logo
Belagavi City Corp (BCC) slaps Rs 7 crore penalty on firm over tax evasion

Belagavi City Corp (BCC) slaps Rs 7 crore penalty on firm over tax evasion

Time of India03-05-2025

Belagavi City Corporation (BCC) has imposed a hefty penalty of Rs 7,08,66,578 on Vega Funmobile Private Limited for alleged tax evasion and violations of building construction norms
BELAGAVI: Belagavi City Corporation (BCC) has levied a tax penalty of Rs 7,08,66,578 on Vega Funmobile Private Limited for alleged tax evasion and serious violations in building construction norms.
According to BCC sources, the penalty was imposed based on discrepancies between the actual built-up area and the area declared for property tax assessment, and also in view of the fact that it continued to pay taxes under the commercial slab though its operations fell under the industrial category .
The company reportedly admitted to the violations during proceedings, prompting action under Section 112(C) of the
Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act
, 1976.
Shubha B, the BCC commissioner, passed the order, following three hearings on Jan 31, April 15, and April 21, 2025.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
New Container Houses Egypt (Take A Look At The Prices)
Container House
Search Now
Undo
In keeping with the Municipal Act, the company must deposit 50% of the penalty amount before appealing to the BCC standing committee on taxation.
"The tax was calculated after deducting previously paid tax amounts," Shubha told TOI.
"The 24,000 sq ft structure is entirely unauthorised, constructed without a valid building permit. Despite this, the company has been paying tax since 2004, using the self-assessment scheme, which lacked verification," the officer said.
Shubha added that Vega Funmobile had entered a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with BEMCO Company for leasing the land in August 2002. Initially, in 2002-03, the company had paid taxes, declaring the land as vacant. Though building permission was granted in Dec 2003, there was no construction in 2004-05. Even then, building tax was paid under the commercial slab, even though the usage fell under the industrial category.
The commissioner initiated a detailed inquiry upon detecting these discrepancies.
Following the hearings, an order dated April 25 directed the company to remit the full tax and penalty amount to BCC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Fixing accountability, initiating projects to produce skilled workforce top priorities': Himachal Pradesh University V-C
‘Fixing accountability, initiating projects to produce skilled workforce top priorities': Himachal Pradesh University V-C

Indian Express

time11 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘Fixing accountability, initiating projects to produce skilled workforce top priorities': Himachal Pradesh University V-C

After being appointed as the Vice-Chancellor of Himachal Pradesh University on Monday, Prof. Mahavir Singh shared with The Indian Express that his top priorities would be establishing accountability and enhancing the standard of research. He also emphasised the need to create centres to produce skilled students, particularly in the field of Green Energy. Meanwhile, a regular Vice Chancellor of HPU Shimla was appointed after a gap of three years. Q: What are your priorities as the V-C? HPU is a prestigious institute, but our university lacks projects relevant to modern times. For instance, when the entire country, especially Himachal Pradesh, is talking about Green Energy, I feel HPU should have a separate wing to deliver skilled scholars in this field. Second, I believe the standard of research at the university should be improved. When I joined HPU as a faculty member, the standard of research at that time was quite higher than what we see today. Third, student exchange programmes are very important for their growth and the growth of the university. Q: HPU had no regular V-C for three years. Do you think this has hurt the university's progress? Besides communication gaps, there were certain shortcomings in day-to-day proceedings in the absence of a regular Vice-Chancellor. Also, the person with the additional V-C charge couldn't come to the university every day. Shortcomings include indiscipline on the part of students as well as faculty members. I will take feedback from every individual to help increase and fix accountability. There is no doubt that HPU staff and faculty members are very hardworking, but what they need is direction. Q: How are you going to address the financial crunch issue? In 2025-26, HPU had prepared an estimated budget of Rs 300 crore but received Rs 152 crore, the same amount it had in 2024-25. I have been a member of the HPU Executive Committee (EC) for a long time, so I understand this problem. Merely increasing the students' fees is not the solution. We have to develop means to generate revenue, like introducing professional courses. I have decided to take up the matter with Governor Shiv Pratap Shukla and Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu, because the past two to three financial years saw HPU receiving the same budget, approximately Rs 152 crore. The liabilities, particularly of pensioners, have been increasing every year. The university should be able to bear these liabilities. Q: Have you been expecting your selection as the V-C? I was among the top five shortlisted contenders. The search and screening committee interviewed me, too. I was hopeful that I would be selected for this responsibility.

Ola Electric Shares Dip 7% As 3.2% Stake Changes Hands Via Block Deal; Time To Sell?
Ola Electric Shares Dip 7% As 3.2% Stake Changes Hands Via Block Deal; Time To Sell?

News18

time13 minutes ago

  • News18

Ola Electric Shares Dip 7% As 3.2% Stake Changes Hands Via Block Deal; Time To Sell?

Last Updated: Shares of Ola Electric Mobility Ltd were under significant pressure in Tuesday's trading session, dropping as much as 7.04% Ola Electric Share Price: Shares of Ola Electric Mobility Ltd were under significant pressure in Tuesday's trading session, dropping as much as 7.04 per cent to a low of Rs 49.91. The stock was last seen 5.9 per cent lower at Rs 50.52, extending its six-month losses to 48.74 per cent. On the earnings front, the EV-focused company reported a consolidated net loss of Rs 870 crore for the January-March 2025 quarter (Q4 FY25), widening from Rs 416 crore in the same period last year. Revenue from operations plunged 59.48 per cent year-on-year (YoY) to Rs 611 crore, down from Rs 1,508 crore in the year-ago quarter. What Should Investors Do? Kotak Institutional Equities has maintained a 'Downgrade' rating on the stock, slashing its target price to Rs 30 per share. This suggests a potential downside of nearly 44 per cent from its previous close at Rs 53.24. The brokerage warned that Ola Electric is likely to continue facing EBITDA losses due to weakening brand equity and intensifying competition, as noted in a CNBC-TV18 report. It also flagged challenges in the company's entry into the motorcycle segment, citing execution and credibility concerns. Technical Indicators Show Mixed Signals Technically, Ola Electric's stock is currently trading below five of its eight key simple moving averages (SMAs) — including the 5-day, 10-day, 100-day, 150-day, and 200-day SMAs — pointing to bearish signals across various timeframes. However, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 57.7 indicates the stock is neither overbought nor oversold. Meanwhile, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) remains positive at 0.4, staying above the center and signal lines, which suggests some ongoing bullish momentum. For the full fiscal year 2024-25 (FY25), Ola Electric posted a net loss of Rs 2,276 crore, compared with Rs 1,584 crore in FY24. Revenue from operations also fell to Rs 4,514 crore, down from Rs 5,010 crore in FY24. The company said its gross margins improved by 38 per cent YoY in FY25, and in Q1 FY26, gross margins saw a 10 percentage point sequential improvement. Ola Electric aims to achieve profitability in the current fiscal year (FY26), focusing on revenue growth and operating leverage. 'FY26 will be focused on scaling revenue and operating leverage as the company marches towards sustainable profitability," it stated in a filing.

Court Rejects Patanjali Ayurved's Petition Against Rs 273.5 Crore GST Penalty
Court Rejects Patanjali Ayurved's Petition Against Rs 273.5 Crore GST Penalty

NDTV

time15 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Court Rejects Patanjali Ayurved's Petition Against Rs 273.5 Crore GST Penalty

Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has dismissed Patanjali Ayurved Limited's petition challenging Rs 273.50-crore goods and service tax (GST) penalty. A division bench comprising Justices Shekhar B Saraf and Justice Vipin Chandra Dixit rejected Patanjali's argument that such penalties constitute criminal liability and can be imposed only after a criminal trial. The bench was of the view that tax authorities can impose penalties under Section 122 of the GST Act through civil proceedings without requiring criminal court trials. The court clarified that GST penalty proceedings are civil in nature and can be adjudicated by proper officers. "After detailed analysis, it is clear that the proceeding under Section 122 of the CGST Act is to be adjudicated by the adjudicating officer and is not required to undergo prosecution," the bench said. Patanjali Ayurved operates three manufacturing units at Haridwar (Uttarakhand), Sonipat (Haryana) and Ahmednagar (Maharashtra). The company came under investigation following information received by authorities about suspicious transactions involving firms with high Input Tax Credit (ITC) utilisation but no income tax credentials. The investigation led to allegations that Patanjali "acting as a main person indulged in circular trading of tax invoices only on paper without actual supply of goods". The Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Ghaziabad issued a show cause notice on April 19, 2024 to Patanjali Ayurved, proposing a penalty of Rs 273.51 crore under Section 122(1), clauses (ii) and (vii) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017. Later, the DGGI dropped tax demands under Section 74 through an adjudication order dated January 10, 2025. The department found that "for all the commodities, the quantities sold were always more than the quantities purchased from the suppliers, thereby making the observation that all the ITC which was availed in the impugned goods was further passed on by the petitioner". Despite dropping the tax demand, authorities decided to continue with penalty proceedings under Section 122, prompting Patanjali to challenge this before the high court. After hearing both sides, the court in its judgment dated May 29 dismissed the petition.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store