logo
See The 4 Books Scientific American Loved Reading In June

See The 4 Books Scientific American Loved Reading In June

In 2008 Ecuador startled the world. Articles 71 to 74 of the nation's then newly ratified constitution stated that nature had rights —rights to be respected for its existence and the crucial, life-giving services it provided and rights to be restored when damaged. Further, it asserted that the government could intervene when human activities might disrupt these inherent rights. In his latest book, Is a River Alive?, Macfarlane travels to three very different rivers (in Ecuador, India and Quebec) to examine the question of a river's sovereignty. He discovers that rivers create interconnected (and often fragile) worlds of plant and animal species—confirming they are life-giving wherever they run, as many Indigenous populations throughout the world have recognized for thousands of years. Now rivers are fighting for their lives as corporations, governments, pollution and climate change violate their vitalizing flow. 'Muscular, wilful, worshipped and mistreated, rivers have long existed in the threshold space between geology and theology,' Macfarlane writes. 'Rivers are—I have found—potent presences with which to imagine water differently. We will never think like a river, but perhaps we can think with them.' —
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CBS News reporter says he got ‘PTSD' from Trump assassination attempt because of crowd anger at media
CBS News reporter says he got ‘PTSD' from Trump assassination attempt because of crowd anger at media

New York Post

time17-07-2025

  • New York Post

CBS News reporter says he got ‘PTSD' from Trump assassination attempt because of crowd anger at media

Advertisement CBS News Capitol Hill correspondent Scott MacFarlane told podcaster Chuck Todd on Wednesday about how traumatized he was by Trump rallygoers blaming the media for the assassination attempt against President Donald Trump in 2024. Americans reeled in shock from the attempt on Trump's life during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, but MacFarlane said he had personal trauma from the crowd's immediate rage in response. 'For those of us there, it was such a horror because you saw an emerging America,' MacFarlane told Todd on his podcast. 'And it wasn't the shooting, Chuck. This was – I got diagnosed with PTSD within 48 hours. I got put on trauma leave, not because, I think, of the shooting, but because you saw it in the eyes, the reaction of the people.' 'They were coming for us,' he said in the clip flagged by The Daily Caller. 'If [Trump] didn't jump up with his fist, they were going to come kill us!' Advertisement 'I know,' Todd agreed. Later in the discussion, MacFarlane added that, 'Many of us on press row, as we talked about this on our text chains for weeks after, were quite confident we'd be dead if he didn't get back up.' 3 CBS News Capitol Hill correspondent Scott MacFarlane opened up about how traumatized he was by Trump rallygoers blaming the media for the assassination attempt against President Donald Trump in 2024. Youtube/ Chuck Todd Podcast 3 Donald Trump is seen with blood on his face surrounded by Secret Service agents as he is taken off the stage at a campaign event at Butler Farm Show Inc. in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, 2024. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 3 'For those of us there, it was such a horror because you saw an emerging America,' MacFarlane said. 'And it wasn't the shooting, Chuck. This was – I got diagnosed with PTSD within 48 hours. I got put on trauma leave, not because, I think, of the shooting, but because you saw it in the eyes, the reaction of the people.' Aristide Economopoulos While it wasn't everyone in the crowd, MacFarlane claimed that dozens of people turned on them and said, ''You did this. This is your fault. You caused this. You killed him,' and they were going to beat us with their hands. I mean, they were going to kill us. And respectfully, the Secret Service had bigger issues [than] protecting us. When he jumped up triumphantly, it saved us.' Nonetheless, he said, 'I can't eliminate from my mind's eye the look in their faces. That's what America is right now. It's not rational. It's an irrational thought to think the media shot somebody from the top of a building, but the lack of rationality is what connects January 6 to this.' 'How do we pull out of this as a country is the defining question of our time,' he said.

See The 4 Books Scientific American Loved Reading In June
See The 4 Books Scientific American Loved Reading In June

Scientific American

time01-07-2025

  • Scientific American

See The 4 Books Scientific American Loved Reading In June

In 2008 Ecuador startled the world. Articles 71 to 74 of the nation's then newly ratified constitution stated that nature had rights —rights to be respected for its existence and the crucial, life-giving services it provided and rights to be restored when damaged. Further, it asserted that the government could intervene when human activities might disrupt these inherent rights. In his latest book, Is a River Alive?, Macfarlane travels to three very different rivers (in Ecuador, India and Quebec) to examine the question of a river's sovereignty. He discovers that rivers create interconnected (and often fragile) worlds of plant and animal species—confirming they are life-giving wherever they run, as many Indigenous populations throughout the world have recognized for thousands of years. Now rivers are fighting for their lives as corporations, governments, pollution and climate change violate their vitalizing flow. 'Muscular, wilful, worshipped and mistreated, rivers have long existed in the threshold space between geology and theology,' Macfarlane writes. 'Rivers are—I have found—potent presences with which to imagine water differently. We will never think like a river, but perhaps we can think with them.' —

Anglican Diocese of N.S. and P.E.I. adopts pledge banning inappropriate use of NDAs
Anglican Diocese of N.S. and P.E.I. adopts pledge banning inappropriate use of NDAs

Hamilton Spectator

time25-05-2025

  • Hamilton Spectator

Anglican Diocese of N.S. and P.E.I. adopts pledge banning inappropriate use of NDAs

The head of a Canadian advocacy group says the Anglican Diocese of Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island's passing of a resolution not to misuse non-disclosure agreements marks an important step forward. Julie Macfarlane of Can't Buy My Silence Canada says a member of the diocese told her the membership unanimously passed a resolution to not use NDAs unless requested by a complainant in cases involving sexual harassment, misconduct or abuse, discrimination, retaliation or bullying. She says the resolution was passed Saturday during the diocese's weekend of meetings, which is called a synod. Macfarlane says the movement among Christian organizations to ban the inappropriate use of NDAs is particularly impactful given that non-disclosure agreements have been used to silence victims of abuse in the church. Macfarlane, who is a survivor of sexual abuse by an Anglican minister, says she hopes the regional Anglican diocese is the first of many religious organizations in Canada to commit to the non-disclosure agreement pledge. The diocese did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In a statement issued by Can't Buy My Silence on Friday, diocese member Cynthia Pilichos said she would be speaking in favour of adopting the ban on inappropriate NDA use at the synod because the pledge is in line with the organization's commitments to ensure justice, respect and dignity for all. This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 25, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store