Tropical forest loss doubles, fire a leading cause: Report
The loss of tropical primary forests reached 6.7 million hectares in the year — nearly twice as much as in 2023 and an area nearly the size of Panama, at the rate of 18 soccer fields every minute, Global Forest Watch said in a statement on Wednesday.
India saw a 6.9% decrease in tree cover loss between 2023 and 2024 but a 5.9% increase in loss of humid primary forests in 2024, according to the data.
One of the factors that may have led to increase in primary forest loss last year in India are forest fires, the data indicates. Primary forest loss due to fires was around 950 hectares last year compared to 368 hectares in 2023, a 158% rise. India lost 22,958 hectares of primary forests compared to 21,672 hectares in 2023. Of this, 22,008 hectares were lost due to non-forest drivers.
That is the global trend too. For the first time in the records of GFW, fires and not agriculture were the leading cause of tropical primary forest loss, accounting for nearly 50% of all forest loss. This marks a dramatic shift from recent years, when fires averaged just around 20% to forest loss. Tropical primary forest loss driven by other causes also jumped by 14%, the sharpest increase since 2016.
'This level of forest loss is unlike anything we've seen in over 20 years of data. It's a global red alert — a collective call to action for every country, every business and every person who cares about a liveable planet. Our economies, our communities, our health — none of it can survive without forests,' said Elizabeth Goldman, Co-Director, WRI's Global Forest Watch in a statement.
Brazil with largest area under tropical forests, accounted for 42% of all tropical primary forest loss in 2024. Fires, fuelled by the worst drought on record, caused 66% of that loss-- over sixfold increase from 2023. The Amazon recorded its highest tree cover loss since 2016. Bolivia's primary forest loss increased by 200% in 2024. For the first time, it ranked second for tropical primary forest loss only to Brazil, overtaking the Democratic Republic of Congo despite having less than half its forest area, the analysis said.
Fires burned five times more tropical primary forest in 2024 than in 2023. In tropical forests fires are almost entirely human caused, often started to clear land for agriculture and spreading out of control in nearby forests. 2024 was the hottest year on record with hot, dry conditions largely caused by climate change and El Nino. Latin America was particularly hard hit, the analysis said.
The area under tree cover includes all tree cover (planted, natural, primary, agroforestry); while primary humid forests are essentially old growth forests which have not been regrown, Global Forest Watch data shows.
GFW which mainly uses satellite data for their analysis records India's baseline tree cover as 38,830,421 ha in 2001 and primary forest cover as 10,185,436 ha.
From 2002 to 2024, India lost 348,000 ha of humid primary forest, making up 15% of its total tree cover loss in the same time period. From 2001 to 2024, India lost 2.31 million hectares of tree cover, equivalent to a 7.1% decrease in tree cover since 2000, GFW said.
The dominant drivers of primary forest loss in India are shifting cultivation, agriculture and logging. Most of the loss since 2001 has occurred in northeastern states including Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram etc according to GFW.
From 2000 to 2020, India gained 1.78 million ha of tree cover equal to 1.4% of the global total.
The Union environment ministry did not respond to HT's queries on the forest cover loss in 2024 .
HT reported on May 9 that India reported that its forest and tree cover is now 25.17% of its geographical area as per the latest India State of Forest Report (2023).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
12-07-2025
- Mint
Mint Explainer: Why ‘local' mangoes are losing out to ‘exotic' apples
NEW DELHI : The idiom advising one not to compare apples and oranges is a cliché—a figurative expression that a fruit lover can safely ignore. But anyone with an interest in the origin, spread, popularity, and market dynamics of a fruit or a vegetable can and must draw comparisons. In that spirit of enquiry, one may compare apples and mangoes, more so as they appear to be headed in different directions. Apples are vying for eternal glory, while mangoes are in tatters. Sample these numbers: In 2024-25, India's mango exports, including fresh fruit and pulp, were valued at just ₹1,150 crore. In comparison, Indians ate imported apples worth ₹3,800 crore, which also hurt earnings of domestic apple growers from Jammu and Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh. The total fresh fruit import bill came to ₹25,770 crore. Now, when a nation calls a fruit its own—like India's bond with mangoes—but treats it with neglect, a comparison is par for the course. When apples are conquering the world, should mangoes be pushed into oblivion? What's pushing the downfall of mangoes? First things first. India is a centre of origin for mango, and scientific evidence suggests that Mangifera indica originated in the Indo-Burma region, spanning Myanmar, Bangladesh, and northeastern India. This hypothesis is based on 60-million-year-old fossil impressions of carbonized mango leaves. Apples, on the other hand, originated in the mountains of Central Asia, in modern-day Kazakhstan, and spread to Europe, Asia, and the Americas. In short, mangoes are native to India, and apples are an exotic fruit. Indians are crazy about mangoes, and India produces more than 22 million tonnes of them every year, second only to bananas. But for several years on end, the hallowed mangoes of India have been struggling. Firstly, most varieties from Alphonso to Dasheri are between 200-500 years old and are not coping well with growing climate adversities. Factors like heatwaves, extended monsoon, temperature swings and sudden storms are taking a toll on the fruit and its growers. Farmers now pre-sell their harvest and outsource management of orchards to contractors. These fly-by-night operators use extractive practices and excessive chemicals, leading to a decline in quality, besides rendering the fruit unfit for exports. Decades from now, if India loses its mango diversity and a few of its prized cultivars, who can it blame but itself? And how are apples thriving? The shaky future of the mango is in sharp contrast to apples, with global breeding initiatives aiming for heat-tolerant varieties. The University of Maryland has developed new apples that are genetically designed to tolerate warmer growing conditions. Being a temperate fruit, apple cultivation is susceptible to rising temperatures. Another notable initiative is the Hot Climate Partnership—a collaboration between New Zealand and Spain—to develop apples that can grow in warmer regions. In 2023, the alliance announced its first breakthrough: an apple variety named Tutti that can withstand day temperatures of up to 40 degrees Celsius. That's like growing apples in Agra. Post-harvest technologies for apples have also seen tremendous improvement. Apples are now pre-cooled and stored in controlled atmosphere facilities for 4-10 months without any loss of taste, crunch, and nutrition, allowing them to be transported over very long distances. Can't mangoes be transported over long distances? Apples are a temperate fruit, so they are more amenable to cold-chain technologies. In comparison, mangoes are a tropical fruit harvested during peak summer. Yet it is hard to accept that India, the largest producer, has yet to develop a post-harvest technology that can extend the shelf life of mangoes by a week or so. That can create a wider market, both within and outside the country. Most domestic mango varieties are now limited to their respective geographies: for instance, the Zardalu of Bihar or Himsagar of West Bengal cannot be found in markets outside of their home state. Fruit exporters say the short shelf life of India's ancient mango cultivars, hovering between 5-12 days, is one reason why the fruit cannot be shipped using longer and cheaper sea routes. Extending the shelf life by two weeks can be a gamechanger. Some technologies are currently in trial, including one—a bio-stimulant named Metwash—developed by the Central Institute of Subtropical Horticulture, Lucknow. The other needed intervention is to develop lab-bred varieties that are climate resilient, have a higher shelf life, or both. Unfortunately, funding for breeding and research is minuscule. The last lab-grown mangoes that achieved some commercial success and popularity among consumers—Mallika and Amrapali—were developed decades ago, in the 1970s. And why is that? For scientists, mango is not an easy fruit to work with because they are highly heterozygous, which means trees show a lot of variability at the time of fruiting (so do apples). In simple words, a mango tree born out of a seed is unlikely to bear fruits with the same characteristics as the parent tree. Growers get around this problem by grafting the best varieties on top of seedlings. Which means, a single tree could have been the mother plant, say of the Alphonso variety, from which tens of thousands of trees were crafted by the human hand. For a breeder, it's a long game of trial and error. Scientists say developing a new mango variety can take at least two decades. A promising lab release may take another decade to reach the farmer's field and the consumer's plate. That is a good enough reason to pump money into climate-proofing mango—before it is too late. But until India finds a breakthrough mango variety, apples will continue to steal the show because of their round-the-year availability, better fruit quality, and aggressive marketing by global sellers. 'Nature's success stories are probably going to look a lot more like the apple's than the (vulnerable) panda's or the white leopard's," wrote Michael Pollan in his 2001 treatise, The Botany of Desire: A Plant's Eye View of the World. If those last two species have a future, it will be because of the human desire to conserve them, Pollan added. Mango is in dire need of some of that 'human desire'—or should one say, a very Indian desire?
Time of India
04-06-2025
- Time of India
Andhra Pradesh sees significant forest loss and tree cover changes in 2024: Report
Vijayawada: As the Andhra Pradesh govt gears up to plant one crore saplings under the 'Vanam-Manam' programme to enhance green cover on the occasion of World Environment Day on June 5, the state reported 468 hectares of primary forest loss in 2024, the second highest after 561 hectares of primary forest loss eported in 2017. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Andhra Pradesh lost a total of 6,550 hectares of primary forest cover between 2002 and 2024, making up 16% of the total tree cover loss during the same period, according to the latest Global Forest Watch (GFW) report. Subsequently, in another disturbing development, Andhra Pradesh lost 5.73 thousand hectares of natural forest last year, which is equivalent to 1.75 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions. As of 2020, the state had 2.46 million hectares of natural forest, extending over 15% of the total land mass, the report mentioned. According to the GFW report, Andhra Pradesh stood in the 13th place out of 28 states and eight union territories in terms of tree cover loss between 2001 and 2024, losing trees to an extent of nearly 42.4 thousand hectares. Meanwhile, Assam, Mizoram, Nagaland, and Manipur, the four north-east states, were responsible for 52% of all tree cover loss during the same period. In terms of tree cover loss, which is about 42.4 thousand hectares, this is equivalent to a 3.8% decrease in tree cover since 2000 and 23.1 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions. As per the GFW data, Andhra Pradesh lost 2.87 thousand hectares of tree cover in 2024 and 2.96 thousand hectares in 2023, i.e., 0.26% and 0.27% of tree cover loss. Andhra Pradesh reported the highest tree cover loss of 3.26 thousand hectares in 2011. Further, East Godavari and Visakhapatnam districts were responsible for 76% of the total tree cover loss that occurred between 2001 and 2024 in the state. East Godavari witnessed the highest tree cover loss at 16.4 thousand hectares compared to an average of 3.26 thousand hectares. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It was further found that 66% of tree cover loss occurred in areas where the dominant driver is deforestation. For permanent agriculture, a record 26.8 thousand hectares of tree cover was axed, while another 214 hectares of tree cover was lost due to infrastructure and settlements, and another 23 hectares for hard commodities. However, Andhra Pradesh made significant strides in tree cover gain between 2002 and 2020 by gaining 194 thousand hectares of tree cover, which is equal to 11% of the overall tree cover gain in the country. Under the tree cover gain charts, Karnataka leads in first place with 222 thousand hectares of tree cover gain, with Andhra Pradesh in second place.
Hindustan Times
22-05-2025
- Hindustan Times
Tropical forest loss doubles, fire a leading cause: Report
Fires caused by dry conditions, in turn brought about by the climate crisis resulted in record forest loss in 2024, including in India, according to new data from the University of Maryland's GLAD (Global Land Analysis & Discovery) Lab released by World Resources Institute's Global Forest Watch platform. The loss of tropical primary forests reached 6.7 million hectares in the year — nearly twice as much as in 2023 and an area nearly the size of Panama, at the rate of 18 soccer fields every minute, Global Forest Watch said in a statement on Wednesday. India saw a 6.9% decrease in tree cover loss between 2023 and 2024 but a 5.9% increase in loss of humid primary forests in 2024, according to the data. One of the factors that may have led to increase in primary forest loss last year in India are forest fires, the data indicates. Primary forest loss due to fires was around 950 hectares last year compared to 368 hectares in 2023, a 158% rise. India lost 22,958 hectares of primary forests compared to 21,672 hectares in 2023. Of this, 22,008 hectares were lost due to non-forest drivers. That is the global trend too. For the first time in the records of GFW, fires and not agriculture were the leading cause of tropical primary forest loss, accounting for nearly 50% of all forest loss. This marks a dramatic shift from recent years, when fires averaged just around 20% to forest loss. Tropical primary forest loss driven by other causes also jumped by 14%, the sharpest increase since 2016. 'This level of forest loss is unlike anything we've seen in over 20 years of data. It's a global red alert — a collective call to action for every country, every business and every person who cares about a liveable planet. Our economies, our communities, our health — none of it can survive without forests,' said Elizabeth Goldman, Co-Director, WRI's Global Forest Watch in a statement. Brazil with largest area under tropical forests, accounted for 42% of all tropical primary forest loss in 2024. Fires, fuelled by the worst drought on record, caused 66% of that loss-- over sixfold increase from 2023. The Amazon recorded its highest tree cover loss since 2016. Bolivia's primary forest loss increased by 200% in 2024. For the first time, it ranked second for tropical primary forest loss only to Brazil, overtaking the Democratic Republic of Congo despite having less than half its forest area, the analysis said. Fires burned five times more tropical primary forest in 2024 than in 2023. In tropical forests fires are almost entirely human caused, often started to clear land for agriculture and spreading out of control in nearby forests. 2024 was the hottest year on record with hot, dry conditions largely caused by climate change and El Nino. Latin America was particularly hard hit, the analysis said. The area under tree cover includes all tree cover (planted, natural, primary, agroforestry); while primary humid forests are essentially old growth forests which have not been regrown, Global Forest Watch data shows. GFW which mainly uses satellite data for their analysis records India's baseline tree cover as 38,830,421 ha in 2001 and primary forest cover as 10,185,436 ha. From 2002 to 2024, India lost 348,000 ha of humid primary forest, making up 15% of its total tree cover loss in the same time period. From 2001 to 2024, India lost 2.31 million hectares of tree cover, equivalent to a 7.1% decrease in tree cover since 2000, GFW said. The dominant drivers of primary forest loss in India are shifting cultivation, agriculture and logging. Most of the loss since 2001 has occurred in northeastern states including Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram etc according to GFW. From 2000 to 2020, India gained 1.78 million ha of tree cover equal to 1.4% of the global total. The Union environment ministry did not respond to HT's queries on the forest cover loss in 2024 . HT reported on May 9 that India reported that its forest and tree cover is now 25.17% of its geographical area as per the latest India State of Forest Report (2023).
