&w=3840&q=100)
Airports close across West Asia as Israel-Iran conflict shuts airspace
After Israeli strikes landed near the hotel where he was staying in the Iranian province of Qom, Aimal Hussein desperately wanted to return home. But the 55-year-old Afghan businessman couldn't find a way, with Iranian airspace completely shut down.
He fled to Tehran after the strike Sunday, but no taxi would take him to the border as the conflict between Iran and Israel intensified.
Flights, markets, everything is closed, and I am living in the basement of a small hotel, Hussein told The Associated Press by cellphone on Monday. I am trying to get to the border by taxi, but they are hard to find, and no one is taking us.
Israel launched a major attack Friday with strikes in the Iranian capital of Tehran and elsewhere, killing senior military officials, nuclear scientists, and destroying critical infrastructure.
Among the targets was a nuclear enrichment facility about 18 miles from Qom. Iran has retaliated with hundreds of drones and missiles.
The dayslong attacks between the two bitter enemies have opened a new chapter in their turbulent recent history. Many in the region fear a wider conflict as they watch waves of attacks across their skies every night.
The conflict has forced most countries in the Middle East to close their airspace. Dozens of airports have stopped all flights or severely reduced operations, leaving tens of thousands of passengers stranded and others unable to flee the conflict or travel home.
Airport closures create massive' domino, tens of thousands stranded The domino effect here is massive, said retired pilot and aviation safety expert John Cox, who said the disruptions will have a huge price tag.
You've got thousands of passengers suddenly that are not where they're supposed to be, crews that are not where they are supposed to be, airplanes that are not where they're supposed to be, he said.
Zvika Berg was on an El Al flight to Israel from New York when an unexpected message came from the pilot as they began their descent: Sorry, we've been rerouted to Larnaca. The 50-year-old Berg saw other Israel-bound El Al flights from Berlin and elsewhere landing at the airport in Cyprus. Now he's waiting at a Larnaca hotel while speaking to his wife in Jerusalem. I'm debating what to do, Berg said.
Israel has closed its main international Ben Gurion Airport until further notice, leaving more than 50,000 Israeli travellers stranded abroad. The jets of the country's three airlines have been moved to Larnaca.
In Israel, Mahla Finkleman was stuck in a Tel Aviv hotel after her Air Canada flight was cancelled, trying to reassure her worried family back home while she shelters in the hotel's underground bunker during waves of overnight Iranian attacks.
We hear the booms. Sometimes there's shaking, she said. The truth, I think it's even scarier to see from TV what happened above our heads while we were underneath in a bomb shelter.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office warned Israelis not to flee the country through any of the three crossings with Jordan and Egypt that are open to the Israeli public. Despite having diplomatic ties with Israel, the statement said those countries are considered a high risk of threat to Israeli travellers.
Iran on Friday suspended flights to and from the country's main Khomeini International Airport on the outskirts of Tehran. Israel said Saturday that it bombed Mehrabad Airport in an early attack, a facility in Tehran for Iran's air force and domestic commercial flights.
Neighboring Iraq's airports have all closed due to its close proximity to Iran. Israel reportedly used Iraqi airspace, in part, to launch its strikes on Iran, while Iranian drones and missiles flying the other way have been downed over Iraq.
Baghdad has reached a deal with Turkey that would allow Iraqis abroad to travel to Turkey if they can afford it and return home overland through their shared border.
Some Iraqis stranded in Iran opted to leave by land. College student Yahia al-Suraifi was studying in the northwestern Iranian city of Tabriz, where Israel bombed the airport and an oil refinery over the weekend.
Al-Suraifi and dozens of other Iraqi students pooled together their money to pay taxi drivers to drive 320 kilometres overnight to the border with northern Iraq with drones and airstrikes around them.
It looked like fireworks in the night sky, al-Suraifi said. I was very scared.
By the time they reached the northern Iraqi city of Irbil, it was another 710 kilometres to get to his hometown of Nasiriyah in southern Iraq.
Back in Tehran, Hussein said the conflict brought back bitter memories of 20 years of war back home in Afghanistan.
This is the second time I have been trapped in such a difficult war and situation, he said, once in Kabul and now in Iran.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Is Trump addressing the nation tonight amid Israel-Iran conflict? What we know
Multiple posts on X (formerly Twitter) are claiming that President Donald Trump is set to deliver an urgent nationwide address tonight. However, there has been no official confirmation. Trump has not made any announcement on Truth Social, nor has the White House issued a statement. Major US outlets, including CNN, USA Today, Fox News, The Washington Post, and The New York Time, have also not confirmed the reports. In response to the speculation, many social media users suggested the president might speak about the escalating Iran-Israel conflict. Some even speculated that the United States could be preparing to intervene on Israel's behalf, potentially entering into direct conflict with Iran. One person wrote on X, 'I don't want a war and to see American lives lost, but I am trusting Trump on what's best for America and our safety.' Another wrote, 'Trump to address the world. If he declares the U.S. is going to war with Iran, this will be one of those major moments in world history that will be remembered 20 years from now. The long term consequences are monumental."
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘It's time for a full tariff overhaul and aligning them with broader economic goals': Ajay Srivastava at explained.Live
Tariffs are essentially taxes that countries impose on imports to protect their domestic industries. When a country wants to shield local producers from foreign competition, it puts a tax on imported goods. Under the World Trade Organization (WTO), every member country submits a tariff schedule. This schedule outlines the maximum tariff a country can impose on each product. These are called 'bound tariffs.' Once negotiated and finalised, countries agree not to exceed these limits. For example, if India commits in its WTO schedule that the tariff on glass is 40 per cent, that becomes the bound tariff. India can lower it in the future but it cannot raise it above 40 per cent. Until recently, most countries abided by their WTO commitments and operated within those agreed limits. The problem started when US President Donald Trump began openly violating these rules. The tariffs he imposed broke at least two major WTO principles, first by exceeding the bound tariffs on a wide range of goods and second, by imposing country-specific tariffs, applying different rates on different sources. The WTO requires countries to treat imports from all member nations equally, so this step is a clear violation undermining the very foundation of the WTO system. Today, every country talks about free trade agreements (FTAs) as if they are the driving force behind global trade. In reality, less than 20 per cent of global trade happens through the preferential route, through Free Trade Agreements or FTAs. The remaining 80 per cent happens under the WTO's Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) tariffs. For countries like India, we need to focus on the 80 per cent trade that doesn't depend on FTAs to grow our exports meaningfully. India has increasingly positioned FTAs as a key tool to boost exports. Initially, our strategy was 'Look East.' We began signing FTAs with our neighbouring countries under SAFTA (South Asian Free Trade Area), then moved on to ASEAN, Japan, South Korea and later Australia. At one point, we were close to signing a deal with China through the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) but we withdrew at the last minute. After covering most of the East, we shifted our focus westward. We signed FTAs with Mauritius, the UAE, Switzerland and Norway. We've now announced the completion of negotiations with the UK and it's expected that we'll sign agreements with the US and the EU in the near future. Once these are finalised, India will have FTAs with more than 75 countries, covering roughly 75 per cent of global trade. So while we started late, compared to Europe or the UK, we're catching up fast. On the surface, countries like the US have average tariffs of around four per cent while India's average is closer to 17 per cent. However, this is the result of a larger, negotiated settlement under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the WTO, which the US helped broker and now conveniently ignores. During these negotiations, developed countries like the US, EU and Japan, then global leaders in global production of industrial and high-tech goods, wanted two things: One, to lower global tariffs to make it easier to sell their high-end goods. Two, to expand the scope of the global trading system beyond just goods to include intellectual property rights and services, such as finance, telecom and IT and agricultural subsidies. Developing nations, like India and China, were seen as producing low-end goods and having weaker intellectual property frameworks. Thus, the developed nations drafted the Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights, or TRIPS, to bring Intellectual Property (IP) enforcement under the WTO, given its strong dispute settlement mechanism. The result was a trade-off: Developing countries accepted stricter rules on IP and services. In exchange, they were allowed to maintain somewhat higher tariff levels for a longer period. As part of this agreement, every country submitted a 'schedule of commitments' to the WTO for each product. For example, for glass, India might have said its maximum tariff, or 'bound tariff,' would be 40 per cent. These schedules were negotiated and accepted by all WTO members. Once the scope is set, the actual negotiations begin. Each country studies its domestic industries and identifies products and industries it would like to protect, which it considers sensitive sectors. For India, these include certain agricultural products to protect farmers and some industrial items. After industry-wide consultation, the country prepares an 'offer list', based on which tariff lines are listed in an Excel sheet. (India has around 12,800 of them.) In that list, it indicates which tariffs we'll reduce and the timing and extent of these reductions. Items to be excluded completely will be recorded in the negative or exclusion list. After both countries exchange their offer lists, they may choose to send each other request lists, asking the other to reconsider. The process continues over multiple rounds, often taking months or even years. Only after these are resolved do they announce the completion of negotiations, after which the legal teams finalise the text and the leaders of the countries sign the agreement. The agreement itself, typically, becomes effective two to three months after the signing. That's when the actual trade benefits — like lower tariffs and improved market access — start kicking in. We need to take a comprehensive look at our entire tariff structure. Right now, in every Union Budget, we make incremental changes — raise tariffs here, reduce them there — but what we haven't done is a full review of all 12,800 tariff lines. When I did a simple analysis, I found that over 90 per cent of our total Customs revenue comes from less than five per cent of our tariff lines. Meanwhile, the bottom 60 per cent of tariff lines contribute less than three per cent of revenue. So we have to ask why we are maintaining tariffs on those lines at all. A thorough review could also help us fix other long-standing issues, like inverted duty structures, where the import duty on raw materials is higher than on finished goods. That discourages domestic manufacturing because it makes local production less competitive. It has been over 25 years since we last did a full tariff overhaul. Now is the time to revisit the structure holistically. Given the number of FTAs we've signed and the structural issues in our system, it's time to conduct a proper, data-driven review. It's not just about revenue, it's about making tariffs more logical, targeted and aligned with our broader economic goals. In the late 1980s, India was ahead of China in several areas. We were exporting more computer hardware. Our pharmaceutical exports, APIs and formulations, were stronger than China's. In textiles and garments, we were neck and neck. When liberalisation came, we focussed more on deregulation without simultaneously building real manufacturing capacity. China, on the other hand, used that same period to build, sector by sector, with vision and intent. They began with textiles and garments, moved into machinery and then into electronics. They scaled up across industries methodically. Importantly, they had strong backing from American companies. What did China do differently? They applied highly strategic, foresighted policies and executed them well. In contrast, we continue to talk about increasing the share of manufacturing in our GDP, while importing the most basic items — knives, nail cutters, nuts, bolts. It's not for a lack of advanced technology, we've just never drilled down deep into the product level to build competitiveness. We need long-term commitment. We need to stop putting bureaucrats in charge of this transformation and instead identify people who have hands-on experience and empower them, set clear goals and get moving. That's how we change the trade equation, by building from the ground up.
India Today
20 minutes ago
- India Today
Khamenei is like frightened rat, time to reclaim Iran: Exiled prince Reza Pahlavi
Amid a spiralling conflict with Israel and deepening unrest at home, exiled Iranian crown prince Reza Pahlavi has issued a call for regime change in Tehran, declaring that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has "gone into hiding underground" and that the Islamic Republic is "in the process of collapsing.""The Islamic Republic has reached its end," Pahlavi said in a social media post. "What has begun is irreversible. The future is bright, and together, we will pass through this sharp turn in history."advertisementHis remarks come as anti-regime sentiment mounts across Iran in the wake of airstrikes and political turmoil. Pahlavi, son of the late Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, is urging Iranians to rise up from "Bandar Abbas to Bandar Anzali, from Shiraz to Isfahan," in what he says is the final chapter of the Islamic IS LIKE A FRIGHTENED RAT, SAYS PAHLAVI He portrayed Khamenei as a weakened, panicked leader: "Khamenei, like a frightened rat, has gone into hiding underground and has lost control of the situation." "The end of the Islamic Republic is the end of its 46-year war against the Iranian nation," Pahlavi exiled royal also appealed directly to Iran's military and security personnel, many of whom he claims are already reaching out to him privately. "Do not sacrifice yourselves for a decaying regime," he wrote. "By standing with the people, you can save your lives. Play a historic role in the transition."The Islamic Republic has come to its end and is collapsing. What has begun is irreversible. The future is bright, and together we will turn the page of history. Now is the time to stand up; the time to reclaim Iran. May I be with you soon. Reza Pahlavi (@PahlaviReza) June 17, 2025Pahlavi assured Iranians that a post-regime future has been mapped out, rejecting fears of civil war or chaos. "We have a plan for Iran's future and its flourishing," he said. "We are prepared for the first hundred days after the fall... for the establishment of a national and democratic government — by the Iranian people and for the Iranian people.""A free and flourishing Iran lies ahead of us. May we be together soon," Pahlavi US JOIN ISRAELI STRIKES ON IRANIAN NUCLEAR SITES?As the conflict between Israel and Iran enters its fifth day, US President Donald Trump is carefully weighing the United States' possible responses. With tensions escalating rapidly, Trump is consulting with his national security team to consider various options to join Israel's ongoing strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, according to US media InMust Watch
