
How To Become An Energy Superpower
In his first remarks as Canada's Prime Minister, Mark Carney pledged to make the country a '…superpower in both conventional and clean energy.' But what does it really mean to be an 'energy superpower'?
Let's define it: an energy superpower is a country that wields influence over global energy markets through its substantial resources, production capabilities, infrastructure, trading capabilities, strategic policies and innovation capabilities. It can influence global prices, supply security and geopolitical alignments while maximizing the value of its domestic resources.
Energy hegemony matters because the world's future economy demands vastly more energy. If all 8 billion people on Earth consumed as much energy per capita as the average North American, we would need five times today's energy supply. That doesn't even account for the impact of the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution.
In April, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt testified to the US Congress that energy demand from datacenters could triple by 2030, rising from 3% of demand now to 9%. By 2050, AI may account for more than half of total energy consumption in advanced economies. The rising global need for air conditioning amid record-breaking heat adds even more pressure, as does the mining of cryptocurrencies. If we supplied all that energy using fossil fuels, we would ensure that our climate crisis becomes a catastrophe.
Today's energy superpowers are losing their grip. Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other Middle Eastern countries influence prices through OPEC and 'swing' capacity, but they lack clear energy transition strategies. The same is true for the United States, which leads in oil and gas production but has bungled its position in clean energy thanks to political dysfunction. The recently signed 'Big Beautiful Bill' ends various clean energy tax credits passed under President Biden, promising yet more uncertainty for energy innovators.
In addition, the US and Canada have driven up the supply of LNG, dreaming that it will replace coal, but that may never happen. Cheap solar and wind have pushed LNG demand and prices downward, causing many projects to be cancelled. The outlook for the next five years is simply not good for LNG, as analysts continue to warn. And then there is Russia, which is rapidly losing influence over European energy markets.
Meanwhile, China—with few fossil fuel resources—is emerging as the next dominant force in global energy, as I discussed in a previous post. Why? China controls critical minerals and their processing, dominates solar, wind, EVs and battery production, and is investing in advanced fission and fusion energy. As The New York Times put it, 'There's a race to power the future. China is pulling away.'
If China becomes an energy superpower, it probably will use that position as a geopolitical cudgel. But it is not too late for the West. What our business and political leaders lack is a focused plan and the will and tenacity to achieve it. China has a strategic vision, crisply defined in five-year plans. The West has, well, elaborate permitting processes defined in legalese. We spend time determining who can't build what where, while China funds deliberate innovations and builds whatever, wherever it chooses.
The next battlegrounds for energy superpowers are small modular reactors (SMRs), geothermal and, most importantly, fusion energy. Often called the 'holy grail' of clean energy, fusion promises reliable, abundant and safe baseload anywhere, anytime, with limited need for additional infrastructure. The country that cracks fusion first will almost certainly dominate global energy markets.
Becoming an energy superpower requires long-term commitment, and China is investing accordingly. If countries in the West are serious about competing, they will need four things:
Let's not forget that rising demand for energy is only part of this story. The growing frequency and cost of extreme floods, storms, wildfires and heatwaves, fueled by climate change, started this race to replace fossil fuels with cleaner and more scalable sources of energy.
This is, indeed, a race. The first countries to become clean energy superpowers will be able to attract valuable industries, create high-paying jobs and wield geopolitical power for decades. The question isn't whether there will be a new energy superpower—it's whether the West has the will to outcompete China and the guts to challenge shortsighted business leaders and politicians at home who are committed to a status quo that is economically and ecologically untenable.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
New NHL CBA Will Make It Tougher For Canadian Teams To Compete
TORONTO, ON - APRIL 27: Auston Matthews #34 of the Toronto Maple Leafs sets for a face-off against ... More the Boston Bruins during the second period in Game Four of the First Round of the 2024 Stanley Cup Playoffs at Scotiabank Arena on April 27, 2024 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. (Photo by Kevin Sousa/NHLI via Getty Images) It was already tough for NHL teams in Canada to compete. Taxes are high, the weather isn't great and the media scrutiny is intense (just ask Mitch Marner). Well, the new NHL CBA is about to make things a bit more challenging for Canadian teams. The issue relates to taxes. Under the old CBA, all of a player's contract could be comprised of signing bonuses except for the CBA mandated yearly minimum salary. That has changed. The new CBA limits bonuses to 60% of a contract. Why does this matter? The Canadian tax on signing bonuses for non-residents of Canada is limited to 15%, with the player then paying the balance owing at the prevailing tax rate in his home state in the United States. So while a player who claims to be a resident of a U.S. state pays taxes in both Canada and the U.S., the combined tax savings is significant, potentially saving the player millions of dollars over the term of the contract. So to minimize the tax burden, some players on Canadian teams structure their contracts primarily by way of signing bonuses knowing those bonuses will only be taxed at 15% in Canada. That's why you sometimes see a player sign a deal with the CBA base salary of $775,000 and the other $10 million in signing bonuses. Taxes, taxes, taxes. Toronto Maple Leafs captain Auston Matthew signed a 4 year/$53,000,000 with $49,650,000 in signing bonuses. By structuring the contract with 94% in signing bonuses, Arizona resident Matthews stands to enjoy a substantial tax savings. On his last deal alone, Matthews saved around $4 million in taxes across his 5 year deal worth $58,201,250. MONTREAL, CANADA - FEBRUARY 3: Carey Price #31 of the Montreal Canadiens makes a pad save on the ... More puck on an attempt by Daniel Alfredsson #11 of the Ottawa Senators during the NHL game at the Bell Centre on February 3, 2013 in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The Canadiens defeated the Senators 2-1. (Photo by) Matthews isn't the only player that has signed bonus laden contracts with a Canadian team to diminish the tax impact. Carey Price's contract has $70 million of the $84 million allocated to signing bonuses, which amounts to 84% of the total value of the contract. On his $122 million deal, 93% of Leon Draisaitl's contract is signing bonuses. And 75% of William Nylander's contract is comprised of signing bonuses. The money adds up quickly. With players having finite careers and finite earning potential, saving as much money as possible matters. And now there can be as much as an additional 35% of a player's income exposed to the very high Canadian tax rates. With the Canadiens, Leafs, Senators and Canucks leading the league in income tax rates, and with all seven Canadian teams in the top eleven in the NHL, things just got a bit more complicated for Canadian teams. It's tough enough with these teams competing against teams in tax free states like Florida, Tennessee, Nevada and Texas. And now, a relief valve for Canadian teams has been partially closed.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Honeywell International Inc. (HON): 'I Think You Buy' It, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . Honeywell International Inc. (NASDAQ:HON) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Honeywell International Inc. (NASDAQ:HON) is one of the biggest industrial conglomerates in America. Its shares are flat year-to-date after a major 6% dip in July after the latest earnings results. The shares fell because despite the fact that the firm reported $10.4 billion in sales and $2.75 in EPS to beat analyst estimates of $10.1 billion and $2.66, investors were looking for a robust earnings performance to drive its guidance raise. Here's what Cramer said about Honeywell International Inc. (NASDAQ:HON) after the earnings: 'Okay, so Honeywell is splitting into three different companies. Some people feel that the cash flow is weaker, uh, I don't feel that this is nearly as and. . .I think you buy Honeywell. Only one division was weaker. This was automation. The stock tends to sell off when they report. And then it spends the next three weeks recovering. I think Honeywell is fine. Charitable trust owns it, it's a big win. It will continue to be a big win. This is a major overreaction to something that shouldn't be happening. Right now, shouldn't be happening. Down 15 you buy it. Copyright: zenstock / 123RF Stock Photo '[On guidance raise] Yes that's what matters. And people just always seize at whatever's most negative. They're breaking up into three companies. He's bringing out value. This is very short sighted. Vimal Kapoor doing a great job. Buy the stock. Overreaction to something that's not even negative for heaven's sake. Unbelievable how poorly the stock acts on the day it reports and then it spends the rest of the time, climbing. Buy it.' While we acknowledge the potential of HON as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) Is Very Good At What It Does, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ:TMUS) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ:TMUS) is an American telecommunications carrier whose shares have gained 10.9% year-to-date. The shares jumped by 6.1% in July after the firm's latest earnings report saw its $21.13 billion in revenue and $2.84 in EPS beat analyst estimates of $21.04 billion and $2.68. Another reason why T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ:TMUS)'s shares rose was due to its 830,000 postpaid additions beating analyst estimates of 700,300. Here's what Cramer said: 'That was a nice quarter. Previously, Cramer discussed T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ:TMUS)'s share price movements: 'Here's one [that's] a little surprising. Keybanc puts out a very cogent piece about how T-Mobile is fiber-deficient. And they think that the consumer value proposition has deteriorated rather rapidly. Downgraded to Underweight. And the stock has been weak. But this is a, in many ways you read this and you think oh my bad, now I know why it's going down. Which will mean that it's got much further to fall. While we acknowledge the potential of TMUS as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.