Will Caitlin Clark attend the 2025 Indy 500?
Will Caitlin Clark attend the 2025 Indy 500?
It's hard to imagine there's been a bigger Memorial Day Weekend for the state of Indiana in the last 30 years.
The Indiana Fever welcomed the New York Liberty to Gainbridge Fieldhouse on Saturday, the Indiana Pacers host Game 3 of the Eastern Conference Finals against the New York Knicks in the same building on Sunday night and in between we get the Greatest Spectacle in Racing with the 109th running of the Indianapolis 500.
With the Fever facing a three-day break after playing the Liberty, that has many fans wondering if Caitlin Clark will finally make her first appearance at the Indy 500.
As of Saturday, it doesn't seem like that's part of Clark's plans.
Per the Fieldhouse Files Scott Agness, Clark is not expected to show up at Indianapolis Motor Speedway:
"The Fever then have three days between games, but all indications are that Fever guard Caitlin Clark — The Needle — will not attend the Indianapolis 500 on Sunday," Agness reported.
Plans can always change, however, and we'll keep our eyes open on Race Day to see if Clark is taking in IMS in person.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Shaquille O'Neal Shares Harsh Criticism for Thunder After NBA Finals Loss
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The NBA Finals is officially underway and Game 1 between the Oklahoma City Thunder and Indiana Pacers did not disappoint. While the Thunder were certainly disappointed, fans got to witness a shocking comeback from the Pacers and pure basketball entertainment. Despite leading the game by a score of 108-99 with 2:52 remaining in the game, Oklahoma City could not put Indiana away. Instead, the Thunder ended up losing by a final score of 111-110 on another game-winner from Tyrese Haliburton. Just like the Pacers have done before in this playoff run, they were able to steal a game that they had no business winning. That has worked out well for them this postseason. Shaquille O'Neal speaks during Pepsi Stronger Together and CTG Foundation Atlanta Law Enforcement Press Conference on April 07, 2021 in McDonough, Georgia. Shaquille O'Neal speaks during Pepsi Stronger Together and CTG Foundation Atlanta Law Enforcement Press Conference on April 07, 2021 in McDonough, Georgia. Photo byfor Pepsi Stronger Together Following blowing Game 1, the Thunder sparked a harsh reaction from NBA legend Shaquille O'Neal. He spoke out with major criticism about Oklahoma City. Read more: Jon Gruden Makes Shocking Pick in Pacers-Thunder NBA Finals "It's not just another game. I understand it's your first time here," O'Neal said. "There may be another chance you don't get back. This is not another game. This is the NBA Finals. This is the championship run. You gotta have that killer. When you get a team down, you gotta put your foot on their throat." O'Neal could not be more accurate with his take on the situation. In the Eastern Conference Finals, the New York Knicks allowed Indiana to make a massive comeback in Game 1 at Madison Square Garden. They were unable to recover from blowing that win. In the loss, the Thunder saw Shai Gilgeous-Alexander put together a strong performance. He scored 38 points on 14-for-30 shooting. Jalen Williams, on the other hand, scored just 17 points on 6-for-19 shooting, while Chet Holmgren scored six points on 2-for-9 shooting. On the other side of the court, Pascal Siakam led the way for Indiana with 19 points and 10 rebounds. Haliburton chipped in 14 points, 10 rebounds, and six assists, while Obi Toppin came off the bench for 17. Read more: Clippers Seen as Sleeper Team to Land Former NBA MVP: Report Gilgeous-Alexander spoke out after the loss with blunt honesty. "We had control of the game for the most part," Gilgeous-Alexander said. "Now, it's a 48-minute game. And they teach you that lesson more than anyone else in the league — the hard way." Game 2 will be played on Sunday evening at 8 p.m. ET. After blowing Game 1, the Thunder need to rebound strong. As for the Pacers, they'll look to steal both games on the road, which would be a major stunner. For more on Pacers, Thunder, and general NBA news, head on over to Newsweek Sports.
New York Post
37 minutes ago
- New York Post
What do tickets cost to see Pacers-Thunder NBA Finals games in Indiana?
Vivid Seats is the New York Post's official ticketing partner. We may receive revenue from this partnership for sharing this content and/or when you make a purchase. Featured pricing is subject to change. We don't believe it either. After being down for 47:59 of 48 minutes of the first game of the NBA Finals, Tyrese Haliburton hit a shocking game winner with 0.3 seconds on the clock to give the Indiana Pacers a 1-0 series lead over the heavily-favored Oklahoma City Thunder. 'We've just had to figure out how to win in so many different ways all year, past two years,' Haliburton told ESPN after the game. 'So many weird, different ways. Really proud of this group. We're a resilient group. 'We keep believing. We keep believing and we stay together. It ain't over until it's over.' And, just like that, the tough as nails underdogs have upset the natural flow of what was projected to be a cakewalk of a series for NBA MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and OKC. This is familiar territory for Indiana; in the Eastern Conference Finals, Haliburton sunk an improbable last-second jumper to send game 1 against the Knicks into overtime. New York never recovered from that momentum-shifting shot and ended up losing in six. The Finals picks back up with game 2 at Oklahoma City's Paycom Center on Sunday, June 8. Game 3 goes down in Indiana on Wednesday, June 11. If you want to be there, tickets are available for all three hypothetical games at Indiana's Gainbridge Fieldhouse. At the time of publication, the lowest price we could find on seats for game 3, 4 or 6 was $941 including fees on Vivid Seats. While that might sound pricey (it is!), keep in mind these are the first Finals games in the Hoosier State since 2000. The stakes and level of excitement surrounding the surprising team couldn't be higher. For more information, our team has everything you need to know and more about Indiana Pacers NBA Finals home games at the Gainbridge Fieldhouse below. All prices listed above are subject to fluctuation. Indiana Pacers NBA Finals home game tickets All Pacers playoff home game dates and the cheapest tickets available at Indiana's Gainbridge Fieldhouse can be found below. Indiana Pacers home game dates Ticket prices start at Game 3 Wednesday, June 11 at 8:30 p.m. $966 (fees included) Game 4 Friday, June 13 at 8:30 p.m. $1,040 (fees included) Game 6 Thursday, June 19 at 8:30 p.m. $941 (fees included) (Note: The New York Post confirmed all above prices at the publication time. All prices are in US dollars, subject to fluctuation and, if it isn't noted, will include additional fees at checkout.) Vivid Seats is a verified secondary market ticketing platform, and prices may be higher or lower than face value, depending on demand. They offer a 100% buyer guarantee that states your transaction will be safe and secure and your tickets will be delivered prior to the event. Still curious about Vivid Seats? You can find an article from their team about why the company is legit here. Oklahoma City Thunder NBA Finals home game tickets A complete calendar including all announced Thunder home game dates (local time) at the Paycom Center can be found here: Oklahoma City Thunder home game dates Game Two Sunday, June 8 at 7 p.m. Game Five Monday, June 16 at 7:30 p.m. Game Seven Sunday, June 22 at 7 p.m. How to watch the Thunder and Pacers on TV Fans hoping to catch SGA and Haliburton live on the tube can watch all NBA Finals games on ABC or stream on ESPN+. Just make sure to review your local listings before tuning in. If you don't have cable, your best bet may be DIRECTV. Huge 2025 concerts Not sure what to do once the final buzzer sounds on the 2024-25 NBA season? We've got you covered, hoops heads. Here are just five of our favorite artists on the road these next few months that you won't want to miss live. • NBA Youngboy • Tyler, The Creator • Wu-Tang Clan • Ice Cube • Wiz Khalifa Want to see who else is on the road? Check out our list of all the biggest concert tours in 2025 to find the show for you. This article was written by Matt Levy, New York Post live events reporter. Levy stays up-to-date on all the latest tour announcements from your favorite musical artists and comedians, as well as Broadway openings, sporting events and more live shows – and finds great ticket prices online. Since he started his tenure at the Post in 2022, Levy has reviewed a Bruce Springsteen concert and interviewed Melissa Villaseñor of SNL fame, to name a few. Please note that deals can expire, and all prices are subject to change
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Becoming Caitlin Clark: How the Fever Star Shifted the WNBA Landscape
This excerpt from Becoming Caitlin Clark: The Unknown Origin Story of a Modern Basketball Superstar by Howard Megdal is reprinted with the permission of Triumph Books. For more information and to order a copy, please Caitlin Clark broke women's basketball. In the best possible way here. But also, in ways that are deeply confounding to Clark and those around here. Because Sheila Johnson, co-owner of the WNBA's Washington Mystics, appeared on CNN and slammed Time Magazine for featuring Caitlin Clark as its athlete of the year. No, really. That happened. "We read Time Magazine where Caitlin Clark was named Athlete of the Year," Johnson said on Dec. 13. "Why couldn't they have put the whole WNBA on that cover and said the WNBA is the League of the Year because of all the talent that we have? Because when you just keep singling out one player, it creates hard feelings." Where to start? This is, of course, sports. There are winners and losers every year, every day, in individual awards, in team accolades. The concept of fairness dictating any man in sports history being honored as Athlete of the Year simply would not be a matter of even basic debate. But this is part of the calibration problem - there have been, as Johnson correctly noted, "so many talented players who have been unrecognized." There have been, as Risa Isard and Nicole Melton documented in their landmark September 2021 study of race in WNBA coverage by ESPN, CBS Sports, Sports Illustrated and as exhibited in WNBA team and league press releases, a disproportionate number of stories about white players compared to the majority Black makeup of the league during the 2020 season. That study did not, however, include Caitlin Clark, nor does it even study the time period in which Clark has been playing college basketball or in the WNBA. It speaks to a truth that is absolutely accepted by a broad base of experts on the subject - that the WNBA's best players have been undercovered historically, and that overwhelmingly the WNBA's best players, just as a majority of all its players, have been Black. Simple reasoning has been assigned in so many of the loudest, least-illuminating conversations about exactly why Caitlin Clark is so prominent in the larger American sports culture now, and what it means about both what came before her and the future of women's basketball. The more singular the explanation, the less useful it is. Even worse are the simple motivations assigned to those on both sides of this discussion - for reference, a significant number of people, particularly those with the most invested in the space, such as players, coaches and executives, don't even view this discussion as one with "opposing sides." But for many of the harshest critics of Clark, it was easy to hear the undercurrent of fear, that the full appreciation for the women's game had come too late for them, the money which follows such fandom simply not trickling down into the sport's remarkable and compelling past. The WNBA has existed as a safe space for marginalized people for nearly three decades because broader American culture so often ignored it. That tradeoff is felt in ways, large and small, that fill the league's players, coaches, executives and long-tenured fans with ambivalence. Everyone with a stake in the league's success is living in that gray area, and not only is the money too good to approach it any other way, with it the chance to finally see what a fully-vested WNBA looks like, but the momentum is so overwhelming the league and its stakeholders couldn't stop this train if they wished to do so. And for the countless, often anonymous newcomers to the women's basketball space who saw Clark being tested like all rookies but only clocked it through the race of the players in the majority Black league doing it, discounting all the incredible stories and women who created the scaffolding of possibility for Caitlin Clark engendered bitterness, fear and anger. And everyone involved in this oversimplification suffered from a failure not just of understanding the racial, gender, historical and competitive context, but so often a failure to understanding that when Caitlin Clark had opened these doors to the broader audience, it represented a chance for others to follow. Caitlin Clark did it first, but is doing it in a way that is precisely designed for the opposite of Clark existing as a one-off phenomenon. She is a beginning, not a culmination. And none of this means that Caitlin Clark is being overcovered now. If it is true that Sue Bird, for instance, received disparate media coverage relative to her greatness, or compared to, say, Sylvia Fowles - the former I'd argue is debatable, the latter is not, with the final seasons of the league's best-ever point guard in Bird and best-ever center in Fowles receiving deeply unequal treatment across television broadcasts and column inches alike - it did not lead to, in the case of Fowles or Bird, the kind of dramatic leaps in audience we have seen from Caitlin Clark in 2024. Clark is different. And there is no counterfactual in the current game: we cannot know what would have happened if Caitlin Clark, but Black, had built her fan base and audience at Iowa, then taken her precision passing and 30-footers to the WNBA. But we do have a historical comp. Frequently, the comparison is made between Clark and her rivalry with Angel Reese and the elevation of the NBA during Magic Johnson and Larry Bird's ascension from college basketball to the pros. After all, more than 35 million people watched the Michigan State-Indiana State national championship game in 1979 featuring the two stars, and the NBA reached a dramatic new level of popularity by the end of their careers. The problem is that, unlike with Clark, it didn't happen anything like right away. (There are other problems with this comparison, too: Magic and Bird were both immediate stars of contending teams, Bird's Celtics winning 61 games, Magic's Lakers winning it all, while Reese's stardom did not translate into a playoff appearance for the Chicago Sky.) The NBA Finals remained on tape-delay broadcast several seasons into both of their pro careers - the clinching win by Johnson's Lakers in the 1980 NBA Finals was preempted by many CBS Network affiliates in favor of The Incredible Hulk, The Dukes of Hazzard and Dallas. By 1984, CBS showed just ten NBA games, nationally, all regular season long. But the actual comp here for Clark also entered the league in 1984, coinciding with TBS purchasing the rights to a national TV cable package: Michael Jordan. Within two years, a dramatic expansion of games, even the slam dunk contest - biggest attraction, Michael Jordan - helped a rising tide of NBA ratings, Jordan's Bulls helping to lead the way, not quite by as much of a lead over the Celtics, Lakers and other teams as Clark just experienced, but notable just the same. To this day, the four most-watched NBA Finals of all time took place in the 1990s, and all featured Jordan's Chicago Bulls. Those ratings fell after Jordan retired, only starting to approach them once more when LeBron James reached the apex of his rivalry with Steph Curry in 2016 and 2017. James was honored with the Time 2020 Athlete of the Year. The apex of these viewership trends correlate not to a generic rising tide. It is when deeply compelling stars make games must-watch. That is the company Clark finds herself in after a single season. The audience tells us so. Time has only been naming an Athlete of the Year since 2019, but Sports Illustrated has honored someone in this way since 1954. In 1991? It was Michael Jordan. If there are any contemporaneous accounts of anyone suggesting the entire NBA should have received the award instead of Jordan in 1991 or James in 2020, I was unable to find them. I'd further note that when Sheila Johnson's Mystics won the WNBA title in 2019, playing home games in a sold-out but entirely-too-small 4,200-seat Entertainment and Sports Arena, she celebrated her team with, among other things, a massive championship ring. Only the Mystics, the team that won the title, received this ring. Not the entire WNBA. And in 2024, the Mystics moved four home games from ESA to Capital One Arena, where the NBA's Washington Wizards play. One of those games, with Angel Reese's Chicago Sky, drew 10,000 fans. Another, with Diana Taurasi and Brittney Griner's Phoenix Mercury, drew 12,586. The other two, against Caitlin Clark and the Fever, drew 20,333 and 20,711. Put another way: Clark's two visits to play the Mystics in 2024 drew 41,044 fans, almost half of what Washington's entire 2023 home slate drew: 87,813 fans. "There were so many times where it felt like if a call was made against the other team, people were cheering, which typically in an away environment, you're not getting positive feedback from the crowd," Clark's Fever teammate, Lexie Hull, told me. "But this year, that happened several places, so feel very fortunate about that." But how does one reconcile it all? It's complicated, and evaluating the ways in which race has held the league back and acting and appreciating the progress that has followed through that prism is not the same thing as pretending it isn't happening at all or that the league as a whole is not benefiting from Caitlin Clark's ability to maximize this moment made possible by pioneers in her home state and trailblazers in the WNBA alike. Knowing bad-faith actors have entered the WNBA space intent on using Caitlin Clark's presence to attack Black women of the league while at the same time embracing how many new fans have arrived to love and appreciate her and so many others in the WNBA. And the extra pressure on her opponents, who are forced to simultaneously answer a disproportionate amount of questions about a player who isn't even on their own team in most cases, who are competing at the demanding level asked of anyone in the WNBA, but if that effort leads to a foul deemed unnecessary by Clark's vociferous fan base - with the ugliest manifestations of that passion curdled by racism - players were subjected to cruel, inhuman taunts, even death threats. Every bit of that discordant mix is something Caitlin Clark is hyper-aware of, the calm in this sea of madness, able to hold two disparate ideas in her head at the same time in ways that so many who are paid to analyze failed at verbalizing all year long, each of these failures from someone with a megaphone only further complicating the degree of difficulty for Clark, her teammates and her opponents alike, ratcheting up the tension further. This article was originally published on as Becoming Caitlin Clark: How the Fever Star Shifted the WNBA Landscape . Copyright ABG-SI LLC. SPORTS ILLUSTRATED is a registered trademark of ABG-SI LLC. All Rights Reserved.
