Minister does not rule out 'supermax' jails for most dangerous offenders following alleged Rudakubana attack on prison officer
"Supermax" jails could be built to house the most dangerous offenders following a spate of alleged attacks on staff, the prisons minister has said.
James Timpson told the Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge that "we shouldn't rule anything out" when asked if the most dangerous criminals should be placed in top security prisons.
It comes after Southport triple killer Axel Rudakubana allegedly at an officer at HMP Belmarsh on Thursday. Police are now investigating.Before that, three prison officers were also allegedly attacked by 28-year-old Hashem Abedi - the brother of Manchester Arena bomber Salman Abedi - with hot cooking oil and "improvised knives", potentially made from a baking tray.
Speaking from HMP Preston for a special programme of the Politics Hub, Mr Timpson told Sophy Ridge: "We inherited a complete mess in the prison system.
"Violence is up, assaults on staff is up. But for me, we shouldn't rule anything out."
He added: "What we need to do is to speak to our staff. They're the experts at dealing with these offenders day in, day out. "
Mr Timpson - who was the chief executive of Timpson Group before he was appointed prisons minister last year - said the violence in prisons was "too high".
He continued: "The number of people when you have prisons are so full, and the people in there are not going to education or into purposeful activity.
"You get more violence and that is totally unacceptable. Our staff turn up to work to help turn people.
"They want to turn people's lives around. They didn't turn up to work to get assaulted. It's totally unacceptable."
Read more:
Reflecting on the crisis facing the UK prison system ahead of the Mr Timpson said a major problem was the high rate of reoffending, saying "80% of offending is reoffending".
He said people were leaving places like HMP Preston "addicted to drugs, nowhere to live, mental health problems - and that's why they keep coming back".
Asked whether every prison had a drugs issue, he replied: "100%."
"If we want to keep the public safe, we need to do a lot more of the work in here and in the community. But also we need to build more prisons."
Put to him that making more use of community sentences - thought to be one of the recommendations in the government's sentencing review - might be considered a "cushy option" compared to a custodial sentence, Mr Timpson said: "There are some people in this prison tonight who would prefer to be in prison than do a community sentence - but that's not everybody.
"Community sentences need to be tough punishments outside of prison, not just to help them address their offending behaviour, but also the victims need to see punishments being done too and for me, technology has a big part to play in the future."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12-05-2025
- Yahoo
Minister does not rule out 'supermax' jails for most dangerous offenders following alleged Rudakubana attack on prison officer
"Supermax" jails could be built to house the most dangerous offenders following a spate of alleged attacks on staff, the prisons minister has said. James Timpson told the Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge that "we shouldn't rule anything out" when asked if the most dangerous criminals should be placed in top security prisons. It comes after Southport triple killer Axel Rudakubana allegedly at an officer at HMP Belmarsh on Thursday. Police are now that, three prison officers were also allegedly attacked by 28-year-old Hashem Abedi - the brother of Manchester Arena bomber Salman Abedi - with hot cooking oil and "improvised knives", potentially made from a baking tray. Speaking from HMP Preston for a special programme of the Politics Hub, Mr Timpson told Sophy Ridge: "We inherited a complete mess in the prison system. "Violence is up, assaults on staff is up. But for me, we shouldn't rule anything out." He added: "What we need to do is to speak to our staff. They're the experts at dealing with these offenders day in, day out. " Mr Timpson - who was the chief executive of Timpson Group before he was appointed prisons minister last year - said the violence in prisons was "too high". He continued: "The number of people when you have prisons are so full, and the people in there are not going to education or into purposeful activity. "You get more violence and that is totally unacceptable. Our staff turn up to work to help turn people. "They want to turn people's lives around. They didn't turn up to work to get assaulted. It's totally unacceptable." Read more: Reflecting on the crisis facing the UK prison system ahead of the Mr Timpson said a major problem was the high rate of reoffending, saying "80% of offending is reoffending". He said people were leaving places like HMP Preston "addicted to drugs, nowhere to live, mental health problems - and that's why they keep coming back". Asked whether every prison had a drugs issue, he replied: "100%." "If we want to keep the public safe, we need to do a lot more of the work in here and in the community. But also we need to build more prisons." Put to him that making more use of community sentences - thought to be one of the recommendations in the government's sentencing review - might be considered a "cushy option" compared to a custodial sentence, Mr Timpson said: "There are some people in this prison tonight who would prefer to be in prison than do a community sentence - but that's not everybody. "Community sentences need to be tough punishments outside of prison, not just to help them address their offending behaviour, but also the victims need to see punishments being done too and for me, technology has a big part to play in the future."
Yahoo
07-05-2025
- Yahoo
Starmer facing growing backbench rebellion over planned disability benefit cuts
A senior Labour MP has said the government needs to take "corrective action" over planned disability cuts - as Sir Keir Starmer faces a growing backbench rebellion. Tan Dhesi, chair of the influential Commons defence committee, told the Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge the "disappointing" local election results show the government must listen and learn, particularly over welfare reforms. The government has proposed tightening the eligibility requirements for the personal independent payment, known as PIP. ADVERTISEMENT Advertisement Politics latest: Farage urged to suspend new Reform councillor A claimant must score a minimum of four points on one PIP daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit. Mr Dhesi, the MP for Slough, said "corrective action" needs to be taken but insisted if the government changed tact, it would not be a U-turn as the disability cuts were only proposals. "A government which is in listening mode should be looking at what the electorate is saying," he said. "And we need to make sure that it's our moral duty, responsibility, to look after the most vulnerable within our community, whether that's in Slough, whether that's elsewhere across the country. ADVERTISEMENT Advertisement "So, I hope that the government will be taking on board that feedback and many of us as MPs are giving that feedback in various meetings happening here in Westminster and then we need to take corrective action." Minister Alex Davies-Jones told the Politics Hub a Labour government "will always seek to protect the most vulnerable" and it wants to "listen to people who have got real lived experience". She added she has the "utmost respect for Tan, he's a great constituency MP and he's doing exactly what he should be doing, is representing his constituency". Sir Keir is facing a rebellion from Labour MPs, with about 40 in the Red Wall - Labour's traditional heartlands in the north of England - reposting a statement on social media in which they said the leadership's response to the local elections had "fallen on deaf ears". ADVERTISEMENT Advertisement Read more: Starmer defends winter fuel cut The choice facing Labour in face of Reform threat Several backbench Labour MPs also spoke out against the plans during a debate on PIP and disabled people in parliament on Wednesday. Ian Byrne, MP for Liverpool West Derby, said he would "swim through vomit to vote against" the proposed changes and said: "This is not what the Labour Party was formed to do." Bell Ribeiro-Addy, the MP for Clapham and Brixton Hill, said she feared tightening PIP eligibility would cause deaths, adding: "Lest we forget that study that attributed 330,000 excess deaths in Britain between 2012 and 2019 to the last round of austerity cuts [under the Conservative government]." ADVERTISEMENT Advertisement Diane Abbott, the longest-serving female MP, accused the government of putting forward "contradictory arguments". "On the one hand, they insist they are helping the disabled by putting them back to work," she said. "But on the other hand, they say this cut will save £9bn. Well, you can't do both." However, fellow Labour MP David Pinto-Duschinsky, said MPs cannot "ignore this issue" of health-related benefit claimant figures rising at "twice the rate of underlying health conditions". Responding for the government, social security minister Sir Stephen Timms said PIP claims were set to "more than double, from two million to over 4.3 million this decade". "It would certainly not be in the interests of people currently claiming the benefits for the government to bury its head in the sand over that rate of increase," he added.
Yahoo
28-04-2025
- Yahoo
Labour MP Leaves Former Tory Minister Speechless By Pointing Out Obvious Fact About Trans Ruling
A Labour MP left a former Conservative minister tripping over his words during a clash over trans rights last week. After the Supreme Court ruling earlier this month that a woman is defined by biology – and not gender – questions have been raised over exactly how that will impact the trans community. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said last week that trans women should not be 'permitted to use the women's facilities' in workplaces or public-facing services like shops and hospitals – and the same applies to trans men. The watchdog did acknowledge that trans people still need access to public facilities, but is yet to explain how that would work in practice. Meanwhile, the government has insisted trans women should use the men's toilets, and trans men use the women's toilets. But, as backbencher Dawn Butler pointed out on Sky News last week, this decision does not exactly help boost women's safety, despite the government's promises. She said: 'Trans women, in my opinion, should of course, continue to use women's bathrooms.' Former chief secretary to the Treasury Simon Clarke began to protest, pointing out this went against the Supreme Court's ruling, but the Labour MP cut in. 'I do not police people in public toilets,' Butler said. 'I think that's where we are getting to as a society, in policing what a woman looks like. 'I have a butch lesbian friend who gets hounded out of women's toilets and it is heartbreaking to the point where we have to escort her into the women's toilets because she's going to be hounded out.' She continued: 'If trans men then have to use women's toilets, that's going to make women less safe, because how are you going to stop a man – a 'normal' man – going into a women's toilet and saying, 'I am a trans man.'' 'I don't follow that logic,' the former MP – who lost his seat in July – said. 'The point is, we're saying that people who are biologically men shouldn't be using the women's toilets, that's the point of this ruling.' Butler reminded him: 'A trans man is biologically a woman, so they would then have to use women's toilets.' There was a long pause, before Clarke, looking completely flabbergasted, said: 'I.. I think this...' 'That's the problem. That's what concerns me!' Butler said. The debate came days before senior Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden told the BBC there would be no policing of public toilets. "Trans women should of course still continue to use women's bathrooms... I do not police people in public toilets."@DawnButlerBrent sets out the practicalities around the Supreme Court ruling that the definition of a 'woman' is a 'biological woman'.#PoliticsHub ⬇️ — Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge (@SkyPoliticsHub) April 23, 2025 Supreme Court Ruling Is Anything But Clear – And Endangers All Women's Rights, Trans Group Warns Bridget Phillipson Still Can't Say Which Toilet Trans People Are Meant To Use 'He Doesn't Have The Balls': Kemi Badenoch Hits Starmer With Low Blow Over Trans U-Turn
