More radioactive wasp nests found at former US nuclear bomb site
The Department of Energy (DOE) confirmed it is aware of the situation and stated that the nests have been sprayed, sealed in bags as radiological waste and properly disposed of. The SRS, which was established in the early 1950s, played a key role in producing plutonium and tritium for America's nuclear weapons program throughout the Cold War . A spokesperson for Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC), the contractor responsible for site cleanup, told the Daily Mail that teams recovered dead wasps after exterminating the nests.
The insects, according to the spokesperson, showed lower levels of contamination than the nests themselves. While the DOE insists there has been no leakage from nearby nuclear waste tanks, some scientists are urging caution. Dr Timothy Mousseau, a biologist at the University of South Carolina, told The New York Times that the contaminated nests suggest radioactive materials may be more widely dispersed across the area than previously believed.
'This is an indicator that there are contaminants spread across this area that have not been completely encased and protected,' Mousseau said, adding that the latest discoveries 'indicate that much greater effort must be made to assess the possible risks and hazards of what appears to be a significant source of radioactive pollutants.' SRMC said all four nests were found in F Tank Farm, an area toward the middle of the 310-square mile SRS boundary or more than five miles from the closest site boundary. The F-Area Tank Farm where the nest was found holds 22 massive underground tanks, each up to 100 feet wide and 23 feet deep, packed with between 750,000 and 1.3 million gallons of radioactive waste.
Legacy contamination refers to pollution that persists in the environment from past activities, even after the original sources of contamination have ceased. 'The main concern relates to whether or not there are large areas of significant contamination that have escaped surveillance in the past,' Dr Mousseau told the New York Times , adding that the nests are a 'red flag' that should be investigated further. While SRMC said dead wasps were recently recovered, the group admitted that none were recovered after the first nest was found.
However, the site's spokesperson stressed that 'nests do not pose a health risk to SRS workers, surrounding communities, or the environment. They added that the average person is exposed to about 620 millirem (mrem) of radiation each year from both natural and man-made sources. 'All of the nests were emitting less than one percent of the natural background radiation rate. Mrem is a unit of measurement for radiation dose equivalent for humans,' the spokesperson continued.
However, the watchdog group Savannah River Site Watch slammed the report as 'incomplete,' saying it fails to explain the source of the contamination, how wasps were exposed or if more radioactive nests may be hidden. Tom Clements, executive director of the group, told AP: 'I'm as mad as a hornet that SRS didn't explain where the radioactive waste came from or if there is some kind of leak from the waste tanks that the public should be aware of.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘It's missing something': AGI, superintelligence and a race for the future
A significant step forward but not a leap over the finish line. That was how Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, described the latest upgrade to ChatGPT this week. The race Altman was referring to was artificial general intelligence (AGI), a theoretical state of AI where, by OpenAI's definition, a highly autonomous system is able to do a human's job. Describing the new GPT-5 model, which will power ChatGPT, as a 'significant step on the path to AGI', he nonetheless added a hefty caveat. '[It is] missing something quite important, many things quite important,' said Altman, such as the model's inability to 'continuously learn' even after its launch. In other words, these systems are impressive but they have yet to crack the autonomy that would allow them to do a full-time job. OpenAI's competitors, also flush with billions of dollars to lavish on the same goal, are straining for the tape too. Last month, Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive of Facebook parent Meta, said development of superintelligence – another theoretical state of AI where a system far exceeds human cognitive abilities – is 'now in sight'. Google's AI unit on Tuesday outlined its next step to AGI by announcing an unreleased model that trains AIs to interact with a convincing simulation of the real world, while Anthropic, another company making significant advances, announced an upgrade to its Claude Opus 4 model. So where does this leave the race to AGI and superintelligence? Benedict Evans, a tech analyst, says the race towards a theoretical state of AI is taking place against a backdrop of scientific uncertainty – despite the intellectual and financial investment in the quest. Describing AGI as a 'thought experiment as much as it is a technology', he says: 'We don't really have a theoretical model of why generative AI models work so well and what would have to happen for them to get to this state of AGI.' He adds: 'It's like saying 'we're building the Apollo programme but we don't actually know how gravity works or how far away the moon is, or how a rocket works, but if we keep on making the rocket bigger maybe we'll get there'. 'To use the term of the moment, it's very vibes-based. All of these AI scientists are really just telling us what their personal vibes are on whether we'll reach this theoretical state – but they don't know. And that's what sensible experts say too.' However, Aaron Rosenberg, a partner at venture capital firm Radical Ventures – whose investments include leading AI firm Cohere – and former head of strategy and operations at Google's AI unit DeepMind, says a more limited definition of AGI could be achieved around the end of the decade. 'If you define AGI more narrowly as at least 80th percentile human-level performance in 80% of economically relevant digital tasks, then I think that's within reach in the next five years,' he says. Matt Murphy, a partner at VC firm Menlo Ventures, says the definition of AGI is a 'moving target'. He adds: 'I'd say the race will continue to play out for years to come and that definition will keep evolving and the bar being raised.' Even without AGI, the generative AI systems in circulation are making money. The New York Times reported this month that OpenAI's annual recurring revenue has reached $13bn (£10bn), up from $10bn earlier in the summer, and could pass $20bn by the year end. Meanwhile, OpenAI is reportedly in talks about a sale of shares held by current and former employees that would value it at about $500bn, exceeding the price tag for Elon Musk's SpaceX. Some experts view statements about superintelligent systems as creating unrealistic expectations, while distracting from more immediate concerns such as making sure that systems being deployed now are reliable, transparent and free of bias. 'The rush to claim 'superintelligence' among the major tech companies reflects more about competitive positioning than actual technical breakthroughs,' says David Bader, director of the institute for data science at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion 'We need to distinguish between genuine advances and marketing narratives designed to attract talent and investment. From a technical standpoint, we're seeing impressive improvements in specific capabilities – better reasoning, more sophisticated planning, enhanced multimodal understanding. 'But superintelligence, properly defined, would represent systems that exceed human performance across virtually all cognitive domains. We're nowhere near that threshold.' Nonetheless, the major US tech firms will keep trying to build systems that match or exceed human intelligence at most tasks. Google's parent Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft and Amazon alone will spend nearly $400bn this year on AI, according to the Wall Street Journal, comfortably more than EU members' defence spend. Rosenberg acknowledges he is a former Google DeepMind employee but says the company has big advantages in data, hardware, infrastructure and an array of products to hone the technology, from search to maps and YouTube. But advantages can be slim. 'On the frontier, as soon as an innovation emerges, everyone else is quick to adopt it. It's hard to gain a huge gap right now,' he says. It is also a global race, or rather a contest, that includes China. DeepSeek came from nowhere this year to announce the DeepSeek R1 model, boasting of 'powerful and intriguing reasoning behaviours' comparable with OpenAI's best work. Major companies looking to integrate AI into their operations have taken note. Saudi Aramco, the world's largest oil company, uses DeepSeek's AI technology in its main datacentre and said it was 'really making a big difference' to its IT systems and was making the company more efficient. According to Artificial Analysis, a company that ranks AI models, six of the top 20 on its leaderboard – which ranks models according to a range of metrics including intelligence, price and speed – are Chinese. The six models are developed by DeepSeek, Zhipu AI, Alibaba and MiniMax. On the leaderboard for video generation models, six of the top 10 – including the current leader, ByteDance's Seedance – are also Chinese. Microsoft's president, Brad Smith, whose company has barred use of DeepSeek, told a US senate hearing in May that getting your AI model adopted globally was a key factor in determining which country wins the AI race. 'The number one factor that will define whether the US or China wins this race is whose technology is most broadly adopted in the rest of the world,' he said, adding that the lesson from Huawei and 5G was that whoever establishes leadership in a market is 'difficult to supplant'. It means that, arguments over the feasibility of superintelligent systems aside, vast amounts of money and talent are being poured into this race in the world's two largest economies – and tech firms will keep running. 'If you look back five years ago to 2020 it was almost blasphemous to say AGI was on the horizon. It was crazy to say that. Now it seems increasingly consensus to say we are on that path,' says Rosenberg.
BreakingNews.ie
8 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Astronauts return to Earth with SpaceX after five months at ISS
Four astronauts returned to Earth after hustling to the International Space Station five months ago to relieve the stuck test pilots of Boeing's Starliner. Their SpaceX capsule parachuted into the Pacific off the Southern California coast a day after departing the orbiting lab. Advertisement 'Welcome home,' SpaceX Mission Control radioed. A SpaceX capsule carrying four astronauts parachutes into the Pacific Ocean off the Southern California coast (Keegan Barber/Nasa via AP) Splashing down were Nasa's Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, Japan's Takuya Onishi and Russia's Kirill Peskov. They launched in March as replacements for the two Nasa astronauts assigned to Starliner's botched demo. Starliner malfunctions kept Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams at the space station for more than nine months instead of a week. Advertisement Nasa ordered Boeing's new crew capsule to return empty and switched the pair to SpaceX. They left soon after Ms McClain and her crew arrived to take their places. Mr Wilmore has since retired from Nasa. Before leaving the space station on Friday, Ms McClain made note of 'some tumultuous times on Earth' with people struggling. Advertisement A SpaceX capsule carrying four astronauts parachutes into the Pacific Ocean off the Southern California coast (Keegan Barber/Nasa via AP) 'We want this mission, our mission, to be a reminder of what people can do when we work together, when we explore together,' she said. Ms McClain looked forward to 'doing nothing for a couple of days' once back home in Houston, US. High on her crewmates' wish list were hot showers and juicy burgers. It was SpaceX's third Pacific splashdown with people on board, but the first for a Nasa crew in 50 years. Advertisement Elon Musk's company switched capsule returns from Florida to California's coast earlier this year to reduce the risk of debris falling on populated areas. Back-to-back private crews were the first to experience Pacific homecomings. The last time Nasa astronauts returned to the Pacific from space was during the 1975 Apollo-Soyuz mission, a detente meet-up of Americans and Soviets in orbit.
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Astronauts return to Earth with SpaceX after 5 months at the International Space Station
Four astronauts returned to Earth on Saturday after hustling to the International Space Station five months ago to relieve the stuck test pilots of Boeing's Starliner. Their SpaceX capsule parachuted into the Pacific off the Southern California coast a day after departing the orbiting lab. 'Welcome home,' SpaceX Mission Control radioed. Splashing down were NASA's Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, Japan's Takuya Onishi and Russia's Kirill Peskov. They launched in March as replacements for the two NASA astronauts assigned to Starliner's botched demo. Starliner malfunctions kept Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams at the space station for more than nine months instead of a week. NASA ordered Boeing's new crew capsule to return empty and switched the pair to SpaceX. They left soon after McClain and her crew arrived to take their places. Wilmore has since retired from NASA. Before leaving the space station on Friday, McClain made note of 'some tumultuous times on Earth' with people struggling. 'We want this mission, our mission, to be a reminder of what people can do when we work together, when we explore together,' she said. McClain looked forward to 'doing nothing for a couple of days' once back home in Houston. High on her crewmates' wish list: hot showers and juicy burgers. It was SpaceX's third Pacific splashdown with people on board, but the first for a NASA crew in 50 years. Elon Musk's company switched capsule returns from Florida to California's coast earlier this year to reduce the risk of debris falling on populated areas. Back-to-back private crews were the first to experience Pacific homecomings. The last time NASA astronauts returned to the Pacific from space was during the 1975 Apollo-Soyuz mission, a détente meet-up of Americans and Soviets in orbit. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
