Supreme Court to hear arguments over whether states may subpoena faith-based pregnancy centers
First Choice Women's Resources Centers had urged the conservative court to throw out a decision from the Philadelphia-based 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals siding with the state. That decision required the nonprofit to continue litigating its objections to the subpoena in state court.
New Jersey officials subpoenaed the center in 2023 as part of investigation into whether the organization violated consumer fraud laws. Pregnancy centers are opposed to abortion, but New Jersey officials said their marketing may have left some patients with the impression that they could receive abortions at the facilities.
The subpoena was aimed at evaluating whether the center 'or its staff engaged in misrepresentations and other prohibited conduct,' according to the state. It sought advertisements, donor solicitations, and the identification of licensed medical personnel. The center framed the subpoena as a demand for donor names.
If that view of the subpoena prevails, then New Jersey's actions may be in conflict with a 2021 Supreme Court decision in which a majority found unconstitutional a California law requiring the conservative Americans for Prosperity Foundation to disclose its donors.
A divided 3rd Circuit ruled in December that the center's claims were not yet ripe because state courts had not yet enforced the subpoena against them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Trump says homeless people in DC 'have to move out IMMEDIATELY'
Trump says he plans to make an announcement Aug. 11 about a D.C. crime initiative, even as violent crime is down significantly in the nation's capital. Last year marked the lowest level of violent crime in Washington, D.C., in more than 30 years, but President Donald Trump has raised concerns about public safety in the city, teasing a plan that would also target its homeless population. "I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before," Trump said on Truth Social on Aug. 10. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital." In a series of social media posts, Trump said he would unveil his initiative on Aug. 11, adding it would address the city's crime and the "Cleanliness and the General Physical Renovation and Condition of our once beautiful and well maintained Capital." The president threatened to "take Federal control" of Washington, D.C., in an Aug. 5 post complaining about crime. The post came after Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old former employee of the Department of Government Efficiency nicknamed "BigBalls," was assaulted in an attempted carjacking. "Crime in Washington, D.C., is totally out of control," Trump said on Aug. 5, adding: "If this continues, I am going to exert my powers, and FEDERALIZE this City." Days later, Trump ordered an increased federal law enforcement presence on D.C. streets, led by officers from U.S. Park Police and including officers from about a dozen other agencies. Cruel and unusual punishment?: In major decision, Supreme Court allows cities to ban homeless camps Violent crime declined by 35% in D.C. in 2024, according to data compiled by the D.C. Metropolitan Police. The 2024 numbers marked the lowest level of violent crime in "over 30 years," the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia said in a news release. Homicides dropped by 32%, robberies were down 39% and armed carjackings were down 53%. Violent crime has declined so far in 2025, according to police data. Homicides and robberies are down 12% and 28%, respectively, while total violent crime is down 26% through Aug. 8 when compared with the same period in 2024. Homicides spiked in D.C. in 2023 to 274, up from 203 the year before, before dropping down to 187 in 2024, according to police data. That is the lowest level since the city had 166 homicides in 2019. There have been 99 homicides in 2025, compared to 112 during the same period last year. Trump has long denigrated Washington, D.C, which leans heavily Democratic. He also floated taking over governance of the district in February in comments to reporters, complaining about crime and homelessness. Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
NY Gov. Kathy Hochul slights Zohran Mamdani in live TV reality check, hints she may not endorse: ‘Many differences'
Gov. Kathy Hochul slighted mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani in a live TV interview Sunday — signaling she may not endorse him in the election even after he praised her 'courage.' 'We still have many differences,' Hochul said, keeping her distance from her fellow Democrat during a Fox News Sunday interview. 'I don't know how you whitewash that away.' Fox host Shannon Bream had read a statement from Mamdani effusively praising Hochul for sparring with President Trump and Republicans over redistricting fights that could dictate who controls Congress. Advertisement 4 Gov. Kathy Hochul hinted that she may not make an endorsement at all in the New York City mayoral election during an interview Sunday. Tomas E. Gaston Mamdani said Hochul showed 'courage' and was 'meeting the moment.' 'Is the feeling mutual? Is Mamdani a good choice' [for New York City mayor], Bream asked, sparking Hochul to bring up their 'many differences.' Advertisement 'He can agree with me and many people agree with me and I think it's not just Democrats who say, 'New Yorkers stand up for our rights.' We do that,' Hochul said. 'We're fighters. I'm a mom from Buffalo. I guess they're not used to taking on a mom from Buffalo.' Hochul, who is seeking re-election next year, has come out against Mamdani's proposals to hike taxes by $9 billion on millionaires and corporations in the city to fund his affordability agenda of subsidized child care, fare-free bus services, housing expansion and government-run grocery stores. 4 Hochul with Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani and Mayor Eric Adams at the Dominican Day Parade on Aug. 10, 2025. LP Media Advertisement Those taxes need sign off from the governor and state lawmakers, who also are up for re-election in 2026. Despite the apparent snub, Hochul did say she agrees with Mamdani's focus on tackling New York's high cost of living and making both the city and state more affordable for residents. 'There's many areas of disagreement,' she noted. 'But also there's areas of alignment including affordability. His election touched a nerve. And people said, 'you know what, we're just not getting ahead.'' 4 Mamdani praised Hochul for having 'courage' and 'meeting the moment' in her battle with Republicans over redistricting. LP Media She claimed that President Trump's policies, including imposing tariffs, have not helped. 'There's a sense that we need some change now,' Hochul said. Hochul then hinted she may sit out the race and not endorse Mamdani, who is running against two other Democrats running on independent party lines — Mayor Eric Adams and ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, whom she served with as lieutenant governor. She took over as governor when Cuomo resigned as governor amid sexual misconduct accusations that he denies. Advertisement 4 Adams and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo are running against Mamdani as independent candidates. LP Media 'I already worked with two different mayors. I'll continue to work with whomever the voters want me to and I'll make it work out. I'm not going to go to war with the 8 million residents of New York I also represent,' the governor said. 'My job is to calm things down,' Hochul said. 'Let's see what the election results are. But people have to recognize that the candidate for mayor [Mamdani] has also touched a nerve and we need to respond to that. I'm aligned with him that we need to find ways to make life more affordable for New Yorkers.' It wouldn't be the first time Hochul stayed on the sidelines during a high-profile mayoral showdown. In her native Buffalo in 2021, democratic socialist India Walton defeated then-sitting Mayor Byron Brown in the Democratic Party primary but Brown, a moderate, continued as a write-in candidate. Hochul stayed out of the race, and Brown won re-election in a landslide in November as the write-in candidate.
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Partisan gerrymandering is a constitutional question
In 2019, the Supreme Court ruled in Rucho v. Common Cause that 'partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.' Partisan gerrymandering is not a 'political question'; it is a constitutional one. When we vote, we speak; we express in writing whom we want to represent us and whom we do not want to represent us, based on shared political values.
