What is the Chilipad and how does it differ from a heating and cooling mattress?
It's a issue for many — 57% of Americans said they sometimes struggle to sleep due to being too hot — that's only likely to get worse over the warmer months. One option is shopping a top-rated cooling mattress but, if you're looking for a high tech cooling upgrade for your existing mattress, consider the Chilipad Dock Pro bed cooling system at Sleepme
It's a mattress pad that is cooled (or heated) by water that flows through it via a control unit, with a smartphone app that allows you to fine tune the climate of your bed. Here, we explore more about the tech, how it works and whether the Chilipad Dock Pro is the right cooling option for you.
The Sleepme Chilipad Dock Pro is a hydronic system (that means it uses water as the means of heating and cooling) comprising a EMF-free smart mattress pad, bedside control unit and Sleepme app.
In an upgrade from the Chilipad Cube, the Dock Pro uses a membrane (rather than tubing) to circulate temperature controlled water through the mattress pad — which fits over your existing mattress and under your fitted sheet — to cool or warm your sleep surface, and therefore your body, through the night.
The pad is designed to absorb heat, and as this warms the circulating water, it returns to the control unit to be cooled again (where the heat being released into the air to stop your bedroom getting too cool).
The mattress pad itself has no electrical connections or wires, which means no electromagnetic fields (EMFs) surrounding it, reducing potentially harmful radiation in your sleep space. Additionally, "Airplane mode reduces EMFs from the Dock Pro control unit," according to Sleepme.
You can control the temperature of your bed and schedule temperature adjustments through the Sleepme App, or keep your sleep space phone-free by using buttons on the control unit.
View the Chilipad at SleepmeThe Chilipad Dock Pro system comes in two different models — the 'me' model covers half the bed, the 'we' model covers both sides direct from Sleepme. With 15% off now, prices start from $1,019.15 for a 'me' half queen and rise to $2,124.15 for a 'we' Cal king. You'll also get a 30-day sleep trial, free shipping and a 1-year warranty.
The Chilipad Dock Pro is available in a 'Me' size mattress pad with a hydrolayer membrane that covers half the bed and a 'We' size that covers the whole bed, with sizes from Queen to Cal King. Depending on which size you choose, the Dock Pro can cool one or both sides of the bed to temperatures as low as 55°F and as high as 115°F, offering a temperature solution no matter the time of year.
This dual temperature control is a key selling point for the Chilipad. Even with the 'we' option, which covers the full bed, you can adjust the temperature of each side independently, meaning you and your partner needn't bicker over your nighttime temperature preferences.
You can control the temperature, schedule changes during the night and set your pad to wake you by gently warming as an alternative to an alarm, all with the free Sleepme app.
Or, for an extra fee ($299 $249), you can add Chilipad's non-wearable sleep tracker which uses AI to identify when you'd benefit from a temperature adjustment during the night. In turn, the mattress pad will heat or cool to keep you at an optimal temperature for the best quality sleep (goodbye sweaty tossing and turning).
Like the Eight Sleep Pod 4, this sleep tracker will also produce a nightly sleep score and report, offering detailed analysis of your sleep metrics including time spent in each essential sleep stage, heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV).
The best mattress toppers for hot sleepers rely on cooling materials like gel-infused foam, copper and breathable fabrics to dissipate heat. While these offer good temperature regulation, they don't actively cool or heat your bed. They simply help wick away excess heat and moisture for a cooler, comfier night's sleep.
However, the Chilipad offers that active climate control, meaning it makes temperature adjustments based on your real-time metrics in order to increase deep and REM sleep — if you upgrade with the sleep tracker that is. Otherwise, temperature adjustments are in your hands, though you can schedule them through the night.
It essentially does what the best smart beds of the year do in terms of climate control, but at a slightly lower price and minus subscription fees.
For reference, a queen size Chilipad 'We' with the sleep tracking upgrade for both sides of the bed is currently a total of $2,367.15 (was $2,797) compared to a queen Eight Sleep Pod 4 at $2,649, which offers dual-sided sleep tracking and temperature regulation, but the subscription fees are a minimum of $199 a year on top.
You can also opt for the Chilipad Dock Pro Bundle, which for a queen-sized 'We' includes everything you'd get if you bought the queen 'We' on it's own, plus two sleep trackers, 12 months of system cleaner and an extended protection plan. This is currently $2,528.00 (was $3,238).
Specializing in active, dual climate control, the 4.1/5 star-rated (from over 400 reviews) Chilipad Dock Pro could benefit many sleepers, from couples with different temperature needs in bed to people sleeping poorly due to menopause. Many reviewers raved about its cooling abilities, claiming it had eliminated their nightsweats.
The Chilipad is a more affordable option offering similar water heating and cooling features to an Eight Sleep Pod for almost $300 less for a queen, and without any additional subscription fees.
As a tight-fitting mattress cover, the Eight Sleep Pod feels more like a part of your mattress, whereas the Chilipad is a topper. Chilipad claim that the Dock Pro only takes 20 minutes to install, compared to up to an hour for the Eight Sleep Pod.
As it's compatible with any mattresses between 8 and 18 inches, you needn't splash on a new mattress either. And, unlike the Eight Sleep Pod, it's machine washable and dryable, making easy work of your mattress cleaning.
Finally, Chilipad say their water-based cooling system is, in general, more energy-efficient than air conditioning units, which is good news for both your wallet and the environment.
While the cover is washable, the Chilipad Dock Pro does require regular maintenance too, like water filter refills, which you wouldn't have to do with a standard cooling mattress or mattress topper.
While the majority of reviews on the Chilipad site are positive, those who had gave negative feedback noted issues connecting the Dock Pro with their WiFi (and maintaining that connection), and some said that they found it too noisy. While white noise can be helpful for some sleepers, it could keep light sleepers who dislike the noise awake at night.
Some customers reported leaking issues with the Chilipad, though the reviewers generally noted the brand had provided replacements or refunds. Anyone keen on decluttering their sleep space should also consider that you must make sure you have bedroom space for the control unit(s).
We'd particularly recommend the Chilipad Dock Pro by Sleepme to hot sleepers struggling to beat the heat at night, but who don't want to change their current mattress. With personalized, customizable and automatic (if you upgrade) climate control, it will help you regulate your body temperature at night.
However, you must have the $1,000+ budget for this tech-enhanced sleep set, so we recommend you try more affordable methods first to ensure it is a worthy investment for you. Cheaper approaches to cooling your sleep space include keeping your blinds closed through the day, keeping windows open and sleeping with breathable nightwear and bedding.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
31 minutes ago
- CNN
Caffeinated coffees are mostly free of toxins, with a few exceptions
That cup of joe that jolts you awake in the morning is pretty safe when it comes to contaminants and toxins, a new investigation has found. Well … almost. 'While some contaminants were present, most were found at minimal levels and well below the European Union's safety limits per 6-ounce serving. This means coffee is generally safe,' said Molly Hamilton, executive director of the nonprofit Clean Label Project, which conducted the investigation into caffeinated coffees. That's great news because coffee has a stellar résumé: Studies have found drinking about 3 cups of black coffee a day provides health benefits, such as reducing risk for such issues as heart disease, multiple sclerosis, type 2 diabetes, liver disease, prostate cancer, stroke, dementia and more. But here's the grind — the testing found traces of a worrisome herbicide called glyphosate and one of its byproducts. Glyphosate is a popular herbicide that has been linked to hormone disruptions and neurotoxic effects, including the development of autism and other developmental disorders in children. The first MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) Commission report, released in May, raised concerns about the impact of glyphosate and other pesticides on children's health. The US Environmental Protection Agency and other regulatory bodies, however, say numerous studies and risk assessments have shown no adverse effects of glyphosate at levels found in the food supply. Plastics from packaging In addition to glyphosate, testing found some coffees also contained small amounts of phthalates, a plasticizer found in consumer products such as food storage containers, shampoo, makeup, perfume and children's toys. Phthalates have been linked with reproductive problems, such as genital malformations and undescended testes in baby boys and lower sperm counts and testosterone levels in adult males. Studies have also linked phthalates to asthma, childhood obesity and cancer. Testing found the highest levels of phthalates in coffee sold in cans, followed by pods and finally bags. The reason for that isn't yet clear, 'so our next study is going to be analyzing the packaging assembly line to discover why there is a change in contaminants,' Hamilton said. 'The Clean Label Project plays an important role in post-market testing for contaminants in everyday consumer products, including this recent report on coffee,' said David Andrews, acting chief science officer for the Environmental Working Group, or EWG, a nonprofit consumer advocacy group that maintains a database on personal care products that contain toxins. 'The higher phthalate levels found in coffee pods and canned coffee suggest that packaging could be a meaningful source of exposure to these chemicals of concern,' Andrews said. The National Coffee Association, which represents the US coffee industry told CNN that it was 'highly irresponsible to mislead Americans about the safety of their favorite beverage.' 'Decades of independent scientific evidence show that coffee drinkers live longer, healthier lives,' NCA President and CEO William 'Bill' Murray said in an email. Traces of a popular pesticide The Clean Label Project measures levels of heavy metals, pesticides and plasticizers in food and consumer products. The organization also checks to see whether the tested products' labels list those contaminants. To do the testing, Clean Label obtained samples of coffee from 45 popular brands — which they did not name. Coffee beans were grown in Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Kenya, Peru and Hawaii. A certified lab conducted over 7,000 tests looking for pesticides, including glyphosate; heavy metals such as lead, mercury, arsenic and cadmium; mycotoxins, which are toxic chemical compounds produced by some molds that grow on crops; and phthalates, a plasticizer found in consumer products such as food wrapping, food storage containers, shampoo, makeup, perfume and children's toys. The tests found scant glyphosate, but 'significant' amounts of aminomethylphosphonic acid, or AMPA, a byproduct of glyphosate as it breaks down in the environment, according to the report. The half-life of AMPA is longer than that of glyphosate, which means it can persist in the environment and is easily absorbed by plants from soil and water. In addition, AMPA has been shown to damage cellular DNA in prostate cells and cause an increased risk of liver inflammation and metabolic disorders in young adults. Surprising finding in organic coffees Testing found organic coffees bested conventional coffees in total amounts of contaminants, but there was one oddity — there were levels of AMPA in all of the 12 organic coffees tested. Of the 45 samples of conventionally grown coffees, only 29 tested positive for aminomethylphosphonic acid, according to the report. While certified organic coffee growers cannot use pesticides like glyphosate, it's possible for organic fields to be contaminated by runoff from neighboring conventional farms, Hamilton said. 'Still, the detection of AMPA in 100% of organic samples we tested is definitely a wake-up call,' she said. 'We definitely need stronger safeguards and greater transparency in our food system.' Other contaminants in coffee Levels of heavy metals depended on where the coffee was grown. Africa has some of the lowest levels of heavy metals, while the highest were found in Hawaiian coffee. Hawaii, however, is a volcanic island and therefore expected to have more significant levels of heavy metals in the soil. An analysis also found 100% of the tested coffee samples contained small amounts of acrylamide, a colorless, odorless chemical formed when certain foods are cooked at high temperatures, such as when frying, baking and roasting. Acrylamide has been linked to cancer in animals when they are exposed to extremely high doses. However, the chemical is not thought to be toxic to humans at small levels of consumption. Despite that, the US Food and Drug Administration has advised manufacturers to attempt to lower levels in the food supply. Clean Label's testing found levels of acrylamide varied with the degree of roasting of coffee beans. The highest levels of acrylamide were found in medium roasts, followed by light roasts and dark roasts. 'The dark coffees are the best choice because they are roasted at lower temperatures for a longer period of time so acrylamide levels don't rise,' Hamilton explained. 'The light coffees are roasted minimally, so here too, acrylamide levels don't build up. 'However, medium roasts have the higher levels of acrylamide because they are roasted at higher temperatures long enough to darken the beans,' she said. What to do? What could a coffee lover take away from the testing? 'When you decide which coffee to buy, choose darker or the lightest roasts in bags or pods and consider where coffee is grown, which can impact the levels of heavy metals,' Hamilton said. 'But I want to stress that it's important to put these findings into context,' she added. 'Caffeinated coffee is still one of the cleanest product categories we've ever tested. 'Our report isn't meant to raise alarm or keep consumers from drinking coffee, but rather to empower people on how to choose the cleanest, safest cup of coffee.'
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
New MAHA Commission Report to Be Released
The Make America Healthy Again Commission is slated to offer solutions to problems it identified in its first report. The commission chaired by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is slated to release its next report. The Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission 'is on track to submit its Make Our Children Healthy Again Strategy report to the President on August 12th,' Kush Desai, a spokesman for the White House, told The Epoch Times in an email on Monday. 'The report will be unveiled to the public shortly thereafter as we coordinate the schedules of the President and the various cabinet members who are a part of the Commission,' he added. Story continues below advertisement A spokesperson for Kennedy's Department of Health and Human Services declined to comment. The commission's first report was released in May. It largely details problems with the health of Americans and attributes the rise of chronic diseases among children to a poor diet full of ultraprocessed foods, exposure to chemicals, a lack of physical activity, and the overprescription of medications. 'America will begin reversing the childhood chronic disease crisis during this administration by getting to the truth of why we are getting sick and spurring pro-growth policies and innovations to reverse these trends,' the report states. A short section at the end features 10 recommendations, including advising new government-funded trials on the effects of various diets and calling for the development of new systems to monitor the safety of drugs and vaccines. Story continues below advertisement President Donald Trump established the commission shortly after his second term began. In an executive order in February, he said the commission should 'study the scope of the childhood chronic disease crisis and any potential contributing causes, including the American diet, absorption of toxic material, medical treatments, lifestyle, environmental factors, Government policies, food production techniques, electromagnetic radiation, and corporate influence or cronyism.' Per the order, the commission was required to submit its first report to the president within 100 days. It was also required to present a strategy to Trump on how to address chronic diseases, including obesity, within 180 days. That deadline was Aug. 12. Kennedy has emphasized removing synthetic additives from foods, with regulators in his department banning several and working with companies to remove others. He has also targeted ultra-processed foods such as soda, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says provide more than half of Americans' calories. Dr. Jim Krieger, executive director of Healthy Food America, told a briefing ahead of the report's release that officials could propose new, mandatory labels on products that are high in fat, sugar, and salt, or contain certain additives, as well as a new tax on beverages with sugar. 'There are many things that can be done,' he said.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
How To Protect Users' Privacy from Tech Corporations
The concept of privacy is foundational to our constitutional democracy. The Fourth Amendment prevents unlawful searches and seizures. The Fifth Amendment prevents self-incrimination. The First Amendment prevents the government from compelling Americans to make disclosures. Some states, like Montana, explicitly list the right to privacy in their constitutions. Although our right to privacy is well established when it comes to government interference in our lives, that is unfortunately not the case when it comes to the companies that know every intimate detail about us. With the allure of free services, we routinely provide our most intimate selves to multi-billion-dollar tech firms that, in turn, make an enormous profit off the data they pilfer. They know everything about us. What we like to eat. When we sleep. Where we live. Where we are. Our beliefs. Our fears. Curiously, they claim our age confounds them, but let's set that aside. A recent Pew survey shows that 73 percent of Americans feel they have little or no control over how companies utilize their personal information. They're right. We sign privacy policies that are filled with so much legal jargon that they may as well be unintelligible to the average person, and presto! Our data is now the company's data, along with our digital selves. The problem is that companies sell our data, not just to third-party advertisers, but also to those who use our data to create fake images, curate biased newsfeeds, conduct elaborate scams, and even engage in espionage. BATH, UNITED KINGDOM - FEBRUARY 09: In this photo illustration 12-year-boy looks at his phone on February 9, 2025 in Bath, England. BATH, UNITED KINGDOM - FEBRUARY 09: In this photo illustration 12-year-boy looks at his phone on February 9, 2025 in Bath, short, we are not in control. Americans are right to be concerned. And with the advent of AI, this problem will only get worse. Our current system is unsustainable. We need to address it through a national privacy framework. Even though many states, like California and Texas, have passed comprehensive privacy laws, we still need federal action to ensure we hold these companies accountable. Currently, tech behemoths view privacy violations as a mere cost of doing business, with penalties akin to a parking violation relative to their bottomless coffers. To demonstrate how little help some privacy laws have been to consumers, let's get specific. Consumers sued Apple earlier this year under California's privacy law for sharing recorded conversations of personal health information with their physicians to ad companies. Apple's surveillance and recordings covered conversations spanning a little over a decade. The case settled. So, what was the total cost of Apple giving advertisers an inside perspective on doctor-patient relationships? A meager $95 million, which accounts for about nine hours' worth of Apple's annual profit. And consumers won't see about a third of that, as it's reserved for the lawyers. The reality is that if Big Tech companies cared about user privacy, they would protect it. For instance, Google, Amazon, and Apple can stop lowering their privacy protocols to cater to autocratic regimes, such as the Chinese Communist Party, that seek to use their platforms to spy on consumers. Even better, companies can stop manipulating the privacy settings on users' devices and third-party services, which is already illegal. Apple describes user privacy as a "human right," but it treats user privacy less as a fundamental human right and more as a license to collude with its fellow Big Tech firms to monetize every facet of its users' data, lives, and privacy. It's no wonder 85 percent of people want more to be done to protect user privacy. We need government intervention here. The good news is that the desire to pass a privacy law is widely bipartisan. Indeed, 20 states across the political spectrum have passed comprehensive privacy laws. A national privacy framework should do the following: First, define goals and stay targeted at accomplishing those goals. One of the primary problems with previous attempts at passing meaningful privacy laws has been that bills attempt to do too much all at once. We have seen the most success in legislation that has clearly articulated goals with targeted solutions to both pass through both houses and be an effective law. Overly sweeping privacy laws have the unintended consequence of entrenching incumbents. That's what we've seen in the E.U.'s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The GDPR should be a cautionary tale for the U.S. because, as the European Centre of Economic Policy Research found, privacy regulations without market guardrails can seriously exacerbate Big Tech's competition issues. Second, enforcement matters, and attorney general enforcement is preferred. As indicated earlier in the case involving Apple, private right of actions don't do much to deter Big Tech companies, given their seemingly endless teams of lawyers and budgets. Agency actions or AG enforcement are far more effective. For instance, the Texas attorney general recently secured a nearly $1.4 billion settlement against Google for violating Texas's privacy law. As should be obvious, that $1.4 billion only covers the people of Texas. Contrast that with the Apple case, where only $95 million covered the entire state of California. Third, the broader the federal statute, the more important preemption will become. That's because targeted legislation is less likely to run into differing state regimes, whereas 20 states have now passed some form of comprehensive privacy legislation. A privacy framework should be clear on what it is preempting and should reserve rights for state attorney general enforcement. That means developing basic definitions (e.g., "personal information"), creating data rights, and specifying what specific data management practices are to be prohibited. In sum, we need Congress to act now more than ever to preserve what's left of our digital selves. Joel Thayer is president of the Digital Progress Institute and an attorney based in Washington, D.C. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
