logo
Heritage expert points to hotel 'salvation' of famous street

Heritage expert points to hotel 'salvation' of famous street

Is the historic core, a World Heritage Site, to become a holiday resort? What kind of development brings best returns to international investors, and should that decide what gets built where and for whom? Whose centre is it?
The 2008 financial crisis, with the collapse of the Royal Bank of Scotland and HBOS, sent shivers through the Edinburgh administration.
The result was a pre-Covid decade in which the city council, further incentivised by austerity, worked closely with Scottish Government agencies to monetise assets, particularly in the city centre, where the unique historic environment and sense of place offered exceptional investment opportunities.
Being 'open for business' reached its apotheosis in 2019 when a huge space deck for the Christmas market was allowed to be erected in East Princes Street without planning permission. The Cockburn Association, the city's civic trust, led public concern, expressed in the theme of a huge public meeting in January 2020, 'City for Sale'.
The most significant development since then was the opening in 2021 of the St James Quarter behind the east end of Princes Street. It is a private space where the public are invited as 'guests'. It exemplifies what happens when global investors control space and promulgate the narrative about the heart of a city.
READ MORE:
Back in 2007, the city council identified the need for a 'main flagship covered shopping centre' to 'maintain an intensely developed vibrant city centre character'. Stalled by the 2008 crash and then by Covid, the St James Quarter with its galleria and 850,000 square feet of new prime retail space, was a welcome replacement for the despised 1970s St James Centre – a glum mall. In their marketing hyperbole, it is a 'lifestyle destination'. The Quarter's website proclaims pride in developing 'a fully inclusive community', while boasting 'exclusive new stores, restaurants, bars, entertainment, and more'.
The W Hotel with its 'bundle of coiled ribbons, culminating in a pennant flying in the Edinburgh breeze', is part of this development. It now commands Edinburgh's historic skyline with Trump-like swagger.
The decline of Princes Street is a recurrent theme in Edinburgh chatter: trams, traffic and tartanry have all been bemoaned across the decades. However, the impact of the St James Quarter on what was the prime shopping street, was brutal. The developer, Nuveen, claims 'foresight' as one of its strengths, so presumably knew its £1 billion investment to generate rental income for pensioners in North America would create vacancies on Princes Street and drive it downmarket.
Conventional department stores are making way for mixed retail and hotel offerings. (Image: Getty Images) Salvation of sorts for Princes Street has come from the buoyant hotel industry. Profit margins on hotels have been over 20%, with Deloitte ranking Edinburgh ninth in Europe as a place for hotel investment. Therefore, hotels are filling vacant office buildings and some of the gaps on Princes Street, often with the promise of ground floor cafés and restaurants.
More are in the pipeline across the city centre, from Haymarket to St Andrew's Square. But, as the Cockburn Association has argued: 'Without robust intervention, Princes Street risks transforming into a corridor of mid-market hotels, global fast-food chains, and uninspired retail, with diminished upper-floor activity.'
The profitability of hotels has been boosted by the city's tourism, culture and events-led economic strategy. The historic environment and the qualities of the city centre as a place have been key assets to exploit. Festivalisation has seen not just a growth in the scale and number of festivals staged, but also an intensification, during the Fringe in particular, in the concentration of events in the Old Town.
This cultural agglomeration effect has infused the economic and social ecosystem of the city centre, a finite space physically constrained by the historical legacy of its streets and buildings. While cities such as Manchester have repopulated their centres, Edinburgh's traditional mixed resident community in the centre has been hollowed by short-term lets, a fate shared by other attractive historic cities.
A successful judicial review by the short-term let industry thwarted council plans to use planning and licensing powers to reclaim for permanent residence the thousands of homes lost to that industry.
Similarly, purpose-built student accommodation has gobbled up scarce city centre sites, as well as land around the fringes of the centre. This form of development is not required to contribute affordable housing. In the office sector, prime rents were predicted (pre-Trump) to achieve a healthy increase by 2028, though demand for 1500 to 3000 square feet offices remains weak.
In summary, what we are seeing across the city centre is polarisation and contestation. Edinburgh is fortunate in being an attractive location for investors, but it comes with a price – loss of affordable housing and pressure to commercialise public space and accommodate an ever increasing number of visitors in a confined historic area, while austerity rots the quality of the public realm.
Civic campaigning against the commercialisation of public space, led by the Cockburn Association, saw the council row back on the takeover of Princes Street Gardens by the events industry.
The Summer Sessions gigs have migrated to Ingleston, restoring tranquillity and public access to the gardens in August. Plans for a big wheel fairground attraction from July to January were rejected but show what may yet come. Might a sandy beach alongside a recreated Nor' Loch in Princes St Gardens generate more tourist income?
The Cockburn Association is planning a civic workshop in the autumn to produce a medium-term vision for the city. Civic greenspace, heritage conservation and streetscape enhancement are essentials, but, above all, ways need to be found to replenish the stock of affordable housing.
Professor Cliff Hague is past chairman of the Cockburn Association, Scotland's oldest independent conservation charity
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Celtic trolled by Scottish Premiership rivals ahead of Parkhead visit as club aim cheeky dig at stadium
Celtic trolled by Scottish Premiership rivals ahead of Parkhead visit as club aim cheeky dig at stadium

Scottish Sun

time11 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

Celtic trolled by Scottish Premiership rivals ahead of Parkhead visit as club aim cheeky dig at stadium

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) CELTIC have the biggest stadium in Scottish football with an attendance of over 60,000. But that hasn't stopped Premiership rivals Livingston from aiming a cheeky dig at the Hoops on social media - over the stadium's away section. Sign up for the Celtic newsletter Sign up 1 View of Celtic Park Credit: Kenny Ramsay Celtic host Falkirk tomorrow in the Premier Sports Cup and then face David Martindale's Livi side at the same venue the following Saturday - after the Scottish Champions' first leg against Kairat Almaty. It's not often that Celtic have THREE home games in a row, with the cup and European schedule allowing that to be the case over the coming 10 days. But while that might be a positive for Celtic fans, the same can't be said for away supporters, according to Livingston's latest social media post. The Lions appeared to aim a cheeky and subtle dig at the Scottish champions with a post on X ahead of Saturday's big showdown in the East End of Glasgow. Like most football clubs, the Almondvale side stuck out a post tonight ahead of the game with ticket information for fans who plan on attending. But it wasn't just any old post as they also took a swipe at the Hoops' infamous away end in the graphic they uploaded. The club used an image from behind the steel pillar at Celtic Park which countless away fans have been left furious by in recent years - after having a restricted view of the pitch. It's a sight away supporters - who have visited the stadium previously - are well aware of and it's fair to say the post has gone down well with fans of other Scottish clubs. Celtic fans, though, haven't taken the tongue-in-cheek post as well as others. It has went down a storm on social media with well over 200,000 users viewing it already. Livingston boss David Martindale opens his heart on life before, during and after prison.. and the managers he admires most And reacting to the post, one fan wrote: "Absolutely top trolling of Celtic. This is the exact view many away fans get when visiting Celtic." Another said: "It's funny cos it's true. The most restricted views in world football." A third commented: "Amazing. Truly the worst stadium for restricted views in Scotland if not the UK." In a statement on Livingston's website, they revealed fans who wish to be seated with a "non-restricted view" of the game will be charged £36, while those seated behind the pillar will need to pay £33. Keep up to date with ALL the latest news and transfers at the Scottish Sun football page

Controversial ‘open space' housing plans revealed
Controversial ‘open space' housing plans revealed

Edinburgh Reporter

time12 minutes ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

Controversial ‘open space' housing plans revealed

Fresh plans for housing on a grassland originally set aside for a public park for residents in Wallyford have been lodged with East Lothian Council. Taylor Wimpey's plans to create more than 90 new homes at the edge of the estate include 84 houses – over half of which will have four bedrooms – and nine two bedroom flats with no affordable housing included. They come more than a year after councillors refused to grant permission for around 150 new homes on the land, which had originally been earmarked as open space. At the time developers of the overall site which has seen hundreds of homes already built around it East Lothian Development Ltd (ELDL) argued that the estate provided lots of open space across the site and did not need the additional park land. Councillors described the move as 'a step too far' and 'too much icing on the cake', however Scottish Ministers backed an appeal by the company overturning the decision and approving the plans. Now Taylor Wimpey have submitted their proposals for a smaller number of homes on the site which will go before the council's planning committee next week. A report to councillors recommending they back the new plans says: 'In his decision letter, the (Scottish Government) reporter concluded that he was satisfied that the other open space areas to be provided over the whole Wallyford/Dolphingstone expansion area were adequate to serve future residents of the expansion area without the need for the whole of the land of the appeal site to be provided for the large, consolidated area of open space, and granted planning permission in principle for a residential development of it, with a small part of the appeal site accommodating an open space area. 'All of the 84 houses and 9 flats to be erected on the site would be for private sale. The houses would comprise of 15 different house types, with 42 being terraced, 6 being semi-detached and 36 detached. 'Of the 84 houses, 44 would have 4 bedrooms, 24 would have 3 bedrooms and 16 would have 2 bedrooms. The 9 flats would all have 2 bedrooms.' The report notes that following the Scottish Ministers decision councillors cannot refuse consent for the housing but can have a say on determining the design, landscape and appearance of the site. By Marie Sharp Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related

Edinburgh council may stop broadcasting some meetings online to save money
Edinburgh council may stop broadcasting some meetings online to save money

Edinburgh Reporter

time13 minutes ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

Edinburgh council may stop broadcasting some meetings online to save money

Edinburgh council may stop broadcasting some meetings online under plans city officers say would save around £6,000 a year. Some committees have been broadcast live since 2012, with recordings published on the council website. And the covid lockdown led to most publicly-open committees being broadcast live. Now, officers are asking councillors to approve the webcasting of three committees to be stopped, in hopes of saving around £6,000 per year. The Planning Local Review Body, the Consultative Committee with Parents and the Pentland Hills Regional Park Joint Committee would cease to be broadcast. This would mark a return to close to pre-Covid arrangements, though broadcasts of the Traffic Regulation Orders Sub-Committee and the Edinburgh City Region Joint Deal committee would continue. And, under proposals by officers, some internal and restricted meetings would stop being recorded with the webcasting system, with recordings instead being made with Teams. The same report also asks councillors to make a decision on whether to start recording private meetings, as well as the private portions of public meetings. Officers have recommended that councillors vote against it, over fears that they would be open to subject access requests and may be asked for in court proceedings. They say that exposure could conflict with the city's 'risk-averse' appetite, and instead want to see more detailed notes of private meetings kept. The request came after councillors raised concerns about the level of detail in minutes produced from private meetings. If recordings of meetings began, most recordings would only be retained until a copy of minutes was agreed. Officers suggest that the recording could be carried out either through the webcasting system – which could incur additional costs – or through Microsoft Teams. They say that using the webcasting system would incur additional costs, and could see uploads of the public portions of meetings significantly delayed. Using Microsoft Teams would produce lower quality recordings, but they say this would not be an issue due to the fact that the recordings would not be intended for publication. By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store