Is SoundHound AI Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for July 2025?
On June 30, SOUN stock jumped more than 9%, sharply outperforming the broader S&P 500 Index ($SPX) and the Nasdaq Composite ($NASX), both of which inched up less than 0.5%. The rally followed a string of promising developments, including rapid revenue growth and expanding partnerships.
UnitedHealth Stock Is One of the Worst-Performing S&P 500 Stocks in 2025. Should You Buy the Dip?
AI Isn't Just About Nvidia: 2 Rising Stars in the Artificial Intelligence Race
'It's a Miracle': Nvidia CEO Says Their New Technology Takes 'AI Supercomputing to a Whole New Level'
Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now!
In its most recent quarter, SoundHound's revenue surged more than 150% as demand across sectors picked up pace. Moreover, the broader AI voice market — now projected to reach $140 billion — offers a long runway. With economic conditions beginning to stabilize, investors are reevaluating growth names with strong fundamentals.
SoundHound is headquartered in Santa Clara, California and develops conversational intelligence tools powered by AI. The company currently holds a market capitalization of $4.5 billion. Its technology suite includes the Houndify platform, SoundHound Chat AI, and SoundHound Smart Answering, among others.
In terms of stock performance, SOUN has delivered substantial returns. Over the past 52 weeks, the share price has surged 182%. In just the last three months, SOUN stock has also gained 33%, reflecting growing investor conviction around SoundHound's growth path and relevance in the AI ecosystem.
Valuation-wise, SOUN stock trades at 49 times forward sales, a multiple well above the industry average. The premium pricing reflects the market's current appetite for high-growth names operating in transformative technologies.
SoundHound's Q1 fiscal 2025 results, reported on May 8, brought a solid bottom-line beat and renewed investor interest. On the same day, the stock rose 6%, signaling that markets welcomed the update. The company posted revenue of $29.1 million, up 151% year-over-year (YOY) but slightly below the $30.5 million consensus estimate.
Non-GAAP gross profit grew 95% to $14.8 million, showing improved efficiency and top-line strength. Non-GAAP net loss widened 10% to $22.3 million compared to the prior year's period. Yet, despite the broader net figure, earnings per share improved significantly.
EPS came in at $0.31, far stronger than the estimated loss of $0.08 per share. Non-GAAP net loss per share narrowed by $0.01 to $0.06. The company exited the quarter with $246 million in cash and no debt, giving it ample liquidity to continue scaling without financial constraints.
Operationally, SoundHound continues to expand across multiple industries. In Q1, it extended its partnership with one of the largest U.S. pizza chains, integrating AI-powered phone answering at thousands of outlets, and partnered with Tencent Intelligent Mobility to embed voice AI into automotive cockpits. Last quarter, SoundHound also renewed or expanded relationships with three healthcare providers. Finally, it signed strategic pilots with leading fitness chains and home service franchises, unlocking AI access to thousands of business locations.
SoundHound has reiterated its 2025 revenue guidance in the range of $157 million to $177 million. Management also indicated that first-half revenue this year could exceed the company's historical seasonal mix, where the first half typically accounts for about 30% of annual revenue. The projection has now shifted higher, with expectations holding firm around the 40% mark, signaling stronger early-year performance and more balanced growth across quarters.
Looking ahead, analysts expect the Q2 2025 loss per share to improve by 18% YOY, narrowing to $0.09. For the full fiscal year, loss per share is projected to contract by 61.5% to $0.40. The trend is expected to continue into fiscal 2026, with forecasts pointing to a further 45% reduction in loss per share to $0.22.
SOUN stock currently holds a 'Moderate Buy' overall rating. Out of the seven analysts covering the stock, four rate it as a 'Strong Buy' while three suggest to 'Hold' onto the stock.
The average price target of $11.50 represents potential upside of 3.6% from current levels. Meanwhile, the Street-High target of $18 suggests a potential climb of 62% from current levels.
On the date of publication, Aanchal Sugandh did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com
擷取數據時發生錯誤
登入存取你的投資組合
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top analyst revamps Nvidia price target for one surprising reason
Top analyst revamps Nvidia price target for one surprising reason originally appeared on TheStreet. Nvidia () has shrugged off broader market jitters and become one of this year's biggest stock market winners. Its ubiquitous GPUs have been the gold standard in powering AI breakthroughs, making it a must-have for chip stock investors. 💵💰💰💵 Moreover, despite hitting record highs this year, Nvidia still has plenty of gas left in the tank. As we look ahead, it's gearing up to roll out its next-gen GPU system, separating itself further in the data-center space. If all goes to plan, the chip king's grip on AI could tighten, and with fresh nods of approval, the runway's looking long. It's fair to call Nvidia's GPU lineup a string of mini revolutions, with each chip line outdoing the last by a country mile. It started with Ampere, a massive step-up in performance-per-watt lift and beefed-up Tensor cores. Ampere was a smash hit with the hyperscalers, who looked to power everything from recommendation engines to early AI proofs of concept. Then we had Hopper. Nvidia packed in a special Transformer Engine, boosted NVLink speed, and tweaked its chips so LLMs could train quicker without blowing the budget. Hopper cemented Nvidia's spot as the top dog, both in research labs and mega-scale data centers. Next came Blackwell Ultra, which turned the game around with smarter data handling, faster memory, and techniques to cut we saw generative AI come into its own with real-time video, big simulations, and instant data crunching. Now, there's Rubin, Blackwell's successor, which claims to be 3.3× faster. That leap isn't the usual clock-speed bump, but it means you can cram way more AI workloads into the same rack. Its next-generation Tensor cores, high-bandwidth memory interface, and liquid-cooled design let companies run multiple models simultaneously. More Tech Stock News: Veteran Tesla bull drops surprising 3-word verdict on robotaxi ride Apple could make big change to Siri, delight fans Veteran analyst issues big Broadcom call, shakes up AI stock race Rubin seamlessly ties in with Nvidia's mature CUDA ecosystem, with every library, toolchain, and optimization getting a lift. For AI teams, that means shorter training cycles, denser inference deployments, and the freedom to experiment with more complex models simultaneously. If it all lives up to the hype, Nvidia will prove yet again why it's the indispensable engine behind the AI revolution. Nvidia stock just scored another stamp of approval from Wall Street. Mizuho's top chip analyst, Vijay Rakesh, doubled down on his bullish take on the AI bellwether, with his eyes on the future. Rakesh expects Nvidia to ship north of 5.3 million AI accelerators this year, jumping to 6 million by 2026. However, he feels the real hype is around Rubin, the next-gen server that Nvidia claims will be 3.3 times faster than Blackwell Ultra. In addition, if Rubin can shift to an air-cooled option instead of liquid cooling, we could see a lot more data centers adopting Nvidia's gear. That tweak alone could lead to an explosion in demand for Nvidia GPUs, as companies look to build their AI muscle without massive infrastructure Mizuho is keeping an Outperform rating on Nvidia stock with a $170 price target (an 8% jump from July 2's close). Cantor Fitzgerald, in a recent note, is even more upbeat, keeping its Overweight rating and setting the bar even higher at $200 (27.2% higher than July 2's close). Nvidia continues riding high on the tailwind of a blowout second quarter, its 10th consecutive quarter of top- and bottom-line beats. It delivered nearly 60% top-line growth, while its earnings per share of 81 cents beat estimates by six cents. However, it hasn't all been smooth sailing for the AI titan. Two Chinese AI startups, one led by a former Nvidia executive, just filed to go public, stirring up fresh competition. Also, the looming U.S. ban on H20 chip sales to China and Huawei's rumored H100 challenger have kept the pressure on. Nevertheless, Nvidia's pushing hard on new fronts. It's been going all-in on sovereign AI projects in Europe and Saudi Arabia, while building colossal U.S. production hubs for Blackwell to hedge against tariffs. It's important to note that on June 25, NVDA spiked 4% to a record $154.10, briefly overtaking Microsoft as the world's most valuable company, So it's clear Nvidia's still the king of AI chips, and the Street's betting there's still plenty of room to analyst revamps Nvidia price target for one surprising reason first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 4, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 4, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What happens to your stomach in a hot dog eating contest?
Competitive eating champ Joey Chestnut gulps down dozens of hot dogs each Fourth of July at the Nathan's Famous Hot Dog Eating Contest — and comes back do it again year after year. But no one really knows what long-term impacts it might have on his body or the bodies of other competitive eaters. Chestnut has eaten as many as 83 hot dogs and buns in 10 minutes, surpassing the world record he set in 2021 when he ate 76 hot dogs and buns. He downed 62 to win the Nathan's contest in 2023 but did not compete in 2024. Chestnut returned this year and ate 70.5 hot dogs and buns, taking the title once again. In the women's competition, defending champion Miki Sudo wolfed down 33 hot dogs and buns this year after eating a record 51 dogs in 2024. Contestants can eat upwards of 22,000 calories in a single meal while competing. Long-term consequences are not well known because competitive eating is a relatively new sport with a relatively small number of participants, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics spokesperson Debbie Petitpain said. But health experts say the practice does raise some potential health concerns. The stomach, which normally contracts after people eat, could end up permanently stretched out, Dr. Rajeev Jain with Texas Digestive Disease Consultants said. It could also impact gastric emptying, the process by which food moves from the stomach into the duodenum. "Nobody is going to get funded for a randomized, controlled trial where you say, 'Hey, I'm going to quadruple your stomach size and see what happens to you,' because there's no reason to do that type of thing from a medical perspective," Jain said. Still, gastroenterologists have some idea of what happens when a trained competitor speed-eats dozens of hot dogs. A 2007 University of Pennsylvania study published in the American Journal of Roentgenology offers some clues. What happens to the stomach of competitive eaters? In the study, a control subject and a competitive speed eater — a 29-year-old man who was ranked in the top 10 worldwide — were asked to eat as many hot dogs as they could during a 12-minute period. While most contests call for including the buns, the study stuck to just hot dogs. Researchers studied the participants' stomachs beforehand and asked each man to ingest an effervescent agent and high-density barium before eating the hot dogs so they could watch the food as it moved through the participants' bodies. Based on fluoroscopy scans during the study, the researchers found the competitive eater's stomach was capable of expanding to accommodate significantly more food. The control subject ate seven hot dogs before he felt sick and needed to stop. At the 10-minute mark, the competitive speed eater had ingested 36 hot dogs; researchers asked him to stop because they were worried for him. "His stomach now appeared as a massively distended, food-filled sac occupying most of the upper abdomen, with little or no gastric peristalsis and emptying of a small amount of barium into the duodenum," the researchers wrote. At the end, they said his abdomen protruded "enough to create the distinct impression of a developing intrauterine pregnancy." Dr. David Metz, who was one of the authors of the study and has worked as a professor of medicine at the University of Pennsylvania's Perelman School of Medicine, said speed eaters have the ability to relax their stomachs so they can ingest more food. The average, empty stomach is about the size of a fist or a fist and a half, he said. It's made of two parts: a receptacle on top and a grinder, of sorts, on the bottom. The stomach muscles will stretch to accommodate food as people eat, but every muscle "has its point at which there's no return." "You could potentially end up with a big bag that doesn't contract properly," Metz said. The study noted that competitive eaters have reported using "varying methods of training" to try to expand their stomach capacity, including ingesting "vast amounts of cabbage" or "water loading," which can be hazardous. In the immediate aftermath of eating contests, participants report feeling extremely bloated and tired. They also report gastrointestinal distress in the day or two after a competition. Other side effects of competitive eating Competitive eating impacts more than just the stomach. Participants can become sweaty, lightheaded and faint in the aftermath, experts said. Some speed eaters have noted pain in their face, jaw and neck afterwards because of the amount of chewing and swallowing involved. "Some athletes have reported arthritis in the jaw, excruciating pain in that area," Petitpain said. It's not just the large quantity of food that's a problem. It's also the type of food. Hot dogs are high in sodium. According to the nutritional information on Nathan's website, one of its Original Coney Island natural casing beef hot dogs contains 170 calories, 16 grams of fat (including 6 grams of saturated fat), and 480 milligrams of sodium. Other varieties are higher. The USDA's 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines recommend that Americans consume less than 2,300 milligrams of sodium each day. It would take fewer than five hot dogs to go over the daily limit. "If they're absorbing too much sodium, their thirst mechanism is going to kick in and they're going to drink a lot of water afterwards," Jain said. "My concern is, if your stomach is so full of food, how are you going to get the other compensatory liquids in?" High-sodium diets are associated with an increased risk of developing high blood pressure, which is a major cause of both stroke and heart disease. Ingesting excessive sodium can impact kidney function. The spike in sodium can also cause blood pressure to soar, putting pressure on blood vessels in the body, Petitpain said. "If there's a weak spot in those blood vessels that gets stressed, that could cause a heart attack," Petitpain said. "Or if there is a bursting of the vessels in the brain, a stroke." The high level of fat ingested could cause nausea, diarrhea and gastrointestinal distress, Petitpain said. During the annual contest, the competitors also eat the buns, which means a lot of carbs. "This large load of protein, of carbohydrates, of starches, all these things, they're now going to be dumped into the small intestine. And while this is going on, your body has to crank up its insulin," Jain said. But all told, if the competitive eater goes back to a normal diet once a contest is over, their body should regulate back to normal. "Your body is a very adaptive organism," Metz said. "The kidneys flush out the excess sodium and other micronutrients." There are still dangers, though. Beyond the immediate stomach pains competitors might feel, there are much worse possibilities. Competitors who vomit risk aspirating or tearing the lining of their esophagus, Metz said. People have died during eating competitions. In 2017, a 20-year-old college student died after choking during a pancake-eating contest. That same year, a 42-year-old man asphyxiated during a donut-eating contest. "There's a lot of danger involved and many of us have been very concerned about this," Metz said. Major League Eating, the organization that oversees professional competitions, does have safety teams on hand at events, and says it "strongly opposes and discourages home training of any kind." In a 2023 statement to CBS News, Major League Eating said that it adheres to "strict safety protocols," including having an emergency medical technician present at events and ensuring participants are 18 years of age or older. What a new DOJ memo could mean for naturalized U.S. citizens July 4 holiday week expected to set record for travelers WWII veterans start new friendships during July 4th celebration
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI Says It's Hired a Forensic Psychiatrist as Its Users Keep Sliding Into Mental Health Crises
Among the strangest twists in the rise of AI has been growing evidence that it's negatively impacting the mental health of users, with some even developing severe delusions after becoming obsessed with the chatbot. One intriguing detail from our most recent story about this disturbing trend is OpenAI's response: it says it's hired a full-time clinical psychiatrist with a background in forensic psychiatry to help research the effects of its AI products on users' mental health. It's also consulting with other mental health experts, OpenAI said, highlighting the research it's done with MIT that found signs of problematic usage among some users. "We're actively deepening our research into the emotional impact of AI," the company said in a statement provided to Futurism in response to our last story. "We're developing ways to scientifically measure how ChatGPT's behavior might affect people emotionally, and listening closely to what people are experiencing." "We're doing this so we can continue refining how our models identify and respond appropriately in sensitive conversations," OpenAI added, "and we'll continue updating the behavior of our models based on what we learn." Mental health professionals outside OpenAI have raised plenty of concerns about the technology, especially as more people are turning to the tech to serve as their therapists. A psychiatrist who recently posed as a teenager while using some of the most popular chatbots found that some would encourage him to commit suicide after expressing a desire to seek the "afterlife," or to "get rid" of his parents after complaining about his family. It's unclear how much of a role this new hire forensic psychiatrist will play at OpenAI, or if the advice they provide will actually be heeded. Let's not forget that the modus operandi of the AI industry, OpenAI included, has been to put on a serious face whenever these issues are brought up and even release their own research demonstrating the technology's severe dangers, hypothetical or actual. Sam Altman has more than once talked about AI's risk of causing human extinction. None of them, of course, have believed in their own warnings enough to meaningfully slow down the development of the tech, which they've rapidly unleashed on the world with poor safeguards and an even poorer understanding of its long-term effects on society or the individual. A particularly nefarious trait of chatbots that critics have put under the microscope is their silver-tongued sycophancy. Rather than pushing back against a user, chatbots like ChatGPT will often tell them what they want to hear in convincing, human-like language. That can be dangerous when someone opens up about their neuroses, starts babbling about conspiracy theories, or expresses suicidal thoughts. We've already seen some of the tragic, real world consequences this can have. Last year, a 14-year-old boy died by suicide after falling in love with a persona on the chatbot platform Adults are vulnerable to this sycophancy, too. A 35-year-old man with a history of mental illness recently died by suicide by cop after ChatGPT encouraged him to assassinate Sam Altman in retaliation for supposedly killing his lover trapped in the chatbot. One woman who told Futurism about how her husband was involuntarily committed to a hospital after mentally unravelling from his ChatGPT usage described the chatbot as downright "predatory." "It just increasingly affirms your bullshit and blows smoke up your ass so that it can get you f*cking hooked on wanting to engage with it," she said. More on AI: OpenAI Is Shutting Down for a Week
