logo
'Worst kitchen in Australia': Major Aussie real estate group under fire as horror detail in $550 per week Sydney home lays bare rental nightmare

'Worst kitchen in Australia': Major Aussie real estate group under fire as horror detail in $550 per week Sydney home lays bare rental nightmare

Sky News AU23-07-2025
A prominent Australian real estate group has come under fire for describing a Sydney home listed for rent as boasting a "good condition kitchen and bathroom" despite photos showing the complete opposite.
Raine & Horne has now removed the positive phrase from the marketing for an apartment in Railway Parade, Burwood.
"Spacious art deco 2-bedroom unit in the heart of vibrant Burwood. Only a short walk to station and shops," the description reads after the change.
The real estate company continues to display only one exterior photo of the home on its site, showing it situated inside a well-kept brick building, leaving the condition of the interior to the imagination of potential renters.
However, content creator Jordan van den Lamb shared shocking photos of the actual state of the home's kitchen on Instagram, ultimately prompting the company to delete the false portion of the description.
In a video, Jordan showed the $550-per-week property as having a dilapidated and worn-looking bench and sink, describing it has the "worst kitchen in Australia".
Old piping and what appeared to be dirty, mouldy boards and a cupboard door were also visible underneath the countertop.
A large gap with a fallen panel inside was next to the misplaced door.
"If by 'good' they (Raine & Horne) mean 'bad', then maybe," Jordan said of the home.
"Some from the s*** rentals subreddit inspected this place, and I guess the only way you can describe it is f*****."
In his video, Jordan went on to show a significant amount of peeling paint on the ceiling, which he said "reminds me of really bad psoriasis".
"So anyway, thanks for wasting this person's time, and also f*** you, Raine & Horne," he said.
"You know exactly what you're doing. That's just f*****.
"Don't waste people's time."
Shocked viewers flooded the comments, praising Jordan for doing a service to Sydney renters by exposing what they really face in the market.
"You are a hero of the people," one person said, as another agreed, adding no photos of the interior were a red flag in the first place.
"A service to the people! But yeah, no interior photos = don't bother," they said.
Another person quipped: "A good kitchen for a crime scene", while another simply said: "Disgusting".
"Woah! I was recently just looking at rentals in this area. That's actually out of my price range-wtf," a third person said.
One more person questioned how it is legal for people to be made to pay to live in a place that is allegedly unsafe.
"I don't get it - an estate agent's job should be to make sure landlords are made to comply with a standard of safety & health," they said.
Another person claimed it would be "illegal" to rent the home as it falls "below the living standards."
"These buildings are so beautiful on the outside, such a shame they are falling apart inside," one more person said.
NSW government legislation mandates landlords and agents ensure rental properties meet seven minimum standards for tenants to live in.
These standards include properties being structurally sound, with major structures being in a reasonable state of repair, not subject to significant dampness or water penetration, and not liable to collapse.
Further requirements include adequate ventilation, plumbing, and drainage, as well as a water connection that can supply hot and cold water for drinking, washing, and cleaning.
SkyNews.com.au has contacted Burwood Council and Raine & Horne for further comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive: Simon Cohen Joins Neale Whitaker and Julia Green on My Reno Rules
Exclusive: Simon Cohen Joins Neale Whitaker and Julia Green on My Reno Rules

7NEWS

time11 minutes ago

  • 7NEWS

Exclusive: Simon Cohen Joins Neale Whitaker and Julia Green on My Reno Rules

The Seven Network has today confirmed the judging panel for the highly anticipated series, My Reno Rules, and it's an all-star lineup that includes our very own property expert and top luxury buyer's agent, Simon Cohen. Simon will be joined by two other titans of the industry: style icon Neale Whitaker and interiors expert Julia Green. The trio's incredible expertise promises a judging panel unlike any other. The All-Star Judging Trio Neale Whitaker, one of Australia's leading style authorities, brings a wealth of experience from his fifteen-plus years on Australian television. Known for his popular roles on The Block and Love It Or List It Australia, his candor and broad knowledge of interior design-honed during his time at the helm of iconic style bibles Belle and Vogue Living-will set the tone for a new and dynamic judging lineup. "I'm thrilled to be joining a show that will truly redefine renovation TV. Along with Simon and Julia, I get to share my experience with a new generation of Aussie renovators in one of my favourite cities.," Whitaker said. "I can't wait to see the creative and innovative ideas our teams bring to the competition." Joining him is Simon Cohen, the "go-to" buyer's agent for some of Australia's most discerning clients. As co-founder of Cohen Handler, the largest property buyer's agency in the country and property expert for Simon lives and breathes property. With his critical eye and intimate knowledge of what truly adds value, he will guide the teams to ensure their renovation plans reach the height of style, elegance, and technology. "I'm excited to be part of a show that's reshaping the competition renovation genre and transforming lives in the process," Cohen said. Completing the panel is Julia Green, founder of Greenhouse Interiors, a premier destination for homewares and interior styling. As a regular contributor to leading Australian and international publications, Julia has a keen eye for interior trends and a passion for unique pieces that can transform any home. Julia is enthusiastic about the show's new approach. "My Reno Rules puts a fresh spin on home renovation. I can't wait to see the creativity, surprises and heart our contestants will pour into bringing these incredible homes to life." A Show That Gives Back This groundbreaking new series, hosted by Dr Chris Brown, will see four teams of "Aussie battlers" go head-to-head. They will be tasked with transforming two neighbouring, rundown homes in an undisclosed Melbourne suburb, all for a cash prize for themselves. However, in a television first, the true winners could be watching from their own living rooms. Two lucky Australians will be given the keys to the spectacularly renovated, multimillion-dollar homes, fully furnished, landscaped, and equipped with luxury features. This unprecedented giveaway will be conducted in an electrifying live grand final. The two homes were generously donated by LMCT+ founder Adrian Portelli. Portelli, who has been a prominent figure in the renovation reality space, explained his decision to partner with Seven. "On previous reno shows, they might do auctions and, unfortunately, only 1 per cent of the viewing audience have the capacity to buy those homes," he said. "So, it's an awesome feeling to be able to take the viewers on an emotional journey, watch the houses get renovated and transformed into a dream luxury home, then potentially win it." Angus Ross, Seven's Director of Television, described My Reno Rules as taking "all the emotion, competition and high-stakes drama of My Kitchen Rules and brings it into the property world, with even higher rewards." As a partner of the show, will be the go-to destination for exclusive content, expert insights, and digital tools to help viewers understand what really adds value to a home. Whether you're a keen renovator, a first-home buyer looking for inspiration, or just love a good stickybeak, My Reno Rules is set to be a must-watch television event.

Friend or foe? The AI bloodletting has begun in Australia
Friend or foe? The AI bloodletting has begun in Australia

The Age

time41 minutes ago

  • The Age

Friend or foe? The AI bloodletting has begun in Australia

Telstra boss Vicki Brady, though less vocal on the company's AI developments at this week's results, was similarly forthright at its recent strategy day. 'We see lots of potential across those areas … customer engagement, how we operate and manage our network, how we develop software and manage our IT environment, how it supports back of office for us where you tend to have manual processes.' While it sounds like a great opportunity for Australian business, it sounds rather alarming when viewed from the vantage of their employees. After all, both are relatively low-growth businesses investing heavily in AI. Will this investment pay off by boosting worker productivity, or by replacing them? 'CBA publicly preaches productivity and innovation while quietly eroding local jobs. This hypocrisy cannot go unchallenged,' Finance Sector Union national secretary Julia Angrisano said after the bank's record $10 billion profit this week. The Australian Council of Trade Unions has demanded that employers guarantee workers' job security before introducing artificial intelligence to protect against jobs carnage. Local academics used research by the International Labour Organisation to translate its findings on AI job losses to Australia. They came up with a startling forecast of Australia's AI future in 2050: 32 per cent of current jobs in Australia could be done by AI. 'But that doesn't mean 32 per cent of people will lose their jobs overnight,' Victoria University academics Janine Dixon and James Lennox said in a report posted to The Conversation last week. 'It will take time for AI capabilities to be installed, giving people time to train for alternative careers. Much of the impact is likely to be years away.' This timeframe gives AI a lot of time to move beyond relatively low-level tasks, like replacing basic call centre work, to replacing white-collar jobs – like the software developers who make it. Loading So what does Atlassian co-founder Mike Cannon-Brookes think the impact will be of the AI transformation on the company he built alongside Farquhar? It is in a frenzy of AI upgrades of its own products and surely looking at the productivity benefits. Cannon-Brookes sees a bright future despite AI's coding adeptness. It appears that the famously prescient 2011 claim by US billionaire venture capitalist Marc Andreessen that 'software is eating the world' still holds. 'Do I think there will be far less developers in the world five years from now? No, I don't think so,' Cannon-Brookes told investors on the company's earnings conference call last week. 'And yes, we're still hiring lots of engineers and developers with the growth of the business.' Cannon-Brookes' argument is simple: the world will need far more software and AI means it will be cheaper and easier to extend its development beyond corporate tech teams to the actual business itself. 'Whether they're in finance or HR or marketing, there's going to be a lot more people creating software,' he says. Mind you, Atlassian has a lot riding on this version of the future. Its business is literally built on managing the workflows and projects for this sort of development. The Farquhar and Cannon-Brookes fortunes will rapidly dwindle if this development can be done by an AI bot instead of teams of employees. But even AI's transformation of low-level customer work – like call centres – is not necessarily seen as a bad thing for local jobs. It could represent a boon for our country, says KPMG's chief digital officer John Munnelly. 'A lot of the stuff that AI is improving is the tasks we used to offshore, like call centre work,' he says. 'There's a really great opportunity for the Australian economy with AI' KPMG's chief digital officer John Munnelly The productivity dividend that Farquhar mentioned could actually make a lot more of this work viable here. 'There's a really great opportunity for the Australian economy with AI,' Munnelly says. Loading But the interesting stuff is already happening further up the wage chain – like KPMG's new AI tax tool that allows its executives to vastly accelerate the delivery of first-draft advice to clients. 'What used to take us two weeks to go and prepare – if a client's in the middle of a deal – now we can literally get it out the door in a day,' Munnelly says. It was left to KPMG chief executive Andrew Yates to address the conundrum this poses. What will this KPMG employee do with the nine days that would have previously been spent on this work? 'I think our current hypothesis is that what we do will change. But AI and the technology we've got will generate so much more data that our work will change from collating that data to really assessing, analysing, presenting, interpreting much more data than is currently available,' he says. 'There will be a real need for that insight and technical understanding of all the data that's produced.' As for the analysts trying to make sense of the AI talk which is starting to creep into earnings season speeches and rising costs, there is a more prosaic question. 'Companies have been keen to point out their investments in AI, but when will we see it translate to the bottom line?' asked UBS strategist Richard Schellback. Even Comyn, who packed more than a dozen AI references into his introduction to the bank's full-year results, came up with a cautious answer. He foresees a more effective workforce, producing higher quality work with both revenue and cost out opportunities. But he does not expect this to come easily. 'You can imagine that there are some much more efficient ways of delivering some of the things we currently do. But I do think that's going to take some time, like some years to work through some of the accuracy and quality that's required.'

Friend or foe? The AI bloodletting has begun in Australia
Friend or foe? The AI bloodletting has begun in Australia

Sydney Morning Herald

time41 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Friend or foe? The AI bloodletting has begun in Australia

Telstra boss Vicki Brady, though less vocal on the company's AI developments at this week's results, was similarly forthright at its recent strategy day. 'We see lots of potential across those areas … customer engagement, how we operate and manage our network, how we develop software and manage our IT environment, how it supports back of office for us where you tend to have manual processes.' While it sounds like a great opportunity for Australian business, it sounds rather alarming when viewed from the vantage of their employees. After all, both are relatively low-growth businesses investing heavily in AI. Will this investment pay off by boosting worker productivity, or by replacing them? 'CBA publicly preaches productivity and innovation while quietly eroding local jobs. This hypocrisy cannot go unchallenged,' Finance Sector Union national secretary Julia Angrisano said after the bank's record $10 billion profit this week. The Australian Council of Trade Unions has demanded that employers guarantee workers' job security before introducing artificial intelligence to protect against jobs carnage. Local academics used research by the International Labour Organisation to translate its findings on AI job losses to Australia. They came up with a startling forecast of Australia's AI future in 2050: 32 per cent of current jobs in Australia could be done by AI. 'But that doesn't mean 32 per cent of people will lose their jobs overnight,' Victoria University academics Janine Dixon and James Lennox said in a report posted to The Conversation last week. 'It will take time for AI capabilities to be installed, giving people time to train for alternative careers. Much of the impact is likely to be years away.' This timeframe gives AI a lot of time to move beyond relatively low-level tasks, like replacing basic call centre work, to replacing white-collar jobs – like the software developers who make it. Loading So what does Atlassian co-founder Mike Cannon-Brookes think the impact will be of the AI transformation on the company he built alongside Farquhar? It is in a frenzy of AI upgrades of its own products and surely looking at the productivity benefits. Cannon-Brookes sees a bright future despite AI's coding adeptness. It appears that the famously prescient 2011 claim by US billionaire venture capitalist Marc Andreessen that 'software is eating the world' still holds. 'Do I think there will be far less developers in the world five years from now? No, I don't think so,' Cannon-Brookes told investors on the company's earnings conference call last week. 'And yes, we're still hiring lots of engineers and developers with the growth of the business.' Cannon-Brookes' argument is simple: the world will need far more software and AI means it will be cheaper and easier to extend its development beyond corporate tech teams to the actual business itself. 'Whether they're in finance or HR or marketing, there's going to be a lot more people creating software,' he says. Mind you, Atlassian has a lot riding on this version of the future. Its business is literally built on managing the workflows and projects for this sort of development. The Farquhar and Cannon-Brookes fortunes will rapidly dwindle if this development can be done by an AI bot instead of teams of employees. But even AI's transformation of low-level customer work – like call centres – is not necessarily seen as a bad thing for local jobs. It could represent a boon for our country, says KPMG's chief digital officer John Munnelly. 'A lot of the stuff that AI is improving is the tasks we used to offshore, like call centre work,' he says. 'There's a really great opportunity for the Australian economy with AI' KPMG's chief digital officer John Munnelly The productivity dividend that Farquhar mentioned could actually make a lot more of this work viable here. 'There's a really great opportunity for the Australian economy with AI,' Munnelly says. Loading But the interesting stuff is already happening further up the wage chain – like KPMG's new AI tax tool that allows its executives to vastly accelerate the delivery of first-draft advice to clients. 'What used to take us two weeks to go and prepare – if a client's in the middle of a deal – now we can literally get it out the door in a day,' Munnelly says. It was left to KPMG chief executive Andrew Yates to address the conundrum this poses. What will this KPMG employee do with the nine days that would have previously been spent on this work? 'I think our current hypothesis is that what we do will change. But AI and the technology we've got will generate so much more data that our work will change from collating that data to really assessing, analysing, presenting, interpreting much more data than is currently available,' he says. 'There will be a real need for that insight and technical understanding of all the data that's produced.' As for the analysts trying to make sense of the AI talk which is starting to creep into earnings season speeches and rising costs, there is a more prosaic question. 'Companies have been keen to point out their investments in AI, but when will we see it translate to the bottom line?' asked UBS strategist Richard Schellback. Even Comyn, who packed more than a dozen AI references into his introduction to the bank's full-year results, came up with a cautious answer. He foresees a more effective workforce, producing higher quality work with both revenue and cost out opportunities. But he does not expect this to come easily. 'You can imagine that there are some much more efficient ways of delivering some of the things we currently do. But I do think that's going to take some time, like some years to work through some of the accuracy and quality that's required.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store