
We are Israeli human rights activists. Our country is committing genocide
Outside Israel, millions already know the answer. But many of us here can't – or won't – say it aloud. Perhaps because the truth threatens to unmake everything we believed about who we are, and who we wanted to be. To name it is to admit that the future will require reckoning – not just with our leaders, but with ourselves. But the cost of refusing to see is even higher.
For Israelis of my generation, the word 'genocide' was supposed to remain a nightmare from another planet. A word tethered to our grandparents' photographs and the ghosts of European ghettoes, not to our own neighborhoods. We were the ones who asked, from a distance, about others: How could ordinary people go on with their lives while something like this happened? How could they let it happen? What would I have done in their place?
In a grotesque twist of history, that question now circles back to us.
For nearly two years, we've heard Israeli officials – politicians and generals alike – say out loud what they intend to do: to starve, flatten and erase Gaza. 'We will eliminate them.' 'We will make it uninhabitable.' 'We will cut off food, water, electricity.' These weren't slips of the tongue; they were the plan. And then, our military carried it out. By the textbook definition, this is genocide: the deliberate targeting of a population not for who they are as individuals, but because they belong to a group – an attack designed to destroy the group itself.
We told ourselves other stories to survive the horror, stories that kept guilt and grief at bay. We convinced ourselves that every child in Gaza was Hamas, every apartment a terrorist cell. We became, without noticing, those 'ordinary people' who keep living their lives while 'it' is happening.
I can still recall the first time reality cracked open for me. Two months into what I was still calling a 'war', three of my B'Tselem colleagues – Palestinian human rights workers we'd worked alongside for years – were trapped in Gaza with their families. They told me about relatives buried under rubble, about not being able to shield their children, about the paralyzing fear.
In the frantic efforts to extract them from Gaza, I learned something that has seared itself into my mind: at that moment, a living Palestinian in Gaza could be 'ransomed' for roughly 20,000 shekels – the cost, at the time, of leaving. Children cost less. Life priced in cash, per head. These were not abstract statistics; these were people I knew. And that was when I understood: the rules had changed.
Since then, the surreal has become routine. Cities reduced to ash. Entire neighborhoods flattened. Families displaced, then displaced again. Tens of thousands killed. Mass starvation engineered, with aid trucks turned away or bombed. Parents feeding animal fodder to their children, some of whom die waiting for flour. Others are shot – unarmed civilians, gunned down for approaching food convoys.
Genocide does not happen without mass participation: a population that supports it, enables it or looks away. That is part of its tragedy. Almost no nation that has committed genocide understood, in real time, what it was doing. The story is always the same: self-defense, inevitability, the targets brought it on themselves.
In Israel, the prevailing narrative insists this all began on 7 October, with Hamas's massacre of civilians in southern Israel. That day was a true horror, a grotesque burst of human cruelty: civilians slaughtered, raped, taken hostage. A concentrated national trauma that summoned, for many Israelis, a profound sense of existential threat.
But 7 October, while catalytic, was not enough on its own. Genocide requires conditions – decades of apartheid and occupation, of separation and dehumanization, of policies designed to sever our capacity for empathy. Gaza, sealed off from the world, became the apex of this architecture. Its people became abstractions, perpetual hostages in our imagination, subjects to bomb every few years, to kill by the hundreds or thousands, with no accountability. We knew more than 2 million people were living under siege. We knew about Hamas. We knew about the tunnels. In hindsight, we knew everything. Yet somehow we were incapable of understanding that some of them might find a way to break out.
What happened on 7 October was not only a military failure. It was a collapse of our social imagination: the delusion that we could corral all the violence and despair behind a fence and live peacefully on our side. That rupture arrived under the most extreme rightwing government in Israel's history, a coalition whose ministers openly fantasize about Gaza's erasure. And so, in October 2023, every star in our darkest nightmare aligned.
This week, B'Tselem released a report, Our Genocide, compiled by Palestinian and Jewish-Israeli researchers together. It is divided into two parts. The first documents how this genocide is being carried out: mass killings, destruction of living conditions, social collapse and engineered starvation, all fueled by incitement from Israeli leaders and amplified through media. The second part of the report traces the path that led here: decades of systemic inequality, military rule and policies of separation that normalized Palestinian disposability.
To confront genocide, we must first understand it. And in order to do so, we – Jewish-Israelis and Palestinians – had to look at reality together, through the perspective of the human beings living on this land. Our moral and human obligation is to amplify the voices of the victims. Our political and historical responsibility is also to turn our gaze to the perpetrators, and to testify, in real time, to how a society transforms into one capable of committing genocide.
Recognizing this truth is not easy. Even for us, people who have spent years documenting state violence against Palestinians, the mind resists it. It rejects the facts like poison, tries to spit them out. But the poison is here. It floods the bodies of those who live between the river and the sea – Palestinians and Israelis alike – with fear and unfathomable loss.
The Israeli state is committing genocide.
And once you accept that, the question we have asked ourselves all our lives rematerializes with urgency: What would I have done, back then, on that other planet?
Except the answer is not rhetorical. It is now. It is us. And there is only one right answer:
We must do everything in our power to stop it.
Yuli Novak is the executive director of B'Tselem, the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
The Paris office of Israeli airline El Al is vandalized with graffiti
Israeli airline El Al said Thursday that its Paris office was vandalized with anti-Israel graffiti, calling the act a 'deeply disturbing' incident as tensions between France and Israel run high. The graffiti was discovered Thursday morning. El Al said the offices were unoccupied at the time of the incident and no one was harmed. Photos shared on social media showed red spray paint across the glass doors and walls, including the phrase 'El Al genocide airline.' The airline said it was handling the matter with the 'utmost gravity' and working 'in close coordination' with authorities in France and Israel.' El Al added it 'unequivocally condemns all forms of violence, particularly those driven by hatred,' and said its planes 'proudly' display the Israeli flag. Israeli Transportation Minister Miri Regev condemned the act and blamed the policies of French President Emmanuel Macron. 'Today it's El Al, tomorrow it's Air France,' she wrote on social media. 'When President Macron makes announcements that give gifts to Hamas, this is the result.' The incident comes amid diplomatic friction following Macron's pledge last month to recognize a Palestinian state — a move welcomed by some European allies but strongly opposed by Israel. Israel's Foreign Ministry also condemned what it called an antisemitic attack and urged the French government to ensure the safety of El Al staff and offices and to bring the perpetrators to justice. In May, several Jewish sites across Paris were defaced with green paint, including the Shoah Memorial, three synagogues and a Jewish restaurant. France is home to Western Europe's largest Jewish population, with an estimated 500,000 Jews — approximately 1% of the national population. In recent years, antisemitic incidents have surged, with a sharp increase reported in 2023 after the Oct.7 Hamas attacks in Israel. These include physical assaults, threats, vandalism, and harassment, prompting alarm among Jewish communities and leaders.


Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russia's seven-month budget deficit exceeds annual target
MOSCOW, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Russia's seven-month budget deficit exceeded the target for the entire year by a quarter, Finance Ministry data showed on Thursday, highlighting the strain of financing the war in Ukraine. U.S. President Donald Trump, who is expected to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in the coming days, said this week that the Russian economy "stinks", and that declining energy prices could pressure Putin to halt the war. The data showed that from January to August this year, Russia ran a budget deficit of 4.9 trillion roubles ($61.44 billion), or 2.2% of gross domestic product. Russia targets a deficit of 1.7% of GDP this year, having tripled it in May, citing falling oil prices and Trump's tariff wars as the main reasons. Last month, the deficit was in line with this target. The ministry reported that expenditures from January to July amounted to 25.19 trillion roubles, an increase of 20.8% compared to the same period last year. Meanwhile, revenues increased by only 2.8% year-on-year to 20.32 trillion roubles. "This is mainly due to the advanced financing of expenses in January of the current year, as well as a decrease in oil and gas revenue inflows," the ministry said, emphasizing that the current figure will not affect the annual target. Russia has been increasing fiscal spending throughout its three and a half years of war in Ukraine to finance the military effort. The Vedomosti business daily cited an unnamed Finance Ministry spokesman this week as saying that the ministry is planning another revision of this year's budget in the autumn. It did not provide any details of the planned revision. The daily also cited Dmitry Gusev, deputy head of the parliament's budget committee, as saying that increased spending was the main reason for the revision. Gusev also mentioned that non-energy revenues were affected by lower investment. The budget's oil and gas revenues - its most important source of cash, slated to account for about 22% of total revenues this year - fell by 27% in July due to lower prices and the strong rouble. Potential new sanctions, flagged by Trump in case Russia does not show any progress towards peace in Ukraine, added pressure on the economy, although the nature of new measures is not yet clear. However, Russia recorded a third consecutive week of deflation on August 6, increasing the possibility of another key rate cut by the central bank in September. A further cut could potentially boost Russia's flagging economic growth. ($1 = 79.7500 roubles)


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Gordon Brown's intervention shows Rachel Reeves is out of ideas
What exactly is Gordon Brown up to? Having largely kept his counsel in recent years, the former prime minister took to the airwaves on Thursday morning to set out what was effectively an alternative budget. Among the ideas he was pushing were ramping up tax on the gambling industry to pay for lifting the two-child benefit cap; ignoring fiscal rules when it comes to defence spending, and teaming up with other European countries to keep procurement costs down. If you understand the way Westminster works, it would be tempting to think this was Rachel Reeves using an elder statesman to 'pitch roll' her own ideas – in other words using a stooge to test the public's reaction so she could deny all connection with it if it went down badly. If anything though, the opposite is true. Ms Reeves did not ask Mr Brown to put the proposals out there, and his intervention was largely unhelpful. Mr Brown may have been a controversial prime minister but he was broadly respected as chancellor, the role he filled for 10 years. His favourite word was prudence, a word no one associates with Ms Reeves as she taxes the economy towards oblivion. The problem, then, for Ms Reeves is that having a predecessor coming up with novel ideas reminds voters how few she has of her own, and just how little room she has for manoeuvre after killing off growth with her jobs tax. Mr Brown did not spring his media appearance on Ms Reeves – he is far too polite to do that. I'm told they spoke at the weekend, when Mr Brown set out what he was going to say, and that Ms Reeves did not try to dissuade him. Ms Reeves has enormous respect for Mr Brown, who is something of a political idol for her, but the Treasury's private response to his appearance on BBC Radio 4's Today programme and a column in The Guardian is telling. Treasury insiders have questioned the figures quoted by Mr Brown in his miracle cure for child poverty. Mr Brown used figures from a report by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), which said that the betting industry only paid £2.5bn in tax, and that another £3bn could be raised by 'taxing it properly', in Mr Brown's words (money that could be spent on lifting the two-child benefit cap). A betting industry source told The Telegraph the true amount of tax paid is £4bn, and one government insider questioned whether the IPPR's figures were 'credible' and suggested think tanks needed better scrutiny. Ms Reeves has launched a consultation on gambling taxes and on child poverty and Mr Brown, a lifelong campaigner for reducing child poverty, has submitted detailed proposals to both. Ms Reeves does not, however, see the two issues as inextricably linked. One Treasury source said that no government could be expected to indulge in a game of 'whack a mole' – the phrase that irritated politicians tend to reach for when they are asked how the Treasury is going to solve this problem or that. The same source said: 'We have done breakfast clubs, free school meals, there is a child poverty taskforce later in the year and we are not going to pre-empt that.' On the issue of putting defence spending outside of Ms Reeves's fiscal rules, the same source pointed out that while Germany has made such a move, it can afford to do so because it has much lower levels of debt, and that however Ms Reeves tries to raise money for increased defence spending, 'borrowing is still borrowing'. As for Mr Brown's suggestion that European members of Nato should use their combined spending power to bring down the costs of procurement, a source close to Ms Reeves said: 'Rachel has been leading the work in Europe on how European countries can do more together.' Ms Reeves and Mr Brown are 'close and speak a lot', but that is not the same as saying they are on the same page. The brutal truth is that every time Mr Brown offers up ideas about how Labour could solve society's problems, a comparison is automatically made in the public's minds that only makes Ms Reeves look feebler.