Standing committee flags road construction delay in LWE-hit areas
In its report, the Standing Committee on Rural Development and Panchayati Raj said: 'The Committee notes that Road Connectivity Project for Left Wing Extremism Areas (RCPLWEA), a very important intervention under PMGSY, was launched in 2016… The deadline for the completion of this vertical under PMGSY was March, 2020 which was extended till March, 2025. In this regard, the Committee are concerned to note that out of total of 12,228 km sanctioned road length only 9,523 km is completed as on 14th May, 2025 and length of 2,705 km is still left even after extended deadlines.'
While acknowledging the challenges such as insurgency terrain and forest clearance issues, the Committee said bottlenecks can be removed by proper planning and strong coordination. 'Perhaps area specific professionals who are skilled to work in combat and insurgent zones such as Border Road Organisation might serve as a boost,' said the committee headed by Congress member Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka.
Harikishan Sharma, Senior Assistant Editor at The Indian Express' National Bureau, specializes in reporting on governance, policy, and data. He covers the Prime Minister's Office and pivotal central ministries, such as the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare, Ministry of Cooperation, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Ministry of Rural Development, and Ministry of Jal Shakti. His work primarily revolves around reporting and policy analysis. In addition to this, he authors a weekly column titled "STATE-ISTICALLY SPEAKING," which is prominently featured on The Indian Express website. In this column, he immerses readers in narratives deeply rooted in socio-economic, political, and electoral data, providing insightful perspectives on these critical aspects of governance and society. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
5 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Need of the hour to revise creamy layer income ceiling for OBCs: Parliamentary panel
NEW DELHI: A parliamentary committee looking into the welfare of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) has said it was the "need of the hour" to revise the creamy layer income ceiling, saying the limit is excluding a large section of eligible OBC families from reservation benefits and government welfare schemes. In its eighth report presented to Parliament on Friday, the panel noted that the last revision of the income threshold from Rs 6.5 lakh to Rs 8 lakh per annum was carried out in 2017. The Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) rules require the ceiling to be reviewed every three years or sooner, if needed. "The present threshold is low, covering only a small segment of OBCs," the panel, chaired by BJP MP Ganesh Singh, said, adding inflation and rising incomes in even lower income groups had made an upward revision the "need of the hour". "The Committee is aware of the fact that the income limit for determining creamy layer for OBCs should be reviewed every three years or even before the stipulated period. However, the same has not been revised since 2017," it said. "The Committee, therefore, in no uncertain words, reiterate their recommendation for reviewing and accordingly revising the present creamy layer threshold limit to cover more and more persons from the OBCs as this would eventually help in raising their socio-economic condition to a satisfactory level," the panel said. The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, however, told the committee that "there is no proposal under consideration" to revise the creamy layer limit. Another unresolved issue flagged by the panel is the absence of equivalence between posts in autonomous bodies and government positions for determining creamy layer status. The report said the lack of such equivalence has led to qualified OBC candidates, including those who cleared the UPSC Civil Services Examination, being denied service allocation because their parents' salaries were counted without considering post equivalence.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
The Income Tax Bill, 2025 withdrawn, an updated version of the bill to be introduced on Monday August 11
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Clause 21: House property The Committee, after a careful review of Clause 21, identified drafting issues in 21(2) that could lead to ambiguity in determining the annual value of properties experiencing vacancy. The committee, therefore, recommend two key changes: first, that the phrase "in normal course" be deleted, and second, that the clause be amended to explicitly provide for a comparison of the actual rent received with the "deeming rent," as was available in the existing Act. The committee believes these adjustments are vital for enhancing fairness, reducing ambiguity in the valuation of vacant properties, and leading to a more equitable tax treatment for property owners. The Committee, further, recommended that the rest of the Clauses may be accepted in their current form. Deductions from income from house property (Clause 22, 22(1), and 22(2)): Firstly, in Clause 22(1)(a), to explicitly state that the standard 30% deduction be computed on the annual value after deducting municipal taxes. Secondly, in Clause 22(2), to ensure that the deduction for pre-construction interest is available for let-out properties in addition to self-occupied ones, aligning it with the existing Act. Clause No 19: Deductions from salaries (Schedule VII) Clause 20: Commercial Property The New Income Tax Bill, 2025 has been withdrawn by the Central government as of August 8, Income-Tax Bill, 2025, which was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 13th February 2025 to replace the existing Income-Tax Act, 1961, has been formally withdrawn.A new version of the Income Tax Bill, incorporating most of the recommendations made by the Select Committee chaired by Shri Baijayant Panda, can be introduced on Monday, August avoid confusion by multiple versions of the Bill and to provide a clear and updated version with all changes incorporated, the new version of the Income Tax Bill will be introduced for the consideration of the House on the old version of the new tax bill 2025, several drafting errors were found by lawyers and chartered accountants pointed out. The Lok Sabha Select Committee also pointed out some of these errors which are as follows:"The Committee, after deliberations on Clause 22, identified the need to clarify the computation of deductions to enhance fairness and transparency for property owners. The Committee, therefore, recommended two key amendments:'The Committee, after a careful review of Clause 19, identified a gap in the equitable tax treatment of commuted pension for different types of recipients. The Committee, therefore, recommended that a deduction for commuted pension, similar to that available to employees under Clause 19, be explicitly allowed under the head "Income from other sources" for non-employees who receive such pension from a fund. Accordingly, the Committee finds no further modifications are necessary for Clause 19 and recommend the acceptance of its remaining provisions as drafted.''The Committee, upon reviewing Clause 20 identified a change in wording in 20(2) from the previous Act that could lead to an incorrect tax treatment for certain business properties . The Committee, therefore, recommended that in Clause 20(2), the word 'occupied' be replaced with the phrase 'as he may occupy' to ensure that temporarily unutilized or ready-to-use business properties are clearly excluded from taxation under the house property head. Accordingly, the Committee recommended that the Ministry amend the clause as proposed to accurately delineate the scope of "Income from house property". The Committee further accepted the remaining provision of Clause 20 as proposed.'
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
6 hours ago
- Business Standard
US Democrat slams Trump over 50% tariff on India, says risks years of work
Gregory Meeks, a prominent US Congressman, on Thursday (local time), criticised US President Donald Trump's 'latest tariff tantrum' on India, adding that such a move risks years of work to build a stronger US-India partnership. Representative Gregory Meeks, a Democrat and Ranking Member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Dems said the US has deep strategic, economic, and people-to-people ties with India, and [bilateral trade] concerns should be addressed in a mutually respectful way consistent with our democratic values. Trump imposes a 50 per cent tariff on India On July 30, two days before the deadline for tariff talks ended, Trump imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, bringing it down from 26 per cent, which was imposed on April 2. In a post on Truth Social, his private social media platform, Trump shared the announcement. He also doubled down on India and Russia, calling them 'dead economies'. In a post on Truth Social, he said, 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India; their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world.' India slams US tariffs as unfair, unjustified After Trump signed an executive order levying another 25 per cent tariff on India, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) released a statement, calling the order 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable'. It further added that New Delhi would take 'all actions necessary to protect its national interests.'
