Experts cast doubt on Australia's ‘aspirational' new 1.2 million housing target
The shift comes as experts and Treasury cast doubt on whether building that many homes is achievable in the timeframe.
Across Australia, about 178,700 new homes were built in 2024-25, the first year of the five-year national housing accord that set the target.
That falls 61,300 short of the average number needed to be built each year to hit the goal by mid-2029.
Ms O'Neil said on Friday she was doing all she could as minister 'to make sure that we meet the target or get as close to it as we can', while repeatedly calling it a 'national aspiration'.
She made similar comments in June, but not during the election campaign.
It echoes language in the National Housing Accord signed by Premiers and the Prime Minister in 2022.
They agreed to 'an initial, aspirational national target of delivering a total of one million new, well-located homes over five years from 2024'. It lifted to 1.2 million a year later.
'We've got a housing crisis that's been cooking in our country for 40 years, and whatever debates there may be about housing policy, one thing is for absolute certain, the real answer to the housing challenges facing our country is to build, build, build,' Ms O'Neil said.
'We've got to build more homes more quickly, because more housing means more affordable housing for Australians.'
The federal view is that there needs to be a massive, collective push from all levels of government if Australia is to get close to meeting the 1.2 million home target, since it's more than has ever been built in any five-year period.
The closest was in the five years to the end of 2019, when almost 1.05 million homes were built, analysis from property data firm Cotality found.
However, its head of research Eliza Owen pointed out that in that period, interest rates were far lower, more units were being approved, and investors made up a bigger proportion of demand.
Treasury advice has also cast doubt on whether the target will be met.
Government data shows the number of homes built increased by 2 per cent in 2023-24 compared with the year prior.
If that growth rate continues over the next five years, the nation will build just under 930,000 new homes — suggesting growth needs to speed up considerably to reach the 1.2 million stretch goal.
The Commonwealth is directly funding the construction of 55,000 social and affordable homes (28,000 of which are currently in planning or construction) and 100,000 properties reserved for first-time buyers, to contribute to the 1.2 million target.
Properties built by Defence Housing Australia, such as the hundreds under construction near Rockingham to accommodate an influx of families related to AUKUS, will also count towards it.
'(The target) is bold, it's ambitious, but I can tell you that that's exactly what's needed,' Ms O'Neil told Radio National.
'We've got to get states, territories, local government and the private sector working together better on housing, and that's the reason why we've got this target in place.
'Having a big, difficult target is exactly the kind of thinking that is going to need to snap us out of what is a 40-year-old problem confronting our country.'
The Federal government is acutely aware it doesn't hold the planning levers and is reliant on state and local governments.
It also sees the need for a cultural shift to counter the NIMBYism, where neighbours in established suburbs can hold up developments – including the one Ms O'Neil used for a media appearance on Friday morning – by pursuing objections through local councils and courts.
The minister met local governments on Wednesday as part of the pre-roundtable discussions and will also speak with her state and territory counterparts.
Cotality's Eliza Owen said policies aimed at pre-fabricated construction and labour mobility sounded like they would be heading in the right direction, although could come with added costs.
She pointed to the increase in dwelling approvals in June, particularly for units, as a sign things were speeding up.
'A combination of the right policy action and lower interest rates will help increase dwelling completions,' she told The Nightly.
Approvals were up 11.9 per cent in June, and 27.4 per cent on the year earlier. Building starts were also up 17 per cent in the March quarter compared to 12 months earlier.
Ms Owen argued that speeding up approvals was not necessarily the main game in fixing the problem, because it appeared to be adding to an already packed pipeline of projects.
But she cautioned that history showed 'you can't just look at the supply side' without controlling demand.
'We allowed a lot of that new demand (leading up to 2019) to be investment, off-the-plan apartment sales,' she said.
'And while that's not inherently a bad thing in itself, it did see a decline in the rate of home ownership, corners cut on dwelling construction, and pretty poor return for those investors over the long term.'
Shadow housing minister Andrew Bragg accused Ms O'Neil of seeking to pre-emptively shift blame if the target wasn't met.
'The Labor Government promised to build 1.2 million homes by July 1, 2029. If they don't, they can't blame it on the States or the RBA. They will have lied to the Australian public,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
9 minutes ago
- Perth Now
US deficit hits $291b in July despite tariff revenue
The US government's budget deficit grew nearly 20 per cent in July to $US291 billion ($A446 billion) despite a nearly $US21 billion jump in customs duty collections from President Donald Trump's tariffs, the Treasury Department says. The deficit for July was up 19 per cent, or $US47 billion, from July 2024. Receipts for the month grew two per cent, or $US8 billion, to $US338 billion, while outlays jumped 10 per cent, or $US56 billion, to $US630 billion - a record high for the month. The month of July this year had fewer business days than last year, so the Treasury Department said that adjusting for the difference would have increased receipts by about $US20 billion, resulting in a deficit of about $US271 billion. Net customs receipts in July grew to about $US27.7 billion from about $US7.1 billion in the year-earlier period due to higher tariff rates imposed by Trump, a Treasury official said. These collections were largely in line with the increase in June customs receipts after steady growth since April. Trump has touted the billions of dollars flowing into US coffers from his tariffs, but the duties are paid by companies importing the goods, with some costs often passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. Consumer price index data on Tuesday showed increases in prices for some tariff-sensitive goods like furniture, footwear and auto parts, but they were offset by lower petrol prices in the overall index. For the first 10 months of the fiscal year, customs duties totalled $US135.7 billion, up $US73 billion, or 116 per cent, from the year-earlier period. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox Business Network the growing US tariff revenue will make it difficult for the Supreme Court to rule against Trump's import taxes if a legal challenge to them makes its way to the country's top court. The overall year-to-date budget results showed a $US1.629 trillion deficit, up seven per cent, or $US112 billion, from the same period a year earlier. Receipts were up six per cent, or $US262 billion, to $US4.347 trillion, a record high for the 10-month period, while outlays grew seven per cent, or $US374 billion, to $US5.975 trillion, also a 10-month record. The year-to-date customs duties were more than eaten up by an increase of 10 per cent or $US141 billion in costs for government healthcare programs, including Medicare for seniors and Medicaid for the poor, to $US1.557 trillion. The Social Security pension program, the largest single expense item, saw an increase of nine per cent or $US108 billion over the first 10 months of fiscal 2025 to $US1.368 trillion. Interest on the public debt also continued to grow, topping $US1.01 trillion for the 10-month period, an increase of six per cent or $US57 billion over the prior year due to slightly higher interest rates and increased debt levels. with AP
Sky News AU
21 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Sky-high expectations around inheritance likely to fall flat, as older Australians face retirement uncertainty
Rising aged care costs, longer life spans and tighter retirement budgets are set to challenge the financial expectations of young Australians, as new figures reveal a major disconnect between what they hope to inherit and what older generations will realistically leave behind. Data from Colonial First State (CFS) has revealed that Australians aged 18 to 29 are banking on a substantial inheritance, estimating they'll receive an average of $525,000. This figure factors in assets such as the family home and remaining superannuation. But those expectations, CFS warns, could be setting them up for a harsh financial reality check. 'When you think about what older Australians are staring down the barrel of including longevity and rising aged care cost, this ($525,000) expectation is going to come under a lot of pressure,' CFS head of technical services Craig Day told NewsWire. 'A lot of the assets that are earmarked to be paid out as an inheritance may in the future be needed elsewhere.' These findings come amid growing reliance on intergenerational wealth transfers, with many younger Australians facing stagnant wages, skyrocketing living costs and an increasingly unaffordable housing market. 'Young people are increasingly relying on the wealth of their parents or grandparents due to rising living costs, stagnant wage growth and housing pressures,' said CFS chief executive of superannuation Kelly Power. 'At the same time, older generations are navigating the complexities of retirement planning. They want to support their families while ensuring their own financial security.' CFS notes that while many older Australians still plan to leave something behind, their estimates of what will remain may fall short. Core assets like the family home, super and vehicles are typically the main sources of inheritance. But other investments, including property portfolios, are now often used to fund retirement. Mr Day is urging families to confront the issue now, rather than waiting until it's too late. 'It's important that young and old can discuss their expectations and plans openly. By having these conversations early, families can ensure that everyone is on the same page and can make informed decisions that align with their values and goals,' he said. 'It's never too early to start planning for retirement.'
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Innovative solutions for first-home buyers
Housing is less affordable than ever. Both renting and buying a home is a tall order as putting a roof over your head emerges as one of the biggest hurdles facing Australians. Rising costs and limited traditional financing options continue to lock hardworking Australians out of the market. These real-life implications are widening the gap of homeownership for downtrodden first home buyers. The price of the typical home has grown much faster than incomes since the turn of the century, from about four times the median income in the early 2000s to more than eight times today – and nearly 10 times in Sydney, explains Brendan Coates, the housing and economic security program director at public-policy think-tank Grattan Institute. 'Rising house prices are pushing homeownership out of reach for many younger Australians. In the early 1990s, it took about six years to save a 20 per cent deposit for a typical dwelling for an average household. It now takes more than 12 years,' Coates says. Grattan's analysis shows that homeownership rates are falling fastest for younger people, with 57 per cent of 30 to 34-year-olds owning their home in 2001, compared to 50 per cent by 2021. Just 36 per cent of 25 to 29-year-olds own their home today, down from 43 per cent in 2001. Housing unaffordability is contributing to wealth inequality, which has been climbing for two decades. Coates says: 'The growing divide between the housing 'haves' and 'have-nots' is largely generational. Older Australians who bought their homes before prices really took off in the early 2000s have seen their share of the country's wealth steadily climb.' To unwind inequality, we need to make housing less expensive, he says. Coates blames a failure of housing policy. 'Australia's land-use planning rules are highly restrictive and complex. Current rules and community opposition make it very difficult to build new homes, particularly in the places where most people want to live and work,' he says.
