Auditor names colleges behind financial report delay
In a subsequent letter to the convener of the committee, Auditor General for Scotland Stephen Boyle advised that the colleges in question are Forth Valley College and Lews Castle College. He explained that both had failed to submit audited accounts on time, and that the SFC had therefore been 'unable to complete its financial sustainability report for the college sector'.
Stephen Boyle also confirmed that he was preparing statutory reports on both organisations. The report on Forth Valley College, which explores a serious procurement breach that led to the involvement of Police Scotland, has since been submitted to parliament.
During a committee session on 7 May, the SFC Chief Executive was asked to explain why reports on the financial sustainability of colleges and universities, which were due to be published in January, have in fact been delayed. The sectors are currently facing major financial challenges, with a number of universities seeking to reduce staff numbers.
SFC Chief Exec Martin Boyle told committee members that the reports would be published 'in the autumn', and explained that his organisation had been unable to provide the reports in January as planned after 'a couple of colleges delayed the publication of their accounts.'
Asked by Labour's Pam Duncan-Glancy MSP if he could 'put at least some information in the public domain on the financial state of the sector', Martin Boyle suggested that his organisation wanted to wait so that it could 'publish a report that covers all the colleges and universities.'
Scottish Liberal Democrat MSP Willie Rennie pointed out to Martin Boyle that committee members had previously been worried that SFC 'staff were not being frank with ministers about the dire situation in universities.' Mr Rennie then asked if the delay to the financial sustainability reports might 'feed into our anxiety that you are not being frank with ministers?'
Martin Boyle insisted that information is provided to ministers, although conceded that some of this is kept private.
Asked by committee convener Douglas Ross MSP to confirm the original and new planned dates for publication of the report, Martin Boyle advised that it would typically have been release by the end of January but will now not be available until September.
He then explained that Audit Scotland's involvement in the process was 'part of the reason' why the colleges were late in submitting their accounts.
Martin Boyle confirmed that accounts have now been submitted, and was pressed to explain why the report was being delayed until September if all the necessary information is available in May. He replied: 'I will go back and speak to my colleagues, and we will have a discussion about whether we should publish the report now.'
An interim report has now been published.
Commenting after the release of the names of the two colleges in question, Willie Rennie told the Herald:
'Scotland's colleges are facing deep financial problems and the delay in the Scottish Funding Council publishing the financial sustainability report is a clear indication of that situation. The explanation of the reason for the delay being two colleges, Forth Valley and Lews Castle, provides little confidence that the situation is under control.
'The lack of clarity from the Scottish Funding Council and also the lack of urgency to the extreme financial environment needs to change if we have any hope of overcoming this challenge.'
A spokesperson for the Scottish Funding Council said:
'As Scotland's tertiary education and research authority, the Scottish Funding Council has a role in monitoring institutional sustainability to enable the best outcomes for students.
'In addition to our regular financial returns, we work closely with institutions regarding a range of issues, including their financial health. We engage with colleges and universities as soon as financial issues are identified. We then ensure they continue to fulfil their duty to learners and staff as we work alongside them to return to a position of financial health in line with a recovery plan designed to create future sustainability.
'Although we report on a sector-wide level, our interventions are on an institutional basis where, for reasons of commercial confidentiality, we are limited on the details we are able to publish'
A spokesperson for Forth Valley College said: 'I can confirm that the delay in submitting the relevant accounts was linked to the College's external auditors carrying out additional scrutiny on the College's accounts related to a wider audit. This has resulted in Audit Scotland submitting a Section 22 report which was released this week. The College's 2022/23 accounts, which are now available, also outline the reasons for the delay.
'The Audit Scotland report also recognised the significant progress we have made in strengthening the processes for college-run projects. These improvements are designed to minimise the risk of similar issues arising in future, and we remain fully committed to regularly reviewing these arrangements to ensure they remain robust and fit for purpose.
'The external auditor's Annual Report for 2022/23 also concluded that with the exception of a stand-alone net zero project - the College has effective arrangements in place for financial planning, governance, and performance management.
'For clarity, the stand-alone project is no longer connected to the College and has been operating as a separate entity since June 2023.'
A spokesperson for UHI North, West and Hebrides said: 'There have been significant delays to the external audit process, which resulted in late submission of our year-end accounts for 2022-23. The college do not accept the appointed auditor's view 'that the delay was due to a lack of responsiveness and staffing challenges at the college.'
"UHI, as the Regional Strategic Body, submitted a formal complaint to Audit Scotland in December 2023 regarding concerns over the performance of the Audit Scotland appointed external audit provider. These matters continue to be discussed with Audit Scotland and the Scottish Funding Council.
'The basis of the Section 22 report into the 2022-23 accounts of the former Lews Castle College solely relates to a difference of opinion between the college and the appointed auditor on the college's prudent approach to the valuation of a joint venture capital asset.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
26 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Swinney defends ‘two-horse race' comments after by-election loss to Labour
The First Minister spoke of his disappointment at his party's loss, acknowledging there is 'anger' about the cost of living and concerns around access to services in Scotland. In the run-up to polls opening on Thursday, Mr Swinney had repeatedly sought to frame the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election as a contest between his party and Nigel Farage's Reform. But in a surprise result in the early hours of Friday, Scottish Labour were victorious with their candidate Davy Russell taking 8,559 votes. The SNP's Katy Loudon took 7,957 votes, while Reform's Ross Lambie secured 7,088. Labour are celebrating their by-election win (Jane Barlow/PA) Mr Swinney spoke to journalists at the SNP headquarters in Edinburgh, saying his party had improved its position from a devastating general election result last year, but recognising they must make further progress ahead of next year's Scottish Parliament vote. He told the PA news agency: 'Clearly, we're disappointed that we didn't win last night, but we made progress in the election compared to the general election last summer, and we've got to build on that and make sure that we strengthen our support in advance of 2026. 'So the SNP made progress last night, but it's not nearly enough and we've got to build on that.' (PA Graphics) Asked if it was a mistake to call the by-election a 'two-horse race', he said: 'I called it the way I saw it. 'The way I saw it was the Labour vote was collapsing compared to the general election last summer, which it did, it was down 20%. 'We saw the Reform vote surging, which it has. The SNP sought to portray the by-election as a contest between themselves and Reform (Jane Barlow/PA) 'And in that context, I thought the SNP was best placed to see off Reform because of the scale of collapse in the Labour vote.' He said Nigel Farage represented a 'poisonous injection into our politics'. Reform UK's deputy leader Richard Tice has said he is 'delighted' with the result in Hamilton. (PA Graphics) Mr Swinney also defended his party's campaign in the constituency, saying it was 'energetic' and 'enthusiastic'. He had frequently visited the seat in the run-up to the vote. Asked if people are turning away from the SNP because of their record in government, he said: 'There's a lot of anger in the electorate just now because people are finding things tough, particularly with the cost of living, and they're concerned about about issues in terms of access to public services. 'So what my government is going to focus on is addressing the day-to-day priorities of people in Scotland, about improving their lives.' He mentioned the Scottish Government's plans to scrap peak rail fares in September and bring down NHS waiting lists.
The Herald Scotland
32 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Hamilton by-election is a set-back and an opportunity for the SNP
From winter fuel payments to energy bills and benefit curbs, the PM and Chancellor have enveloped voters in tough love. Little wonder that the glad confident morning of last July is now fogged with disquiet. Yet still Davy Russell won. He is to be an MSP. Remarkable, secondly, when one looks at history. This is only the 12th constituency by-election since the Scottish Parliament was founded. In nine of those contests, the incumbent, defending party held the seat. This is just the third where a seat changed hands. (The others being Ayr in 2000 and Dunfermline in 2013) History, you could say, was against Labour. And yet Davy Russell won. He is to be an MSP. Read more Remarkable, thirdly, because very, very few predicted a Labour victory. The candidate was the quiet man, avoiding the media, staying away from a televised debate with rivals. Preferring, he said, to chap doors. And yet he won. Davy Russell is to be an MSP. Have all Labour's problems evaporated? Most certainly not. Chapping doors only takes you so far. For the Holyrood elections next year, Labour will need a coherent programme to indicate that they are fit for devolved government. Anas Sarwar knows that. His delight in victory is evident and justified. Yet he still needs his UK governing chums to cut him some slack. In essence, he is asking for a break, saying to the PM and Chancellor: 'Gonnae no' dae that!' Arithmetic matters in politics. More votes than your rivals at the count. But momentum matters too if you are to sustain such victories. And Davy Russell becoming an MSP grants momentum to Mr Sarwar. For John Swinney, this is both a substantial set-back and a significant opportunity to learn lessons. It is up to him which element ends up predominating. He had described this Hamilton contest as a two-horse race. His own SNP and Reform. This proved not to be the case. Labour came up on the rails to win. Does that pose questions for Mr Swinney's judgement? Not really, no. With his two-horse comment, he was attempting to shape the contest in his favour. He wanted to sideline Labour – and to polarise the by-election into a battle between the SNP and Reform, whom he characterised as representing the antithesis of Scottish values. Another point. As Mr Swinney rightly pointed out, Labour won out of the park in this area of the country at the UK General Election last year. Labour's vote in this by-election is slightly down on their performance at the last Holyrood elections in 2021. Snag for the FM is that the SNP vote is down sharply over that timescale. Yes, it would appear evident that Mr Swinney has contrived to steady the ship in the past year. But, equally, he has yet to pull entirely clear of Labour. I have long spoken of the scunner factor in politics, arguing that it must never be neglected. As Mr Sarwar knows, folk are fed up with what they hear from the PM and the Chancellor. But, as Mr Sarwar also argues, there is a significant degree of disquiet with the Scottish Government too. (He puts it rather more bluntly.) John Swinney knows that. If there was any scintilla of complacency in his make-up, it will now have been expunged. Remember the TV series Dr Finlay's Casebook? In my favourite episode, young Finlay is protesting vigorously that he had not been aware of a particular patient's history. The lugubrious Dr Snoddy replies drily: 'Well, ye ken noo!' Not sure it is required but that phrase could easily be aimed at the First Minister and leader of the SNP. Other parties? The Greens outpolled the Liberal Democrats, picking up more votes than the Labour majority over the SNP. Something the Nationalists will have noted. The Liberal Democrats will find other pavements on which to practise pavement politics. This was not their night. The Tories? At six per cent and hugely outpolled by Reform, they must feel like they should take themselves away to a dark corner and cry. However, such behaviour tends not to appeal to the voters. So they will fight on, hoping that the fury with the previous UK Conservative government will abate – and support for Reform likewise. Read more As for Reform, they declare themselves delighted with their third place. In practice, Nigel Farage may have been a little preoccupied with the resignation of his party chairman, Scots-born Zia Yusuf. Mr Yusuf declared that working to secure Number 10 for Mr Farage was no longer a good use of his time. He was also less than happy with the Reform MP who urged a ban on the burka. In Scotland, Reform insist they can set aside such internal difficulties and go on to play a significant role at Holyrood. Reform figured strongly in this by-election, not least in the row over the advert featuring Anas Sarwar. Rivals called it racist, Reform demurred. Which presents a challenge now to other parties. Do they continue to talk up the challenge presented by Reform, decrying their policies and attitudes? Or do they seek to ignore them, hoping they will slide back into irrelevance? I expect a blend of the two. But, in practice, with an emphasis upon sidelining Reform and focusing upon the deep-rooted, day to day concerns of the voters. In Hamilton, Larkhall, Stonehouse and elsewhere. Mr Swinney says he will 'set out a vision of hope and optimism'. Ditto his rivals. Brian Taylor is a former political editor for BBC Scotland and a columnist for The Herald. He cherishes his family, the theatre - and Dundee United FC
STV News
36 minutes ago
- STV News
Planning applications backlog as council struggles to recruit staff
Concerns have been raised over the amount of time it is taking to process planning applications in Glasgow. Glasgow has the second highest cost per planning application in Scotland, a report has found. The local authority charges £12,259 while the Scottish average sits at £6,679 per application. Despite this a backlog of cases is building up, leading to concerns about applications being dealt with in time, members of the city's scrutiny committee heard. During the meeting, councillor Ken Andrew, who chairs the planning committee, told fellow councillors that the council was struggling to recruit and maintain staff in their planning department. Councillor Andrew also said that this was causing an increase in the amount of time it was taking to review applications. There are two types of applications, local applications which can be anything from a shop front, a house extension or a change of property use of less than 5000 sq m of new floorspace and major or national application which is generally bigger than the thresholds already listed. Local applications generally have a two month determination timescale and if discussions are going well the council can agree an extension for making a decision. However, if there hasn't been an agreement about an extension of time to determine then the applicant can submit an appeal called an appeal against non-determination. Major or national applications generally have the same principles but the council has four months to reach an outcome before the applicant can appeal. During a recent scrutiny committee councillor Ken Andrew explained some of the difficulties. He said: 'My understanding is that what has been happening in planning is that the planning team have struggled both to recruit and maintain staff. 'A decision was made to restructure how the planning function was managed to try and keep hold of the staff we had managed to recruit. 'What we have seen is this blip and this increase in the amount of time it has taken to get planning applications through and in front of the committee so it is an issue that is being managed. 'I am sure it will be interesting for the committee to get a better level of information than I am able to give you here.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
