
Septic tanks under scrutiny as subdivision grows
The deep, glacial lake south of Hokitika is the source of the town's water supply.
The prospect of contamination from septic tanks was raised earlier this year by the council's management chair Brett Cummings.
And iwi rep Jackie Douglas (Ngati Maahaki; Makaawhio) asked if the council had any reports on Kaniere, given growing development in the area.
Council staff who monitor the lake for invasive weeds and for E. coli in the swimming season have reported bacteria levels rising sometimes after heavy rain.
But a recent survey carried out at the councillors' request has shown Lake Kaniere is in good health, Environmental Science manager Shanti Morgan told the July meeting of the council's Resource Management committee.
'We identified some areas where we want to do some more intensive sample monitoring to track the influence of increased development around certain parts of the lake. We can provide that to you in the quarterly update. '
Ms Douglas said she had gone out on Lake Kaniere with council staff when they sampled the water at key points and was happy with the results.
'We had a really good look at Hans Bay and Sunny Bight… the science team is able to follow up to ensure we don't see problems in the future or they can be easily identified.'
Buller councillor Chris Coll said he was fascinated to hear that the water quality was unaffected.
'What happens if it starts to change? With the town water supply coming from there, if E.coli started showing up, how would you reverse it? ' he asked.
Cr Cummings said that had been a problem at Punakaiki when run-off from an old septic tank was putting E. coli into the lagoon.
'They traced it back and found out what was going on – it's important to monitor, though Lake Kaniere is a whole lot bigger than Punakaiki lagoon,' he said.
Ms Morgan said the council's compliance team could check out any issues with septic tanks but the Westland District Council was also monitoring the water independently, under the (national) drinking water guidelines.
Westland mayor Helen Lash told Local Democracy Reporting the council was very much aware of the new subdivision activity in the hills around Lake Kaniere and was considering the potential risks.
'It's causing a bit of angst; more sections are appearing and it has been brought to our notice. Once you have an issue, how do you clean it up? '
The council might have to bring in additional testing, to be sure the water quality was beyond reproach, Mrs Lash said.
'All our water supplies are chlorinated, so there is a safeguard there, but we need to keep a close eye out for possible incremental effects and be sure the new septic systems are all top quality. Though it's more likely any problems would stem from the old ones. '
The regional council monitors West Coast lakes along with the Department of Conservation and Manawa Energy, as part of its obligations under the National Policy Statement on freshwater, using submerged plant life as a health indicator.
The surveillance programme detects invasive aquatic weeds but the report tabled this month shows mainly native vegetation in Lake Kaniere, with no signs of deterioration in its ecology.
- By Lois Williams, Local Democracy Reporter
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
10-08-2025
- RNZ News
Fire-safety rules review hears concerns on clarity, inconsistency
Five of 92 Loafers Lodge residents died in a fire at the boarding house in May 2023, prompting a review of building fire safety rules. Photo: Local Democracy Reporting / George Heard Warehouses using robots and shuttles present firefighting challenges that need examination - this is one of 10 brand new issues raised in a welter of submissions on changing fire-safety regulations. The review of rules around high-density accommodation sprang from the fatal Loafers' Lodge fire two years ago. The official summary out on Friday said warehouses with automatic storage and retrieval systems (ASRS) have not come up before. Some are 38 metres high and chock full of racks. They "have limited access for people" and "can be challenging to extinguish the fire and for firefighters to access the buildings". "Further consideration is required for the fire protection and access needs for these types of facilities," one fire engineer told the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. The engineer declined to comment to RNZ. Among the total of 112 submitters - the largest number on any fire rules change - the highest priority was making the fire regulations clearer, and cutting out gaps and inconsistencies - 92 percent agreed on that. The biggest concern was "inconsistent treatment of risk, in particular with regard to sleeping occupancies", a submitter said. Five people died in Loafers Lodge and 70 similar buildings were identified . Inspections found many had at least one fire-safety issue. Some submitters argued people in some type of buildings could be at greater risk in a fire, such as old or disabled people. "Requirements are not always set at the right fire risk level for different types of buildings" was noted as another high priority among submitters. "Occupant load densities for early childhood centres also require further consideration," said one. The Building Code was not up to it on that front and not performing well, 37 submitters said, although councils generally thought it was doing OK. "The operation of specific buildings, such as early childcare centres, hospitals, courthouses and police stations, are not addressed well in the Building Code and this results in unnecessary costs, when trying to demonstrate compliance." Those costs could inhibit compliance. "Some raised concerns that consideration of the financial implications would result in lowering life safety to an unacceptable level," the MBIE summary said. Submitters were most vocal about lack of clarity for both new construction and renovations. This was "alongside the disconnects" to other legislation and regulation such as the Resource Management Act, Fire and Emergency New Zealand Act, and Health and Safety Act. MBIE will feed the submissions into its proposals for Cabinet to consider changing the Building Code early next year. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

1News
29-07-2025
- 1News
Tākaka home proposed for ancient waka: ‘It'll be talk of the town'
Work is now well underway to plan a home for Aotearoa's "most significant archaeological find" in the Tasman town of Tākaka. It's been 13 years since the 700-year-old Anaweka waka was found on Golden Bay's west coast by a family on a picnic. The artefact is a six-metre fragment of what would have been a much longer, double-hulled, ocean-going waka. For most of the time since its discovery, the waka has been submerged in a polyethylene glycol solution in a shed, away from public view, to preserve it. But now, the waka is expected to be finished drying by the end of the year, and planning is underway for a facility which would keep the Anaweka waka in Golden Bay. ADVERTISEMENT The three local iwi that make up Manawhenua ki Mohua – Te Ātiawa, Ngāti Rārua, and Ngāti Tama – and Ngāti Kuia discussed options before eventually landing on their preferred approach. The Anaweka waka was dug up 13 years ago and is almost finished being preserved before it can be displayed to the public. Photo: Max Frethey (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) That plan would be a purpose-built home for the taonga – a wharewaka – constructed adjacent to the Golden Bay Museum on the corner of Commercial and Reilly Streets. The land, currently home to Pioneer Park, was already designated for use as a museum. Tasman District Council agreed to the location in principle last month, subject to public consultation. Butch Little, chairperson of the Ngāti Tama ki Te Waipounamu Trust, said the decision showed that local stakeholders – the council, iwi, and ahikā (local whānau) – were prepared to work together on the project. "Obviously, there has to be a consultation process with the community, but then we can start looking at funding, because it will be significant." ADVERTISEMENT Ngāti Tama ki Te Waipounamu Trust chair Butch Little. Photo: Supplied/Ngāti Tama (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) The wharewaka would properly recognise the mana of, what he said had been described as, the country's "most significant archaeological find ever". He also envisioned the facility as a museum about the history of local Māori and their mātauranga (knowledge) of celestial navigation and waka-building. "More than just a waka sitting there, there's going to be an opportunity to tell stories, to see other artifacts, to hear the history of voyaging… that's the vision, I suppose – telling our own stories and hopefully inspiring generations," Little said. "We're looking for something that the community can be really proud of and also in awe of." The Anaweka waka is currently drying in a shed away from public view but is intended to be displayed in a purpose-built museum. Photo: Supplied/Ngāti Tama (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) Once completed, Little thought the wharewaka would be an international drawcard for visitors to the region and could capitalise on the already-existing waka tourism in the Abel Tasman. ADVERTISEMENT "It blows people's minds," he said. "There will be people coming to the Bay just to see that, that will be their sole purpose. It's going to attract visitors that might not have otherwise come." The prospect of neighbouring the wharewaka was a "real honour" for the Golden Bay Museum. "It'll really be a huge boost to history, to let people know what a big historical significance Golden Bay has with the waka, and previously with the first encounter between Māori and Europeans," said museum board chair Frank Susko. The wharewaka is proposed to be built adjacent to the Golden Bay Museum on land currently used as a park that was designated for use as a museum. Photo: Max Frethey. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) Services manager Karen Johnson added that the museum looked after other Māori artefacts, with only a "teeny" portion on display, and so the wharewaka would provide additional opportunities to show more of the taonga. "There's just so much that you could incorporate." ADVERTISEMENT Although the site had been agreed to in principle, there was still "plenty" of work to do before shovels entered the ground, including further analysis, designs, fundraising, and community consultation. "We want to do it properly, we want to make it relevant in terms of what else was shown in there," Little said. Golden Bay Museum chair Frank Susko and services manager Karen Johnson welcomed the possibility of having the wharewaka next door. Photo: Max Frethey (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) "The whole community will be able to celebrate that. 'Wow, this was found here'. It'll be the talk of the town for a long time once it's up and running." Polynesian ocean-voyaging canoes were incredibly rare, with the Anaweka waka being only the second one known to have survived into the modern day. Parts of the first canoe were discovered in 1978 on the island of Huahine in French Polynesia, while hundreds of fragments of a potential third were recently uncovered on the Chatham Islands. Local Democracy Reporting is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air

1News
16-07-2025
- 1News
Māngere family say 'yes for now' to buyout after two-year wait
A Māngere family is faced with a difficult decision after learning that their home is considered an "intolerable risk to life". After waiting two years for answers, the Taufoous are now forced to choose between staying uninsured or leaving the community they have built over decades. Auckland Council claimed that the buyout was fair and voluntary but local leaders, including Councillor Alf Filipaina, said families should have access to all relevant information before making their decision. Daisy Taufoou, who has lived on Hinau Rd for 42 years, was shocked to return to her flood-damaged home only to discover that it was categorised as high-risk. Along with her husband, children, and elderly parents, the family has decided to proceed with the Auckland Council's voluntary buyout process to understand the implications of their choices. ADVERTISEMENT They must notify the council of their decision by July 17. Like their neighbours, they wished to stay, but after extensive deliberation, they felt they needed to explore all options before making a decision. Taufoou said the buyout situation felt like a "lose-lose" for many families on Hinau Rd. "It's been an emotional rollercoaster for us trying to decide what to do," she said. "We have decided to move forward in the process so that we can understand what we're saying yes or we're saying no to. Because, at any time, we can still say no and pull out. "It's a lose-lose. If we go, we lose our community. If we stay, we lose insurance and can't get cover for the next flood." Unlike some homeowners eager to receive a Category Three designation to escape flood-prone properties, Taufoou and her neighbours never wanted the buyout label. They wanted to remain in their homes. She criticised the limited timeframe they were given to decide on a buyout process after a lengthy two-year wait to learn their street was classified as Category Three. She said it had taken countless hours of unpaid effort to pursue reports and briefings. ADVERTISEMENT "Our whole street have repaired their homes or renovated their homes fully and we're all back into our homes. And then to hear, two years later, that it is an intolerable risk to life… just doesn't sit right with us. "Unlike the council staff who work on this eight hours a day, we have full-time jobs, kids and elderly parents. We're doing this in the evenings and weekends, just to figure out what's true." Workers upgrade Walmsley Road Bridge as part of flood resilience projects aimed at reducing future flooding in Māngere. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) Nick Vigar, Auckland Council's head of Planning for Healthy Waters, said Māngere was prioritised for major flood reduction projects, but assessing how upgrades like the Walmsley Rd Bridge would affect each home's risk took time. "Hinau Rd sits very low and close to the stream, which means that, even with these major upgrades, the risk to life during another major storm would still be too high," Vigar said. "Because of this, these homes remain eligible for a voluntary buyout. We know this is incredibly difficult, so we extended their timeframe and put extra support in place to help residents make an informed choice." Vigar said the upgrade to Walmsley Rd Bridge and the wider Māngere Flood Resilience Project would reduce flooding for many homes but Hinau Rd was an exception due to its location in the more hazardous 10-year floodplain. This meant floods might occur more frequently than in surrounding areas. ADVERTISEMENT "The unfortunate thing for Hinau Rd is that, while they are part of the big floodplain, they are developed in an area which we currently call the 10-year or 10% floodplain. That means those properties can expect to get hit more frequently than everyone else," Vigar said. Taufoou said the council's data did not align with the reality residents experienced. She insisted drains and upstream ponds had not been adequately maintained and minor repairs were neglected. "They keep talking about the bridge, but what about the drains? The worst of the damage came from blocked stormwater drains. It just doesn't seem fair to decide our lives on one big flood when fixing the small things could help," she said. Vigar said the council wished it could have provided families with answers sooner, but final modelling and funding approvals required time to complete. "It would have been preferable to come to them earlier and say, hey, this is the situation, but the reality is it took time to secure funding, do the design, update the flood models and get approval. It's really unfortunate for these people," he said. Vigar admitted the technical language around flood risk could be difficult for families to understand. He said opting into the buyout process did not commit families to follow through with it or agree to a set buyout price. "We talk about flood risk, 100-year events, 10-year events. It's really technical. I always worry that people won't fully understand what that means for them. ADVERTISEMENT "Opting into the buyout process does not lock a homeowner into going through with the buyout or a specific buyout price. "But it does give homeowners access to a dedicated property adviser, plus $5000 for legal and valuation costs, to help them understand what they would get from Council, including reimbursement for insurance repairs they have already done in good faith." Vigar said the added risk of losing insurance complicated the decision. "More and more, the insurance industry is requiring higher premiums or declining cover for flood-prone properties. It's not just about risk to life. There are real difficulties for higher-risk properties to get insurance," he said. Filipaina said the council's proposal aims to provide people with choices, but that they need all the information to make informed decisions. Hinau Rd. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) He said Hinau Rd was one of the streets most at risk despite nearby flood mitigation works. ADVERTISEMENT "We as an Auckland Council… we cannot say that if there's another major flood or cyclone that you will end up being safe," Filipaina said. "This is why we're asking you to please consider the buyout option. If you have all the information and it says to leave, but you don't want to leave, well then you take on the burden if anything happens." Taufoou said her neighbours have rallied to push back against the proposal, organising street-wide meetings with the council and seeking support from Community Law and local board members to challenge the findings collectively. She said they still worried about the future of the land if they decided to leave. "What we did was unique. No other area has come together like this to challenge the council as a street. We're proud of that. "You can't tell me Māngere won't be developed later. If we leave, will this land really stay empty? That's hard to believe," Taufoou said. The council stated that no final decision had been made about the land, but its policy meant that most Category Three sites would remain undeveloped for flood resilience or public use. Future residential development was "highly unlikely" because of the high hazard risk. For now, Taufoou's focus was on staying informed, asking questions, and reminding families that they still had the option to walk away if the buyout does not feel right. "It's about being able to reach out and ask for help and question things if they don't make sense. I don't want any of our families to feel like they're alone in this," Taufoou said. Local Democracy Reporting is local-body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.