Iran lacks clear fallback as nuclear talks with US falter
Iranian uranium enrichment continues together with US talks
Iran's leadership has no clear backup plan if nuclear negotiations with the United States collapse, according to three Iranian sources, as rising tensions over Tehran's uranium enrichment programme threaten to derail diplomatic efforts.
With talks stalling over conflicting positions, Iranian officials indicated the country may turn to China and Russia as a 'Plan B', but acknowledged this strategy appears uncertain given Beijing's trade disputes with Washington and Moscow's focus on Ukraine.
'The plan B is to continue the strategy before the start of talks. Iran will avoid escalating tensions, it is ready to defend itself,' a senior Iranian official said. 'The strategy also includes strengthening ties with allies like Russia and China.'
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Tuesday described US demands to halt uranium enrichment as 'excessive and outrageous', stating that the negotiations were unlikely to succeed.
The fifth round of talks aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief will take place in Rome on Friday, Oman's foreign minister announced on Wednesday.
After four previous rounds, significant obstacles remain. Tehran refuses to ship its highly enriched uranium stockpile abroad or discuss its ballistic missile programme, according to two Iranian officials and a European diplomat.
The breakdown in trust stems partly from President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw from a 2015 nuclear accord with world powers, which has increased Iran's demands for guarantees that Washington will not abandon any future agreement.
Iran's challenges have increased under Trump's renewed 'maximum pressure' campaign since February, which has tightened sanctions and included military threats. The country faces energy and water shortages, a declining currency, and concerns about potential Israeli attacks on its nuclear facilities.
Demonstrations over social issues and economic difficulties in recent years have highlighted the Islamic Republic's sensitivity to public discontent, leading to government crackdowns and Western human rights sanctions.
'Without lifting sanctions to enable free oil sales and access to funds, Iran's economy cannot recover,' said a second Iranian official, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter.
Even if uranium enrichment disputes are resolved, sanctions relief remains contentious. The US favours gradually phasing out nuclear-related sanctions, whilst Tehran demands immediate removal of all restrictions.
Dozens of Iranian institutions, including the central bank and national oil company, have been sanctioned since 2018 for allegedly supporting terrorism or weapons proliferation.
Wendy Sherman, the former US undersecretary for political affairs who led negotiations for the 2015 accord, said it was impossible to convince Tehran to 'dismantle its nuclear programme and give up their enrichment even though that would be ideal'.
'So that means they will come to an impasse, and that we will face the potential for war, which I don't think, quite frankly, President Trump looks forward to because he has campaigned as a peace president,' she said.
China, Iran's primary oil buyer despite sanctions, has helped maintain economic stability, but Trump's pressure on Chinese trade entities threatens these exports. Analysts note that Beijing's support has limitations, as China seeks significant discounts for Iranian oil and may push for lower prices as global demand weakens.
France, Britain and Germany have warned they would reimpose UN sanctions if no deal emerges quickly. Under the 2015 nuclear agreement's UN resolution, the three European nations have until October to trigger a 'snapback mechanism' before the resolution expires.
According to diplomats and documents seen by Reuters, the European countries may act by August if no substantial progress is made.
Diplomats suggest that reaching any agreement before then would require, at best, an initial political framework similar to 2013, allowing both sides to offer immediate concessions whilst negotiating details.
'There is no reason to think it will take less time than the 18 months in 2013 especially when the parameters and the geopolitical situation is more complicated now,' a senior European official said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tatler Asia
2 days ago
- Tatler Asia
What are luxury brands doing in the face of trade tariffs?
Above Maroquinerie de Louviers in Normandy is Hermès' 21st workshop (Photo: Hermès) Many high-end brands have also accelerated domestic production capabilities in the last few years. Whether these were in direct relation to imposed tariffs is unknown. For instance, LVMH has increased its European production capabilities, particularly for Louis Vuitton leather goods. Two new ateliers have opened in France in 2022 and increased hiring has been widely reported. Similarly, Richemont, Van Cleef & Arpels' parent company, has been investing in expanding its French manufacturing footprint for the jewellery brand, including plans to open two new workshops in France by 2026. This will create approximately 600 new jobs. In April 2023, Hermès opened a new leather workshop, Maroquinerie de Louviers, in Normandy. Since 2010, Hermès has opened 11 leather goods workshops in France. Read more: The Arnault effect: how LVMH defines global luxury, indulgence and desire TikTok manufacturing exposé Above Viral TikToks show luxury bags made in Chinese factories (Photo: Screenshot of TikTok) The trade tensions have sparked an unexpected cultural phenomenon that further complicates the luxury industry's narrative. In April 2025, Chinese manufacturers began flooding TikTok with viral videos claiming to expose the truth behind luxury goods manufacturing; factory owners present themselves as the original equipment manufacturers for major luxury brands while standing in front of walls of what appear to be expensive handbags. These 'Trade War TikTok' videos feature sales agents breaking down the material costs of luxury goods, claiming items like Hermès Birkin bags and Lululemon leggings cost just a fraction of their retail prices to produce. However, experts labelled many of these claims as false, noting that the videos represent a form of mass consumer disinformation rather than factual exposés; a well-oiled machine to sell high-quality counterfeit goods. Read more: The best quirky bag charms to Jane Birkin-fy your bag Diversification of materials Above Chanel known for its tweed, recently acquired a 35 per cent stake in an Italian silk manufacturing company () Perhaps the most intriguing development has been the acceleration of material innovation and diversification. Faced with unpredictable costs for traditional luxury materials, brands have invested in alternatives. Since its launch in 2001, Stella McCartney has been committed to using sustainable materials in its products, refusing to use leather, fur, skins, feathers or animal glues. It continues to lead in this area, with garments made from planet-friendly alternatives such as grape-based leather substitutes in partnership with Veuve Clicquot. The vegan leather is manufactured from 80 per cent recycled materials. Chanel has increased its use of French-produced tweeds and Italian silks. In April 2025, after 50 years of working together with Italian silk manufacturer Mantero Setamarketing in Como, Italy, it acquired a 35 per cent stake in the company. Chanel president of fashion Bruno Pavlovsky said before the brand's Cruise 2025-26 show, 'I always say that Chanel is half French and half Italian.' Read more: Kicks by Kibo: The Hong Kong brand making sneakers using apple waste The Asian manufacturing renaissance While Western and European brands adapt, Asian manufacturing hubs have proven remarkably resilient. China's luxury goods production has evolved beyond simple contract manufacturing toward full-service partnerships that include design, materials sourcing and even marketing support. Vietnam has emerged as a particular beneficiary, with leather footwear production increasing by 31.8 per cent since 2025. Bangladesh, traditionally associated with fast fashion, has made surprising inroads into luxury accessories. It is actively promoting its leather, footwear, and leather goods sector internationally and is recognised as a competitive sourcing destination for global buyers. Read more: Ladies Who Lead: The fashion founders behind Jimmy Choo, Perfect Moment, Rejina Pyo, Saloni and Boyy share their advice for fledgling designers These countries have also strengthened regional trade relationships, creating alternative supply networks that reduce dependence on any single market. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) has facilitated smoother trade flows within Asia, allowing manufacturers to source materials regionally and maintain competitive pricing despite external tariff pressures. The rise of Asian luxury Above (Video: Shang Xia) Asian luxury brands themselves have turned trade tensions into competitive advantages. Chinese brands like Shang Xia (backed by Hermès) and Qeelin have emphasised their domestic heritage, appealing to both local pride and international curiosity about authentic Asian luxury. Japanese brands have been particularly strategic, leveraging their reputation for quality while maintaining manufacturing flexibility. Issey Miyake has expanded production capabilities in both Japan and selected Southeast Asian facilities, allowing the brand to serve different markets through optimal supply chain configurations. Read more: Chinese designer Yang Li is Shang Xia's new fashion director Strategic moves for luxury consumers Above Savvy luxury customers understand the industry shifts and are adjusting their purchasing decisions () For discerning buyers, understanding these industry shifts presents clear opportunities to maximise purchasing power while building more strategic collections. The most sophisticated consumers are already adjusting their approach to luxury acquisition. Savvy buyers are monitoring production cycles and tariff announcements to optimise purchase timing. Items manufactured before tariff implementations often remain at lower price points until inventory clears. Heritage pieces are also smart pieces to invest in. These items produced in the brands' traditional manufacturing bases are less susceptible to tariff-related price volatility. These pieces also tend to hold value better over time, making them superior long-term investments. As new luxury goods face pricing pressure from tariffs, pre-owned alternatives become comparatively more attractive, often offering items from periods when manufacturing costs were lower. Read more: The Tatler Guide to matching watches according to dress codes A new global fashion geography The long-term implications extend far beyond individual brand strategies. We're witnessing the emergence of a truly multipolar fashion industry, where production decisions are driven by sophisticated calculations that balance quality, cost, cultural authenticity and political stability. Smart luxury brands are treating this complexity as an opportunity rather than a burden. They're building supply chains that are not just efficient but also resilient, creative and aligned with evolving consumer values around transparency and sustainability. For investors and industry observers, the message is clear: the brands that will thrive in this new environment are those that view trade tensions not as obstacles to overcome, but as catalysts for innovation and differentiation. In an industry built on exclusivity and craftsmanship, the ability to tell compelling stories about provenance and production has become as valuable as the products themselves. The tariff era has fundamentally altered fashion's global calculus, but the industry's response suggests that adaptability remains its greatest luxury. Credits This article was created with the assistance of AI tools
Libyan Express
23-05-2025
- Libyan Express
Iran lacks clear fallback as nuclear talks with US falter
Iranian uranium enrichment continues together with US talks Iran's leadership has no clear backup plan if nuclear negotiations with the United States collapse, according to three Iranian sources, as rising tensions over Tehran's uranium enrichment programme threaten to derail diplomatic efforts. With talks stalling over conflicting positions, Iranian officials indicated the country may turn to China and Russia as a 'Plan B', but acknowledged this strategy appears uncertain given Beijing's trade disputes with Washington and Moscow's focus on Ukraine. 'The plan B is to continue the strategy before the start of talks. Iran will avoid escalating tensions, it is ready to defend itself,' a senior Iranian official said. 'The strategy also includes strengthening ties with allies like Russia and China.' Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Tuesday described US demands to halt uranium enrichment as 'excessive and outrageous', stating that the negotiations were unlikely to succeed. The fifth round of talks aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief will take place in Rome on Friday, Oman's foreign minister announced on Wednesday. After four previous rounds, significant obstacles remain. Tehran refuses to ship its highly enriched uranium stockpile abroad or discuss its ballistic missile programme, according to two Iranian officials and a European diplomat. The breakdown in trust stems partly from President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw from a 2015 nuclear accord with world powers, which has increased Iran's demands for guarantees that Washington will not abandon any future agreement. Iran's challenges have increased under Trump's renewed 'maximum pressure' campaign since February, which has tightened sanctions and included military threats. The country faces energy and water shortages, a declining currency, and concerns about potential Israeli attacks on its nuclear facilities. Demonstrations over social issues and economic difficulties in recent years have highlighted the Islamic Republic's sensitivity to public discontent, leading to government crackdowns and Western human rights sanctions. 'Without lifting sanctions to enable free oil sales and access to funds, Iran's economy cannot recover,' said a second Iranian official, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter. Even if uranium enrichment disputes are resolved, sanctions relief remains contentious. The US favours gradually phasing out nuclear-related sanctions, whilst Tehran demands immediate removal of all restrictions. Dozens of Iranian institutions, including the central bank and national oil company, have been sanctioned since 2018 for allegedly supporting terrorism or weapons proliferation. Wendy Sherman, the former US undersecretary for political affairs who led negotiations for the 2015 accord, said it was impossible to convince Tehran to 'dismantle its nuclear programme and give up their enrichment even though that would be ideal'. 'So that means they will come to an impasse, and that we will face the potential for war, which I don't think, quite frankly, President Trump looks forward to because he has campaigned as a peace president,' she said. China, Iran's primary oil buyer despite sanctions, has helped maintain economic stability, but Trump's pressure on Chinese trade entities threatens these exports. Analysts note that Beijing's support has limitations, as China seeks significant discounts for Iranian oil and may push for lower prices as global demand weakens. France, Britain and Germany have warned they would reimpose UN sanctions if no deal emerges quickly. Under the 2015 nuclear agreement's UN resolution, the three European nations have until October to trigger a 'snapback mechanism' before the resolution expires. According to diplomats and documents seen by Reuters, the European countries may act by August if no substantial progress is made. Diplomats suggest that reaching any agreement before then would require, at best, an initial political framework similar to 2013, allowing both sides to offer immediate concessions whilst negotiating details. 'There is no reason to think it will take less time than the 18 months in 2013 especially when the parameters and the geopolitical situation is more complicated now,' a senior European official said.
Libyan Express
23-05-2025
- Libyan Express
UK demands probe after diplomats hit by Israeli fire
BY Libyan Express May 23, 2025 - 06:42 Members of a diplomatic delegation from the European Union reacting after shots were fired as they gathered in Jenin camp Britain's Middle East minister has demanded a full investigation after British diplomats were caught in gunfire from Israeli soldiers during an incident in the occupied West Bank. Hamish Falconer said he had spoken directly to the diplomats affected by Wednesday's events in Jenin, describing the situation as 'unacceptable' in a statement posted on social media platform X. 'Today's events in Jenin are unacceptable. I have spoken to our diplomats who were affected,' Mr Falconer wrote. 'Civilians must always be protected, and diplomats allowed to do their jobs. There must be a full investigation and those responsible should be held accountable.' The minister did not provide details about the circumstances of the incident or specify how many British diplomatic personnel were involved. It remains unclear whether any diplomats were injured during the gunfire. The incident highlights ongoing tensions in the occupied West Bank, where Israeli military operations frequently take place in Palestinian towns and cities. Jenin has been a particular focal point of Israeli raids in recent months. Britain maintains diplomatic ties with both Israel and the Palestinian territories, with British officials regularly visiting the region as part of international efforts to monitor the situation and engage with local communities. The views expressed in Op-Ed pieces are those of the author and do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of Libyan Express. How to submit an Op-Ed: Libyan Express accepts opinion articles on a wide range of topics. Submissions may be sent to oped@ Please include 'Op-Ed' in the subject line.
