logo
Democrats and Republicans take on soda, but they're using different tactics

Democrats and Republicans take on soda, but they're using different tactics

Yahoo07-03-2025

Soda is displayed in a grocery store. Lawmakers in Maryland are considering a new tax on sugary drinks like soda. (Bryan P. Sears/Maryland Matters)
Maryland lawmakers may impose the nation's first dedicated statewide tax on soda and other sugary beverages — joining cities including Philadelphia, Seattle and Boulder, Colorado, that have created similar taxes.
Advocates say the proposed Maryland legislation would raise much-needed state revenue and incentivize people to avoid sugary beverages that are linked to health problems such as diabetes, obesity and heart disease.
'We can promote healthier choices, and we can generate revenue to support essential programs that benefit all Maryland residents, especially those in underserved communities,' the bill's co-sponsor, Democratic state Del. Emily Shetty, said during a hearing Thursday.
But the proposal drew strong pushback from the soda industry and retailers.
Nebraska lawmakers also are considering raising taxes on soft drinks. The proposals come at a time when GOP lawmakers nationwide are lining up to advance the 'Make America Healthy Again' agenda promoted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the new U.S. health secretary. As part of that broader movement, red states have aimed to remove fluoride from public water sources, roll back vaccination requirements and regulate candy and soda purchases in social welfare programs.
GOP lawmakers in several states have introduced bills asking the federal government to allow them to remove candy and soda from the list of eligible products that can be purchased with food stamps, officially known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
State lawmakers embrace RFK Jr.'s health policies
Like many other states, Maryland is facing a gaping budget hole: Lawmakers are grappling with a $3 billion projected budget deficit. Leaders fear that gap could further widen with declining federal aid.
The Maryland bill proposes a 2-cent-per-ounce tax on distributors of sugary beverages, syrups and powders. It would include sports drinks, diet sodas and other beverages with added sugars or sweeteners. The bill would exempt natural fruit juice, natural vegetable juice, milk, infant formula and water that is not flavored with sugar or sweeteners such as aspartame.
The Maryland bill is projected to raise nearly half a billion dollars per year. It would earmark $189 million for free breakfast and lunch programs, $50 million for child care subsidies and the remaining revenue to Maryland's general fund.
Shetty acknowledged the bill could be viewed as regressive because groceries represent a larger share of budgets for families with lower incomes.
'That's a fact. But what is also a fact is if you don't purchase these products, you won't pay this tax,' she said during the hearing. 'Consumers will make healthier choices when treats cost more than their budget allows.'
Health experts testified for the measure. But the bill faces staunch opposition from Maryland's soda industry, along with retailers such as grocers and convenience stores. During Thursday's hearing, some Republican lawmakers expressed concerns about increasing costs on consumers and warned that the bill could push residents to buy groceries in neighboring Delaware, Pennsylvania and Virginia.
Opponents characterized the bill as an anti-business move that would push employers to cut staff or leave the state.
If you don't purchase these products, you won't pay this tax. Consumers will make healthier choices when treats cost more than their budget allows.
– Maryland state Del. Emily Shetty, a Democrat
The bill would tax distributors, leaving it up to those companies to decide how much of the cost to pass on to customers. But Marshall Klein, who operates a chain of grocery stores in and around Baltimore, said the measure would pinch retailers and consumers alike.
He said a $2.99 gallon of iced tea could leap to $5.50 a gallon, if distributors passed along the entire cost to consumers.
Some supporters argued the bill would specifically help Black and brown communities and low-income households, whom they say beverage companies target with their marketing of sugary drinks. But Klein, who said he runs two stores in urban food desserts, said raising the costs of products like soda will cut into family grocery budgets, making it harder to pay for healthy foods.
'This is a tax on people that don't have any other options,' he said. 'This is a group of progressive legislators trying to get a revenue option and tell people what they should and what they shouldn't drink and how they should and how they shouldn't live.'
The Maryland bill has not been scheduled for a committee vote yet.
Cutting services or raising taxes: State lawmakers weigh how to fill big budget gaps
Lawmakers in Nebraska are also targeting sugary beverages as a potential revenue source.
Facing a budget hole of at least $100 million over two years, Republican Gov. Jim Pillen proposed new taxes on soft drinks, candy, certain nicotine products and cryptocurrency mining facilities.
State Sen. Tom Brandt, a Republican, told Stateline the budget hole has made lawmakers 'much more receptive than other years' to his idea to impose sales tax on products such as soda.
He proposed legislation to remove sales tax exemptions for candy and soft drinks, part of his wider effort to revisit the state's dozens of sales tax exemptions.
Brandt, who expects the bill to raise $50 million per year, said he's approaching it from a revenue standpoint, but acknowledged the health issues.
He said colleagues representing urban parts of Nebraska raised concerns about the bill because many residents rely on places such as convenience stores for food purchases.
'And my counterargument to that is they're paying $3 for a bottle of pop,' he said. 'They can pay 15 cents for tax.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Steak 'n Shake product on the way. What to know about the MAHA-approved item
New Steak 'n Shake product on the way. What to know about the MAHA-approved item

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

New Steak 'n Shake product on the way. What to know about the MAHA-approved item

After being lauded by the Trump administration's health movement for its transition away from vegetable oils and using beef tallow to cook its signature shoestring fries, Steak 'n Shake will sell tallow directly to customers. The Indianapolis-based fast-food chain said its restaurants will start selling grass-fed beef tallow later this month. The chain began cooking its fries in tallow at all of its restaurants earlier this year; but the potatoes are pre-fried in seed oils. "Buy our 100% Grass-Fed Beef Tallow for your home cooking at any Steak n Shake starting June 23. MAHA!' the chain announced on social media. The posts included an image of a 14-ounce jar. Steak 'n Shake, a subsidiary of San Antonio, Texas-based Biglari Holdings, has about 400 locations nationwide. Although the jars will be sold in the restaurants, other Steak 'n Shake-branded products, including chili made by Pinnacle Foods Group and frozen burgers distributed by AdvancePierre Foods, are sold in grocery stores. Beef tallow is rendered beef fat, sometimes called beef drippings. Like other solid cooking fats such as butter and coconut oil, beef tallow is made up primarily of saturated fat, including stearic acid, which appears not to raise cholesterol in the same way as other saturated fats, according to Mayo Clinic. Tallow also contains monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, which are considered healthier, as well as fat-soluble vitamins that are vital for various bodily functions, including immune support, bone health, cellular function and skin health. Steak 'n Shake announced in January that by the end of February, all locations would end the use of vegetable oil and switch to 100% all-natural beef tallow for its fries, onion rings and chicken tenders. Operations chief Daniels told Fox the company had been considering the move for a while, a directive of owner Sardar Biglari, who as a boy, was impressed with fries he tasted in Belgium that were cooked in beef tallow. 'We wanted to switch years ago but couldn't get a chemical-free, additive-free, all-natural pure beef tallow,' Daniels said. 'He tells me we have to do beef tallow, but we have to do it all-natural and no additives and no preservatives. And we found a supplier who could finally do it for us.' 'We've RFK'd our fries.' Steak 'n Shake touts beef tallow fries: Early MAHA supporters question chain's process The move was praised by U.S. health czar Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose 'Make America Healthy Again' agenda the brand supports. The U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services even did a Fox News Channel interview at a Florida Steak 'n Shake, commending the chain. 'Steak and Shake has been great. We're very grateful to them for RFKing the french fries,' Kennedy said. "They turned me into a verb." Kennedy wants fast food companies to use beef tallow for frying instead of seed oils, like soybean and canola oil, which he has called 'one of the most unhealthy ingredients that we have in foods.' The chain later said that while it is committed to removing seed oils from its restaurants, its suppliers pre-fry fries, onion rings and chicken tenders in seed oils before freezing them and shipping them to the shops. Indy Steak 'n Shake $1M renovation: What's new at the downtown restaurant Republican politicians and high-profile MAGA and MAHA boosters responded positively to Steak 'n Shake's blatant appeal on social media to Kennedy and others tied to the Trump administration. The chain's postings included a red hat with yellow letters saying 'Make Frying Oil Tallow Again,' nodding to the Kennedy-led agenda, and posting images of the health secretary. A version of the hat is available on the Kennedy's MAHA merchandise website. The chain's social media accounts also made overtures to Tesla and its CEO, Elon Musk, who President Donald Trump tapped to lead an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. Contact IndyStar reporter Cheryl V. Jackson at or 317-444-6264. Follow her on or Bluesky: @ This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Steak 'n Shake's newest product. What to know about the MAHA favorite

Trump is trying to kill the US climate effort. It was already in trouble.
Trump is trying to kill the US climate effort. It was already in trouble.

E&E News

time13 minutes ago

  • E&E News

Trump is trying to kill the US climate effort. It was already in trouble.

President Donald Trump's latest climate rollback makes it all but official: The United States is giving up on trying to stop the planet's warming. In some ways, the effort has barely started. More than 15 years after federal regulators officially recognized that greenhouse gas pollution threatens 'current and future generations,' their most ambitious efforts to defuse that threat have been blocked in the courts and by Trump's rule-slicing buzzsaw. Wednesday's action by the Environmental Protection Agency would extend that streak by wiping out a Biden-era regulation on power plants — leaving the nation's second-largest source of climate pollution unshackled until at least the early 2030s. Rules aimed at lessening climate pollution from transportation, the nation's No. 1 source, are also on the Trump hit list. Advertisement Meanwhile, the GOP megabill lumbering through the Senate would dismember former President Joe Biden's other huge climate initiative, the 2022 law that sought to use hundreds of billions of dollars in tax breaks and other incentives to encourage consumers and businesses to switch to carbon-free energy. At the same time, Trump's appointees have spent months shutting down climate programs, firing their workers and gutting research into the problem, while making it harder for states such as California to tackle the issue on their own.

Sen. Joni Ernst pushes to ban taxpayer-funded union time in One Big Beautiful Bill Act
Sen. Joni Ernst pushes to ban taxpayer-funded union time in One Big Beautiful Bill Act

New York Post

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Sen. Joni Ernst pushes to ban taxpayer-funded union time in One Big Beautiful Bill Act

Sen. Joni Ernst wants to tweak the House-passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act to eliminate the longstanding practice of taxpayer-funded union time. Approximately $160 million of your money went toward fed workers' union time as of 2019, the last time such data was available, and Ernst (R-Iowa) has been on a quest for more recent information. Her legislation, dubbed the 'Protecting Taxpayers' Wallet Act,' would compel government unions to reimburse taxpayers for all of their taxpayer-backed activities. Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) has championed the measure in the House. 'Bureaucrats should be serving the American people, not themselves,' Ernst said in a statement. 'Taxpayer-funded union time is a completely backwards and bonkers policy that gives handouts to union bosses and puts taxpayers last. 3 Sen. Joni Ernst has long been a critic of taxpayer funded union time. AP 3 Federal labor unions have been critical of the Trump administration's efforts to slash government bloat. Zach D Roberts/NurPhoto/Shutterstock 'I worked with the Trump administration to get federal employees back to work and now is the time to force the deep-pocketed unions to foot their own bill.' Taxpayer-funded union time refers to activities including union-sponsored training events, preparations for collective bargaining, labor meetings, and work on behalf of those facing disciplinary action. By law, federal unions can't negotiate with the government over benefits or pay. 'They're left negotiating for tedious things that are of zero or negative benefit to taxpayers,' Rachel Greszler, a senior research fellow on workforce and public finance at the Heritage Foundation, previously explained to The Post. 'This includes things like the height of cubicle panels, securing designated smoking areas on otherwise smoke-free campuses, and the right to wear Spandex at work.' The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which cleared the House last month, is now working its way through the Senate, where Republicans in that chamber are hoping to make modifications. After it clears the Senate, the megabill will head to the House for another vote and then to President Trump's desk for his signature. GOP leaders are hoping to get it over the finish line by the Fourth of July. 3 There was an estimated $160 million spent on taxpayer funded union time in 2019, the last time comprehensive data was collected. Zach D Roberts/NurPhoto/Shutterstock With the GOP holding narrow majorities in both houses, senators have significant leverage and are hoping to use it to make adjustments to the megabill. Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) have signaled they may push for changes to the megabill's Medicaid reform provisions. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) has noted that she wants to look closely at the bill's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) reforms. Fiscal hawks, including Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah), have demanded steeper cuts to federal spending. Paul has specifically demanded that Republicans remove the increase to the debt ceiling. The House version would hike the debt limit by $4 trillion, which the Senate's blueprint calls for a $5 trillion increase. The US is projected to hit its credit limit by August or September, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated. Ernst, who helms the Senate DOGE Caucus, has pushed for other reforms to find additional savings. Those include the Presidential Election Campaign Fund, which had $320 million allocated to it last year; disqualifying millionaires from receiving unemployment benefits, which cost about $271 million during the first two years of the Biden administration; and selling six federal buildings to recoup a projected $400 million. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is intended to be President Trump's signature legislative achievement of his second term, featuring tax cuts, enhanced border security, boosted energy supply, bolstered defense spending, and more. The CBO estimates that the megabill will increase the federal deficit by about $3 trillion over the next decade.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store