
Maharashtra language panel opposes early Hindi push, urges CM Devendra Fadnavis to roll it back
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
With the opposition against the "imposition" of Hindi gaining momentum in Maharashtra, a government-appointed advisory committee has urged Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to roll back the decision to introduce the language in primary classes.The Language Advisory Committee, which makes recommendations to the government on matters related to the Marathi language, passed a resolution on Friday demanding that no third language, including Hindi, be taught before Class 5.The resolution was passed during a meeting held in Pune, attended by 20 out of 27 committee members. Kiran Kulkarni, secretary of the Marathi language department, was also present during the meeting.A language row has erupted in Maharashtra after the state government recently issued an amended order stating that Hindi will "generally" be taught as a third language to students from Classes 1 to 5 in Marathi and English medium schools.According to the order, if 20 students per grade in a school wish to study any other Indian language, they can opt out of Hindi. If such a demand arises, either a teacher will be appointed, or the language will be taught online.Speaking to reporters, the committee's chairman, Laxmikant Deshmukh, said that it was the first time a government-backed body has taken such a stand against a government decision."We are not against Hindi or any other language, but imposing it in early schooling is neither educationally sound nor culturally appropriate. Language learning in the early years must focus on the mother tongue for strong foundational skills," he said.Deshmukh said the committee had previously flagged concerns after the government's decision to make Hindi a part of the primary school curriculum, but its objections were brushed aside."The government attempted to bypass this by presenting misleading interpretations. We want the government resolution on this matter to be cancelled outright," he said.Committee members, including renowned language expert Prakash Parab and senior Marathi writer Shripad Bhalchandra Joshi, raised the issue during the meeting and received unanimous support.Joshi, a scholar and educationist, warned of consequences."English was introduced as a compulsory subject for primary classes in Marathi-medium schools in 1999. It is worth noting that Marathi was made compulsory in English-medium schools seven years later, and as a result, children could not learn either language properly. Now, by adding Hindi or any other third language early on, children's linguistic abilities will only weaken," he said.He claimed the move was a systematic attempt to dilute Maharashtra's intellectual strength.The main functions of the committee are to advise the government on the development and preservation of the Marathi language, and this includes preparing new dictionaries, selecting standardised words, setting guidelines for the use of the language and determining policies, among other things.The committee's resolution also states that the idea of introducing a third language should only be considered after Class 5, and even then, it should remain optional."As an advisory committee, we strongly recommend that the government avoid introducing a third language in primary schools," Deshmukh said.Doing so could negatively affect students' psychological development and undermine the cultural identity of the state, he said, adding that the committee has also decided to participate in the Shiv Sena (UBT)-MNS morcha on July 5.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Perpetrator of terrorism cannot be equated with victim of cross-border terrorism: Govt tells RS
New Delhi, The Indian government has made it clear that Pakistan, the perpetrator of terrorism, "cannot be equated" with India, the victim of cross-border terrorism, the Centre told Parliament on Thursday. Perpetrator of terrorism cannot be equated with victim of cross-border terrorism: Govt tells RS Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh said this in a written response to queries in the Rajya Sabha. The Ministry of External Affairs was asked how the government has countered claims of "India-Pakistan hyphenation in global diplomacy" and the diplomatic measures taken by the government to address "China's growing influence over Pakistan" in terms of intelligence and military cooperation. "The government of India has made it clear that the perpetrator of terrorism, i.e., Pakistan, cannot be equated with the victim of cross-border terrorism, i.e., India. This unequivocal message was consistently reiterated during interactions with interlocutors in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor," Singh said. The seven all-party delegations, which visited various global capitals in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, also "emphatically conveyed" the above message while demonstrating India's strong national consensus and resolute approach to combating terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, the MoS said. "The issue of terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, including cross-border terrorism, was taken up with the Chinese Foreign Minister during his recent visit to India," he added. The MEA was also asked how the government plans to strengthen India's foreign policy narrative in 2025-2026. "The global community widely acknowledges India's robust democracy, economic progress, military might, technological prowess, civilisational heritage, and its contribution in addressing global issues," Singh said. The government's engagement with various stakeholders, including think-tanks and academic and research institutions, serves to highlight India's foreign policy achievements and priorities, he said. "Government undertakes a series of targeted public diplomacy initiatives to carry forward India's message to the world and continues to make all endeavours to further strengthen India's voice in global affairs. "It also constantly monitors all developments having a bearing on India's security and national interest and takes all required steps in this regard," Singh said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Dream11, MPL, other fantasy apps face uncertain future as Online Gaming Bill clears Parliament
The Rajya Sabha on Thursday cleared the Online Gaming Bill, 2025, outlawing money-based fantasy apps, poker, rummy and other games, dealing a heavy blow to India's $3.8 billion gaming industry. Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 prohibits 'harmful' real-money gaming services, along with related advertisements and financial transactions, with the government citing risks of psychological distress and financial loss. (Pic for representational purpose only) The bill prohibits 'harmful' real-money gaming services, along with related advertisements and financial transactions, with the government citing risks of psychological distress and financial loss. While it is not immediately clear which apps will be directly impacted, the move poses a threat to India's gaming industry, one that has attracted global investors and nurtured homegrown fantasy platforms such as Dream11, Games24x7 and Mobile Premier League, Bloomberg reported. The Online Gaming Bill was passed in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday without a debate as Opposition members raised slogans demanding a discussion on the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar by the Election Commission. An online money game is one in which a user deposits money in the expectation of winning monetary and other enrichment. Endorsements by top cricketers and film stars have incited interest in real money gaming apps such as fantasy sports betting games offered by Dream11, Games24X7, and Mobile Premier League. There is a realisation that online gaming has become a major problem for society, PTI quoted a senior official as saying, adding that the government has decided to keep the welfare of people above revenue loss from its ban. Indian apps which are expected to be impacted by Online Gaming Bill 2025 Dream11: Dream11 commands a valuation of $8 billion. In fantasy cricket games on Dream11, users create their teams by paying as little as ₹8 (10 US cents), with a total prize pool of 1.2 million Indian rupees ($14,000). The app becomes more popular during the Indian Premier League season. Mobile Premier League: MPL is valued at $2.5 billion, PitchBook data shows. Other apps likely to be impacted My11Circle Howzat SG11 Fantasy WinZO Games24x7 (parent of My11Circle and RummyCircle) Junglee Games (covers Rummy & Poker) PokerBaazi GamesKraft (also known as RummyCulture) Nazara Technologies (investor in PokerBaazi, though its direct RMG revenue is minimal) Bloomberg News reported that Dream11 and Mobile Premier League declined a request to comment. Why did government bring the bill? Union minister of electronics and information technology Ashwini Vaishnaw told PTI that online money gaming has become a serious social and public health issue, with a proven significant negative impact on society. "Our endeavour is to promote eSports and social gaming, online social gaming, and we would like India to become a game-making hub. For that, a lot of efforts are already being made," he said. The minister said, so far, as digital technologies go, online gaming has emerged as a 'major secto' with three main segments. "Two segments, eSports and online social gaming, are good for society. We are promoting two out of three segments... These two will get legal recognition and they will be promoted. And this bill will create an authority which basically creates programs and schemes which promote eSports and online social gaming," Vaishnaw said. The third segment, online money gaming, is causing harm to the society, he said, adding that this has emerged as a major social and public health problem. There is a realisation that online gaming has become a major problem for society, PTI quoted a senior official as saying. The official added that the government has decided to keep the welfare of people above revenue loss from its ban. Is it punishable under the new law? Yes. With the nod from both houses of Parliament, offering or facilitating online money gaming will now be punishable by imprisonment of up to three years and/or a fine of up to ₹1 crore. The bill also seeks to prohibit advertisements related to online money games and bars banks and financial institutions from transferring funds for any of such games. Advertising of money games can attract imprisonment up to two years and/or fine up to ₹50 lakh. Facilitating financial transactions related to money games can lead to imprisonment up to three years and/or fine up to ₹1 crore. Repeat offences attract enhanced penalties, including 3-5 years' imprisonment and fines up to ₹2 crore. Offences under key sections are sought to be made cognizable and non-bailable. (With inputs from Reuters, Bloomberg and PTI)


Business Standard
14 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Asia Cup fixture with Pak to go as scheduled, ban on bilateral events stays
Indian government will not stop its cricket team from facing Pakistan in the upcoming Asia Cup 2025 next month. However, the government has reiterated its ban on bilateral sporting contests with the neighbouring country. The Sports Ministry, while announcing a revised policy on Thursday, said India's engagements in multilateral competitions will continue unaffected, but bilateral tours and series remain off the table. Officials explained that India's approach to sporting ties with Pakistan mirrors its broader diplomatic stance, emphasising that while the Olympic Charter requires participation in global and regional events, New Delhi will not host or travel to Pakistan for direct encounters. The clarity ends weeks of speculation about whether the Asia Cup fixture would be jeopardised by political considerations. Why the Asia Cup fixture was in question The fate of India's clash with Pakistan at the Asia Cup had been a matter of uncertainty ever since deliberations began on the government's new sports policy. Cricket encounters between the two sides attract some of the highest viewership worldwide but are also weighed down by political sensitivities. With the tournament drawing near, doubts persisted over whether India would permit its team to take the field against Pakistan after the Pahalgam terror attack earlier this year. Sources in the ministry clarified that while bilateral matches remain suspended, multilateral tournaments such as the Asia Cup, the World Cup and ICC events fall under a different category and will not be disrupted. India's ban on bilateral events with Pakistan According to the new guidelines, Indian teams will not participate in bilateral matches hosted in Pakistan, nor will Pakistani teams be allowed to tour India for similar contests. Officials noted that this stance reflects the government's broader policy of limiting direct sporting exchanges. The ministry pointed out that this has been the practice for several years, with the last full bilateral cricket series between the two countries played in 2012-13. Since then, interactions have been restricted to global tournaments, and the latest directive reaffirms that this position remains unchanged. The World Championship of Legends controversy The notion against India playing Pakistan in Asia Cup 2025 was fanned further when the Indian team of former cricketers, playing in the World Championship of Legends event in England earlier, refused to play Pakistan—first in the league stages and then in the semifinal—resulting in their elimination. Fans questioned whether it is acceptable for the national team to play the neighbours in the Asia Cup despite the ongoing geopolitical tensions with Pakistan. Government's take The Sports Ministry said that India's participation in multilateral competitions reflects its adherence to the Olympic Charter and international commitments. A senior source said the government would not stop athletes from fulfilling these obligations, as global and regional tournaments are beyond bilateral considerations. At the same time, officials stressed that Pakistan would not be permitted to host or participate in bilateral fixtures involving India on Indian soil. Bigger picture This dual-track approach underscores India's strategy of maintaining its sporting obligations without normalising bilateral exchanges. By separating multilateral tournaments from direct contests, the government seeks to balance international expectations with national policy. For fans, the reassurance means that high-profile encounters, such as the Asia Cup match, will go ahead as planned, though the larger freeze in bilateral ties remains firmly in place.