AI experts warn electricity costs may stunt growth
AI is set to be at the forefront of a £2bn data centre in Loughton, Essex, as well as the chancellor's plans for 'Europe's Silicon Valley' between Cambridge and Oxford.
Dr Haider Raza, a senior AI lecturer at the University of Essex, said it was a "very exciting time" for the region but stressed sustainable energy was needed for AI to flourish.
A government spokesman said it was "exploring bold, clean energy solutions" to meet its AI ambitions while aligning with the UK's net zero goals.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has outlined his vision to "unleash" AI, saying it offered "vast potential" for rejuvenating public services.
The East of England was placed at the forefront of the government's plan for AI technology.
Nscale pledged £2bn towards the Loughton data centre, due to be built by 2026.
It was also hoped development in the Oxford-Cambridge growth corridor would boost the UK economy by up to £78bn, with AI playing a catalytic role.
The plan has received backing from AstraZeneca, GSK and Astex, which is using AI to develop new cancer drugs at Cambridge Science Park.
However, Dr Raza said "awful" electricity costs could stunt growth and said the government should invest in renewable energy to power AI centres.
"We have to make data centres more efficient. This point is very, very important," he told the BBC.
"Data centres are going to churn through a lot of energy, especially if they are processing too many jobs and mining large amounts of data.
"There are so many aspects we have to manage. Considering the cost of electricity, it's very challenging financially."
The energy issue could be worsened when using a generative AI system, according to a study by Dr Sasha Luccioni.
The research found generative AI might use about 33 times more energy than machines running task-specific software.
Concerns have also been raised by Kenso Trabing, whose AI firm Morphware builds its computer servers in the UK but runs them for a cheaper cost in South America.
He said the country's industrial electricity price of £350 to £400 per megawatt hour (MWh) was unattractive when compared to £35 to £40 per MWh in Paraguay.
The 35-year-old feared despite the UK being a leader in AI, Rachel Reeves' 'Silicon Valley' plan was unrealistic without cheaper electricity.
"High energy costs are a significant barrier to innovation because they make it too expensive to test and experiment with new technologies," he added.
"AI and blockchain projects require enormous computational power, which directly translates to high electricity consumption."
Science minister Lord Patrick Vallance visited Cambridge Science Park after he was chosen by Reeves as the person to lead the Oxford-Cambridge growth corridor.
He said the area could become "one of the most important innovation zones in the world".
Cambridge City Council leader Mike Davey said AI must be used responsibly and in line with the authority's green ambitions.
Concerns have been raised about the region being among the driest in the country, a factor that has previously hindered development.
"We've got to make sure water is in place for the AI data centres, and we have to make sure the electricity grid is up to scratch," Davey said.
However, he stressed AI "will be at the heart of what we do in the future".
A Department for Science, Innovation and Technology spokesman said it recognised data centres faced "sustainability challenges such as energy demands and water use".
He added: "Many newer data centres are already addressing these issues, using advanced cooling systems that significantly reduce water consumption."
Follow East of England news on X, Instagram and Facebook: BBC Beds, Herts & Bucks, BBC Cambridgeshire, BBC Essex, BBC Norfolk, BBC Northamptonshire or BBC Suffolk.
Oxbridge growth minister keen to 'get things done'
What do government plans mean for Cambridge?
Plans for £2bn AI centre and 750 jobs
PM plans to 'unleash AI' across UK to boost growth
Electricity grids creak as AI demands soar
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
Act Fast to Save 10% on Plaud AI Voice Recorder and NotePin This Back-to-School Season
If you're a student, educator or work at a job that requires you to remember lots of information, you may want a way to automate your note-taking or record meetings and lectures. But not all recorders are alike. If you're looking for a voice recorder that can also transcribe for you, perhaps it's time to try Plaud's AI note voice recorder and case bundle. It's now down to $143 at Amazon, which saves you $16 and amounts to a discount of 10% just in time for this back-to-school season. Plaud's AI note voice recorder comes in three colors, supports up to 112 languages and includes 64GB in storage. Measuring only an estimated 3.5 inches in height and 2.13 inches in width, this compact note voice recorder is perfect for anyone on the go. Plaud's recorder is equipped with a microphone, offers clear recordings and weighs just 30 grams. All recordings are saved as WAV files. On top of its recording features, Plaud offers encrypted recordings for added security. Your purchase includes a magnetic ring, magnetic charging cable, CR5 battery, and a free Starter plan that will transcribe up to 300 minutes for no additional cost. All transcriptions and summaries are created with your choice of GPT-4.1, Claude 4.0, o3-mini or Gemini 2.5 Pro(Beta). If you'd like a different option, the Plaud AI NotePin is also down to $143, making it also $16 off. The NotePin requires one AAA battery, which is included with your purchase. Looking for more back-to-school deals but not sure if these are for you? We've got a list of the best back-to-school tech and gear for your convenience. Why this deal matters Plaud's AI note voice recorders allow you more easily take audio notes during meetings and other important conversations. With its support for up to 112 languages, recording in WAV format and two compact options, now is the perfect time for busy students and professionals to stock up on a note-taker that can make it easier to review any material. Both the note voice recorder and NotePin are 10% off -- a rare discount -- you'll spend $143 and save $16 for a limited time. Plus, you get a free 300 minutes of transcription with purchase, as well as all accessories you'll need to keep your note recorder working.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Meet your new office bestie: ChatGPT
Deborah has fast become one of Nicole Ramirez's favorite colleagues. She's quick to deliver compliments, sharp-witted, and hyper-efficient. Perhaps best of all, there's no internal competition with Deborah at the health marketing agency they work for, because she isn't on the payroll. She isn't even human. Ramirez, a 34-year-old who lives in the Pittsburgh area, says she randomly chose the name Deborah as a way to refer to the generative AI app ChatGPT, which she began using about a year ago to help her with basic tasks like drafting emails. As time went on, she asked Deborah to do more complex work, such as market research and analysis, and found herself typing "thank you" after the results came back. Eventually the relationship got to the point where the app became akin to a coworker who's always willing to give feedback — or listen to her gripes about real-life clients and colleagues. And so the bot became a bud. "Those are things that you would usually turn to your work bestie over lunch about when you can go to ChatGPT — or Deborah, in my case," says Ramirez. People are treating AI chatbots as more than just 24/7 therapists and loyal companions. With the tools becoming ubiquitous in the workplace, some are regarding them as model colleagues, too. Unlike teammates with a pulse, chatbots are never snotty, grumpy, or off the clock. They don't eat leftover salmon at their desks or give you the stink eye. They don't go on a tangent about their kids or talk politics when you ask to schedule a meeting. And they won't be insulted if you reject their suggestions. For many, tapping AI chatbots in lieu of their human colleagues has deep appeal. Consider that nearly one-third of US workers would rather clean a toilet than ask a colleague for help, according to a recent survey from the Center for Generational Kinetics, a thought-leadership firm, and commissioned by workplace-leadership strategist Henna Pryor. Experts warn, though, that too much bot bonding could dull social and critical-thinking skills, hurting careers and company performance. In the past two years, the portion of US employees who say they have used Gen AI in their role a few times a year or more nearly doubled to 40% from 21%, according to a Gallup report released in June. Part of what accounts for that rapid ascendance is how much Gen AI reflects our humanity, as Stanford University lecturer Martin Gonzalez concluded in a 2024 research paper. "Instead of a science-fiction-like ball of pulsing light, we encounter human quirks: poems recited in a pirate's voice, the cringeworthy humor of dad jokes," wrote Gonzalez, who's now an executive at Google's AI research lab DeepMind. One sign that people see AI agents as lifelike is in how they politely communicate with the tools by using phrases like "please" or "thank you," says Connie Noonan Hadley, an organizational psychologist and professor at Boston University's Questrom School of Business. Like junk food, it's efficient when you need it, but too much over time can give you relational diabetes. Laura Greve, clinical health psychologist "So far, people are keeping up with basic social niceties," she says. "AI tends to give you compliments, too, so there are some social skills still being maintained." Human colleagues, on the other hand, aren't always as well-mannered. Monica Park, a graphic designer for a jeweler in New York, used to dread showing early mock-ups of her work to colleagues. She recalls the heartache she felt after a coworker at a previous employer angrily responded to a draft of a design she'd drawn with an F-bomb. "You never know if it's a good time to ask for feedback," Park, 32, tells me. "So much of it has to do with the mood of the person looking at it." Last year she became a regular ChatGPT user and says that while the app will also dish out criticism, it's only the constructive kind. "It's not saying it in a malicious or judgmental way," Park says. "ChatGPT doesn't have any skin in the game." Aaron Ansari, an information-security consultant, counts Anthropic's AI chatbot Claude among his top peers. The 46-year-old Orlando-area resident likes that he can ask it to revise a document as many times as he wants without being expected to give anything in return. By contrast, a colleague at a previous job would pressure him to buy Girl Scout cookies from her kids whenever he stopped by her desk. "It became her reputation," Ansari says. "You can't go to 'Susie' without money." Now a managing partner at a different consulting firm, he finds himself opening Claude before pinging colleagues for support. This way, he can avoid ruffling any feathers, like when he once attempted to reach a colleague in a different time zone at what turned out to be an inconvenient hour. "You call and catch them in the kitchen," says Ansari. "I have interrupted their lunch unintentionally, but they certainly let me know." AI's appeal can be so strong that workers are at risk of developing unhealthy attachments to chatbots, research shows. "Your Brain on ChatGPT," a study published in June from researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, found that the convenience that AI agents provide can weaken people's critical-thinking skills and foster procrastination and laziness. "Like junk food, it's efficient when you need it, but too much over time can give you relational diabetes," says Laura Greve, a clinical health psychologist in Boston. "You're starved of the nutrients you need, the real human connection." And if workers at large overindulge in AI, we could all end up becoming "emotionally unintelligent oafs," she warns. "We're accidentally training an entire generation to be workplace hermits." In turn, Hadley adds, businesses that rely on collaboration could suffer. "The more workers turn to AI instead of other people, the greater the chance the social fabric that weaves us together will weaken," she says. Karen Loftis, a senior product manager in a Milwaukee suburb, recently left a job at a large tech company that's gone all-in on AI. She said before ChatGPT showed up, sales reps would call her daily for guidance on how to plug the company's latest products. That's when they'd learn about her passion for seeing musicians like Peter Frampton in concert. But when she saw the singer-songwriter perform earlier this year, it was "like a non-event," she said, because those calls almost entirely stopped coming in. "With AI, it's all work and no relationships," she said. Workers who lean heavily on AI may also be judged differently by their peers than their bosses. Colleagues are more inclined to see them as dependent on the technology, less creative, and lacking growth potential, says David De Cremer, a behavioral scientist and Dunton Family Dean of Northeastern University's D'Amore-McKim School of Business. "It's objectification by association," he says. Company leaders, however, are more likely to view workers who demonstrate AI chops as assets. Big-company CEOs such as Amazon's Andy Jassy and Shopify's Tobi Lütke have credited the technology for boosting productivity and cost savings. Workers who spoke with BI about using chatbots — including those who work remotely — say they still interact with their human peers, but less often as they did before AI agents came along. Lucas Figueiredo, who lives near Atlanta and works at a revenue management specialist for an airline, says he previously struggled to tell whether the AirPods a former colleague constantly wore were playing music whenever he wanted to ask this person a coding question. "You don't want to spook someone or disrupt their workflow," the 27-year-old tells me, though he admits he has done just that. These days, if Figueiredo gets stuck, he will first go to Microsoft's Copilot before approaching a colleague for an assist. The new strategy has been paying off. "I've learned to be more self-sufficient," he says. "You don't want to ask those silly questions." Sarah E. Needleman is Business Insider's leadership & workplace correspondent. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Duolingo CEO says controversial AI memo was misunderstood
While Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn was loudly criticized this year after declaring that Duolingo would become an 'AI-first company,' he suggested in a new interview the real issue was that he 'did not give enough context.' 'Internally, this was not controversial,' von Ahn told The New York Times. 'Externally, as a publicly traded company some people assume that it's just for profit. Or that we're trying to lay off humans. And that was not the intent at all.' On the contrary, von Ahn said the company has 'never laid off any full-time employees' and has no intention of doing so. And while he didn't deny that Duolingo had cut its contractor workforce, he suggested that 'from the beginning … our contractor workforce has gone up and down depending on needs.' Despite the criticism (which does not seem to have made a big impact on Duolingo's bottom line), von Ahn still sounds extremely bullish about A.I.'s potential, with Duolingo team members taking every Friday morning to experiment with the technology. 'It's a bad acronym, f-r-A-I-days,' he said. 'I don't know how to pronounce it.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
