Nissan Drops Pricing On 2026 Nissan Leaf & It's Surprising
Nissan is making a value statement against the EV establishment
Undoubtedly, one of the most hyped vehicles that is set to be released later this year is none other than the 2026 Nissan Leaf. Back in March, the Japanese automaker pegged the radically designed new model as the catalyst of an epic comeback plan that includes a rollout of 10 new and refreshed models by 2027.
By the looks of its pricing announcement on August 19, Nissan clearly has electric vehicle giants like Tesla and General Motors' mainstream Chevrolet brand in its crosshairs. It undercuts not only the uber-popular Model Y but also Chevy's least expensive electric crossover.
Nissan says the '26 Leaf's MSRP of $29,990 is cheaper than what it was 15 years ago.
The newly revamped 2026 Nissan Leaf starts at $29,990 for the S+ grade, a $1,850 price bump from the standard 2025 S model. Though the new model year vehicle commands a four-digit premium, it should be noted that the lowest-priced trim grade for 2026 is the one pegged around the mid-range of the Leaf trim lineup.
Pricing is as follows:
LEAF S+ : $29,990
LEAF SV+ : $34,230
LEAF PLATINUM+ : $38,990
Nissan says that pricing and details for the entry-level LEAF S will be announced at a later date. Per the automaker, its asking price for the S+ is the lowest starting MSRP of any new EV on sale in the United States, a feat that it credits to its "commitment to making EV mobility accessible to all."
View the 5 images of this gallery on the original article
"We've stuck to our mission of engineering EVs that are affordable but packed with value," Nissan U.S. Marketing and Sales SVP Vinay Shahani said in a statement. "That's how we've kept the LEAF's price steady over three generations — all while giving owners more style, more technology, more features and a vastly improved driving range over the original 2011 model."
Compared to the entry-level trims of popular electric crossovers like Tesla's revamped 2025 Model Y and Chevrolet's Equinox EV, the 2026 Leaf S+'s MSRP is about $15,000 less than the lowest-priced trim of the Tesla and just $3,610 less than the standard LT 1 FWD (front-wheel-drive) trim of the Chevy.
View the 4 images of this gallery on the original article
The Leaf has changed inside and out for 2026
For 2026, Nissan decided to turn a new leaf for its most notable electric vehicle, increasing its size to become a crossover SUV to better match its competitors. In addition to bold, new styling that includes distinct elements like a Z-inspired sloped roofline, the new Leaf has a noticeable bump in driving range of up to 303 miles per charge, as well as a built-in NACS (North American Charging Standard) port, which provides access to Tesla Superchargers.
In addition, Nissan says that the new Leaf comes with a suite of new technology features, including standard ProPilot Assist, 360-degree 3D Intelligent Around View, Invisible Hood View, and Front Wide View monitors. Available features include an electrically dimming panoramic moonroof, dual 14.3-inch screens, and Google built-in.
Though the $29,990 Leaf S+ model does not have many of the available features that the higher SV+ and top-of-the-line Platinum+ models have, it remains a contender. Its single motor makes 214 horsepower and 261 lb-ft of torque to the front wheels and is backed by a 75 kWh lithium-ion battery.
View the 2 images of this gallery on the original article
When compared to the Leaf S+ model, the lowest-priced version of its closest price rival, the $33,600 LT1 FWD Chevrolet Equinox EV, the Equinox has a slight power advantage at 220 horsepower and a battery capacity advantage with its 85 kWh battery. The Chevy is also a much bigger vehicle, boasting 11 more inches in its wheelbase than the Leaf (116.3 vs. 105.9 inches) and more rear legroom (38 vs. 39.9 inches), a larger trunk (26.4 vs. 20 cu. ft behind 2nd row seats), as well as a bigger 17.7-inch screen with Google Built-in as standard.
However, while both the Equinox EV and Leaf can be charged at Tesla Superchargers, the Leaf can be charged adapter-free, thanks to its built-in NACS port. But while the Nissan may have smaller interface screens than the Chevy, Equinox EV owners will have to make do with GM's proprietary software, as the Leaf is still compatible with popular smartphone mirroring like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.Final Thoughts
Nissan has not disclosed an exact date for when the new 2026 Leaf will hit dealers, but given the "Fall 2025" timeline, it is likely to fall close to when the $7,500 U.S. Federal EV Tax Credit ends on September 30.
Although the Equinox EV may not be a fair comparison against the Leaf size-wise, given the proposition of the impending loss of the Federal EV Tax Credit, General Motors seems to have a lot to prove with the upcoming Chevrolet Bolt when it comes out sometime next year. It will have to offer a compelling package against the $29,990 Leaf while remaining competitively priced.Nissan Drops Pricing On 2026 Nissan Leaf & It's Surprising first appeared on Autoblog on Aug 19, 2025
This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Aug 19, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elizabeth Warren Says Elon Musk's SpaceX Is Paying Less Tax Than You But Getting 'Billions' From The Government: Trump And GOP 'Rigged' The Tax Code
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has accused Elon Musk's SpaceX of benefiting from billions in U.S. government contracts while paying little to no federal taxes. Warren Accuses Musk Of Dodging Taxes On Monday, Warren took to X, formerly Twitter, and said that "Elon Musk's SpaceX is worth over $350 BILLION – after receiving billions in government contracts – but could be paying LESS in taxes than you." She blamed Donald Trump's tax reforms, saying Republicans "rigged the tax code with loopholes for billionaire corporations" and demanded "no more corporate handouts." Trending: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Her remarks followed a New York Times report that SpaceX has avoided paying federal income tax on about $5 billion in taxable income since its founding in 2002 by using a legal tax strategy known as a net operating loss carryforward. The provision, expanded indefinitely under Trump in 2017, lets companies offset future income with earlier losses. Musk Previously Defended Tesla's Tax Strategy Musk currently has a net worth of $375 billion, according to Bloomberg's Billionaire Index, making him the wealthiest individual on Earth. In February earlier this year, Musk and Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) VP of Finance Sendil Palani denied claims that Tesla evaded taxes, saying that the company legally carried forward past losses under IRS provisions. At the time, Musk acknowledged Tesla didn't pay U.S. federal income tax for several years, including 2024, since most profits come from overseas sales, but highlighted the need for comprehensive tax reform to address excessive Revenue Soars, Taxes Stay Low Documents reviewed by the publication show that more than 75% of SpaceX's revenue in 2020 and 2021 came from federal contracts. Despite that reliance on taxpayers, SpaceX paid only minimal taxes — including $483,000 to foreign governments and $78,000 in state taxes in 2021. SpaceX's business is also booming. Revenue is expected to reach $15.5 billion in 2025, double the $7.4 billion reported in 2023. Starlink, its satellite internet service, now generates more revenue than its rocket division, with 2.5 million users and $8 billion in 2023 sales. Warren Broadens Criticism Of Musk Warren has previously also targeted Musk over what she describes as conflicts of interest and misuse of government influence. In June, her office released a report titled "130 Days of Elon Musk," alleging more than 100 abuses of power during his time as a Trump administration adviser. She has also criticized the Pentagon for awarding Musk's AI startup xAI a $200 million contract just days after its chatbot Grok was caught making antisemitic remarks. Read Next: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. Bezos' Favorite Real Estate Platform Launches A Way To Ride The Ongoing Private Credit Boom Photo Courtesy: Sheila Fitzgerald On UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Elizabeth Warren Says Elon Musk's SpaceX Is Paying Less Tax Than You But Getting 'Billions' From The Government: Trump And GOP 'Rigged' The Tax Code originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Better Quantum Computing Stock: D-Wave Quantum vs. Quantum Computing Inc.
Key Points Quantum computing offer an intriguing opportunity given its potential to revolutionize many industries. D-Wave Quantum and Quantum Computing Inc. are early-stage businesses with promising innovations. However, both companies are seeing volatile sales across quarters, and neither is profitable. 10 stocks we like better than D-Wave Quantum › The quantum computing sector offers an exciting new area to invest in. Quantum machines can perform sophisticated calculations beyond the capabilities of current classical computers. This tech could transform industries such as medicine and artificial intelligence. But among the bevy of businesses in the field, which are worthwhile long-term investments as the nascent industry grows? Two to consider are D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS) and Quantum Computing Inc. (NASDAQ: QUBT), which also refers to itself as QCi. Between D-Wave and QCi, one looks like the better quantum computing stock. Read on for an exploration of both businesses to understand which one and why. Untangling D-Wave Quantum's business performance D-Wave produces income primarily through subscriptions to its quantum systems via the cloud and professional services to support customers in the use of its technology. In 2025, D-Wave's sales have been on a roller coaster. It generated $15 million in the first quarter after selling one of its quantum computers. In Q2, revenue was $3.1 million, a 42% increase from 2024's $2.2 million as the company picked up $1 million to upgrade the device sold in the first quarter. This sales volatility could continue for some time as D-Wave grows its business. An encouraging sign is 92% year-over-year growth in its Q2 bookings to $1.3 million. Bookings represent customer orders received in the quarter that are expected to produce revenue when the orders are fulfilled. However, D-Wave isn't turning a profit. Its Q2 operating loss of $26.5 million was a 42% increase from the previous year. That's a concerning trend given its Q2 revenue of just $3.1 million. Fortunately, D-Wave has stockpiled a record high $819.3 million in cash and equivalents on its balance sheet. It exited Q2 with total assets of $843.6 million versus total liabilities of $149.3 million. This enables the company to maintain operations in the short term on its path to revenue growth. Quantum Computing Inc.'s budding business QCi uses light particles, called photons, to perform calculations in its quantum computer chips. It sells these chips, other hardware, and professional services to generate revenue. The company is in an early stage of its business lifecycle with sales coming primarily from research grants and proof-of-concept projects. As a result, its sales are small, and prone to substantial swings. For example, in 2024, QCi generated revenue of $373,000, a 4% year-over-year increase. But through the first half of 2025, sales plunged 52% to $100,000. QCi's technology has the potential to generate long-term revenue growth. Photons can be used in a wide range of light sensing, imaging, and other optical applications. Nevertheless, until QCi can gain traction with a larger group of customers, sales will continue to struggle. And that does not bode well for its business viability, because the company is not profitable. The company exited Q2 with an operating loss of $10.2 million against revenue of $61,000 as research and development costs more than doubled year over year to $6 million. QCi's saving grace is that, like D-Wave, it amassed a large war chest to fund operations in the short term. Q2 total assets were $426.1 million with cash and equivalents of $348.8 million. Total liabilities in the quarter were $30.1 million. Deciding between D-Wave Quantum and Quantum Computing Inc. In choosing between D-Wave Quantum or QCi, an important consideration is share price valuation. Since both are not profitable, the way to get at this is using the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, which measures how much investors are willing to pay for every dollar of revenue generated over the trailing 12 months. The chart shows QCi's P/S multiple is far above D-Wave's, and the disparity is so great, QCi shares look overpriced. Consequently, D-Wave stock is the better value. This, combined with promising sales and bookings growth, makes D-Wave a more attractive investment than its rival. At QCi's current phase of development, it's a highly speculative stock given the low revenue, high costs, and limited commercial sales. This doesn't mean D-Wave shares are a bargain, since its sales multiple is quite high as well. Another factor to consider is that the quantum computing industry is in its early stages. Quantum computers are prone to calculation errors, because the atomic particles in these machines are sensitive to the slightest environmental disturbances, such as a minor temperature change. So while D-Wave is the better choice versus QCi, any investment in a pure-play quantum computer company is a risk. And it could take years before a scalable quantum device is possible. Some estimates predict that won't happen until 2040. Given these factors, only investors with a high risk tolerance should consider investing in D-Wave. Should you invest $1,000 in D-Wave Quantum right now? Before you buy stock in D-Wave Quantum, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and D-Wave Quantum wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $671,466!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,633!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,077% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025 Robert Izquierdo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Quantum Computing Stock: D-Wave Quantum vs. Quantum Computing Inc. was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lowe's to buy Foundation Building Materials for $8.8 billion to boost contractor business
(Reuters) -Lowe's Cos said on Wednesday it has agreed to buy interior building products distributor Foundation Building Materials for nearly $8.8 billion, stepping up its expansion into the professional builder market. Shares of the home improvement chain rose 4.3% in premarket trading as the company also beat second-quarter profit estimates. Lowe's and rival Home Depot are leaning on deals to bolster their businesses that serve contractors and builders, a key growth area, amid softness in the do-it-yourself segment. Lowe's acquired Artisan Design for $1.33 billion in April, while Home Depot in late June decided to buy specialty building products distributor GMS for about $4.3 billion. The company raised its total annual sales forecast to a range of $84.5 billion to $85.5 billion, compared to its prior expectation of $83.5 to $84.5 billion. It earned $4.33 per share on an adjusted basis in the quarter, exceeding estimates of $4.24, according to data compiled by LSEG. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data