
9 People Arrested, S$1.9M Seized in Police Operation Targeting Scam Activities in Singapore
Working together with local banks, ASC officials confiscated over S$1.9 million in alleged scam proceeds and frozen over 400 bank accounts throughout the operation.
At the same time, members of the Police Land Divisions' Scam Strike Teams conducted raids throughout Singapore to find people who might have given their bank accounts to scammers for money laundering purposes. A total number of 33 people are under investigation, and seven males and two women, ages 18 to 33, were taken into custody.
The police also shut down over 900 online enablers and terminated over 806 phone lines used in the scams by working closely with key industry players, including social media companies, messaging platforms, and telecommunications companies (for telco line reporting).
Forty-two people are thought to have been involved in over 200 scam cases, primarily including investment scams, government official impersonation scams, and employment scams.
The Singapore Police Force (SPF) said in a statement, "Investigations are ongoing into offences under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992, and Computer Misuse Act 1993."
"The offence of assisting another to retain benefits from criminal conduct in certain circumstances under Section 55A(1) of the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992 carries an imprisonment term of up to three years, a fine of up to $50,000, or both. For first-time offenders the offence of unauthorized access to computer material under Section 3(1) of the Computer Misuse Act 1993 carries an imprisonment term of up to two years, a fine of up to $5,000, or both," added the statement.
People who may be involved in scams are taken seriously by the police, and those who do so will face legal consequences. In order to avoid being an accomplice to criminal activities, members of the public are advised to reject requests by others to use their SingPass credentials, bank accounts or mobile lines as they will be held accountable for their misuse.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Jail for woman who extorted man after they exchanged sexual texts
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Student-care teacher Savanna Goh was sentenced to two years and six months' jail on Aug 14. SINGAPORE – A student-care teacher at a tuition centre exchanged sexual text messages with a man she met on an online dating platform, but then proceeded to extort him of $700. Savanna Goh told the victim, a 23-year-old full-time national serviceman (NSF), that her uncle was working for the Singapore Police Force (SPF) and that she would alert him about the 'uncomfortable' messages she had received if the NSF failed to hand her the amount. The victim, identified in court documents as V1, complied out of fear. However, this 'uncle' did not exist. The 24-year-old Singaporean woman was sentenced to two years and six months' jail on Aug 14 after she pleaded guilty to one count each of extortion, cheating and misusing a computer system. Deputy Public Prosecutor Sean Teh said: 'During investigations, the accused admitted that she came up with the idea to extort and cheat money from V1 on her own as she found him to be an easy target that would succumb to her threats easily.' The prosecutor told the court that V1 got to know Goh in April 2023, and she claimed to be a pre-school teacher. The pair later communicated with text messages and phone calls. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Jalan Bukit Merah fire: PMD battery could have started fatal blaze, says SCDF Singapore askST: What to do in the event of a fire at home? Singapore 4 housebreaking suspects taken to Bukit Timah crime scene under police escort Asia AirAsia flight from KL to Incheon lands at the wrong airport in South Korea Singapore Reformative training for teen who cheated man of $47k Rolex watch on former stepdad's instructions Opinion Could telco consolidation spell the end of attractive mobile plans? Asia Strong India-Singapore ties key to economic growth amid 'volatile landscape': DPM Gan Asia Citizenship for foreign talent: How this footballer from Brazil became Vietnam's favourite 'Son' During these conversations, they talked about sexual topics and flirted with each other. They also talked about meeting in person so that they could engage in sexual activities. In May 2023, Goh lied to V1, claiming that she needed money to pay hospital bills. She also told him that they could meet in person in return. Believing the offender, he transferred $430 to her on May 13 that year. The next day, Goh asked him for more money, and he transferred another $600. But after he did so, she told him that she was 'uncomfortable' with his text messages and threatened to tell her 'SPF uncle' about them. A fearful V1 then transferred $700 to Goh on May 16, 2023. However, she continued to threaten him and stated that he had to pay her $5,000 in compensation. She also said that if her demands were not met, she would inform the police about the messages so they wo uld press charges against him. DPP Teh said: 'The accused eventually told V1 that she would settle the matter for $2,500. V1 told her that he did not have the money to pay her. 'The accused threatened V1 that he could either compensate her privately or face up to a $100,000 fine or imprisonment following criminal prosecution... He later stopped responding after the accused demanded $500.' On June 1, 2023, Goh texted V1, claiming that she had some money to repay him. However, she also asked him for another $1,000 to purportedly activate her bank account. When V1 questioned her, she replied that he needed to transfer to her $950 instead. He complied and contacted his bank about the matter shortly after 11am that day. He was then advised to lodge a police report. He blocked Goh on messaging platform Telegram two days later, and she reached out to him on WhatsApp asking him to unblock her. When he refused, she created a fake Telegram account and pretended to be a police officer. She then used the account to reach out to V1. Among other things, Goh told him: 'I need you to do whatever she (asked) you to do, because this is a very serious offence and you can be charged and... imprisoned if you are reported. 'Please unblock her from WhatsApp and from phone calls. If not, I'll take serious action towards you.' V1 apologised to the 'police officer' and alerted the authorities at around 11.30am on June 3, 2023. In an unrelated case in September 2022, Goh saw a Telegram post by one ' Ange Emily' involving the purchase of bank accounts. Wanting to earn some cash, she sent Ange Emily a text message and decided to sell her bank account after she was promised $1,600 for it. Goh also shared with the unknown person her internet banking information. In the end, Ange Emily did not hand Goh any money, and instead blocked her on Telegram. Goh's bail has been set at $15,000, and she is expected to begin serving her sentence on Aug 18.


CNA
20 hours ago
- CNA
Inside the CPIB: Meet the officers on Singapore's frontline against corruption
SINGAPORE: What makes someone choose a career investigating corruption – often in silence, sometimes in secrecy? For officers at the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), it's a mix of conviction, resolve and the belief that integrity matters. When 29-year-old Farhan Azimi was studying criminology at a local university, one type of crime caught his attention during class: corruption. 'Corruption is often thought of as a victimless crime, because often there's no ideal victim and ideal perpetrator," he said. 'But I think that's incorrect.' Farhan believes that just because corruption doesn't align with traditional notions of crime, it doesn't mean there are no victims. That realisation inspired him to pursue a career combating it. When he saw an opening for an investigation officer at the CPIB, he applied. Now, two years into the role, he's investigating the very types of cases he once studied. For others, the path to CPIB was less direct. Mr Ashley Santa Maria joined the bureau five years ago after working in the accounting and finance sector, where he reviewed audit reports. Today, the 35-year-old leads an investigation branch within CPIB and finds purpose in untangling complex cases. "The complexity of corruption and white collar crimes was something that drew me to this job," he said. "Being on this job has certainly broadened my horizons, as we engage with people from different walks of life. "It also gives me the confidence to stand up for and do what is right." Mr Farhan and Mr Santa Maria are among the officers working quietly but tirelessly to root out corruption in Singapore. Established in 1952 by the British colonial government, CPIB operates under the Prime Minister's Office and is led by a director who reports directly to Prime Minister Lawrence Wong. The bureau has handled several high-profile cases in recent years, including investigations into former Transport Minister S Iswaran and property tycoon Ong Beng Seng – cases that garnered national attention and led to a 12-month prison sentence for Mr Iswaran. But what is the day-to-day reality for officers at CPIB? CNA spoke to several of them to better understand the nature of their work, the challenges they face and the values that guide them. WHAT IT'S LIKE ON THE JOB Unlike frontline law enforcement, CPIB's work often takes place out of sight – long hours poring over evidence, tracing financial transactions and conducting discreet interviews. Ms Ong Shen Yi joined CPIB three years ago after working in the real estate industry. What pushed her to make the leap? News reports of corruption cases. Like Mr Farhan, she was struck by how overlooked corruption can be compared with other "serious crimes". She shared the mixed emotions that come with working on a difficult case. "So what I do is really to stay focused, stay patient. Sometimes I will also seek my colleagues' help, and we can bounce ideas off each other, to see whether there's any solution to this particular case,' she said. Like Ms Ong, Mr Farhan acknowledges the challenges of building a strong case. "The nature of corruption cases means that it's hard to sometimes collect a good amount of evidence, or the types of evidence that we actually need, and a good case actually hinges on having the correct kind of evidence," he said. And no two days are ever the same. "Sometimes, you are talking to members of the public, sometimes you are talking to accused persons, and sometimes you are just spending a whole day just looking at what you've gathered so far ... it's very hard to say what an actual day is like," Mr Farhan added. For Mr Santa Maria, it all comes down to collaboration. "It takes a team to work together to solve a case, we cannot work in silos," he said. "There's always a learning value for each case, and there's always an aim to do better." THE HUMAN COST OF CORRUPTION Despite the low public profile of their work, the emotional weight can be significant. "It's gaining their trust that sometimes is a bit difficult, and knowing that they potentially may admit to an offence," said Mr Santa Maria. "How do you treat them, how do you see them? Because you are the first person that they are revealing their secrets to, so I think that's something we have to be mindful of and to approach them and treat them as a human being, and give them the respect that they are admitting and acknowledging what they are doing." Ms Ong said it can be emotionally difficult to see families affected by the actions of their loved ones. 'After putting in so much effort, after each case is solved, I think there would certainly be a sense of satisfaction,' she said. 'But at the same time, these people have families also, so sometimes their families can get affected, and that is the part where you feel a bit emotionally affected as well … after all, we are all human beings.' Still, she reminds herself to stay objective. 'You really need to focus on the facts and use the facts to actually solve the case, rather than emotions,' she said. Working at CPIB can involve long hours and unexpected developments. "There are definitely times with early mornings, late nights and times where we have to act immediately," said Ms Ong. "But that doesn't happen every time." Mr Farhan added: 'Generally, there's good work-life balance, and it's really just about time management.' Due to the confidential nature of their work, CPIB officers rarely discuss their work outside the office. Even so, family remains a strong pillar of support. "At the end of the day, I know that when I go home, my mum will cook meals for me, and my dad, he doesn't ask (about my job) but I know when I need him, he's there," said Ms Ong. And as for whether the lack of public recognition makes their work feel thankless, Mr Santa Maria doesn't dwell on it. "There's purpose in the work that we do," he said. "There's an expectation from the public as well as the organisation for us to do the right things, and that we shouldn't abuse that trust, and that's how we carry out our work and what helps us continue doing our work well." Why does CPIB report to the prime minister – and other questions CNA also spoke to CPIB's director of investigations, Mr Fong Wai Kit, to clarify common misconceptions and explain more about how the bureau operates. Why is the CPIB not under the police? A common misconception is that the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) falls under the Singapore Police Force or the Ministry of Home Affairs. Mr Fong clarified that this is not the case. 'CPIB is an independent anti-corruption agency in Singapore (and) we are the only agency in Singapore to investigate corruption offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act,' he said. Although CPIB is a government agency under the Prime Minister's Office, it operates independently. This ensures 'a very high level of autonomy and impartiality in our investigations', he added. What powers does CPIB have, and do officers wear uniforms? CPIB officers can arrest, conduct searches, seize evidence and interview suspects. They do not wear uniforms. In some cases, CPIB officers have made arrests while suspects were in the act of receiving bribes. One such case, tried in court in 2022, involved a resident technical officer from a private construction firm who accepted bribes from various subcontractors. He was working on a Housing Board Build-to-Order project and was arrested while receiving a bribe from a subcontractor. He was later sentenced to 20 months' imprisonment, and the bribe money was forfeited. How does a CPIB operation take place? According to Mr Fong, operations often begin with public complaints or leads developed through CPIB's own intelligence gathering. The bureau evaluates each complaint to determine whether further action is necessary. 'Once we assess a complaint as credible, we will register the complaint for formal investigation,' he said. 'In preparation for active open investigation, officers will formulate some plans, which may include how to proceed with the investigation, who are those people that are involved.' Investigations typically involve interviews, searches of premises and the seizure of evidence. 'Because our work is actually very specialised, our officers are highly trained, meticulous and have an eye for detail,' he said. While CPIB does not usually disclose operational details, an example surfaced in parliament in 2023 during discussions about the Ridout Road bungalow rentals. In that case, which concluded with no wrongdoing found, Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan described his experience with a CPIB interview: 'Let me assure all of you, it is a most uncomfortable, invasive, intrusive, thorough process; and I do not wish it upon any of you.' What happens when investigations are complete? Once an investigation is concluded, the CPIB submits its findings to the Attorney-General's Chambers. If there is sufficient evidence, the case proceeds to court. 'It can lead to fines, jail sentences and forfeiture of bribes, and hence, the receiver will not be able to enjoy the benefits from corruption,' Mr Fong said. Are there new trends in corruption that CPIB tracking? While cash remains the most common form of corrupt gratification, Mr Fong noted several emerging trends. One is the use of virtual currencies, which complicate financial tracing. In response, CPIB has developed procedures since 2018 for the seizure and handling of virtual assets, and officers have received relevant training. Another trend is the use of digital tools to obstruct investigations. Offenders are using various software applications to 'frustrate investigation work' said Mr Fong. To counter this, the digital forensics and intelligence technology branch ensures officers stay updated with the latest technology. Offenders are also increasingly using intermediaries to launder corrupt proceeds, making financial tracing more complex. To address this, CPIB continues to strengthen its officers' capabilities, especially in financial investigation. International corruption is also evolving. To keep pace, CPIB actively engages with overseas counterparts to enhance cooperation and deepen understanding of cross-border issues.


International Business Times
a day ago
- International Business Times
Singapore Police Arrest Teen for Alleged Loan Shark Harassment
An 18-year-old teenager was arrested for his suspected involvement in a case of loan shark harassment. The Singapore Police Force (SPF) said that they were informed about a case of loan shark harassment on Monday, August 11, at a residential unit along Haig Road at about 4.10 pm. The authority said that a debtor's note was placed on the gate. SPF said in a statement that the officers from Bedok Police Division established the identity of the teenager through ground enquiries and with the aid of images from police cameras they arrested him within two hours. "Preliminary investigations revealed that he is believed to be involved in other cases of loan shark harassment. One mobile phone, three bicycle locks and two debtor notes were seized as case exhibits," said the police. On Wednesday, August 13, the teen will face charges under the Moneylenders Act of 2008 in court. Loan shark harassment is punishable by a fine of S$5,000 to S$50,000, up to five years in jail, and up to six canings for first-time offenders.