logo
Dems aren't shying away from talking about 2028 presidential bids

Dems aren't shying away from talking about 2028 presidential bids

Yahoo15-05-2025

Presidential contenders used to pretend they weren't running for president. Not anymore.
Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg suggested Tuesday he would 'assess' a potential campaign in 2028. Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, already laying the groundwork for a national run, said he 'would consider' it. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, when asked by HBO's Bill Maher about why he was 'the guy' for 2028, touted his win record in a swing state, while Rahm Emanuel said he's 'in training.'
Even former Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo openly said she's weighing a presidential bid.
For years, the run-up to the presidential primary has been marked by a wink-wink approach — defined by intense behind-the-scenes preparations and a public coyness about national ambitions. But the days of the shadow primary are giving way to a franker, more overt set of potential 2028 presidential primary candidates, many of whom are bluntly acknowledging they're taking a serious look at running — two and a half years out.
'People are smart to make their intentions known, or thinly veiled, because the days of playing coy are over. Everyone sees through that bullshit,' said Rebecca Pearcey, who advised Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren during her 2020 presidential campaign. 'I wouldn't be surprised if anyone out on the national circuit did announce at any point.'
The campaign's jump start does not come without potential downsides. Contenders can catch a spark too early and flame out, or turn off voters with their ambition or pitch. But there is pressure on Democrats to start making moves now, with the lack of any clear frontrunner and a void in party leadership in a GOP-controlled Washington.
It's not that denials are entirely absent from the landscape of potential 2028 contenders. Some politicians must navigate their own reelections in 2026, including Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, who maintained he is 'not running' during an interview on ABC's 'The View' this month. Buttigieg, following up on his own 2028 comments later on Tuesday night and after a town hall in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, said, 'Right now, I'm not running for anything.'
But the steps contenders are taking now are unabashed — even if they're still largely happening in private. Buttigieg was trailed during a visit to Iowa on Tuesday by a videographer from his political group Win the Era. Last week, he and Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) posed for selfies and chatted up influencers at a four-day 'Trending Up' content creator conference in Washington, D.C., according to two attendees granted anonymity to describe a private event.
Across the country, Beshear, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Emanuel, former U.S. ambassador to Japan, all addressed high-dollar donors at the Future Forward summit in California, according to a schedule obtained by POLITICO.
Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego, who kicked up his own 2028 speculation with a trip to battleground Pennsylvania this past weekend, told reporters that whenever 'any politician who's ever ran for Congress, Senate, governor' has demurred about whether they've thought about running for president, 'they're lying to you.'
'Of course, I've thought of it,' he added, before quickly noting he's not focused on 2028 now.
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Moore both recently announced plans to speak in South Carolina, the Democrats' first-in-the-nation primary state, while Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker lit up 'do-nothing Democrats' in a speech in New Hampshire last month. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) barnstormed the country, drawing record-breaking crowds for their 'Fighting Oligarchy' tour, and Newsom popped his own TV ad, airing on Fox News last weekend, that amounted to a general election hit on President Donald Trump's tariffs.
'What's important to voters is honesty and authenticity, so if you're running for president, you're running for president. Why are you coming to South Carolina or going to New Hampshire, and you're not running for president? Come on,' said South Carolina state Rep. JA Moore. 'Don't pee on my head and tell me it's raining. Don't run for president and tell me you're not.'
One reason contenders are embracing that advice is that there's heavy demand for anyone interested in testing the 2028 waters, longtime Democratic strategist David Axelrod said, as the party has sunk to record lows in public polling and struggled to effectively push back against Trump.
'There is no obvious nominee, so I think there are a whole bunch of people who are then thinking about it and wanting to be in the conversation,' Axelrod said. 'There's a lot of interest out there for Democrats, searching for a new leader … I wouldn't say it's desperation, but there's a thirst for new leadership among Democrats.'
One former adviser to a 2020 presidential candidate, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said that in 2017, 'the base would punish you for being so explicit so early, and now, in this new information age, being yourself and answering the question is a better move.'
'You don't need to be cute about it,' the adviser added.
Coupled with their public comments, potential 2028 candidates are still furiously working the inside game, too. Many contenders are meeting one-on-one with high-dollar fundraisers, attending donor summits and retreats as a part of the 'audition phase' of the primary, said one Democratic donor adviser, granted anonymity to describe private interactions.
'Donors are emerging from their hibernation after the 2024 loss, and starting to say, 'I'm going to start shopping for my next candidate,'' the adviser said. 'People aren't necessarily writing checks yet, but they're poking and prodding these candidates.'
Moore, the state representative from South Carolina, said he's had 'a number of conversations with a number of interesting folks' he declined to identify, as contenders reach out to local elected officials in early states. But he did flag Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) as 'the person who's come around the most' and who is 'trying to build inroads with a lot of folks in the elected space.'
Many have also taken to town halls, particularly in red congressional districts, to highlight their willingness to take their message to swaths of the country that have exposed their party's weaknesses in recent years. Gallego and Khanna both held town halls in Pennsylvania just in the last week. Walz did town hall stops in Iowa, Nebraska, Wisconsin, Texas, Ohio and West Virginia. Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) joined Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) for a town hall in Arizona last month.
Some of these Democrats, frustrated by their inability to crack into more online spaces, are also trying their hand at content creation of their own. Newsom and Beshear both started their own podcasts this spring. Others are sitting for long-form interviews on other podcasts, like Booker and Buttigieg, who went viral on the 'Flagrant' comedy podcast. Buttigieg is also weighing whether to launch his own podcast, according to people close to him and granted anonymity to discuss private plans, and he has already launched a Substack list.
Several factors are contributing to the Democratic primary's early start. There's the reality of the hole Democrats find themselves in — 'that unlike 2017, this doesn't feel like a fluke and the problem is no longer Trump, it's us,' said an adviser to a potential 2028 candidate, granted anonymity to discuss the issue candidly, adding that the party is on the hunt for someone to "make us better."
'That's the question that got this going earlier than ever,' the adviser said.
A second adviser to a 2028 hopeful argued that the primary started as far back as 2022 and 2023, when Democrats were sizing up whether then-President Joe Biden was running for reelection. 'There was a lot of, 'I'll be a surrogate,' as an excuse to be in the early states,' the adviser said.
There's also the harsh financial reality of presidential politics, which tend to require multimillion-dollar operations and national name recognition to break through to primary voters. The Democratic National Committee has not yet said how it plans to handle the primary debate process, but in 2019, candidates had to meet several thresholds, both on fundraising and polling, to earn a spot on the debate stage.
'If you've already made the decision to do it, why be shy about it? You're going to have to raise money, raise name ID, all of that, to execute an actual run and compete, and these guys still need to establish themselves on the national scene,' said a third adviser to a potential 2028 candidate, granted anonymity to discuss the issue candidly. 'If you're doing it in 2027, you might be too late already.'
Holly Otterbein, Adam Wren, Shia Kapos and Brakkton Booker contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Legislature to repeal MinnesotaCare for undocumented adults
Legislature to repeal MinnesotaCare for undocumented adults

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Legislature to repeal MinnesotaCare for undocumented adults

Demonstrators gather for a protest organized by the Minnesota Immigrant Rights Action Committee calling for the continuation of MinnesotaCare for undocumented adults at the Minnesota State Capitol Tuesday, May 27, 2025. (Photo by Nicole Neri/Minnesota Reformer) Despite Democratic-Farmer-Labor control of the state Senate, the governor's office, and half of the House, Republicans forced Democrats to roll back one of their signature accomplishments from the 2023 legislative session: health care for undocumented people. The Legislature is expected to vote Monday to repeal undocumented adults' eligibility for MinnesotaCare, the state-subsidized health insurance program for the working poor. Children would still be covered. Republicans successfully used their leverage — the threat of a government shutdown starting July 1 — to force the Democrats' hand on an issue that is of supreme importance to GOP lawmakers. The DFL pulled out all nearly of the stops to avoid cutting health care access for undocumented adults. During negotiations, DFL leaders offered Republicans concessions related to paid leave, earned sick and safe time, and noncompete agreements — but Republicans didn't budge, said Sen. Alice Mann, DFL-Edina. 'They turned all of those things down, because all they wanted…was to make sure that the 17,000 people were left out to die, that we worsen our health care system and that we decrease our tax revenue,' Mann said at a press conference Monday decrying the move. When Gov. Tim Walz and legislative leaders announced a budget deal — contingent on repealing MinnesotaCare eligibility for undocumented adults — on May 15, lawmakers with the People of Color Indigenous Caucus protested outside the door. They told reporters later that they were blindsided by the deal. After the announcement, POCI caucus members brought alternatives to legislative leaders, said Rep. Liish Kozlowski, DFL-Duluth. The POCI caucus suggested capping undocumented enrollment in MinnesotaCare, raising premiums, allowing children currently enrolled to retain coverage instead of aging out, or making exceptions for elderly people or those with chronic conditions. None of those options made it into the bill, which is expected to be heard first on the House floor during a 21-hour special session beginning at 10 a.m. Republicans have repeatedly exaggerated the cost of providing health care to undocumented people enrolled in MinnesotaCare. Enrollment has exceeded the state's expectations, however, with more than 17,000 undocumented people currently enrolled. Meanwhile, per-person spending on the undocumented population has been lower than expected, according to the Department of Human Services. Federal politics and funding have complicated the issue: A budget bill passed by the GOP-controlled U.S. House would cut funding to states that provide health care to undocumented people, including Minnesota. And while the federal government pays for some of the cost of MinnesotaCare, it doesn't contribute any money for undocumented enrollees. Walz is expected to sign the bill into law.

Lawmakers condemn Trump's use of Guard, active-duty troops in LA
Lawmakers condemn Trump's use of Guard, active-duty troops in LA

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lawmakers condemn Trump's use of Guard, active-duty troops in LA

Congressional Democrats and administration critics condemned President Donald Trump's decision this weekend to federalize National Guard troops in California as a serious breach of standards for the involvement of the military in domestic affairs. 'Such unilateral action, taken without consultation with local leaders, risks escalating tensions rather than calming them,' Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., and ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said in a statement Sunday night. 'This move sets a troubling precedent for military intervention in local law enforcement. 'It is crucial that decisions of this magnitude are made with transparency, restraint, and respect for constitutional balance.' Over the weekend, Trump announced plans to deploy 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles to quell the protests over immigration policies and enforcement. About 300 have already arrived in the city to help with peacekeeping activities. The move came over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who called the move 'a serious breach of state sovereignty' in a social media post Sunday. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., in a statement called Trump's decision 'an abuse of power and a dangerous escalation. It's what you would see in authoritarian states and it must stop.' Officials from the veterans organization Common Defense said the moves 'undermine civil rights and betray the principles we swore to uphold.' Newsom and others promised to file legal actions in coming days to challenge the president's decision. In addition to the Guard actions, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth took to social media late Saturday night to say that if violence in the Los Angeles region continues, 'active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized.' Officials said about 500 active-duty personnel are preparing to deploy if needed. Trump has cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States.' But critics have called his interpretation of the law an overreaction, and noted that the recent moves were the first time in decades that a state's National Guard was activated without a request from its governor. Hegseth is scheduled to testify before the House and Senate Appropriations Committees on Tuesday, where he will likely face additional questions about the military deployments. The Los Angeles protests were sparked by the arrest of more than 40 individuals in immigration raids across the city Friday. Since then, nearly 60 more have been charged with vandalism and violence for attempts to block federal officials from conducting additional operations. Trump on social media said the individuals objecting to the immigration raids 'are not protesters, they are troublemakers and insurrectionists.' He also repeatedly criticized Newsom and local Democratic leaders for not taking a stronger stance against the violence. The Associated Press contributed to this story.

Democrats have a dirty secret - they actually like some of the tax cuts in Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
Democrats have a dirty secret - they actually like some of the tax cuts in Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats have a dirty secret - they actually like some of the tax cuts in Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'

Some of the sweeping tax cuts proposed in President Donald Trump's massive spending package have found support among Democrats — even as they are expected to oppose the legislation over proposed cuts to Medicaid and other government services when it comes up for debate in the Senate later this month, according to a new report. The gargantuan budget package, which House Republicans and the White House have dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed the House by a single vote last month and is now drawing heat from fiscal hawks in both chambers as well as Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who was fresh off his months-long stint as a special government employee when he began threatening to back challengers to any legislator who votes for the bill. Still, there are facets of the proposal that have appeal for some Democrats, the New York Times reports. Virginia Rep. Don Beyer, a Democrat who is also a wealthy car dealership owner, told the Times his party is 'in general very much in favor of reducing taxes on working people and the working poor' when asked about Trump's plan to end taxes on service workers' tips. 'Those people are living on tips,' he added. Trump's tip tax cut plan has also attracted attention from Sen. Jacky Rosen of Nevada, a state where service workers make up a large and powerful voting bloc that has traditionally supported Democrats but shifted to Trump in large numbers during the 2024 presidential election, handing him the Silver State's electoral votes. Rosen, a Democrat, took to the Senate floor last month to advance a bill approving Trump's 'no tax on tips' plan. It passed unanimously even though the measure was largely symbolic because the U.S. constitution requires tax laws to originate in the House 'I am not afraid to embrace a good idea, wherever it comes from,'. she said at the time in remarks on the Senate floor. Yet despite the support for some of the individual tax provisions in the plan, it's highly unlikely that it will be able to muster enough if any Democrats to ease the way to Trump's desk, even under a Senate procedure known as budget reconciliation, which fast-tracks some types of spending legislation without subjecting it to the upper chamber's de facto 60-vote threshold for passage. Democrats are expected to unanimously vote against the legislation in the upper chamber, where it has also attracted opposition from some Republicans who've complained that the cuts to spending in the package don't go far enough to offset the reduced revenue caused by provisions meant to enact Trump campaign promises to end taxes on tips for service workers, as well as taxes on overtime pay for hourly workers and on social security benefits for seniors. Nonpartisan experts such as those at the Congressional Budget Office have warned that the reduced tax receipts would blow a massive hole in the federal budget and jeopardize America's long-term fiscal outlook, but that hasn't stopped some prominent Democrats from getting behind the individuals tax cuts. Trump and his allies hope the prominent tax cut proposals will blunt Democrats' efforts to paint the One Big Beautiful Bill Act as a giveaway to wealthy GOP donors that will gut government services while only providing limited relief for working-class voters. To that end, the president and others in his camp have routinely taken to social media to argue that anyone who votes against the bill is effectively voting for tax increases because the legislation makes permanent a number of temporary tax cuts enacted in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which Trump signed into law during his first term. Democrats, meanwhile, remain opposed to the bill's massive cuts to Medicare and other measures that make it harder for people to claim tax credits meant to boost lower-income Americans' bottom lines. Rep. Brad Schneider, an Illnois Democrat, told the Times that the whole bill had to be considered rather than any individual provision or provisiosn. 'Any one thing — a tax credit or a tax cut — might make sense, but you've got to take a look at the whole picture,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store