ComCom Finds No Evidence Of Cartel Behaviour In Banks' Involvement In Net-Zero Banking Alliance
The banks involved are ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited (ANZ), ASB Bank Limited (ASB), Bank of New Zealand (BNZ), Rabobank New Zealand Limited (Rabobank), and Westpac New Zealand Limited (Westpac). These banks collectively account for around 97% of New Zealand's agricultural lending market.
Commerce Commission General Manager Competition, Fair Trading and Credit Vanessa Horne says the complaint, received last December, alleged the banks were coordinating their agricultural lending policies to align with Net-Zero Banking Alliance strategies and targets. It alleged that, in doing so, the banks were potentially acting anti-competitively, in breach of the Commerce Act.
The complaint also raised concerns that this alleged coordination could reduce farmers' access to capital, resulting in higher borrowing costs and stricter lending terms.
'We know New Zealanders are very focused on the work being done by the Commission (and others) to ensure banks are acting fairly - and farmers are no different,' says Ms Horne.
'If we see activity that falls foul of the laws we enforce, we will not hesitate to act. In this case, however, we thoroughly investigated the complaint and concluded that the banks had made their own, independent decisions. We found no evidence of unlawful coordination between the banks or with the Net-Zero Banking Alliance, either relating to the banks joining or in meeting their obligations under this alliance.'
On that basis, the Commission says, it will be taking no further action.
The Commission is keenly aware that, in many sectors, New Zealand businesses are working hard to develop and deliver sustainability initiatives together. New Zealand's competition laws can accommodate such collaboration - to help businesses, the Commission has developed Collaboration and Sustainability Guidelines that can be found on its website.
Background
The Net-Zero Banking Alliance
The Net-Zero Banking Alliance is a United Nations (UN) convened initiative, supporting banks to lead on climate mitigation in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement. It was co-launched on 21 April 2021 by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Financial Initiative and the Prince of Wales Sustainable Markets Initiative Financial Services Taskforce, with 43 initial banks as signatories.
Joining the Net-Zero Banking Alliance is entirely voluntary, and any signatory may join or withdraw at any time. Banks that choose to become signatories to this alliance make a public statement of an intention to align the greenhouse gas emissions from their lending and investment portfolios with net-zero pathways by 2050 or earlier.
The Net-Zero Banking Alliance does not prescribe targets that signatories should set. Instead, it provides signatories with a framework for target setting, resources, global expertise, and tools to help them individually assess the emissions within their portfolios and understand ways that the shift of capital towards low-carbon activity might be accelerated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Scrapped Surcharges A Win For New Zealanders
Hon Scott Simpson Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs Surcharges will be axed to put money back in Kiwis' pockets, says Commerce and Consumer AffairsMinisterScottSimpson. 'Surcharges are a hassle and an unwelcome surprise when shoppers get to the till. That pesky note or sticker on the payment machine will become a thing of the past. 'We're banning surcharges so consumers can shop with confidence knowing how much they will pay for their purchases. 'New Zealanders are paying up to $150 million in surcharges every year, including excessive surcharges of up to $65 million. That's money that could be saved or spent elsewhere. 'By May 2026 at the latest, we will ban surcharges for in-store payments. Shoppers will no longer be penalised for their choice of payment method, whether that's tapping, swiping or using their phone's digital wallet.' The ban follows the Commerce Commission decision to reduce interchange fees paid by businesses to accept Visa and Mastercard payments, a move to save businesses around $90 million a year. 'Surcharges cover the fees businesses pay for accepting contactless payments and credit cards, but we know these are often excessive. 'In some cases, the retailer doesn't even make it clear what the percentage is. 'A ban on surcharges means no more surprises for people who currently feel like they're being charged to use their own hard-earned money. It means they can make a purchase knowing exactly what they'll pay, and how they'll pay it.' Notes: The Retail Payment System (Ban on Surcharges) Amendment Bill is expected to be introduced by the end of this year. The ban will apply to most in-store payments made using domestic Mastercard, Visa debit, credit cards and EFTPOS. Transactions through the Visa and Mastercard networks and by EFTPOS are the main method of card payment in New Zealand. The Commerce Commission estimates New Zealanders pay about $150 million in surcharges annually including $45-$65 million in excessive surcharges. The Commerce Commission has already announced lower interchange fees paid by businesses to accept Visa and Mastercard payments. Interchange fees make up approximately 60% of merchant service fees. In the United Kingdom and across the European Union, surcharges for debit and credit cards for designated schemes are banned. Australia currently has surcharging on debit and credit cards, but this must be no more than the cost to retailers of accepting these cards. The Reserve Bank of Australia has recently proposed banning surcharges altogether for EFTPOS and Visa and Mastercard debit and credit cards.
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
Surcharge Ban Will Benefit Consumers, Retail NZ Says
Banning surcharges will improve the retail experience for customers but risks prices being increased to cover the costs of accepting credit card payments, Retail NZ says. 'Retail payments are a contentious and complex area for retail businesses. We are pleased the Government has listened to our calls for changes in the system, to enable retailers to provide better customer experiences,' Retail NZ Chief Executive Carolyn Young says. The changes will mean retailers cannot add surcharges to in-person domestic debit and credit cards. However, businesses will still be able to add surcharges to online sales, pre-paid and international credit cards. The changes are expected to come into force by May 2026 at the latest. Removing surcharges from in-store purchases is a positive move for domestic consumers, but the wider issue of pricing will need to be considered, Ms Young says. 'Retailers continue to face costs to accept debit and credit card payments and these costs will likely be added to product prices in future,' she says. The surcharge ban will likely see an accelerated decline in EFTPOS payments by consumers. EFTPOS payments do not incur any fees to retailers. As consumers change from using EFTPOS to contactless debit and credit cards, there will be a corresponding increase in the fees paid by retailers, so the benefits in the reduction of the interchange fee will be short-lived, especially for SMEs. A 2024 survey of Retail NZ members found that only 25.6% of respondents applied surcharges. Almost half of retailers calculated a rate that covered their costs, while 39% took advice from their terminal provider or relied on information from their bank statement. About 5% looked at what other retailers are charging. Members told us that the complexity of the Merchant Payment System prevented them from fully understanding the charges and fees they pay. These fees include interchange fees, scheme fees, switch fees, other external costs, internal costs and an acquirer margin. Considerable work will be needed to ensure that terminals have the ability to distinguish between domestic debit and credit cards, and commercial or international credit cards, and charge differential surcharge rates, Ms Young says. Retail NZ's position is that all cards should be treated equally. Retail NZ also wants certainty around the Commerce Commission's ability to monitor and enforce both the new interchange fees and the ban on surcharging. The Commerce Commission will need to ensure that the fees being charged to merchants reflect the new legislation, that the savings are passed on to retailers and that other fees are not increased. 'We will be seeking more detail on the surcharge changes, particularly around commercial credit cards which are not mentioned in today's announcement, and possible future changes to online transactions. We look forward to continuing to engage with the Government as it progresses these changes,' Ms Young says.
NZ Herald
6 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Nicola Willis criticised for cost of living ‘sermon' during post-Cabinet press conference
'Spending more, taxing and borrowing more as Labour and other parties advocate for, didn't work in the past and it won't work in the future,' Luxon said. Finance Minister Nicola Willis during the post-Cabinet Press conference at Parliament. Photo / Mark Mitchell 'The most important thing we can do to make you better off is to double down on our economic plan,' he said. Hipkins called Willis' and Luxon's address a 'sermon' that showed the pair was out of touch with the daily reality of New Zealanders. Although the party said they were going to get 'New Zealand back on track' as per their election campaign slogan, Hipkins claimed 'across the board, New Zealanders can see the country is going backwards.' 'Yet Christopher Luxon and Nicola Willis just say – 'oh, that's all part of the plan, we've got this' – they haven't got it. 'Things are getting worse for the vast majority of New Zealanders and no amount of spin from them is going to change the reality that things are getting worse for New Zealanders under their leadership. 'I think we should start calling them Fisher and Paykel because they've got more spin than a front load washing machine.' Tax relief was a major part of National's 2023 election campaign amid flaring inflation and a cost of living crisis. The party campaigned on a series of policies aimed at helping the 'squeezed middle', including adjusting tax rates, increasing tax credits and FamilyBoost. These policies came into effect in July last year. Willis said today the average household is $1,560 better off after the Government's tax relief package. 'We have also introduced FamilyBoost, which with the latest expansion gives families up to 40 per cent off their childcare costs. 'We have removed the Auckland fuel tax, introduced 12-month prescriptions, increased the rates rebate for 66,000 seniors and increased Working for Families payments.' Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon arriving for the post-Cabinet Press conference. Photo / Mark Mitchell Luxon stressed that a year and half into the term, he and his party were still fixated on improving the economy and the cost of living. Things were still tough for many families but the economy was 'expected to grow on average 2.7% per year creating 240,000 jobs over the next four years. 'In the short term we are pulling every lever we can to help Kiwi families with the cost of living.' The Government also announced the scrapping of surcharges at the till, such as when a customer uses PayWave or their mobile phone to make a payment. 'New Zealanders are paying up to $150 million in surcharges every year. That's money that could be saved or spent elsewhere.' Luxon also said the changes the Government were making to construction would help reduce costs for businesses and New Zealanders. Earlier in the day, Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden announced she would review safety rules for scaffolding, saying she had received many complaints from the construction industry that current regulations were too complex and expensive. Van Velden was light on the details of what specifically would be reviewed, but said officials would consult on proposed new rules that would give people a selection of safety options depending on how dangerous the job was. 'If it's not very risky, they will not need to use expensive scaffolding. 'For example, they will be considering whether a ladder could be used instead of scaffolding for a simple roof gutter repair or minor electrical maintenance when working at height.'
