
My perfect husband was hiding a twisted truth that led to a bloodbath – police found me in ‘worst crime scene' ever
'I HAD the perfect husband, up until the day he tried to kill me.'
'Looking back on things now, I think there were some red flags that started to display themselves after we got married,' Kelly Sutliff told PopCrimeTV. 'But up until then, there really weren't many red flags.
8
8
'He seemed to come off completely authentic, and really wanted me to be authentic as well.
'He really presented[himself] as Prince Charming. Everything I was looking for, he checked off every single box; he was really kind, he was generous, he was kind to other people and he really seemed to love me.'
Kelly met Chris through the dating app Bumble back in August 2018. She described him as being 'very attractive'.
'He seemed like a guy who was really in touch with his feelings and could understand other people's emotions as well. He described himself as an empath.'
Little did she know, she would end up running for her life.
Kelly, now 43 and a psychotherapist, had her first date with Chris, who was three years her junior, in Morristown, New Jersey, a week after they matched online.
He told her he was a US Army veteran and had since worked as a government contractor.
The couple then embarked on a whirlwind romance.
Chris told Kelly he loved her after a few weeks of dating. She recalled: 'My gut was saying, 'maybe something isn't right here?' But I rationalised it because I really wanted this man to be who I thought he was.'
In November 2018, Chris moved in with Kelly and then proposed a month later.
Everyone thinks fentanyl killer who murdered mum & dad is nice bloke & I'm real killer - even my relatives accused me
Completely won over by his charm, Kelly says she 'got swept up' in their wedding plans, which were booked for an intimate ceremony in Maui in January 2019.
They discussed having children - Chris already had an eight-year-old son from a previous relationship - but they decided against it so they could travel the world together as a twosome.
Kelly said: 'I truly thought like he was going to be my husband for the rest of my life.'
Mysterious illness
Soon after their honeymoon, Kelly fell ill. Her skin broke out in hives, then her general health deteriorated quickly.
Initially, she thought it was linked to a virus she had the previous summer when on holiday in Croatia, but her symptoms got worse - she felt nauseous, headachy and exhausted.
At one point, her legs gave way and she collapsed on the stairs. She was rushed to the hospital to check for a blood clot, thankfully, she didn't have one.
The fatigue progressed, and she was spending days in bed, unable to get up.
Chris was the doting husband, going food shopping, cooking meals, making sure she stayed hydrated.
Kelly said: 'In taking care of me, he acted like the best husband ever. He kept saying he would make sure I was going to get better.'
8
Secrets exposed
But in December 2019, everything changed when Chris fell asleep next to Kelly, clutching his phone.
Kelly took this opportunity to look through his messages, checking Instagram first.
She found explicit pictures and texts from another woman.
But the messages were worse. Chris had told the woman that his wife was a drug addict and alcoholic, whom he no longer loved.
Kelly described Chris' behaviour as demeaning and she started questioning who he really was.
'I thought, 'I don't know who this man is, because my husband would never do something like that.' I don't know who I'm married to,' she recalled.
When Chris woke, Kelly confronted him and showed him the copy of texts she had.
She then asked him to leave and go stay with his mum, be he refused, desperate to know if this was the end of their marriage.
Then at 6pm, Chris' behaviour darkened. He became violent.
Returning from spending the afternoon at her sister's house, Kelly walked in to find Chris standing naked, covered in blood, brandishing a military knife. He had cut himself with the knife and yelled abuse into her face.
In a turn of events, Chris set out to make it look like Kelly was trying to murder him.
Over the next 45 minutes, he wrecked their home and physically assaulted Kelly.
Recalling the attack, Kelly explained how Chris pinned her down by her neck and legs and told her she would watch as he destroyed their home, before killing her.
She tried to call 911 several times, but at each attempt, he wrestled the phone from her.
Once, he got hold of the phone and told the operator everything was fine. But the operator didn't believe him and traced the address before dispatching the police.
During this time, Kelly put her dog, Chester, in the basement for safety before running out of the house and banging on a neighbour's door, who then rang for the emergency services.
8
"As I stood in their [neighbours'] foyer, I looked out and saw Chris smearing his blood over the bay window," she said in the documentary. "And then I saw Chris walking towards the basement, because that's where I hid Chester."
Kelly risked her own life for her dog and went back to the house whilst Chris was on a rampage.
"I was not going to let that man kill my dog," she said. "There was no way in hell, he was going to lay a hand on that dog. The dog was everything to me."
Going back inside, Kelly saw the basement door halfway open and Chester sitting outside it - alive.
"I slammed the basement door shut," she said. "And I heard Chris screaming. I looked to my right, and saw the police, and I started screaming 'please help me.'"
Blood everywhere
Detective David Littman was among the first responders, and he explained what he walked into in the ID Discovery series Toxic.
The policeman said, 'Chris was covered in blood and muttering incoherently. He was on some kind of rant, how he was in the war, how he killed people. He refused to follow the police's demands but was eventually handcuffed.
8
8
'I saw every room was destroyed. There was blood on the walls, TVs pulled off the wall, tables overturned, the master bedroom was destroyed. It was probably one of the worst scenes I had ever seen.'
But Kelly had survived.
As for Chris, he was taken to a Veterans' Affairs hospital and treated for his wounds before being charged with aggravated assault by strangulation, criminal mischief, and possession of a deadly weapon.
He was able to walk out of jail the same day due to a law in New Jersey that eliminates bail for first-time offenders.
Drug and rape allegations
That evening, Kelly briefly popped home to get some clothes and found her husband's phone on the floor.
She said it contained chilling pictures of him masturbating next to her while she was sleeping. In others, he was smiling ominously as she slept soundly with her head on the pillow. In a video, it showed him putting something under her nose while she was sprawled on the bed, incapacitated.
Kelly said it 'didn't look like I was sleeping naturally at all. It was as if I was drugged'.
8
And her worst fears were confirmed true when a stash of pills Kelly had never seen before was found. According to Kelly, the medications tamoxifen and mammoth, which are normally used to treat people with breast cancer, caused the exact symptoms she'd experienced when she was sick, including causing people's legs to give way.
In an even darker turn of events, Kelly questioned whether Chris might have sexually assaulted her while she was allegedly drugged.
She told police about a time during their honeymoon when she suddenly woke to find her husband in the midst of having intercourse with her.
She asked Chris what he was doing, and he said he thought she was again.
She told him to never do that to her again.
After she heard about the pills, which she suspects he had slipped into her food and drink, she thinks that she was drugged that night.
Speaking to The Daily Mail, Kelly said: It's so painful to discover that someone who is supposed to love you and protect you has violated and betrayed you in such a horrific way.'
Domestic abuse - how to get help
DOMESTIC abuse can affect anyone - including men - and does not always involve physical violence.
Here are some signs that you could be in an abusive relationship:
Emotional abuse - Including being belittled, blamed for the abuse - gaslighting - being isolated from family and friends, having no control over your finances, what you where and who you speak to
Threats and intimidation - Some partners might threaten to kill or hurt you, destroy your belongings, stalk or harass you
Physical abuse - This can range from slapping or hitting to being shoved over, choked or bitten.
Sexual abuse - Being touched in a way you do not want to be touched, hurt during sex, pressured into sex or forced to have sex when you do not consent.
If any of the above apply to you or a friend, you can call these numbers:
The Freephone National Domestic Abuse Helpline, run by Refuge on 0808 2000 247 for free at any time, day or night
Men who are being abused can call Respect Men's Advice Line on 0808 8010 327 or ManKind on 0182 3334 244
Those who identify as LGBT+ can ring Galop on 0800 999 5428
If you are in immediate danger or fear for your life, always ring 999
Remember, you are not alone.
1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men will experience domestic abuse over the course of their lifetime.
Every 30 seconds the police receive a call for help relating to domestic abuse.
Justice thwarted
There was a year-long investigation into the alleged sexual assaults. However, soon after he was arrested, Hanover Township PD handed back Chris' phone, and the suspected images were deleted before the police were granted a search warrant.
No evidence of either the photos or Kelly being drugged was found, and too much time had passed for medical tests to be carried out to show the medication in her system.
Detective David added, 'Every doctor that I spoke to said that whatever Kelly experienced and described, those drugs would have had an effect on her like that. But trying to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt is extremely hard, because I don't have a blood test to prove that she was given those drugs.'
He was also disappointed that the prosecutor's office hadn't pursued charges for sexual assault, but was hopeful that the other charges against Chris would likely end up with him in jail.
His hopes for Chris to get time were dashed.
In October 2023, Chris accepted a plea deal and was sentenced to just three years' probation on aggravated assault by strangulation charges.
Kelly said, 'I felt abused by the criminal justice system. It makes me sick to my stomach that Chris did what he did, and still kept his freedom.'
When Kelly stood up and delivered her impact statement, she told the court she could've died that night.
'He was going to kill me, but I survived. There is going to come a day when he does kill someone, and the blood will be on the system's hands,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Controlling' husband killed wife after tracking her to refuge, court told
A 'violent, jealous, controlling' husband stabbed his wife to death as she pushed their baby in a pram after tracing her to a hostel where she was staying to escape him, prosecutors have told a jury. Habibur Masum, 26, launched a 'ferocious' knife attack on Kulsuma Akter, 27, after confronting her on a street in Bradford, West Yorkshire. A court heard Ms Akter had come to Bradford to be housed in a refuge 'to escape (Masum's) violence, jealousy and controlling behaviour'. Bradford Crown Court jurors were told Masum had previously threatened to kill Ms Akter and, at the time of the attack on April 6 last year, was subject to court bail conditions ordering him to keep away from her. Opening the case on Monday, prosecutor Steven Wood KC said Masum tracked Ms Akter to Bradford and, in the days leading up to the attack, tried to trick her into leaving the hostel by pretending to be from a GP's surgery and offering her fake appointments. The court heard at 3pm on April 6 Ms Akter was walking with a friend while pushing her seven-month-old son in a pram and was confronted by the defendant who walked with her into a shop. Mr Wood said she was shocked Masum was there as she believed that he was in Spain. CCTV footage played in court showed Masum walking with Ms Akter until he stopped her, and spinning her and the pram around before pulling a knife from his jacket. Mr Wood said: 'He grabs Kulsuma and pushes her into a wall, stabbing her to the body. You will see that Kulsuma then goes to the ground only for the defendant to launch a ferocious and deadly attack. 'When the defendant had finished stabbing her, as a final act of sheer gratuitous violence, he kicks Kulsuma before moving away, but not before ensuring that he disposed of the knife.' The court heard Ms Akter suffered multiple stab wounds to her body and face including a wound to the neck which partly cut her windpipe and severed her left jugular vein. Mr Wood told jurors: 'The (prosecution) say this was cold-blooded, calculated, pre-meditated murder. 'Why would the defendant take a knife with him to meet his estranged wife unless he planned to use it?' The court heard that by November 2023, Ms Akter and the defendant had been married for about 18 months. Mr Wood said: 'Generally, the relationship had been good, but there were already warning signs. 'There were previous incidents of his making threats to kill her and in July 2023, she was staying with family members because of his controlling behaviour.' Jurors heard on November 23 Masum became jealous over a 'completely innocuous' message she received from a male colleague, grabbing her face, slapping her and pulling her hair. 'In what you may think was a chilling prediction of what he was to do in April of the following year, he told Kulsuma, 'I am going to murder you, and the police will be taking me',' Mr Wood said. The next day, after coming home from work, he went into their bedroom carrying a knife and said: 'Tell me what your relationship is with him, or I will kill you,' jurors heard. Mr Wood said Masum put the knife to Ms Akter's throat and 'she was so genuinely afraid that he would cut her throat, that she thought that the only way to stop him was to keep the baby on her lap'. A female family member who was concerned for Ms Akter's safety called the police, and Masum was arrested that night, jurors heard. In his interview at Ashton police station he denied using any violence towards his wife and 'just asked who the guy was'. He also told officers he had no mental health conditions. The court heard Masum was charged with two offences of assault by beating and one offence of making a threat to kill. Jurors heard Ms Akter told a social worker from Oldham Council she 'believed that one day her husband would kill her', asking if her son could stay with her sister-in-law and brother 'when this day comes'. She was moved to accommodation in Bradford in January 2024. Mr Wood said in March, Ms Akter told her social worker Masum had contacted her on Snapchat, threatening that if she did not go back to him by April 1 he would kill her brothers. The court heard the refuge contacted the police and, the next day, Masum sent Ms Akter a Snapchat video of the Bradford Interchange Railway Station with a message saying he had 'come to her town'. He later sent her a photo of the refuge with a message saying: 'I know that you are living in this place. I knew from the first day you moved here. 'If I had any wish to kill you, I could have from the first day. You do not know what you have lost but one day you will understand. Nobody will love you like I do.' The court heard Ms Akter's social worker arranged for her to be rehoused and she was due to move on April 8, but in the meantime she heard from one of Masum's relatives that he was in Spain, and 'felt safe to leave the refuge' on the day she was killed. Masum denies murdering Ms Akter but has pleaded guilty to manslaughter and possession of a knife. He also denies two charges of assault, one count of making threats to kill and one charge of stalking.


The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Fresh Los Angeles rallies planned to demand release of arrested union leader
Los Angeles was waking Monday up to another day of high tensions with Donald Trump's administration, the fourth since protests began over efforts by federal immigration authorities' attempts to arrest illegal migrants in the city and a day after the president ordered in the national guard. New rallies against US immigration and customs enforcement (Ice) detentions are planned, with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) announcing an event 'to demand justice for detained immigrants and an end to the ongoing human rights abuses by Ice'. 'We will not be intimidated. We will not be silenced,' the civil rights organisation said in a statement on its website. The rally is set to demand the immediate release of David Huerta, a union leader who it said 'was unjustly arrested and is still being held by the government, and all unjustly detained individuals'. But the political rhetoric over the protests has not cooled. Trump's 'border czar' Tom Homan told Fox News early Monday that Ice 'took a lot of bad people off the street'. 'We arrested a sexual predator, we arrested gang members, we arrested somebody that had an armed robbery conviction,' Homan said, without providing specifics. 'We made LA safer … but you're not hearing any of this. All you're hearing is rhetoric about Ice being racist, Ice being Nazis and terrorists – and Governor [Gavin] Newsom feeds that, just like [Democratic US House minority leader] Hakeem Jeffries says he's going to unmask Ice agents. 'We're not going to stop.' Homan also told NBC News that more raids are coming. 'I'm telling you what – we're going to keep enforcing law every day in LA,' he said. 'Every day in LA, we're going to enforce immigration law. I don't care if they like it or not.' The tensions between elected state and local officials and the federal government showed signs of escalating further after Newsom said he planned to sue the federal government and dared Trump to arrest him. In an interview on MSNBC, Newsom said the lawsuit would challenge Trump's federalizing of the California national guard without the state's consent. 'Donald Trump has created the conditions you see on your TV tonight,' Newsom told the outlet. 'He's exacerbated the conditions. He's, you know, lit the proverbial match. He's putting fuel on this fire, ever since he announced he was taking over the national guard – an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' Federal law, he said, 'specifically notes they had to coordinate with the governor of the state. 'They never coordinated with the governor of the state.' On Fox News, Newsom said Trump is 'reckless and immoral, and he's taken the illegal and unconstitutional act of federalizing the national guard and putting lives at risk'. Newsom added that he is confident that California's legal challenge would succeed.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
They hoped their children's deaths would bring change. Then a Colorado bill to protect kids online failed
Bereaved parents saw their hopes for change dashed after a bill meant to protect children from sexual predators and drug dealers online died in the Colorado state legislature last month. Several of those parents had helped shape the bill, including Lori Schott, whose 18-year-old daughter Annalee died by suicide in 2020 after consuming content on TikTok and Instagram about depression, anxiety and suicide. 'When the legislators failed to vote and pushed it off onto some fake calendar date where they're not even in session, to not even have accountability for where they stand – as a parent, it's a slap in the face,' said Schott, who identifies as a pro-second amendment Republican. 'It's a slap in the face of my daughter, and to other kids that we've lost.' Had the legislation passed, it would have required social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to investigate and take down accounts engaged in gun or drug sales or in the sexual exploitation or trafficking of minors. It also mandated the creation of direct hotlines to tech company personnel for law enforcement and a 72-hour response window for police requests, a higher burden than under current law. Additionally, platforms would have had to report on how many minors used their services, how often they did so, for how long and how much those young users engaged with content that violated company policies. Several big tech firms registered official positions on the bill. According to Colorado lobbying disclosures, Meta's longtime in-state lobby firm, Headwater Strategies, is registered as a proponent for changing the bill. Google and TikTok also hired lobbyists to oppose it. 'We're just extremely disappointed,' said Kim Osterman, whose 18-year-old son Max died in 2021 after purchasing drugs spiked with fentanyl from a dealer he met on Snapchat. '[Legislators] chose big tech over protecting children and families.' Protections for users of social media (SB 25-086) passed both chambers before being vetoed on 24 April by governor Jared Polis, a Democrat, who cited the bill's potential to 'erode privacy, freedom and innovation' as reasons for his veto. Colorado's senate voted to override the veto on 25 April, yet those efforts fell apart on 28 April when the state house opted to delay the vote until after the legislative session ended, effectively blocking an override and keeping the bill alive. The bill originally passed the senate by a 29-6 vote and the house by a 46-18 margin. On 25 April, the senate voted 29-6 to override Polis's veto. Lawmakers anticipated that the house would take up the override later that day. At the time, according to those interviewed, there appeared to be enough bipartisan support to successfully overturn his veto. 'It was an easy vote for folks because of what we were voting on: protecting kids from social media companies,' said the senator Lindsey Daugherty, a Democrat and a co-sponsor of the bill. She said she urged house leadership to hold the vote Friday, but they declined: 'The speaker knew the governor didn't want us to do it on Friday, because they knew we would win.' The parents who advocated for the bill attribute its failure to an unexpected, 11th-hour lobbying campaign by a far-right gun owners' association in Colorado. Two state legislators as well as seven people involved in the legislative process echoed the parents' claims. Rocky Mountain Gun Owners (RMGO) cast the bill as an instrument of government censorship in texts and emails over the legislation's provisions against 'ghost guns', untraceable weapons assembled from kits purchased online, which would have been prohibited. RMGO launched massive social media and email campaigns urging its 200,000 members to contact their legislators to demand they vote against the bill. A source with knowledge of the workings of the Colorado state house described the gun group's social media and text campaigns, encouraging Republicans voters to contact their legislators to demand opposition to the bill, as incessant. '[Legislators] were getting countless calls and emails and being yelled at by activists. It was a full-fledged attack. There was a whole campaign saying: 'This is a government censorship bill,'' they said. The group's actions were instrumental in a campaign to deter house Republicans from voting against the veto, resulting in the quashing of the bill, and unexpected from an organization that had been facing funding shortfalls, according to 10 people interviewed who were involved in the design of the bill and legislative process. Sources in the Colorado state house spoke to the Guardian on condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisal from RMGO. The house had delayed the vote until 28 April, which allowed RMGO time to launch a campaign against the bill over the weekend. When lawmakers reconvened Monday, the house voted 51-13 to postpone the override until after the legislative session ended – effectively killing the effort. The gun activists' mass text message campaign to registered Republican voters asserted the social media bill would constitute an attempt to 'compel social media companies to conduct mass surveillance of content posted on their platforms' to search for violations of Colorado's gun laws, describing the bill as an attack on first and second amendment rights, according to texts seen by the Guardian. Founded in 1996, RMGO claims to have a membership of more than 200,000 activists. It is recognized as a far-right group that takes a 'no-compromise' stance on gun rights. Dudley Brown, its founder and leader, also serves as the president of the National Association for Gun Rights, which positions itself further to the right than the National Rifle Association (NRA). RMGO has mounted criticism against the NRA for being too moderate and politically compromising. Critics have described RMGO as 'bullies' and 'extremists' because of its combative tactics, which include targeting and smearing Democrats and moderate Republicans. The group did not respond to requests for comment on its legislative efforts. RMGO is a well-known presence at the Colorado capitol, typically opposing gun-control legislation. Daugherty described its typical campaign tactics as 'scary'. She got rid of her X account after being singled out by the group over her work on a bill to ban assault weapons earlier this year. 'When we were running any of the gun bills at the capitol, they put my and some other legislators' faces on their websites,' she said. A screenshot of a tweet from RMGO showed Daugherty with a red 'traitor' stamp on her forehead. The group's campaign resulted in the spread of misinformation about the bill's impact on gun ownership rights, sources involved in the legislative process said. 'The reason I was in support of the bill, and in support of the override, was it has to do with child trafficking and protecting the kids,' said the senator Rod Pelton, a Republican, who voted in favor of the veto override in the senate. 'I just didn't really buy into the whole second amendment argument.' Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion The bill had enjoyed the backing of all 23 of Colorado's district attorneys as well as bipartisan state house support. RMGO's late-stage opposition to the social media bill marked a break from its usual playbook. The group generally weighs in on legislation earlier in the process, according to eight sources, including two of the bill's co-sponsors, Daugherty and the representative Andy Boesenecker. 'They really ramped up their efforts,' Boesenecker said. 'It was curious to me that their opposition came in very late and appeared to be very well funded at the end.' In recent years, RMGO group had been less active due to well-documented money problems that limited its ability to campaign on legislative issues. In a 2024 interview, the group's leaders stated plainly that it struggled with funding. Daugherty believes RMGO would not have been able to embark on such an apparently costly outreach campaign without a major infusion of cash. A major text campaign like the one launched for SB-86 was beyond their financial capacity, she said. Others in Colorado politics agreed. 'Rocky Mountain Gun Owners have not been important or effective in probably at least four years in the legislature. They've had no money, and then all of a sudden they had tons of money, funding their rise back into power,' said Dawn Reinfeld, executive director of Blue Rising Together, a Colorado-based non-profit focused on youth rights. The campaign made legislators feel threatened, with primary elections in their districts over the weekend, Daugherty said, particularly after accounts on X, formerly Twitter, bombarded the bill's supporters. 'Folks were worried about being primaried, mostly the Republicans, and that's kind of what it came down to,' Daugherty said. Aaron Ping's 16-year-old son Avery died of an overdose in December after buying what he thought was ecstasy over Snapchat and receiving instead a substance laced with fentanyl. Ping saw the campaign against the bill as an intentional misconstrual of its intent. 'It was looking like the bill was going to pass, until all this misinformation about it taking away people's gun rights because it addresses people buying illegal shadow guns off the internet,' he said. Ping gave testimony in support of the bill in February before the first senate vote, alongside other bereaved parents, teens in recovery and a district attorney. 'The bill gave me hope that Avery's legacy would be to help. So when it didn't pass, it was pretty soul-crushing,' said Ping. Several states, including California, Maryland, Vermont, Minnesota, Hawaii, Illinois, New Mexico, South Carolina and Nevada, have introduced legislation aimed at improving online safety for children in the past two years. These efforts have faced strong resistance from the tech industry, including heavy lobbying and lawsuits. Maryland became the first state to successfully pass a Kids Code bill, signing it into law in May 2024. But the victory may be short-lived: NetChoice, a tech industry coalition representing companies including Meta, Google and Amazon, quickly launched a legal challenge against the measure, which is ongoing. Meanwhile, in the US federal government, the kids online safety act (Kosa), which had wound its way through the legislature for years, died in February when it failed to pass in the House after years of markups and votes. A revamped version of the bill was reintroduced to Congress on 14 May. In California, a similar bill known as the age-appropriate design code act, modeled after UK legislation, was blocked in late 2023. A federal judge granted NetChoice a preliminary injunction, citing potential violations of the first amendment, which stopped the law from going into effect. In the US, you can call or text the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline on 988, chat on or text HOME to 741741 to connect with a crisis counselor. In the UK, the youth suicide charity Papyrus can be contacted on 0800 068 4141 or email pat@ and in the UK and Ireland Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email jo@ or jo@ In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at