Elmira man arrested after early-morning shooting
ELMIRA, N.Y. (WETM) — An Elmira man is facing charges related to an early-morning shooting that was reported through the City of Elmira's gunshot detection system.
Jaheim Brown, 23, was arrested following a police investigation into the shooting. According to the Elmira Police Department, officers went to Balsam Street near Broadway Street at 1:35 a.m. on March 15 after the city's Flock Raven acoustic gunshot detection system sent a notification about shots being fired to Chemung County's E911 Center. No one reported being hit by the shots.
Authorities say that police discovered that a vehicle was leaving the area at a high speed while officers were on the way to the area. An officer pulled the vehicle over near the intersection of Broadway Street and South Avenue, took the three people inside into custody, and called for assistance from the EPD Detective Bureau and the Gun Involved Violence Elimination Initiative Unit. Police reportedly found a defaced 9mm semi-automatic handgun that was loaded and spent shell casings, and they arrested Brown.
Brown was charged with second-degree criminal possession of a weapon (a class C felony) and third-degree criminal possession of a weapon (a class D felony). Brown is currently being held at the Chemung County Jail.
Anyone who may have witnessed the shooting or who has information is asked to call theElmira Police Department at 607-737-5626 or leave a message on the anonymous tip line at607-271-HALT.
The Chemung County Sheriff's Office and the New York State Police assisted the Elmira Police Department with the investigation.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Clergy join protesters to keep the peace after weekend's destruction
Priests, rabbis and other religious leaders took to the streets of Los Angeles on Monday to help keep the peace amid protests that spiraled into violence over the weekend. The protests against President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown intensified with the deployment of National Guard members, something local and state officials said has worsened, not improved, the situation. Additionally, hundreds of U.S. Marines are reportedly on the way to L.A. Waymo cars were torched, businesses were ransacked and numerous injuries were reported over the weekend's chaos. On Monday, however, protests were much more peaceful, and religious leaders — some of them partnered with the organization Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice — made a point to discourage violence by both police and protesters at the intersection of Alameda and Aliso streets in downtown Los Angeles. 'We're here to peacefully ask where the families are,' the Rev. Omega Burckhardt told KTLA's Kimberly Cheng. '¿Donde están los niños? Where are the people who've been detained? We're also here peacefully to support the right to protest, and we're here to help keep a peaceful presence for folks. We understand people are very angry and very upset, and we're here to provide a non-anxious presence.' Another religious leader directly spoke with police following what appeared to be one person's frustrations with officers. 'I was saying, 'Nobody needs to get shot today, nobody needs to get harmed today,'' the Rev. Eddie Anderson told Cheng. 'We can stand here and do our First Amendment right and nonviolently protest them ripping apart our families and taking away our loved ones. This is Black-brown solidarity and all religious faiths coming together. This is our Los Angeles and everyone deserves to be free in this city.' Police and Anderson appeared to come to a common understanding, as an officer thanked the minister for his assistance in keeping that agitated crowd member from trying to break through officers, while the minister thanked police for protecting protesters as part of their duties. 'We're not going to shoot anyone,' the officer affirmed. Anderson's colleagues added that their religious beliefs require them to stand up for immigrants and others targeted by the Trump administration. Rabbi Susan Goldberg said she was defending 'the deepest values of the Jewish community,' including 'compassion,' 'love' and 'care and support for the most vulnerable.' 'It's the most-repeated command inside our Torah to take care of the widow, the orphan and the stranger, and to treat them as family and to take care of them,' she said. Another clergy member, the Rev. Stephen 'Cue' Jn-Marie, continued to make a faith-based case for the protest, calling it 'a moral obligation' to stand against the immoral crackdown. 'In Scripture and in my faith tradition, it says the two greatest commandments are to love the Lord your God with all your heart and to love your neighbor as yourself,' he said. 'They can't be separated; you have to do them together … In order to love God, I have to love you first, because you're created in the image of God in my faith tradition.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
A Brown Student Went Full DOGE Over How His $93,000 Tuition Is Spent. The Fallout Was Predictable—and Wrong.
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. Brown University sophomore Alex Shieh had a good idea. Inspired by Elon Musk's efforts to reduce supposed staffing inefficiencies in the federal government, Shieh wondered if there were a way to quantify and combat an analogous trend at his university. So with the help of A.I. and a number of publicly available databases, he compiled a list of the university's nearly 4,000 non-faculty employees, grouped them by category, and mocked up working job descriptions for each. Then he wrote emails to all of them, asking them to describe their value to the university. Shieh hoped the project would be the basis for a reporting project that would anchor the first few issues of the Brown Spectator, a defunct conservative student newspaper he and two classmates hoped to relaunch. Shieh's project had the erstwhile DOGE chief's fingerprints all over it, but there's one big difference between the two men: Musk will be able to start drawing on Social Security (if, of course, it's still solvent) in under a decade, while Shieh can't yet legally drink. Shieh's idea, even if it did have roots in our raging national culture wars, was quite ambitious, strong work for a young man with less than half of a degree under his belt. The authorities at Brown, however, didn't see it that way. Upon getting wind of the provocative email blast, they launched a conduct-code investigation and accused Shieh and his partners of trademark violations. And although all charges were eventually dropped, the university's intent was clear: They came to bury Shieh, not to praise him. They couldn't have been more wrong to do so. And it's not just Republicans who think so. I've been teaching sophomores for over a decade and a half, and while Shieh's project is certainly undergraduate work, it's of a particularly high caliber. It is timely, relevant, and enterprising, and it asks a pressing research question. Brown shouldn't have met him with disciplinary threats. Instead, the university should have offered him the best resources an elite institution can provide: academic mentorship and access to top-flight faculty research. If I'd had the opportunity to work with Mr. Shieh, I would have begun by praising him for identifying and focusing on a pressing problem for American higher education in a time of rising tuition costs: administrative bloat. According to a report by the Progressive Policy Institute's Paul Weinstein Jr., non-faculty hiring has exploded over the past 50 years, and today, at the nation's top 50 universities, there is on average 1 non-faculty employee for every 4 students. This trend is particularly acute at Brown, where the ratio nears 1 to 3. But then I would challenge this student to reconsider his methodology—and to research whether Musk's approach is advisable. I would remind him that Musk's efforts to trim the fat at Twitter probably contributed to a giant drop in that company's valuation. And I would add that some experts believe that DOGE's cuts to the federal workforce may actually end up costing taxpayers money. (I would also admit that either initiative might bear fruit in the longer term.) I would then leverage the interdisciplinary connections available at a large research institution, sending Shieh to colleagues in the business school to learn about other approaches to considering and enacting substantial layoffs. If Shieh and his partners persisted, I would have sent them to professors in sociology and communications to figure out best practices for designing a survey that didn't inspire one recipient to respond, 'Fuck off.' (His email, which only garnered 20 responses, allegedly included the too-pert question 'What do you do all day?') If he wanted, in good faith, to get results, he should have recognized that he was operating inside a highly polarized, charged environment, sending a survey to adults who pay their bills with these jobs, and modulated his approach accordingly—something the university's many experts in rhetoric could have helped him see. As a onetime writing instructor, I would also advise him that it is misleading to refer to that profane recipient as an 'administrator [at] Brown' in Congressional testimony, when he is really a relatively low-level functionary in the events planning office. And by the way, I would have done all these things not because I agree with Shieh. Indeed, I don't think I do. Rather, I would have supported him because he had a serious academic question and the drive to think it through as part of an ambitious, time-intensive project. The fact that Brown University responded so aggressively only lends ammunition to those on the right who believe—often correctly—that American academia is hostile to conservative viewpoints. (This despite the fact that, as Shieh himself said, 'It's not inherently conservative to want to make education more affordable.') Now, perhaps Brown would have done some of these things had they been given ample notice of Shieh's plans, or if Shieh had registered the Spectator with the university in advance. As it was, it seems they were blindsided, and ended up reacting, rather than acting. So now, instead of boasting about high-profile conservative-leaning student research, they're trying to put out a political firestorm and opening themselves to attack at a moment when Elon Musk's old boss is gunning for the Ivy Leagues.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Berkeley man charged with 24-year-old woman's shooting death
ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Mo. – A Berkeley man is in custody for allegedly shooting and killing a woman he was dating. According to Mary Schmitt, a St. Louis County Police Department spokeswoman, the shooting happened shortly before 12:30 a.m. on June 3 in the 4600 block of Wallington Court, in the Norwood Court municipality. Police said officers found evidence of a shooting and later learned the victim, D'Asja Barrow-Foote, had been taken to the hospital. Barrow-Foote was pronounced dead at the hospital a short time after her arrival. She was 24. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Investigators with the county's Bureau of Crimes Against Persons learned a gray Nissan Altima fled the scene just after the shooting. Police said the car belonged to Antonio M. Brown, 36, who had a relationship with Barrow-Foote. On Friday, June 6, the St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney's Office charged Brown with second-degree murder, armed criminal action, and unlawful possession of a firearm. Brown remains jailed on a $300,000 cash-only bond. He's due in court on June 16 for a bond reduction hearing and again on July 8 for a preliminary hearing. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
