Opposition questions Centre on Trump's remarks, verbal attack on Colonel Qureshi
Parliament Monsoon Session: Follow highlights from July 29, 2025
The 'political leadership' of the country had failed to defend the 'military leadership', and no effort had been made to expose the 'Pakistan-China nexus' at global forums, Opposition members alleged. They also questioned the silence of the BJP over a Madhya Pradesh Minister's controversial comments on Colonel Sofiya Qureshi, and the social media attack on Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri and his daughter.
Ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA) members and Ministers countered the arguments. Operation Sindoor had proved that giving a befitting answer to terrorism was the 'new normal' for India, unlike in the past Congress governments that 'did not retaliate' even after the terrorist attack in November 2008, they said.
India had accepted no third party intervention, and there had been no pressure from foreign powers to announce the ceasefire, Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, who initiated the debate, said.
Also Read | Plea in Supreme Court seeks removal of MP Minister for 'nauseating' remarks against Colonel Sofiya Qureshi
Three terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack had been eliminated by defence forces, Mr. Singh told the House. India's action was in self-defence, and it was not expansionist, he said. 'India's forces are capable of taking effective action against terrorism this side of the border, as well as on the other side. Pakistan has already witnessed this during Operation Sindoor,' Mr. Singh said, adding that if Pakistan was linked to any terror incidents in future, India would relaunch Operation Sindoor without hesitation.
Mr. Singh also condemned 'nuclear blackmail' by Pakistan. 'Some people think that since Pakistan has nuclear weapons, we must only negotiate with them. Because of this nuclear bluff, we have lost countless civilians. Our vision is that we will give a befitting reply,' he said, adding that Operation Sindoor displayed India's new policy against terrorism, and ended the perception that India was a 'soft state'. He said Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations had requested India to stop the attacks, and India had accepted it on the condition that the operation would be suspended, not terminated.
The Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha and Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge posed four questions to the Union government, questioning why India accepted a ceasefire even when Pakistan was on the backfoot and what the terms of the ceasefire were. He asked the Centre whether the American government had intervened during Operation Sindoor and at whose behest.
He demanded an answer on the allegation that the Operation Sindoor had been stopped against the backdrop of trade threats, as claimed by U.S President Donald Trump. 'Did the U.S. President broker this ceasefire as he is repeatedly claiming, and if so, isn't this against India's 'no third party mediation' policy?' Mr. Kharge said.
Also Read | Opposition parties in Lok Sabha question the government on accountability for the Pahalgam terror attack, 'ineffective' foreign policy
Mr. Kharge asked Union Home Minister Amit Shah to resign and taking moral responsibility for the 'security lapse' in Pahalgam. 'I would like to ask the Home Minister — who is responsible for this?...What did you do to rectify the mistake?...Vacate your post if you are [responsible]. If not, what action is the PM taking?' the Congress leader said.
Mr. Kharge said Prime Minister Narendra Modi and senior BJP leaders had remained silent when BJP MPs and Ministers had insulted India's armed forces. Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader Tiruchi Siva and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MP Sanjay Singh also raised this issue, and said the Madhya Pradesh Minister had made insulting remarks about Ms. Qureshi. The silence of top leaders was an approval of the statement, Mr. Siva said. 'How was she being interpreted? She was likened to the sister of militants, the terrorists in Pakistan,' he added.
The Supreme Court condemned such remarks, Mr. Siva said. 'Did your party condemn it? Did your Prime Minister, did the leader who leads the nation, condemn that? It should not be done,' he said. Mr. Siva urged the BJP not to communalise 'each and every thing'.
The government has asked everyone to applaud our brave soldiers, Mr. Singh said. 'You asked us to bow to honour them and we bowed. What did you do? Your Minister of the BJP government in Madhya Pradesh says the Indian Army's brave daughter Colonel Sofiya Qureshi is the sister of terrorists!' Mr. Siva said.
Also Read | In Lok Sabha, Amit Shah hits out at Chidambaram over terrorists' link to Pakistan
The country's political leadership did not provide the needed support to the military leadership, senior Congress MP P. Chidambaram said. Many global financial institutions had supported Pakistan with loans after the Pahalgam attacks, and the Indian government had not opposed it, he said. 'Everyone condemned terrorism and sympathised with terror victims in India after the Pahalgam attack, but no country named and shamed Pakistan,' Mr. Chidambaram said, asking the government to take on the joint front of Pakistan, China, and some other players.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
3 minutes ago
- India.com
Tejashwi Yadav Slams Amit Shahs Speeches In Bihar, Calls It ‘Pakau-Thaku'
Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader and former Deputy Chief Minister Tejashwi Yadav on Saturday took a jibe at Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing him of delivering 'repetitive' and 'unproductive' speeches during his visits to Bihar, referring to it as "pakau-thaku". Speaking to the media, Yadav accused the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of practising "politics of negativity" and ignoring pressing issues such as education, healthcare, poverty, and large-scale migration from Bihar. "Amit Shah speaks the same 'pakau-thaku' things whenever he visits. He should speak about the development of Bihar, about ending unemployment and inflation. He doesn't speak about any of these. Bihar will not benefit if they keep abusing Lalu Yadav and Tejashwi Yadav. Unless unemployment, poverty and migration end in Bihar, they do not speak about education and health facilities. Their is only the politics of negativity. Let them do it, this doesn't matter...," Yadav said. Amit Shah reached Bihar's Sitamarhi on Friday and laid the foundation stone for the redevelopment of Janki Mata Temple at Punaura Dham. Later, addressing a public rally, Shah lashed out at the Opposition over their criticism of the government's handling of Operation Sindoor, accusing the Congress party and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief Lalu Prasad Yadav's camp of "opposing" the anti-terror operation. Shah also hit out at the Opposition parties for opposing the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the voter list in Bihar, accusing them of indulging in vote bank politics. He alleged that the opposition parties were opposing the SIR because infiltrators form part of their vote bank. The Union Minister further asserted that this exercise is not happening for the first time, and former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru started it. On being asked about Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's meetings with Anant Singh and gangster-turned-politician Anand Mohan, Tejashwi Yadav chose a guarded response. "I do not want to comment on understand only the language of the AK-47. The Government seizes AK-47 from their house, and the same Government releases them. People of Bihar know very well who they are. Party spokespersons are there to speak on their behalf. It does not suit us to speak on them...," he said.
Mint
3 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump to lay out his plan for reducing crime in Washington
President Donald Trump said he will lay out his administration's plan to reduce crime in the nation's capital, even as violent incidents in the District of Columbia are at a 30-year low. Trump said in a social media post that he will have a news conference on Monday that 'will, essentially, stop violent crime in Washington, DC.' Trump on Thursday directed an increased presence of federal law enforcement around Washington, DC, a day after threatening the federal government could seize control of it. That move came a day after a former member of his so-called Department of Government Efficiency was injured during an attempted carjacking in DC. The city, which has voted overwhelmingly for Democrats for decades, has also been seeking to end all federal control of the city, a movement known as 'home rule.' Violence has been dropping in the District for two years, according to local police data. As of Jan. 3, violent crime in DC in 2024 was at a 30-year low, according to the US Justice Department. Trump's powers to 'take over' the capital city are limited. Partial home rule was established by Congress in 1973, which allows residents to elect their own mayor, who appoints the police chief. Residents also elect a District council that can pass local laws. But those laws can be overturned by Congress, which approves the city's budget. Trump can't override the home rule law without Congress, but he can assign federal agents to conduct law enforcement operations inside the city and has done so before, acting independently of the Metropolitan Police Department. He has also said that he is considering deploying the National Guard in the city. The president has often, without evidence, cast cities around the country as crime-ridden, and has increased those complaints about DC since the former staffer was attacked. Trump said on his Truth Social platform earlier this week that he wants to 'federalize' the city if local officials don't do more to address crime. Trump has issued executive orders this year that created a panel to coordinate efforts to improve safety and address graffiti and vandalism in the city, along with one that ordered a crackdown on homeless encampments on federal lands.
Time of India
3 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump attack on Intel's CEO could compound factory struggles
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills At the end of July, Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio said Intel 's chief executive was "very, very optimistic" about the company's plans to build multibillion-dollar semiconductor factories in his state. Last week, President Donald Trump attacked the tech executive, and a Republican senator called for an investigation into delays surrounding Intel's massive construction project outside demanded Thursday that Lip-Bu Tan, Intel's new CEO, resign over his past ties to Chinese companies, adding to the woes of a company that DeWine and other senior figures in Ohio's Republican Party had said would help create a manufacturing boom and turn the state into a "Silicon Heartland."To help build its Ohio factories, Intel received commitments worth roughly $1.5 billion in federal funding in recent years, as well as a $2 billion incentive package from the project has been badly delayed, and the chipmaker said this year that the factories would not be operational until at least company's challenges in Ohio highlight the risks that federal and state officials took when they financially backed Intel, a once-powerful force in chip manufacturing, an industry now dominated by the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing situation is also indicative of the struggles the Trump administration will face as it tries -- through the pressure of tariffs and threats from the White House -- to shift the bulk of semiconductor production to the United States from Asia. When the Biden administration offered financial incentives through the CHIPS Act, Intel was one of the few American companies that it made sense to whether by stick or carrot, forcing this transition could prove extraordinarily difficult, as the delays around the Ohio project demonstrate."It's pretty obvious that Intel has failed to meet the commitments it made to the people of Ohio," Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, wrote on social media Thursday. "Now we find out its new CEO is deeply conflicted with ties to the CCP," he said, referring to the Chinese Communist Party."The CEO must immediately resign, the project completed, and a fraud investigation should be initiated by Ohio," Moreno factories are extremely expensive and complicated to build. Intel has struggled to find enough customers to stay afloat as it poured money into construction. After posting an $18.8 billion loss in 2024 in its foundry division, the company ousted its CEO in December, cut 15,000 jobs and appeared to be exploring other strategies, including the possible sale of its manufacturing business to TSMC Asked for comment, a spokesperson for Intel referred to its most recent earnings report from July, in which the company said it was committed to completing the project in Ohio but had slowed construction to match customer Tierney, press secretary for DeWine, said Friday that the governor remained optimistic about the project."We expect chips to be made in that facility," Tierney said. He added that the company had already invested $7 billion in the construction project in Ohio, more than three times the amount of the state's incentive package, which involves some tax credits that have yet to be paid incentive package is tied to job creation by the end of 2028, so the earliest that the state would attempt to claw back any money is 2029, Tierney for the allegations against Tan, he said, DeWine is concerned about any allegation of involvement with the Chinese Communist Party that is detrimental to the national interest but is not rushing to judgment."We don't have all the facts, and we will need to see what facts come out," Tierney stakes are high for Intel and Ohio. Semiconductor chips, which are used in everything from cellphones to fighter jets, have recently become a particular focus for Trump, as they were for former President Joe Biden. Both presidents viewed domestic production as critical to national security, especially as more than 90% of the world's most advanced chips were produced in Taiwan, an island claimed by 2022, under Biden, Congress passed a bill with bipartisan support that aimed to remedy that vulnerability by pouring billions of dollars into subsidies for semiconductor companies to build facilities in the United States. Intel, the only American-owned maker of advanced logic chips, was awarded up to $7.9 billion to build factories in the United States. (Only about $2 billion of that has been disbursed.)Trump has criticized the subsidy approach, arguing that tariffs are a more effective tool to bring manufacturing back to the United States. He threatened last week to impose a 100% duty on many imported who took over Intel in March, has been hailed as a savior of the struggling American chipmaker. He is a longtime Silicon Valley investor who focused on semiconductor startups, even during eras when venture capital money seemed to be pouring into software and July 28, a company that Tan once ran pleaded guilty to transferring technology that was under U.S. export controls to Chinese entities. Though the plea agreement with the Justice Department did not name Tan, Sen. Tom Cotton , R-Ark., wrote to the chair of Intel's board of directors Tuesday, raising questions about what Tan may have known about the illicit a statement Thursday, Tan, an American citizen who was born in Malaysia, said that "misinformation" was circulating about his past roles and that he fully shared "the president's commitment to advancing U.S. national and economic security.""I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards," Tan said. He added that he was engaging with the administration "to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts."The questions surrounding Tan could create yet another hurdle in the attempt to bring the manufacturing of advanced semiconductors to Jon Husted , R-Ohio, was among the lawmakers who supported public funding for the Intel semiconductor factory. He posted a message on social media saying the company had promised to "respond promptly" to Cotton's letter."The facts have not changed: We need an American company to make American chips on American soil," Husted wrote. "Producing the world's most advanced high-tech chips in the U.S. is not just economic policy -- it's a national security imperative. Every day we are not doing that, we are putting our country at risk."Husted did not respond to a request for Sen. Bill DeMora, a Democrat representing Columbus, said Ohio Republicans were using Trump's attack on Tan to distract from the fact that they sank public money into a project that has who has long called the project a boondoggle, said in an interview Friday that Ohio Republicans "did all this hoopla and pageantry" to hype the Intel project. "Now they want the Intel president to step down because he has ties to China," he said. "That's their excuse."He said construction had continued with a fraction of the workers the company had promised to hire. He predicted that the site would never become a semiconductor factory."Intel is never going to make a chip there," he said.
