At the NATO summit, Trump faces an alliance further shaped to his liking
President Donald Trump on Wednesday will meet with members of a NATO alliance that he has worked to bend to his will over the years and whose members are rattled by his latest comments casting doubt on the U.S. commitment to its mutual defense guarantees.
Trump's comments en route to the Netherlands that his fidelity to Article 5 'depends on your definition' are likely to draw a spotlight at the NATO summit, as will the new and fragile Iran-Israel ceasefire that Trump helped broker after the U.S. unloaded airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.
At the same time, the alliance is poised to enact one of Trump's chief priorities for NATO: a pledge by its member countries to increase, sometimes significantly, how much they spend on their defense.
'NATO was broke, and I said, 'You're going to have to pay,'' Trump said Tuesday. 'And we did a whole thing, and now they're paying a lot. Then I said, 'You're going to have to lift it to 4% or 5%, and 5% is better.''
Spending 5% of a country's gross domestic product on defense is 'good,' Trump pronounced, adding, 'It gives them much more power.'
NATO countries agree to increase defence spending to 5%
New NATO target will require Canada to spend $150-billion annually on defence, Carney says
The boost in spending follows years of Trump complaints that other countries weren't paying their fair share for membership in an alliance created as a bulwark against threats from the former Soviet Union. Most NATO countries, with the key exception of Spain, are preparing to endorse the 5% pledge, motivated to bolster their own defenses not just by Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine but also, perhaps, to placate Trump.
As a candidate in 2016, Trump suggested that he as president would not necessarily heed the alliance's mutual defense guarantees outlined in Article 5 of the NATO treaty. In March of this year, he expressed uncertainty that NATO would come to the United States' defense if needed, though the alliance did just that after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
On Tuesday, he told reporters aboard Air Force One on his way to The Hague for the summit that whether he is committed to Article 5 'depends on your definition.'
'There's numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right?' Trump said. 'But I'm committed to being their friends.' He signaled that he would give a more precise definition of what Article 5 means to him once he is at the summit.
Trump also vented to reporters before leaving Washington about the actions by Israel and Iran after his announced ceasefire. He said, in his view, both sides had violated the nascent agreement.
After Trump arrived in the Netherlands, news outlets, including The Associated Press, published stories revealing that a U.S. intelligence report suggested in an early assessment that Iran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months by weekend strikes and was not 'completely and fully obliterated,' as Trump had said.
The White House called the report 'flat-out wrong,' and Trump posted in all-caps on social media early Wednesday that any reporting that the strikes weren't 'completely destroyed' was an attempt to 'demean one of the most successful military strikes in history.'
The White House has not said what other world leaders Trump would meet with one-on-one while in The Hague, but he said he was likely to cross paths with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
20 minutes ago
- National Observer
Carney, NATO allies will debate new defence spending target today
NATO leaders are expected to decide today whether to more than double the alliance's defence spending target. Prime Minister Mark Carney is among the leaders around the table at the annual leaders' summit in The Hague, where a proposal is being discussed to increase the target to five per cent of annual GDP, up from the current two per cent. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte 's proposal would break that into two parts. The first 3.5 per cent would be for core defence needs including jets and weapons, and the remaining 1.5 per cent on defence-adjacent investments including infrastructure and cybersecurity. Before the official meeting of the North Atlantic Council, Carney held bilateral meetings with the Prime Minister of New Zealand, Christopher Luxon, and the Prime Minister of Estonia, Kristen Michal. The agenda was delayed Wednesday, with leaders still arriving as of 10:30 a.m., when their meeting was scheduled to begin. Carney told CNN International on Tuesday that Canada will reach the target in part by developing deposits of critical minerals and that some of the work will be done in partnership with the European Union, EU member states, the U.K. and other allies. He also said five per cent of GDP would mean a $150 billion defence budget for Canada. NATO said in 2024 Canada spent $41 billion. All 32 NATO member states have to agree on a new spending target and will also have to debate the timeline for its implementation. US President Donald Trump left Washington for The Hague on Tuesday. Even before his arrival, Trump had a major effect on the summit. Earlier this year, Trump suggested the US might abandon its commitments to the alliance if member countries don't meet their defence spending targets. The president generated more uncertainty Tuesday when he said his commitment to the mutual defence guarantee in the NATO treaty "depends on your definition" of that guarantee. Pressed later by reporters, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said he has no doubt about the US commitment to NATO and Article 5, the portion of the NATO treaty which says an armed attack on one member is an attack on all. Trump, who has long accused the alliance of not paying its fair share toward the cost of its defence, is also the key driver behind the plan to hike members' defence spending target. At a dinner event with NATO leaders Tuesday, Rutte thanked Trump for pushing for a spending hike and getting Europe to "truly step up." Kerry Buck, the former Canadian ambassador to NATO, told The Canadian Press that it's in the interests of Canada and European allies to keep the US in NATO as "deep and as long as possible." "Whatever we can do to get through this NATO summit with few public rifts between the US and other allies on anything, and satisfy a very long-standing US demand to rebalance defence spending, that will be good for Canada because NATO's good for Canada," Buck said. Britain, France, the Netherlands and Germany have all committed to the five per cent goal. NATO nations closer to the borders of Ukraine, Russia and its ally Belarus have also pledged to do so. But some are balking, including Spain and Slovakia. Rutte warned Monday that no country can opt out of the target and that progress made toward the new target will be reviewed in four years.
Globe and Mail
21 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Should You Buy, Sell, or Hold Netflix Stock in 2025?
As of June 20, the S&P 500 index has generated a total return of 2% in 2025. After a difficult start to the year, the market has rallied in remarkable fashion to get in positive territory. A fresh all-time high could be achieved in the near future. While the broad index is in the green this year, Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) has climbed at a much better clip. The streaming stock is up an impressive 38% in 2025. Trade negotiations, economic uncertainty, and geopolitical tensions continue to happen in the background, but seemingly have no effect on this business and its shareholders. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Should you buy, sell, or hold Netflix stock in 2025? Why you should buy and/or hold Netflix stock Netflix is the leader in the streaming arena, having established a powerful position in the global media and entertainment industry. It brought in $10.5 billion in revenue in the first quarter. As of year-end 2024, it had 302 million subscribers. And according to data from Nielsen, 7.5% of all daily TV viewing time in the U.S. went to Netflix. Management never rests on its laurels. It's always appearing to be playing offense. The company is finding new ways to bring on subscribers, whether that means cracking down on those who share passwords, launching a very successful ad-supported tier, or getting into live sports and events. Netflix has tremendous brand strength, and the leadership team thinks there are hundreds of millions of people who can still become members. Investors should buy this stock today is if they believe Netflix will keep generating strong financial results -- and that's not a reach. According to Wall Street consensus analyst estimates, the company's revenue and earnings per share (EPS) are projected to increase at compound annual rates of 12.3% and 23.4%, respectively, between 2024 and 2027. The same reasoning applies to existing shareholders, particularly those sitting on huge gains thanks to their Netflix positions. If you have conviction that the business will continue to perform well over the next five years and beyond, then there is no reason to sell the stock. But that's if you don't believe the current valuation is a stretch (more on this below). A richer valuation doesn't automatically mean it's time to dump your holding, especially if the company is in tremendous shape. Why it's time to sell The case to sell Netflix stock also makes complete sense. I see nothing wrong with shareholders taking some profits off the table. This might mean it's time to lower the position size Netflix commands in your portfolio to something that's a bit more comfortable. That's an even smarter move if there are other, more attractive opportunities to allocate capital to. Another obvious reason to sell is the valuation. Netflix trades at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 58.2 right now. That's a 147% premium to the S&P 500 index. To be clear, this is an elite business we're dealing with here. But it's a stretch in my mind to think that it commands that type of elevated valuation. There's a much greater likelihood that the P/E multiple will be much lower five years from now than that it will stay the same or go higher. The market has kept rewarding Netflix with each impressive quarterly financial report, even though the valuation has looked steep. I just think there is absolutely no margin of safety left, and it might be time to switch gears. Unsurprisingly, I personally would not be a buyer of Netflix stock at the current valuation. Between holding and selling, I lean toward the latter. For those who care less about valuation and more about owning a top-notch enterprise, I can understand why they would have a different perspective. Should you invest $1,000 in Netflix right now? Before you buy stock in Netflix, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Netflix wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $676,023!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $883,692!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is793% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to173%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025
Globe and Mail
21 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Fed's Powell heads to Senate panel for second day of testimony
U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell resumes two days of Congressional testimony on Wednesday when he appears before the Senate Banking committee after scrutiny before a House panel the day before that focused on the Fed's concerns the Trump administration's tariff plans will raise inflation. The Senate session begins at 10 a.m. with Powell expected to deliver the same message he presented to the House Financial Services Committee that even with recent inflation more moderate than expected, the central bank expects rising import taxes will lead to higher inflation beginning this summer. He is also expected to reiterate that the Fed won't be comfortable cutting interest rates until it sees if prices do begin to rise and whether that process shows signs of becoming more persistent. 'We should start to see this over the summer, in the June number and the July we don't we are perfectly open to the idea that the pass-through (to consumers) will be less than we think, and if we do that will matter for policy,' Powell said on Tuesday. 'I think if it turns out that inflation pressures remain contained we will get to a place where we cut rates sooner than later...I do not want to point to a particular meeting. I don't think we need to be in any rush,' particularly given a still-strong labor market and so much uncertainty about the impact of the still-unresolved tariff debate. U.S. Federal Reserve should consider cutting rates as soon as July, governor says Tariffs have already risen on some goods, but there is a coming July 9 deadline for higher levies on a broad set of countries – with no certainty about whether the Trump administration will back down to a 10 per cent baseline tariff that analysts are using as a minimum, or impose something more aggressive. The Fed has held its benchmark interest rate steady in the 4.25 per cent to 4.5 per cent range since December, despite demands by President Donald Trump for immediate, and deep, rate cuts. Economic projections released by the Fed last week showed policymakers at the median do anticipate reducing the benchmark overnight rate half a percentage point by the end of the year. But within those projections is a clear divide between officials who take the inflation risk more seriously – seven of 19 policy makers see no rate cuts at all this year – and those who feel any tariff price shock will be less severe or quickly fade. Ten of the 19 see two or more rate reductions. Investors currently expect the Fed to cut rates at its September and December meetings, but hold rates steady at its next meeting on July 29-30.
