
Oil prices little changed as investors eye impact of new sanctions on Russia
Brent crude futures fell 1 cent to $69.27 a barrel by 0153 GMT after settling 0.35% lower on Friday. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $67.44 a barrel, up 10 cents, following a 0.30% decline in the previous session.
The European Union approved on Friday the 18th package of sanctions against Russia over the conflict in Ukraine, which also targeted India's Nayara Energy, an exporter of oil products refined from Russian crude.
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Friday that Russia had built up a certain immunity to Western sanctions.
The EU sanctions followed U.S. President Donald Trump's threats last week to impose sanctions on buyers of Russian exports unless Russia agrees a peace deal in 50 days.
ING analysts said the lack of reaction from oil markets showed that the market is not convinced by the effectiveness of these sanctions.
"However, the part of the package likely to have the biggest market impact is the EU imposing an import ban on refined oil products processed from Russian oil in third countries," the analysts led by Warren Patterson said.
"But clearly, it will be challenging to monitor crude oil inputs into refineries in these countries and, as a result, enforce the ban."
Iran, another sanctioned oil producer, is due to hold nuclear talks in Istanbul with Britain, France and Germany on Friday, an Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson said on Monday. That follows warnings by the three European countries that a failure to resume negotiations would lead to international sanctions being reimposed on Iran.
In the U.S., the number of operating oil rigs fell by two to 422 last week, the lowest since September 2021, Baker Hughes said on Friday.
U.S. tariffs on European Union imports are set to kick in on August 1, although U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Sunday he was confident the United States could secure a trade deal with the bloc.
"U.S. tariff concerns will continue to weigh in the lead up to August 1 deadline, while some support may come from oil inventory data if it shows tight supply," IG market analyst Tony Sycamore said.
"It feels very much like a $64-$70 range in play for the week ahead."
Brent crude futures have traded between a low of $66.34 a barrel and a high of $71.53 after a ceasefire deal on June 24 halted the 12-day Israel-Iran war. - Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
23 minutes ago
- The Star
US, EU trade talks boosted by Trump's agreement with Japan
FILE PHOTO: Stacked containers and cranes are shown at the Port of Los Angeles in Los Angeles, California, U.S., November 22, 2021. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo BRUSSELS/WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The European Union and the U.S. are heading for a potential trade deal that includes a 15% U.S. baseline tariff on EU goods and possible exemptions, two European diplomats said on Wednesday, potentially moving President Donald Trump closer to securing another major trade agreement hours after he unveiled one with Japan. European negotiators were hoping to reach an agreement to dodge the 30% tariff rate Trump has said he would impose on imports from the 27-nation blocon August 1. The rate, which could also extend to cars, would mirror the framework agreement the U.S. has struck with Japan, which Trump announced late on Tuesday. The deal could include exemptions for some EU goods, the diplomats said. As talks continued, the European Commission said it would press on with potential counter-measures in case a deal was not reached. EU member states were set to vote on 93 billion euros of counter-tariffs on U.S. goods on Thursday, European diplomats said. A broad majority of members support using anti-coercion instruments if there is no deal, they said. Trump was hoping for a boost from the complicated deal reached with Japan, the largest foreign investor in the U.S., which included a $550 investment and loan pledges from Japan and its commitment to buy 100 Boeing airplanes and boost purchases of U.S. agricultural products. Tariffs on Japan's auto sector will drop from 27.5% to 15% as part of the agreement, reviving hopes for a similar deal for EU cars. Asian and European stock markets rallied as investors cheered that agreement, but U.S. stocks showed a more modest rise and earnings reports were gloomy. U.S. businesses making everything from chips to steel reported downbeat results on Wednesday, revealing how the Trump administration's chaotic trade policy has hurt profits, added to costs, upended supply chains and weighed on consumer confidence. Trump said late on Tuesday that other countries would be coming for talks this week and governments were scrambling to close trade deals before next week's deadline that the White House has repeatedly pushed back under pressure from markets and intense lobbying by industry. AUTO TARIFFS Automobile stocks led the climb of European shares after the Japan deal spurred hopes that the U.S. was budging over tariffs on EU cars. EU officials have previously said Washington has shown little sign of doing so. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview with Bloomberg Television that Japan received the 15% rate on auto tariffs "because they were willing to provide this innovative financing mechanism" that he did not think other countries could replicate. Trump, however, has appeared open to a range of options as the U.S. negotiates trade deals. "I will only lower tariffs if a country agrees to open its market," Trump wrote in a social media post on Wednesday. In addition to talks in Washington, the European Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic planned to speak with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Wednesday from Brussels. (Reporting by Philip Blenkinsop in Brussels and Trevor Hunnicutt in Washington; Additional reporting by Bhargav Acharya and Susan Heavey; Writing by Doina Chiacu; Editing by Paul Simao)


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
EU-China talks test unity as tariffs and war frictions dominate
EXPECTATIONS are rock-bottom for a European Union-China summit today that will test European resolve and unity as the bloc faces intense trade pressure from Beijing and the United States, analysts say. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and European Council president Antonio Costa plan to press Chinese leaders on rare earths and the war in Ukraine, both areas of tension, during the summit in Beijing. There is little hope for headway, at a time both sides face major challenges sustaining economic growth and Europe struggles to shore up support for Ukraine. Both sides may reach a modest joint statement on climate, a source familiar with the planning said, but no other tangible achievements are expected. In recent speeches, von der Leyen has revived hawkish China rhetoric, accusing China on July 8 of "enabling Russia's war economy" and flooding global markets with overcapacity. "We know that we don't see eye to eye with China on many issues, but we believe that it is essential to have this kind of very direct and open and constructive conversation," said one EU official. A spokesperson for the European Commission referred to a statement announcing the summit, which said leaders would discuss ways of ensuring "a more balanced, reciprocal and mutually beneficial trade relationship". In response to Reuters' questions, the Chinese Foreign Ministry referred to a spokesperson's statement on Monday. "Some people in Europe continue to ... exaggerate specific economic and trade issues and make groundless accusations against China on the Ukraine issue, causing unnecessary interference to China-EU relations," its spokesperson said. The 27-member European Union has also been negotiating hard with Washington after President Donald Trump threatened 30 per cent tariffs on most EU exports from Aug 1, with prospects for a broader trade deal fading. At the Beijing summit, China hopes to press the EU for a solution to its tariffs on China-built electric vehicles, for which Beijing claims price commitment negotiations are in the "final stages". Last week, China threatened to respond to EU sanctions on two Chinese banks and five firms over the Ukraine war. Its Commerce Ministry said on Monday the sanctions "seriously harmed trade, economic and financial ties". Other trade disputes are simmering in the background. China retaliated against EU restrictions on medical device procurement with its own curbs on July 6, and slapped duties on French cognac producers. China's exports to the EU grew in May while its US exports plunged 34.5 per cent in value terms the same month, sparking fears Chinese trade overcapacity is being diverted to the bloc due to US tariffs on Chinese goods. There is also a growing sense that EU firms are collateral damage for China's rare earth export controls that primarily targeted Washington but have disrupted European defence and automotive supply chains. In return for concessions on rare earths, China's asks could include reviving a long-stalled investment agreement after Beijing lifted sanctions on European Parliament members in May, and pushing back on US export curbs on Dutch firm ASML's chipmaking equipment. China has raised both in the weeks leading up to the summit, two sources familiar with the matter said. "The mood is extremely pessimistic in Europe regarding the summit," said Mathieu Duchatel, a director at the Institut Montaigne think tank in Paris. He said that Washington rejected previous EU proposals for coordination on China policy. "There is a sense that the gloves are completely off on the Chinese side. "They sense the transatlantic relationship has weakened and are trying to seize the opportunity." Diplomats and analysts also say that China is growing increasingly frustrated behind closed doors with European officials' repeated insistence on the war in Ukraine, which Beijing views as an obstacle in the relationship. There is little space for constructive dialogue on this, another EU official said, with Chinese counterparts denying evidence of Chinese firms' involvement in supplying dual-use goods to Russia.


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
E-hailing firms inDrive, Maxim get conditional licence renewal
KUALA LUMPUR: Russian-founded e-hailing firms inDrive and Maxim have been placed under a three-month probation period starting tomorrow after successfully appealing the revocation of their operating licences. The Land Public Transport Agency (Apad) said the corrective actions both firms have taken were deemed satisfactory, and company representatives are required to attend monthly meetings with Apad throughout the monitoring period. "On July 11, Apad conducted random checks on drivers under inDrive and Maxim and found that all drivers checked held valid E-Hailing Vehicle Permits (EVPs), based on cross-referencing with Apad's records. "Based on Apad's and the Road Transport Department's (JPJ) assessments and reviews, the corrective actions and commitment shown by both operators were deemed satisfactory. "Although both companies are now allowed to continue operating, they will remain under a three-month monitoring period starting July 24. "Strict action under Section 12A(5) of the Land Public Transport Act 2010 may be taken if they fail to comply with any of the stipulated service conditions," it said in a statement. It added that both firms have improved their driver registration systems to ensure all drivers possess valid EVPs before taking on assignments. As an additional measure, it said, they also granted "view-only" access to Apad for easier cross-checking between company data and EVP records. On its monthly meetings with Apad, it said the number of required attendances will be determined by Apad based on the monitoring level and current issues. "These sessions aim to allow real-time monitoring, including random driver checks via the inDrive and Maxim apps," it said. On April 24, Apad issued a Notice of Business Mediation Licence (LPP) Cancellation to Aist Malaysia Sdn Bhd (Maxim) and ID Applications Sdn Bhd (inDrive), which was to take effect on July 24. This action followed an audit of major e-hailing operators, which found non-compliance by both firms, particularly in regard to the requirement for EVPs. Following the action, both firms submitted their appeal and were required to take corrective actions before July 24 to continue their services.