Tuners Create Ford Ranger Raptor R With a Supercharged V8
In case you hadn't heard, the Ford Ranger Raptor is a weapon. When my buddy Andrew reviewed it last March, he called it an 'instant classic,' and it even won The Drive 's Truck of the Year award. Not only is its Fox Live Valve suspension incredible, paired with that snazzy Watts link rear-end, but the 3.0-liter EcoBoost V6 is also mighty in its own right with 405 horsepower and 430 lb-ft of torque. But what if Ford made a Ranger Raptor R with a V8?
That's effectively what Killa Conversions and Performance out of Australia has created with its new supercharged Coyote V8 swap. It elevates the power specs to 750 hp and 670 lb-ft of torque thanks to a Roush blower. Importantly, this switcharoo also involves a transmission swap to the sturdier 10R80 from the stock 10R60 in the Ranger Raptor, Bronco Raptor, and Explorer ST.
Now, I can't pretend to know what this rig is like to drive. But I imagine it compares similarly to the F-150 Raptor and its Raptor R counterpart. The supercharged, dual overhead cam 5.0-liter surely makes it faster on the top end and rowdier all around, if not necessarily better in most real-world situations. Both the F-150 and Ranger Raptor are more than capable enough; crank up the power and you start to see diminishing returns on handling and, crucially, balance. But whoever's willing to pony up nearly $57,000 USD on top of the cost of the truck probably cares more about V8 grunt anyway.
You have to remember that this isn't being marketed in the States, where you can buy an F-150 Raptor R for $115,000. In Australia, one of those full-size monsters costs the equivalent of $230,000. That means this DIY Ranger Raptor R is a big bargain at the US equivalent of $125,000 all-in.
The Gen 3 Coyote on its own wouldn't be a worthwhile swap. Sure, the noise is good, and even though the naturally aspirated V8 makes 460 hp on its own, it's actually down 10 lb-ft of torque compared to the 3.0-liter EcoBoost. That explains why Killa Conversions and Performance went all the way over the top with the supercharger. If it weren't for that, I'd feel a little meh about this truck.
If you're going to eliminate the finesse of a factory-built rally truck with more power, you'd better give it enough to blow through the turns it can't make. I'd say that's exactly what they've done here.
Got a tip or question for the author? Contact them directly: caleb@thedrive.com
From running point on new car launch coverage to editing long-form features and reviews, Caleb does some of everything at The Drive. And he really, really loves trucks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmunds
4 hours ago
- Edmunds
Tested: 2025 Nissan Murano Is Better With Fewer Cylinders
The new engine makes a bit less power than last year — 241 horsepower vs. 260 horsepower for the V6 — but torque output is up to 260 lb-ft, an increase of 20 lb-ft over the V6. Despite the reduction in cylinder count, the EPA's combined fuel economy rating disappointingly remains the same as before at 23 mpg (21 city/27 highway) with either front- or all-wheel drive. I'm not saying the new engine is an unwelcome change, but don't expect an improvement in fuel economy. What I did see was an improvement in performance. Our test car was a loaded Murano Platinum, which is great as the last Murano we tested was also a loaded Platinum trim. This test vehicle was exactly 300 pounds heavier than that last one (4,388 pounds vs. 4,088 pounds), but it proved to be significantly quicker anyway. The new Murano sprinted from 0 to 60 mph in 7.4 seconds, 0.7 second quicker than the last Murano that graced our test track. The new Murano's quarter-mile time of 15.5 seconds at 90.9 mph is half a second better.
Car and Driver
12 hours ago
- Car and Driver
View Photos of the 1989 Budget-Friendly Sports Sedans
Read the full review The basic formula of the sports sedan is simple: Take a four-door, imbue it with some zoot, and let 'er rip. We pulled together six of our favorite sports sedans for a knock-down, drag-out, test-track rumble.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ongoing $407 act on side of Aussie freeway prompts calls for new roadside cameras
You might drive past and not notice, but if you're paying attention, it would be hard to miss a bizarre – and illegal – roadside practice that is again being called out in one of Australia's biggest cities. Along a major freeway in Melbourne, drivers continue to discard disposable e-cigarette cartridges or vapes, causing them to keep building up on a dividing wall along the West Gate Freeway as motorists head into the city. One driver took a photo of the stretch of road, sharing it online on Saturday, showing the plastic vapes littered all over the place, prompting some to call for cameras to be installed to catch the drivers responsible for the trend. "This is gross, clean this up. Fine the people doing this," one commenter said. "This is deeply infuriating. It's absurd the fact that this amount of people in this country think littering is completely acceptable," another wrote. Related: Concerning roadside find reveals dangerous trend landing users in hospital While Melbourne, like cities around the country, has increased the number of cameras monitoring motorists for driving infringements like mobile phone use, some residents believe littering cameras should be installed at the trouble spot. "Seems like a camera would pay itself back with fines in a week," one person commented. According to the Environmental Protection Authority of Victoria (EPA), the fine for littering from a vehicle is $407 and $2,035 for a company. However that jumps if the item is considered dangerous, like a lit cigarette, doubling to $814 and $4,070 respectively. It's been an ongoing issue that authorities have had to deal with over the last couple of years. When previously contacted by Yahoo about the problem on the West Gate Freeway, it was understood The Department of Transport, which oversees the freeway, did not have a specific plan for the vape littering trend and was treating it like regular rubbish build up. Last year, a parliamentary inquiry in Victoria heard how the plastic e-cigarette devices were creating an increasing environmental problem in the state, as well as posing a serious risk of starting fires when littered. "Vapes contain lithium-ion batteries, which are combustible and are an ignition source when improperly handled, meaning that they can cause fires when they are not sorted, separated, handled, or stored appropriately," the then CEO of Victoria's EPA, Lee Miezis, told the inquiry. War against vapes is driving down the number of users Shifting social norms and concerted government campaigns are slowing the number of young people being hooked on vapes, but Australia isn't out of the woods yet, expert say. A survey of almost 15,000 14 to 17-year olds found the number of teens vaping fell from 18 to 15 per cent since February 2023. A report released last month by the Cancer Council's Generation Vape Project found rates of e-cigarettes among 30 to-59-year-olds have halved, while fewer than one-in-five 18 to 24-year-olds used vapes. Despite being banned, vape shops and tobacconists are leading a rise in black market sales of vapes, Cancer Council chair Alecia Brooks said. The report found the number of vapes being bought by young people at stores surged to almost 35 per cent of all sales. That is despite laws only allowing vapes to be sold in participating pharmacies where they are sold for the purpose of helping people quit smoking or manage nicotine dependence. The Australian Border Force and the Therapeutic Goods Administration have also seized almost $500 billion worth of illicit vapes since January 2024. Tobacco use remains the leading cause of preventable death in Australia and is estimated to kill more than 24,000 Australians each year. with AAP Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
