverance, and relentless effort. Yet it is also a transition – a step into a new stage of the struggle for sovereign states in a fractured world. The most consequential result of Anchorage was the quiet burial of the West's old formula: isolating and 'strategically defeating' Russia. For decades, any state refusing to fall in line risked ostracism. That system cracked in Alaska. Not because of American goodwill – there is no such thing in international politics – but because of pressure. Pressure from Russia, from the so-called 'global majority,' and from the turmoil tearing at America itself. Trump's administration has shifted its approach, and the summit proved it. The outcome was clear: American capabilities diminished, Russian ones enhanced. This, in turn, frees space for other nations to act more independently, even if they will not admit their debt to Moscow. Some talk of a 'renaissance' in relations between Moscow and Washington. But there is nothing to restore. The ties that existed before 2022 were shaped by the USSR's defeat in the Cold War, and cannot be recreated. Instead, dialogue will stabilize on new terms. The core will be recognition that Russia cannot be excluded from the international system. This simple fact means disputes between Moscow and the West, however sharp, are solvable in principle. Competition will remain fierce, especially over Ukraine. But after Anchorage, the Western refusal to acknowledge Russian interests is no longer an insurmountable barrier. For Trump, Alaska delivered something equally valuable: a domestic win. In the US, relations with Russia have become central to the internal political struggle. One camp insists on preserving an ideological monopoly at all costs. The other argues for flexibility. Trump belongs to the latter – and needed a visible success to show his critics. The face-to-face meeting with Putin provided it. He strengthened his position at home, showing that he can engage Washington directly while sidestepping Western Europe. Foreign policy has always mattered more in Russia, domestic politics more in America. Each man walked away with what he most needed. It is tempting to compare Trump to Mikhail Gorbachev, who sought to win approval abroad through concessions. But the comparison fails. Gorbachev compromised when he didn't need to, given foreign policy's secondary role for a Soviet leader. Trump, by contrast, is locked in a domestic fight, and Alaska was part of it. America's strong economic base gives him confidence that international losses can later be reversed. Russia, with a less flexible economy, weighs foreign policy gains and setbacks much more heavily. Now that Putin and Trump have steadied the bilateral relationship, the American–Russian rivalry enters a new phase. It will remain sharp. But the summit proved one thing: Russia cannot be defeated or sidelined. The world is not interested in the collapse of either the United States or Russia. What it does demand is stability – and recognition that global order cannot exist without Moscow. Anchorage was no final peace. But it was a victory, on both sides. For Russia, it was proof that perseverance and strength can bend the world's most powerful adversary toward dialogue. For Trump, it was ammunition in his domestic political war. Together, these outcomes make the summit not a conclusion, but the opening chapter of a new, unpredictable article was first published by the magazine Profile and was translated and edited by the RT team.
Russia Today
14 hours ago
- Russia Today
Why Putin walked away satisfied from Alaska
The meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump in Alaska may go down as one of Russia's most significant diplomatic wins. It was secured through years of military sacrifice, political perseverance, and relentless effort. Yet it is also a transition – a step into a new stage of the struggle for sovereign states in a fractured world. The most consequential result of Anchorage was the quiet burial of the West's old formula: isolating and 'strategically defeating' Russia. For decades, any state refusing to fall in line risked ostracism. That system cracked in Alaska. Not because of American goodwill – there is no such thing in international politics – but because of pressure. Pressure from Russia, from the so-called 'global majority,' and from the turmoil tearing at America itself. Trump's administration has shifted its approach, and the summit proved it. The outcome was clear: American capabilities diminished, Russian ones enhanced. This, in turn, frees space for other nations to act more independently, even if they will not admit their debt to Moscow. Some talk of a 'renaissance' in relations between Moscow and Washington. But there is nothing to restore. The ties that existed before 2022 were shaped by the USSR's defeat in the Cold War, and cannot be recreated. Instead, dialogue will stabilize on new terms. The core will be recognition that Russia cannot be excluded from the international system. This simple fact means disputes between Moscow and the West, however sharp, are solvable in principle. Competition will remain fierce, especially over Ukraine. But after Anchorage, the Western refusal to acknowledge Russian interests is no longer an insurmountable barrier. For Trump, Alaska delivered something equally valuable: a domestic win. In the US, relations with Russia have become central to the internal political struggle. One camp insists on preserving an ideological monopoly at all costs. The other argues for flexibility. Trump belongs to the latter – and needed a visible success to show his critics. The face-to-face meeting with Putin provided it. He strengthened his position at home, showing that he can engage Washington directly while sidestepping Western Europe. Foreign policy has always mattered more in Russia, domestic politics more in America. Each man walked away with what he most needed. It is tempting to compare Trump to Mikhail Gorbachev, who sought to win approval abroad through concessions. But the comparison fails. Gorbachev compromised when he didn't need to, given foreign policy's secondary role for a Soviet leader. Trump, by contrast, is locked in a domestic fight, and Alaska was part of it. America's strong economic base gives him confidence that international losses can later be reversed. Russia, with a less flexible economy, weighs foreign policy gains and setbacks much more heavily. Now that Putin and Trump have steadied the bilateral relationship, the American–Russian rivalry enters a new phase. It will remain sharp. But the summit proved one thing: Russia cannot be defeated or sidelined. The world is not interested in the collapse of either the United States or Russia. What it does demand is stability – and recognition that global order cannot exist without Moscow. Anchorage was no final peace. But it was a victory, on both sides. For Russia, it was proof that perseverance and strength can bend the world's most powerful adversary toward dialogue. For Trump, it was ammunition in his domestic political war. Together, these outcomes make the summit not a conclusion, but the opening chapter of a new, unpredictable article was first published by the magazine Profile and was translated and edited by the RT team.
Russia Today
07-08-2025
- Russia Today
South Africa rejects industry push to favor US in mineral trade
South African Mining Minister Gwede Mantashe has rejected a proposal by top business leaders to offer the US favorable access to Africa's critical minerals, accusing them of pushing private interests, Bloomberg reported on Wednesday. According to the outlet, the proposal – bearing the phrase 'make minerals great again' – was drafted by a group including Sibanye Stillwater CEO Neal Froneman and board member Rick Menell ahead of President Cyril Ramaphosa's meeting with US President Donald Trump in May. Mantashe said neither the Mines Ministry nor the Minerals Council South Africa, which represents most of the country's mining firms, was consulted during the plan's development. 'They didn't talk to us,' he told Bloomberg, adding that 'there can be nothing about mining without' input from the ministry and broader industry. The minister objected to the 'make minerals great again' wording in the document, saying it 'is not our language.' 'We don't want a critical minerals strategy for the US,' Mantashe said, instead of 'a cross-cutting strategy for everyone.' The disagreement is the latest in a string of disputes between the state and industry over the country's mining policy. South Africa holds over 90% of the world's known platinum group metal reserves and remains Africa's most developed mining economy, though its gold output has declined in recent years, according to estimates by the Minerals Council South Africa and the World Gold Council. Froneman, CEO of Sibanye Stillwater – South Africa's largest gold producing company – reportedly defended the proposal as an effort to improve Pretoria's strained ties with Washington. He said it recommended 'South Africa providing a springboard into Africa to develop relations and explore the potential to supply critical minerals for the US' by leveraging the industry's expertise. He criticized the government's approach as hostile to foreign investment, saying 'the truculent manner of the minister' deters US capital. South Africa-US relations have deteriorated since Trump took office, with Washington accusing Pretoria of enabling a so-called 'white genocide,' opposing its International Court of Justice case against Israel, and imposing steep trade tariffs. Mantashe has previously called for halting mineral shipments to the US in response to Trump's aid cuts.
