Zohran Mamdani Gets Major Polling Boost in New York Mayoral Race
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Zohran Mamdani is leading other candidates by double-digits in New York City's mayoral race, according to a new poll from Gotham Polling & Analytics.
Newsweek has contacted Mamdani's campaign for comment via email outside regular business hours. Incumbent mayor Eric Adams' campaign and a spokesperson for former governor Andrew Cuomo have also been contacted for comment via email,
Why It Matters
Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist, won New York City's Democratic mayoral primary last month in a stunning upset for Andrew Cuomo, after running an energetic campaign focused on lowering the cost of living. He has promised free city buses, free child care, a rent freeze for people living in rent-stabilized apartments, government-run grocery stores and more, all paid for with taxes on the wealthy.
Cuomo, the former governor who is seeking a political comeback from the sexual harassment that led to his resignation in 2021, conceded defeat on the night of the primary, but is weighing whether to mount a campaign as an independent candidate.
The general election field also includes incumbent New York City mayor Eric Adams, who said he would run as an independent rather than seek the Democratic nomination again following backlash over his indictment on federal corruption charges. The case has been dismissed, and Adams has denied wrongdoing.
The field also includes independent candidate Jim Walden and Republican Curtis Sliwa.
Zohran Mamdani, Democratic candidate for New York City mayor, speaks during a press conference celebrating his primary victory with leaders and members of the city's labor unions on July 2, 2025 in New York.
Zohran Mamdani, Democratic candidate for New York City mayor, speaks during a press conference celebrating his primary victory with leaders and members of the city's labor unions on July 2, 2025 in New York.
Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images
What To Know
Mamdani is leading with 41 percent, followed by 26 percent for Cuomo and just 16 percent for Adams, according to the survey by Gotham Polling & Analytics, first reported by the New York Post. Sliwa had just under 10 percent of support.
The poll surveyed just over 1,000 voters between June 30 and July 2.
According to the Post, the survey was aimed at drumming up support for Adams' reelection bid and was "heavily skewed when surveying voters to try to boost Adams' numbers and tarnish others."
Still, both Cuomo and Adams' numbers appear to be dragged down by their scandals.
More than half—51 percent of voters—said they would never vote for Adams, while 39 percent said the same about Cuomo. Some 46 percent said the same for Mamdani.
What People Are Saying
Stephen Graves, of Gotham Polling & Analytics, told the Post: "If both [Cuomo and Adams] are in the race anywhere near the election, Mamdani can go pick out drapes for Gracie Mansion.
"If [Adams or Cuomo] drops out, [the other has] a chance, but based on this, Cuomo has the better chance."
Adams' campaign spokesman Todd Shapiro told the Post: "Let's be clear: Andrew Cuomo spent nearly $30 million in the primary and was soundly rejected by voters. If all that money and national attention translates to just a two-point lead in one early poll, that's not a show of strength—it's a ceiling.
"Meanwhile, Mayor Adams is just beginning to campaign, and as more voters hear his message and see the facts, that gap will close and the momentum will shift decisively."
Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi told The Associated Press last week: "We'll be continuing conversations with people from all across the city while determining next steps."
Mamdani said on X last week: "I am humbled by the support of more than 545,000 New Yorkers in last week's primary. This is just the beginning of out expanding coalition to make New York City affordable. And we will do it together."
What's Next
Voters will go to the polls to decide the city's next mayor on November 4.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
21 minutes ago
- Axios
Planned Parenthood sues Trump over "defund" provision
Planned Parenthood on Monday sued the Trump administration over a one-year funding ban in the Republican tax and spending package, saying it violates the reproductive health group's constitutional rights. Why it matters: Planned Parenthood has called the provision a "backdoor abortion ban" and said it could lead to the closure of some 200 affiliated clinics nationwide. Driving the news: The just-passed reconciliation bill includes a provision that effectively cut off Planned Parenthood and other large organizations that offer abortions from federal Medicaid funding for one year. Republicans lawmakers originally pressed for a 10-year ban but dialed back the duration while the Senate parliamentarian reviewed whether the prohibition was in order. The lawsuit also comes after the Supreme Court late last month ruled Medicaid patients don't have a right to freely choose their medical provider, in a South Carolina case that centered around state funding for Planned Parenthood. What they're saying: "The Defund Provision is a naked attempt to leverage the government's spending power to attack and penalize Planned Parenthood and impermissibly single it out for unfavorable treatment," the organization said in the filing in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts. "There is no legitimate justification for the statute; rather, the true design of the Defund Provision is simply to express disapproval of, attack, and punish Planned Parenthood," the group stated in the complaint. More than 1 million Medicaid patients annually access health services through Planned Parenthood affiliates, they said. The suit names HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, as well as the health department, CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz and his agency.
Miami Herald
28 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Beloved grocery store staple about to get a major price hike
Inflation is a word no one likes to hear, but everyone who has to pay for living expenses likely knows it well. It's a common joke that older people complain about inflation a lot - but it's typically because they've been alive long enough to remember when things cost about half of what they do now. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter While inflation anxiety is common, ever since President Donald Trump enacted his tariffs plan in April, consumers have been more worried than ever that the cost of living will surge. It's a fair concern to have. The U.S. is the largest goods importer in the world, with $330 trillion spent on imports in 2024 alone. Additional levies on these imports present a new problem for businesses - either eat the costs, which few can afford to do, or pass them on to the consumer. Related: Wendy's will soon start exporting its most popular meal The 90-day pause on tariffs was originally set to expire as of July 9, but the Trump administration announced it will push that date to August 1 for countries that have not struck a deal with the U.S. So while that change does buy a small bit of time, it's still likely that U.S. consumers will see price hikes this year. Now one particular grocery item is set to become more expensive, and it actually has nothing to do with tariffs (for now). Image source:While most Americans have grown up with the classic peanut butter and jelly sandwich, an alternative sandwich spread has captured the hearts of many who love rich flavors: Nutella. The spread is made with hazelnuts, which Italian maker Ferrero currently buys from Turkey. It's been making the product since 1964, when a cocoa shortage post-World War II inspired the idea of turning to hazelnuts instead. The majority (65%) of the world's production of hazelnuts originates in Turkey. But a cold snap in April severely damaged the crops, leading to a hazelnut shortage. Related: General Mills quietly discontinues three cereals fans loved Ibrahim Yumakli, the country's agriculture minister, said on social media at the time it was "one of the largest agricultural frost events in our history since the major agricultural frost event in 2014." Wholesale prices for hazelnuts leapt 30% because of the shortage. And per data from agricultural intelligence firm Expana, that cost could keep rising. Nutella may not disappear from store shelves anytime soon; Ferraro issued a statement saying it did not expect a disruption. Still, a price hike is likely. While the nature of inflation is typically that things slowly become more expensive over time, the last five years have posed a more dramatic change that's left many consumers feeling overwhelmed. Between 2020 and 2024, U.S. food prices have surged 23.6%, per a report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. "Food price increases in 2020-21 were largely driven by shifting consumption patterns and supply chain disruptions resulting from the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic," the report says. Experts also predict that tariffs going into effect will drive food prices up again, with costs rising 2.6% in the short term, according to the Yale Budget Lab. It also predicts that number will settle at around 3% higher than what consumers paid before the tariffs took effect. In other words, you may want to consider stocking up on some staples before August 1 rolls around - and grab a few jars of Nutella while you're at it. Related: Krispy Kreme brings back fan-favorite menu item after 6 years The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
New York Post
34 minutes ago
- New York Post
NY Times rushed out story on Mamdani claiming to be black on Columbia application over fears it would be scooped by Christopher Rufo: report
The New York Times rushed to put out its story on Zohran Mamdani claiming to be 'African American' when he applied to Columbia University because the newspaper feared it would be scooped by right-leaning journalist Christopher Rufo, according to a report. The Gray Lady is facing a storm of criticism following its decision to publish the story based on hacked Columbia documents that revealed Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor, identified as both 'Asian' and 'Black or African American' on his 2009 college application. Mamdani, who is of Indian descent and was born in Uganda, confirmed the details to the Times and said he checked those boxes because the application did not reflect the complexity of his background. Advertisement 4 Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for mayor of New York City, claimed to be African American on his 2009 college application. Paul Martinka for NY Post Two people familiar with the reporting process told Semafor that the Times knew Rufo and other reporters were working on the same lead. Rufo confirmed to Semafor that he had been pursuing the story and planned to release more details on his Substack. Advertisement A Times spokesperson declined to say whether Rufo's reporting prompted the timing of the publication but referred Semafor to a prior statement given to the Columbia Journalism Review. 'What matters most here is whether the information was true and factual — it was, confirmed by Mr. Mamdani; that it was independently confirmed; and that it is relevant to the public,' Patrick Healy, assistant managing editor for standards and trust at the Times, told CJR. Mayor Eric Adams, who is running against Mamdani as an independent, publicly called on Columbia to release Mamdani's admission records, calling his racial identification 'deeply offensive.' Aides to former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who lost to Mamdani in the Democratic primary, said Mamdani's claims on the form could be 'the tip of the iceberg' and that the state assemblyman could be hiding even more 'fraud.' Advertisement 4 The New York Times broke the story about Mamdani's application to Columbia University. Christopher Sadowski The Times piece drew criticism over the weekend, sparking heated debate among Mamdani's supporters, media observers and even Gray Lady journalists. Some critics defended Mamdani's racial identification, pointing out that he was born in Africa. Others questioned the ethics of reporting on a college application that was ultimately rejected, and whether hacked materials from a teenager's personal file merited a full news article. A large share of the criticism focused on the source of the documents — a online figure known using the psuedonym Crémieux. Advertisement Initially described by the Times as 'an academic and an opponent of affirmative action,' Crémieux has previously promoted controversial views on the link between race and IQ. According to The Guardian, Crémieux is the alias of Jordan Lasker. The Times later updated the article to note that Crémieux 'writes often about IQ and race.' The Post has sought comment from Rufo and Mamdani. Lasker was not immediately available for comment. Jane Kirtley, a media ethics professor at the University of Minnesota Law School, questioned the decision to grant the source anonymity. 'It seems a little disingenuous to play this game of 'We know something you don't know,'' she said. 'Why would you promise him anonymity and then play hide-the-ball with the readers?' She added: 'My question is: Why would you have even made that promise to this individual in the first instance? I don't see the need.' The story also caused friction within the Times newsroom. Advertisement 4 According to a report, the Times rushed the story's publication because it feared it would be scooped by right-leaning journalist Christopher Rufo. The Washington Post via Getty Images 'People are really upset,' one Times journalist told Semafor. Times columnist Jamelle Bouie was particularly vocal, posting on Bluesky: 'i think you should tell readers if your source is a nazi.' He deleted that post — and others expressing frustration with the article — citing a violation of Times social media guidelines. Bouie did not respond to a request for comment. Advertisement Lydia Polgreen, another Times columnist, shared her perspective without directly commenting on the story's newsworthiness. 'I can see why a political young man like Zohran might fill out his college application the way he did,' she wrote on Twitter. 'Because if you are like me, you struggle to be known in this country. Our visual sorting is so simplistic and quite brutal.' Polgreen, who is biracial with African parents, said she understood Mamdani's identification choices. Advertisement 4 Mamdani unsuccessfully applied for admission to Columbia University (whose campus is seen above). AP The Times leadership stood by the reporting. According to Semafor, senior editors were aligned in their decision to publish and approved the story after a standard editorial review. A senior Times reporter defended the story by pointing to the public conversation it had sparked. 'The fact that this story engendered all the conversation and debate that it has feels like all the evidence you need that this was a legit line of reporting,' the reporter said. Advertisement Still, critics questioned the newsworthiness of the article and the Times' choice to base it on stolen records. 'We publish stories once newsworthy information is confirmed and our reporters and editors have completed their work,' a Times spokesperson told The Post. 'That was the case with this story; we went to Mr. Mamdani, he confirmed our information as true, and our colleagues had done thorough reporting. We don't hit publish because others may be working on a story.'
